WULF vs. CADE, BMA, OZK, VLY, PFSI, GBCI, HWC, FLG, UPST, and AUB
Should you be buying TeraWulf stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of TeraWulf include Cadence Bank (CADE), Banco Macro (BMA), Bank OZK (OZK), Valley National Bancorp (VLY), PennyMac Financial Services (PFSI), Glacier Bancorp (GBCI), Hancock Whitney (HWC), Flagstar Financial (FLG), Upstart (UPST), and Atlantic Union Bankshares (AUB). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.
TeraWulf vs.
TeraWulf (NASDAQ:WULF) and Cadence Bank (NYSE:CADE) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, community ranking, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.
Cadence Bank has higher revenue and earnings than TeraWulf. TeraWulf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cadence Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
TeraWulf has a beta of 3.09, suggesting that its stock price is 209% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.
TeraWulf presently has a consensus price target of $7.67, suggesting a potential upside of 71.71%. Cadence Bank has a consensus price target of $36.82, suggesting a potential upside of 17.29%. Given TeraWulf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe TeraWulf is more favorable than Cadence Bank.
In the previous week, TeraWulf had 5 more articles in the media than Cadence Bank. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for TeraWulf and 7 mentions for Cadence Bank. TeraWulf's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Cadence Bank's score of 1.04 indicating that TeraWulf is being referred to more favorably in the media.
62.5% of TeraWulf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Cadence Bank shares are held by institutional investors. 24.9% of TeraWulf shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Cadence Bank shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.
Cadence Bank has a net margin of 18.03% compared to TeraWulf's net margin of -41.88%. Cadence Bank's return on equity of 9.87% beat TeraWulf's return on equity.
Cadence Bank received 275 more outperform votes than TeraWulf when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 82.76% of users gave TeraWulf an outperform vote while only 59.38% of users gave Cadence Bank an outperform vote.
Summary
TeraWulf beats Cadence Bank on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get TeraWulf News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WULF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding {thisCompany.Symbol} and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
TeraWulf Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
This page (NASDAQ:WULF) was last updated on 6/11/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff