Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SFIX?

Stitch Fix has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.21 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A Stitch Fix $1.27B 0.32 -$28.74M -$0.08 N/A

Is AKA or SFIX more profitable?

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -1.43% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Stitch Fix's return on equity of -9.35% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17% Stitch Fix -1.43% -9.35% -3.78%

Does the media refer more to AKA or SFIX?

In the previous week, Stitch Fix had 3 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Stitch Fix and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Stitch Fix's score of 0.36 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stitch Fix 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate AKA or CAL?

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Caleres 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AKA or CAL?

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Caleres is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.21 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A Caleres $2.81B 0.15 -$6.69M -$0.01 N/A

Is AKA or CAL more profitable?

Caleres has a net margin of 0.02% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.33% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17% Caleres 0.02% 7.33% 2.21%

Does the media favor AKA or CAL?

In the previous week, Caleres had 7 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Caleres and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Caleres' score of 0.67 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Caleres 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LE or AKA?

Lands' End has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lands' End, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Lands' End $1.34B 0.25 $5.51M $11.24 0.97 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.21 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is LE or AKA more profitable?

Lands' End has a net margin of 26.62% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Lands' End's return on equity of 8.98% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Lands' End 26.62% 8.98% 3.49% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media prefer LE or AKA?

In the previous week, Lands' End had 14 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Lands' End and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Lands' End's score of 0.05 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lands' End 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, AKA or GCO?

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.21 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A Genesco $2.43B 0.16 $13.27M $3.84 9.35

Is AKA or GCO more profitable?

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.13% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17% Genesco 1.71% 3.13% 1.19%

Does the media favor AKA or GCO?

In the previous week, Genesco had 21 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Genesco and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Genesco's score of 0.53 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Genesco 7 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SHOE?

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.21 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A Shoe Carnival $1.14B 0.34 $52.27M $1.35 10.42

Is AKA or SHOE more profitable?

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 3.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 7.24% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17% Shoe Carnival 3.31% 7.24% 4.19%

Does the media favor AKA or SHOE?

In the previous week, Shoe Carnival had 1 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Shoe Carnival and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Shoe Carnival's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 1.16 indicating that Shoe Carnival is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Shoe Carnival 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

$11.36 +0.20 (+1.79%)

As of 09/4/2026 12:26 PM Eastern

Compare

AKA vs. SFIX, CAL, LE, GCO, and SHOE

Should you buy a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? a.k.a. Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Stitch Fix (SFIX), Caleres (CAL), Lands' End (LE), Genesco (GCO), and Shoe Carnival (SHOE). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Stitch Fix?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Stitch Fix (NASDAQ:SFIX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Stitch Fix shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.1% of Stitch Fix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.27, indicating that its share price is 127% more volatile than the broader market.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -1.43% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Stitch Fix's return on equity of -9.35% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Stitch Fix	-1.43%	-9.35%	-3.78%

In the previous week, Stitch Fix had 3 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Stitch Fix and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Stitch Fix's score of 0.36 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stitch Fix	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.25%. Stitch Fix has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 63.93%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Stitch Fix.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Stitch Fix	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Stitch Fix has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.21	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Stitch Fix	$1.27B	0.32	-$28.74M	-$0.08	N/A

Summary

Stitch Fix beats a.k.a. Brands on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Caleres (NYSE:CAL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Caleres had 7 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Caleres and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Caleres' score of 0.67 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Caleres	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Caleres shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Caleres shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Caleres	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caleres has a beta of 0.75, suggesting that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

Caleres has a net margin of 0.02% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.33% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Caleres	0.02%	7.33%	2.21%

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Caleres is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.21	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Caleres	$2.81B	0.15	-$6.69M	-$0.01	N/A

Summary

a.k.a. Brands and Caleres tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Lands' End?

Lands' End (NASDAQ:LE) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and risk.

Lands' End currently has a consensus target price of $20.00, indicating a potential upside of 82.82%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Given Lands' End's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lands' End is more favorable than a.k.a. Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lands' End	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Lands' End has a net margin of 26.62% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Lands' End's return on equity of 8.98% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lands' End	26.62%	8.98%	3.49%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Lands' End has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its stock price is 132% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market.

37.5% of Lands' End shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Lands' End shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lands' End has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lands' End, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lands' End	$1.34B	0.25	$5.51M	$11.24	0.97
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.21	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

In the previous week, Lands' End had 14 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Lands' End and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Lands' End's score of 0.05 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lands' End	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Lands' End beats a.k.a. Brands on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Genesco (NYSE:GCO) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.5% of Genesco shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of Genesco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its share price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesco has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the broader market.

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.13% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Genesco	1.71%	3.13%	1.19%

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.21	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Genesco	$2.43B	0.16	$13.27M	$3.84	9.35

In the previous week, Genesco had 21 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Genesco and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Genesco's score of 0.53 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Genesco	7 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.25%. Genesco has a consensus target price of $36.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.28%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Genesco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Genesco	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20

Summary

Genesco beats a.k.a. Brands on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Shoe Carnival (NASDAQ:SHOE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, valuation and dividends.

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.25%. Shoe Carnival has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 56.36%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Shoe Carnival.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Shoe Carnival	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, Shoe Carnival had 1 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Shoe Carnival and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Shoe Carnival's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 1.16 indicating that Shoe Carnival is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Shoe Carnival	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.1% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.6% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.39, indicating that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 3.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 7.24% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Shoe Carnival	3.31%	7.24%	4.19%

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.21	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Shoe Carnival	$1.14B	0.34	$52.27M	$1.35	10.42

Summary

Shoe Carnival beats a.k.a. Brands on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AKA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	a.k.a. Brands	Specialty Retail Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$120.46M	$11.16B	$12.94B	$23.65B
Dividend Yield	N/A	87.24%	51.61%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	-4.58	25.36	46.54	29.33
Price / Sales	0.21	17.95	88.16	17.01
Price / Cash	N/A	13.26	28.83	33.54
Price / Book	1.31	5.53	5.82	7.61
Net Income	-$31.43M	$438.66M	$444.56M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	7.17%	-0.10%	-0.59%	-0.05%
1 Month Performance	3.37%	-2.31%	-1.60%	0.08%
1 Year Performance	5.97%	-6.25%	-4.35%	12.82%

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AKA a.k.a. Brands	3.0213 of 5 stars	$11.36 +1.8%	$19.00 +67.3%	+6.0%	$120.46M	$600.21M	N/A	1,650	Positive News
SFIX Stitch Fix	2.3727 of 5 stars	$3.01 -5.0%	$5.13 +70.3%	-46.0%	$401.62M	$1.27B	N/A	4,165	News Coverage Positive News Analyst Forecast
CAL Caleres	1.5829 of 5 stars	$11.71 -3.9%	N/A	-20.8%	$393.34M	$2.76B	N/A	10,000	News Coverage Positive News Upcoming Earnings Dividend Announcement
LE Lands' End	3.5382 of 5 stars	$11.81 -0.2%	$20.00 +69.3%	-24.0%	$363.04M	$1.34B	1.07	3,900	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Revision
GCO Genesco	3.4754 of 5 stars	$32.49 -2.9%	$36.67 +12.9%	+7.7%	$360.96M	$2.44B	18.78	16,000	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AKA) was last updated on 9/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. SFIX, CAL, LE, GCO, and SHOE

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Stitch Fix?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Lands' End?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. SFIX, CAL, LE, GCO, and SHOE

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Stitch Fix?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AKA or SFIX?

Which has more risk & volatility, AKA or SFIX?

Is AKA or SFIX more profitable?

Does the media refer more to AKA or SFIX?

Do analysts recommend AKA or SFIX?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SFIX?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Does the media favor AKA or CAL?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in AKA or CAL?

Do analysts rate AKA or CAL?

Which has more risk & volatility, AKA or CAL?

Is AKA or CAL more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, AKA or CAL?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Lands' End?

Do analysts rate LE or AKA?

Is LE or AKA more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, LE or AKA?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in LE or AKA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, LE or AKA?

Does the media prefer LE or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AKA or GCO?

Which has more volatility & risk, AKA or GCO?

Is AKA or GCO more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AKA or GCO?

Does the media favor AKA or GCO?

Do analysts recommend AKA or GCO?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Do analysts recommend AKA or SHOE?

Does the media favor AKA or SHOE?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AKA or SHOE?

Which has more volatility and risk, AKA or SHOE?

Is AKA or SHOE more profitable?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SHOE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools