Do analysts recommend CAL or AKA?

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.12%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Caleres 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, CAL or AKA?

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caleres, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Caleres $2.76B 0.18 -$6.69M $1.50 9.81 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.19 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is CAL or AKA more profitable?

Caleres has a net margin of 1.85% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.84% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Caleres 1.85% 7.84% 2.42% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media prefer CAL or AKA?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Caleres. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Caleres. Caleres' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Caleres is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Caleres 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Does the media refer more to AKA or OXM?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 4 articles in the media. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Oxford Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative Oxford Industries 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GCO or AKA?

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Genesco $2.44B 0.17 $13.27M $3.84 10.23 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.19 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is GCO or AKA more profitable?

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.14% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Genesco 1.71% 3.14% 1.19% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media favor GCO or AKA?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Genesco. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Genesco. Genesco's average media sentiment score of -0.52 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Genesco is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Genesco 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SHOE or AKA?

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Shoe Carnival $1.14B 0.38 $52.27M $0.88 18.07 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.19 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is SHOE or AKA more profitable?

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 2.20% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 5.32% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Shoe Carnival 2.20% 5.32% 3.08% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media favor SHOE or AKA?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Shoe Carnival. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Shoe Carnival. Shoe Carnival's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Shoe Carnival is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Shoe Carnival 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CTRN or AKA?

Citi Trends has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Citi Trends $819.96M 0.59 $5.21M $0.82 70.46 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.19 -$31.43M -$2.48 N/A

Is CTRN or AKA more profitable?

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Citi Trends' return on equity of 8.11% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Citi Trends 0.84% 8.11% 2.00% a.k.a. Brands -4.43% -20.93% -5.17%

Does the media favor CTRN or AKA?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Citi Trends. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 1 mentions for Citi Trends. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Citi Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Citi Trends 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

$10.12 -0.37 (-3.53%)

As of 10:49 AM Eastern

Compare

AKA vs. CAL, OXM, GCO, SHOE, and CTRN

Should you buy a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? a.k.a. Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include Caleres (CAL), Oxford Industries (OXM), Genesco (GCO), Shoe Carnival (SHOE), and Citi Trends (CTRN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Caleres (NYSE:CAL) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Caleres has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Caleres. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Caleres. Caleres' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Caleres is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Caleres	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.12%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Caleres.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Caleres	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

98.4% of Caleres shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Caleres shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Caleres has a net margin of 1.85% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Caleres' return on equity of 7.84% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Caleres	1.85%	7.84%	2.42%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Caleres has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Caleres, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Caleres	$2.76B	0.18	-$6.69M	$1.50	9.81
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.19	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

Caleres beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.12%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.51%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Oxford Industries	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -0.46% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Oxford Industries' return on equity of 4.88% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%
Oxford Industries	-0.46%	4.88%	1.99%

Oxford Industries has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.19	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A
Oxford Industries	$1.48B	0.31	-$27.89M	-$0.51	N/A

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 4 articles in the media. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Oxford Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Oxford Industries	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Oxford Industries beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Genesco (NYSE:GCO) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Genesco has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

94.5% of Genesco shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 23.1% of Genesco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesco has a net margin of 1.71% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Genesco's return on equity of 3.14% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Genesco	1.71%	3.14%	1.19%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

Genesco currently has a consensus price target of $36.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.37%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 81.12%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Genesco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Genesco	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Genesco. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Genesco. Genesco's average media sentiment score of -0.52 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Genesco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Genesco	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Genesco has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genesco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Genesco	$2.44B	0.17	$13.27M	$3.84	10.23
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.19	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Summary

Genesco beats a.k.a. Brands on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Shoe Carnival (NASDAQ:SHOE) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

66.1% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.6% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 2.20% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 5.32% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Shoe Carnival	2.20%	5.32%	3.08%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 2 more articles in the media than Shoe Carnival. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 2 mentions for Shoe Carnival. Shoe Carnival's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Shoe Carnival is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Shoe Carnival	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Shoe Carnival	$1.14B	0.38	$52.27M	$0.88	18.07
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.19	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Shoe Carnival currently has a consensus price target of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 38.36%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 81.12%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Shoe Carnival.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Shoe Carnival	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Shoe Carnival beats a.k.a. Brands on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -4.43%. Citi Trends' return on equity of 8.11% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Citi Trends	0.84%	8.11%	2.00%
a.k.a. Brands	-4.43%	-20.93%	-5.17%

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 3 more articles in the media than Citi Trends. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 1 mentions for Citi Trends. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of -0.65 indicating that Citi Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Citi Trends	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Citi Trends has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Citi Trends	$819.96M	0.59	$5.21M	$0.82	70.46
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.19	-$31.43M	-$2.48	N/A

Citi Trends presently has a consensus target price of $81.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.19%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 81.12%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Citi Trends.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Citi Trends	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Citi Trends beats a.k.a. Brands on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AKA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	a.k.a. Brands	Specialty Retail Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$111.22M	$11.61B	$12.82B	$23.23B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.19%	3.11%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	-4.08	33.18	26.22	29.74
Price / Sales	0.19	1.14	1.63	3.41
Price / Cash	N/A	13.30	15.42	15.49
Price / Book	1.11	4.22	3.58	3.82
Net Income	-$31.43M	$440.44M	$443.52M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-5.33%	1.25%	0.89%	-1.24%
1 Month Performance	-7.16%	4.89%	1.23%	0.15%
1 Year Performance	-19.68%	1.40%	-2.20%	6.55%

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AKA a.k.a. Brands	2.3265 of 5 stars	$10.12 -3.5%	$19.00 +87.7%	-13.1%	$111.22M	$600.21M	N/A	1,650	News Coverage Earnings Report
CAL Caleres	2.4554 of 5 stars	$12.95 +0.2%	N/A	+41.0%	$446.90M	$2.76B	8.63	10,000
OXM Oxford Industries	4.7373 of 5 stars	$27.38 -0.4%	$35.25 +28.7%	-16.6%	$410.15M	$1.48B	N/A	6,000	Analyst Upgrade
GCO Genesco	2.7957 of 5 stars	$36.48 +0.4%	$36.00 -1.3%	+36.9%	$394.72M	$2.44B	9.50	16,000	News Coverage Analyst Downgrade
SHOE Shoe Carnival	4.4882 of 5 stars	$14.25 +1.4%	$22.00 +54.4%	N/A	$387.37M	$1.11B	16.19	5,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AKA) was last updated on 11/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. CAL, OXM, GCO, SHOE, and CTRN

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. CAL, OXM, GCO, SHOE, and CTRN

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Caleres?

Which has more risk and volatility, CAL or AKA?

Does the media prefer CAL or AKA?

Do analysts recommend CAL or AKA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in CAL or AKA?

Is CAL or AKA more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CAL or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Which has more volatility and risk, AKA or OXM?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of AKA or OXM?

Do analysts recommend AKA or OXM?

Is AKA or OXM more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, AKA or OXM?

Does the media refer more to AKA or OXM?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Genesco?

Which has more volatility & risk, GCO or AKA?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in GCO or AKA?

Is GCO or AKA more profitable?

Do analysts recommend GCO or AKA?

Does the media favor GCO or AKA?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, GCO or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SHOE or AKA?

Is SHOE or AKA more profitable?

Does the media favor SHOE or AKA?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SHOE or AKA?

Which has more risk & volatility, SHOE or AKA?

Do analysts rate SHOE or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Which has more volatility & risk, CTRN or AKA?

Is CTRN or AKA more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CTRN or AKA?

Does the media favor CTRN or AKA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CTRN or AKA?

Do analysts rate CTRN or AKA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools