Do analysts prefer AKA or CAL?

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Caleres 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AKA or CAL?

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caleres, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A Caleres $2.76B 0.15 -$6.69M $1.50 8.16

Is AKA or CAL more profitable?

Caleres has a net margin of 1.85% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.84% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17% Caleres 1.85% 7.84% 2.42%

Does the media favor AKA or CAL?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 1 articles in the media. Caleres' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Caleres is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Caleres 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CTRN or AKA?

Citi Trends has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Citi Trends $819.96M 0.49 $5.21M $0.82 58.37 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is CTRN or AKA more profitable?

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Citi Trends' return on equity of 8.11% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Citi Trends 0.84% 8.11% 2.00% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media favor CTRN or AKA?

In the previous week, Citi Trends and Citi Trends both had 1 articles in the media. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Citi Trends 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor OXM or AKA?

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 5 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Industries 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GCO or AKA?

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Genesco $2.44B 0.16 $13.27M $3.84 9.26 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is GCO or AKA more profitable?

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.14% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Genesco 1.71% 3.14% 1.19% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media refer more to GCO or AKA?

In the previous week, Genesco had 3 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Genesco and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Genesco's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Genesco is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Genesco 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, JILL or AKA?

J.Jill has higher earnings, but lower revenue than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.Jill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio J.Jill $588.19M 0.62 $27.89M $1.79 13.67 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is JILL or AKA more profitable?

J.Jill has a net margin of 4.62% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. J.Jill's return on equity of 28.51% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets J.Jill 4.62% 28.51% 8.13% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

$10.90 +0.20 (+1.87%)

As of 10/5/2026 09:30 AM Eastern

Compare

AKA vs. CAL, CTRN, OXM, GCO, and JILL

Should you buy a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? a.k.a. Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Caleres (CAL), Citi Trends (CTRN), Oxford Industries (OXM), Genesco (GCO), and J.Jill (JILL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Caleres (NYSE:CAL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Caleres has a net margin of 1.85% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.84% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Caleres	1.85%	7.84%	2.42%

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caleres has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Caleres shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Caleres shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caleres, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Caleres	$2.76B	0.15	-$6.69M	$1.50	8.16

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Caleres	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 1 articles in the media. Caleres' average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Caleres is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Caleres	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Caleres beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Citi Trends and Citi Trends both had 1 articles in the media. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Citi Trends	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its share price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Citi Trends' return on equity of 8.11% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Citi Trends	0.84%	8.11%	2.00%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Citi Trends has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Citi Trends	$819.96M	0.49	$5.21M	$0.82	58.37
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Citi Trends currently has a consensus price target of $81.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.24%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Citi Trends.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Citi Trends	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Citi Trends beats a.k.a. Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Industries has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Industries	$1.48B	0.26	-$27.89M	-$0.51	N/A
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Oxford Industries presently has a consensus target price of $35.25, indicating a potential upside of 38.97%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Industries	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 5 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -0.46% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Oxford Industries' return on equity of 4.88% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Industries	-0.46%	4.88%	1.99%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Summary

Oxford Industries beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Genesco (NYSE:GCO) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Genesco had 3 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Genesco and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Genesco's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Genesco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Genesco	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

94.5% of Genesco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.1% of Genesco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesco has a beta of 1.81, meaning that its stock price is 81% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Genesco	$2.44B	0.16	$13.27M	$3.84	9.26
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Genesco currently has a consensus price target of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.26%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Genesco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Genesco	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.14% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Genesco	1.71%	3.14%	1.19%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Summary

Genesco beats a.k.a. Brands on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to J.Jill?

J.Jill (NYSE:JILL) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

J.Jill has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its stock price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

40.7% of J.Jill shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of J.Jill shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

J.Jill presently has a consensus price target of $24.50, indicating a potential upside of 0.12%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 74.31%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than J.Jill.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
J.Jill	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

J.Jill has a net margin of 4.62% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. J.Jill's return on equity of 28.51% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
J.Jill	4.62%	28.51%	8.13%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 1 more articles in the media than J.Jill. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for J.Jill. J.Jill's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
J.Jill	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	Neutral

J.Jill has higher earnings, but lower revenue than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than J.Jill, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
J.Jill	$588.19M	0.62	$27.89M	$1.79	13.67
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

J.Jill beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AKA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	a.k.a. Brands	Specialty Retail Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$119.79M	$10.41B	$12.39B	$23.05B
Dividend Yield	N/A	234.84%	73.13%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	-4.40	24.79	44.23	28.13
Price / Sales	0.20	16.74	92.40	23.13
Price / Cash	N/A	12.88	18.17	19.11
Price / Book	1.20	5.51	3.98	4.74
Net Income	-$31.43M	$440.44M	$443.78M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.91%	0.02%	-0.24%	1.13%
1 Month Performance	-4.05%	-3.97%	-4.60%	-4.74%
1 Year Performance	14.38%	-6.68%	-6.94%	6.00%

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AKA a.k.a. Brands	2.338 of 5 stars	$10.90 +1.9%	$19.00 +74.3%	+13.2%	$119.79M	$600.21M	N/A	1,650	Gap Down
CAL Caleres	2.727 of 5 stars	$12.45 -0.6%	N/A	-14.4%	$429.65M	$2.76B	8.30	10,000
CTRN Citi Trends	1.1968 of 5 stars	$50.70 -0.2%	$81.00 +59.8%	+47.2%	$422.84M	$819.96M	61.83	4,700	Positive News
OXM Oxford Industries	4.7416 of 5 stars	$25.01 -3.3%	$35.25 +41.0%	-37.5%	$374.58M	$1.48B	N/A	6,000	Analyst Forecast
GCO Genesco	3.9125 of 5 stars	$34.56 -0.9%	$36.00 +4.2%	+17.9%	$373.93M	$2.44B	9.00	16,000	Analyst Upgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AKA) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. CAL, CTRN, OXM, GCO, and JILL

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to J.Jill?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. CAL, CTRN, OXM, GCO, and JILL

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Is AKA or CAL more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, AKA or CAL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AKA or CAL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, AKA or CAL?

Do analysts prefer AKA or CAL?

Does the media favor AKA or CAL?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Does the media favor CTRN or AKA?

Which has more volatility and risk, CTRN or AKA?

Is CTRN or AKA more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CTRN or AKA?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CTRN or AKA?

Do analysts rate CTRN or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in OXM or AKA?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, OXM or AKA?

Do analysts rate OXM or AKA?

Does the media favor OXM or AKA?

Which has more risk & volatility, OXM or AKA?

Is OXM or AKA more profitable?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Does the media refer more to GCO or AKA?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GCO or AKA?

Which has more risk & volatility, GCO or AKA?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, GCO or AKA?

Do analysts rate GCO or AKA?

Is GCO or AKA more profitable?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to J.Jill?

Which has more volatility & risk, JILL or AKA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in JILL or AKA?

Do analysts prefer JILL or AKA?

Is JILL or AKA more profitable?

Does the media prefer JILL or AKA?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, JILL or AKA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools