Log in

NASDAQ:ULTAUlta Beauty Competitors & Alternatives

$209.00
+5.41 (+2.66 %)
(As of 07/6/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$204.33
Now: $209.00
$209.43
50-Day Range
$189.99
MA: $222.32
$254.57
52-Week Range
$124.05
Now: $209.00
$368.83
Volume922,600 shs
Average Volume1.26 million shs
Market Capitalization$11.77 billion
P/E Ratio27.83
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.46

Competitors

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) Vs. TSCO, TIF, FIVE, DKS, SBH, and ODP

Should you be buying ULTA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "specialty stores" are considered alternatives and competitors to Ulta Beauty, including Tractor Supply (TSCO), Tiffany & Co. (TIF), Five Below (FIVE), Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS), Sally Beauty (SBH), and Office Depot (ODP).

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) and Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Tractor Supply's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55
Tractor Supply$8.35 billion1.85$562.35 million$4.6828.58

Ulta Beauty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tractor Supply. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tractor Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Tractor Supply shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Tractor Supply's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%
Tractor Supply6.71%38.38%10.38%

Volatility and Risk

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tractor Supply has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Ulta Beauty and Tractor Supply, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ulta Beauty091802.67
Tractor Supply0131112.52

Ulta Beauty currently has a consensus target price of $258.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 23.70%. Tractor Supply has a consensus target price of $118.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 11.32%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Tractor Supply.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Tractor Supply on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tiffany & Co. (NYSE:TIF) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both large-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and earnings.

Volatility and Risk

Tiffany & Co. has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tiffany & Co. and Ulta Beauty's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tiffany & Co.$4.42 billion3.37$541.10 million$4.5926.78
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Tiffany & Co.. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tiffany & Co., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

80.2% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Tiffany & Co. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Tiffany & Co. and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tiffany & Co.8.83%11.48%5.68%
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Tiffany & Co. and Ulta Beauty, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tiffany & Co.017302.15
Ulta Beauty091802.67

Tiffany & Co. presently has a consensus target price of $122.1250, suggesting a potential downside of 0.64%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus target price of $258.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 23.70%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Tiffany & Co..

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Tiffany & Co. on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Five Below (NASDAQ:FIVE) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends and earnings.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Five Below and Ulta Beauty's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Five Below$1.85 billion3.11$175.06 million$2.9834.61
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Five Below. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Five Below, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Five Below and Ulta Beauty, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Five Below041502.79
Ulta Beauty091802.67

Five Below presently has a consensus target price of $118.5789, indicating a potential upside of 14.98%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus target price of $258.5385, indicating a potential upside of 23.70%. Given Ulta Beauty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Five Below.

Profitability

This table compares Five Below and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Five Below5.87%14.23%5.29%
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%

Risk & Volatility

Five Below has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Five Below shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Five Below on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) and Dicks Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.6% of Dicks Sporting Goods shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.6% of Dicks Sporting Goods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dicks Sporting Goods has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Ulta Beauty and Dicks Sporting Goods, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ulta Beauty091802.67
Dicks Sporting Goods1131002.38

Ulta Beauty presently has a consensus target price of $258.5385, indicating a potential upside of 23.70%. Dicks Sporting Goods has a consensus target price of $41.9565, indicating a potential upside of 2.61%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Dicks Sporting Goods.

Profitability

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Dicks Sporting Goods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%
Dicks Sporting Goods1.18%9.84%2.36%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Dicks Sporting Goods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55
Dicks Sporting Goods$8.75 billion0.41$297.46 million$3.6911.08

Ulta Beauty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Dicks Sporting Goods. Dicks Sporting Goods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Dicks Sporting Goods on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sally Beauty (NYSE:SBH) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

Risk and Volatility

Sally Beauty has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Sally Beauty and Ulta Beauty, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sally Beauty14102.00
Ulta Beauty091802.67

Sally Beauty presently has a consensus price target of $12.1667, suggesting a potential downside of 9.68%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus price target of $258.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 23.70%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Sally Beauty.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sally Beauty and Ulta Beauty's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sally Beauty$3.88 billion0.39$271.62 million$2.265.96
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Sally Beauty. Sally Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Sally Beauty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Sally Beauty and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sally Beauty5.45%-491.27%9.14%
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Sally Beauty on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) and Office Depot (NASDAQ:ODP) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Office Depot's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ulta Beauty6.37%24.36%8.93%
Office Depot1.28%11.98%3.58%

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Office Depot's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion1.59$705.95 million$11.9117.55
Office Depot$10.65 billion0.11$99 million$4.105.34

Ulta Beauty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Office Depot. Office Depot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Office Depot has a beta of 2.31, suggesting that its share price is 131% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Ulta Beauty and Office Depot, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ulta Beauty091802.67
Office Depot10102.00

Ulta Beauty presently has a consensus price target of $258.5385, suggesting a potential upside of 23.70%. Office Depot has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 45.18%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Office Depot.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

87.0% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.6% of Office Depot shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Office Depot shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Office Depot on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Tractor Supply logo
TSCO
Tractor Supply
2.0$133.76+1.0%$15.32 billion$8.35 billion28.22Decrease in Short Interest
Tiffany & Co. logo
TIF
Tiffany & Co.
2.3$122.91+0.6%$14.89 billion$4.42 billion42.38Decrease in Short Interest
Five Below logo
FIVE
Five Below
1.6$103.13+0.4%$5.77 billion$1.85 billion58.93
Dicks Sporting Goods logo
DKS
Dicks Sporting Goods
2.4$40.89+0.3%$3.58 billion$8.75 billion40.09Decrease in Short Interest
Sally Beauty logo
SBH
Sally Beauty
1.8$13.47+2.9%$1.48 billion$3.88 billion7.74Decrease in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Office Depot logo
ODP
Office Depot
2.2$21.89+3.5%$1.15 billion$10.65 billion8.76Stock Split
Increase in Short Interest
Winmark logo
WINA
Winmark
0.7$174.20+2.2%$636.71 million$73.30 million21.83Increase in Short Interest
Heavy News Reporting
Signet Jewelers logo
SIG
Signet Jewelers
1.8$10.57+0.3%$554.87 million$6.14 billion-4.42
MarineMax logo
HZO
MarineMax
1.3$23.96+3.4%$496.93 million$1.24 billion13.39Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Barnes & Noble logo
BKS
Barnes & Noble
1.2$6.49+0.0%$475.13 million$3.55 billion19.12
Hibbett Sports logo
HIBB
Hibbett Sports
0.9$23.61+2.6%$379.91 million$1.18 billion-25.11
GNC logo
GNC
GNC
0.8$0.55+0.0%$46.54 million$2.07 billion-0.19Decrease in Short Interest
Big 5 Sporting Goods logo
BGFV
Big 5 Sporting Goods
1.3$1.94+2.1%$42.13 million$996.49 million19.40Decrease in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 7/7/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for $1.00

Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools:

  • Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

    View the latest news, buy/sell ratings, SEC filings and insider transactions for your stocks. Compare your portfolio performance to leading indices and get personalized stock ideas based on your portfolio.

  • Stock Ideas and Recommendations

    Get daily stock ideas top-performing Wall Street analysts. Get short term trading ideas from the MarketBeat Idea Engine. View which stocks are hot on social media with MarketBeat's trending stocks report.

  • Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

    Identify stocks that meet your criteria using seven unique stock screeners. See what's happening in the market right now with MarketBeat's real-time news feed. Export data to Excel for your own analysis.

Start Your Risk-Free Trial Subscription Here

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.