Do analysts rate AKA or HVT.A?

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Haverty Furniture Companies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HNST or AKA?

Honest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than a.k.a. Brands. Honest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Honest $371.32M 1.15 -$15.69M -$0.17 N/A a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.81 N/A

Is HNST or AKA more profitable?

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Honest's net margin of -5.39%. Honest's return on equity of 3.52% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Honest -5.39% 3.52% 2.71% a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01%

Does the media refer more to HNST or AKA?

In the previous week, Honest had 1 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Honest and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Honest's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Honest is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Honest 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer AKA or SGU?

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Star Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Star Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SGU?

Star Group has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.81 N/A Star Group $1.86B 0.23 $73.50M $2.23 5.79

Is AKA or SGU more profitable?

Star Group has a net margin of 5.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Star Group's return on equity of 28.64% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01% Star Group 5.31% 28.64% 9.59%

Does the media favor AKA or SGU?

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 1 articles in the media. Star Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Star Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Star Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is BBBY or AKA more profitable?

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Bed Bath & Beyond's net margin of -5.76%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -23.32% beat Bed Bath & Beyond's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Bed Bath & Beyond -5.76% -27.60% -12.99% a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01%

Does the media favor BBBY or AKA?

In the previous week, Bed Bath & Beyond and Bed Bath & Beyond both had 1 articles in the media. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Bed Bath & Beyond's score of -0.64 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bed Bath & Beyond 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative a.k.a. Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer SHOE or AKA?

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Shoe Carnival. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Shoe Carnival 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 a.k.a. Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, SHOE or AKA?

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Shoe Carnival $1.13B 0.36 $52.27M $1.35 11.13 a.k.a. Brands $600.21M 0.20 -$31.43M -$2.81 N/A

Is SHOE or AKA more profitable?

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 3.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 7.24% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Shoe Carnival 3.31% 7.24% 4.19% a.k.a. Brands -5.00% -23.32% -6.01%

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

$11.21 +0.07 (+0.63%)

As of 11:17 AM Eastern

Compare

AKA vs. HVT.A, HNST, SGU, BBBY, and SHOE

Should you buy a.k.a. Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares a.k.a. Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with a.k.a. Brands include Haverty Furniture Companies (HVT.A), Honest (HNST), Star Group (SGU), Bed Bath & Beyond (BBBY), and Shoe Carnival (SHOE). These companies are all part of the "retail" industry.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Haverty Furniture Companies (NYSE:HVT.A) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.8% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

a.k.a. Brands presently has a consensus price target of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Haverty Furniture Companies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Haverty Furniture Companies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity of 0.00% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%
Haverty Furniture Companies	N/A	N/A	N/A

Haverty Furniture Companies has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A
Haverty Furniture Companies	$766.48M	0.60	$19.31M	$1.20	23.83

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Haverty Furniture Companies. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Haverty Furniture Companies'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	Neutral
Haverty Furniture Companies	Neutral

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Haverty Furniture Companies beats a.k.a. Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Honest?

Honest (NASDAQ:HNST) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Honest's net margin of -5.39%. Honest's return on equity of 3.52% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Honest	-5.39%	3.52%	2.71%
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%

Honest has a beta of 2.11, indicating that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Honest has higher earnings, but lower revenue than a.k.a. Brands. Honest is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Honest	$371.32M	1.15	-$15.69M	-$0.17	N/A
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A

45.5% of Honest shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 9.4% of Honest shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Honest presently has a consensus target price of $3.47, indicating a potential downside of 10.77%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Honest.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Honest	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Honest had 1 more articles in the media than a.k.a. Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Honest and 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands. Honest's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Honest is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Honest	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Honest beats a.k.a. Brands on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) and Star Group (NYSE:SGU) are both small-cap retail companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Star Group has a beta of 0.33, meaning that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Star Group has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A
Star Group	$1.86B	0.23	$73.50M	$2.23	5.79

Star Group has a net margin of 5.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Star Group's return on equity of 28.64% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%
Star Group	5.31%	28.64%	9.59%

a.k.a. Brands currently has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Star Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Star Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands and a.k.a. Brands both had 1 articles in the media. Star Group's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat a.k.a. Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Star Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Star Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.4% of Star Group shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.4% of Star Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Star Group beats a.k.a. Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Bed Bath & Beyond (NYSE:BBBY) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

a.k.a. Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bed Bath & Beyond. Bed Bath & Beyond is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than a.k.a. Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bed Bath & Beyond	$1.04B	0.38	-$84.62M	-$0.95	N/A
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A

Bed Bath & Beyond has a beta of 2.85, indicating that its share price is 185% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, indicating that its share price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bed Bath & Beyond and Bed Bath & Beyond both had 1 articles in the media. a.k.a. Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Bed Bath & Beyond's score of -0.64 indicating that a.k.a. Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bed Bath & Beyond	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
a.k.a. Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

76.3% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Bed Bath & Beyond shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bed Bath & Beyond currently has a consensus target price of $8.67, indicating a potential upside of 62.15%. a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Bed Bath & Beyond.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bed Bath & Beyond	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

a.k.a. Brands has a net margin of -5.00% compared to Bed Bath & Beyond's net margin of -5.76%. a.k.a. Brands' return on equity of -23.32% beat Bed Bath & Beyond's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bed Bath & Beyond	-5.76%	-27.60%	-12.99%
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%

Summary

a.k.a. Brands beats Bed Bath & Beyond on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Shoe Carnival (NASDAQ:SHOE) and a.k.a. Brands (NYSE:AKA) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

a.k.a. Brands has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 69.49%. Given a.k.a. Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe a.k.a. Brands is more favorable than Shoe Carnival.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Shoe Carnival	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
a.k.a. Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 3.31% compared to a.k.a. Brands' net margin of -5.00%. Shoe Carnival's return on equity of 7.24% beat a.k.a. Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Shoe Carnival	3.31%	7.24%	4.19%
a.k.a. Brands	-5.00%	-23.32%	-6.01%

In the previous week, a.k.a. Brands had 1 more articles in the media than Shoe Carnival. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for a.k.a. Brands and 0 mentions for Shoe Carnival. Shoe Carnival's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled a.k.a. Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Shoe Carnival	Neutral
a.k.a. Brands	Neutral

Shoe Carnival has higher revenue and earnings than a.k.a. Brands. a.k.a. Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shoe Carnival, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Shoe Carnival	$1.13B	0.36	$52.27M	$1.35	11.13
a.k.a. Brands	$600.21M	0.20	-$31.43M	-$2.81	N/A

Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.43, meaning that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, a.k.a. Brands has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

66.1% of Shoe Carnival shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.4% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 33.6% of Shoe Carnival shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 18.2% of a.k.a. Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Shoe Carnival beats a.k.a. Brands on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get a.k.a. Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AKA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

AKA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	a.k.a. Brands	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$121.29M	$9.84B	$26.54B	$23.32B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.17%	175.38%	4.01%
P/E Ratio	-3.99	15.23	20.36	30.77
Price / Sales	0.20	1.04	3.81	20.74
Price / Cash	N/A	12.05	17.83	25.43
Price / Book	1.23	4.26	6.28	4.73
Net Income	-$31.43M	$378.06M	$948.02M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.09%	-1.78%	-3.18%	-0.76%
1 Month Performance	24.42%	-2.29%	0.78%	1.59%
1 Year Performance	-0.88%	14.78%	-4.85%	15.92%

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
AKA a.k.a. Brands	2.5021 of 5 stars	$11.21 +0.6%	$19.00 +69.5%	+3.6%	$121.29M	$600.21M	N/A	1,650	Gap Up
HVT.A Haverty Furniture Companies	N/A	$28.60 flat	N/A	+29.8%	$460.17M	$758.99M	23.83	2,840
HNST Honest	1.9623 of 5 stars	$3.94 -0.1%	$3.47 -11.9%	-21.0%	$433.17M	$371.32M	N/A	190	News Coverage Positive News
SGU Star Group	3.3691 of 5 stars	$13.10 +1.4%	N/A	+11.4%	$430.24M	$1.78B	5.88	3,024	Positive News
BBBY Bed Bath & Beyond	2.1461 of 5 stars	$5.56 -0.1%	$8.67 +56.0%	-25.5%	$410.66M	$1.04B	N/A	1,050

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:AKA) was last updated on 7/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. HVT.A, HNST, SGU, BBBY, and SHOE

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Honest?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

a.k.a. Brands (AKA) Competitors

AKA vs. HVT.A, HNST, SGU, BBBY, and SHOE

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Haverty Furniture Companies?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of AKA or HVT.A?

Do analysts rate AKA or HVT.A?

Is AKA or HVT.A more profitable?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, AKA or HVT.A?

Does the media favor AKA or HVT.A?

Which has more volatility and risk, AKA or HVT.A?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Honest?

Is HNST or AKA more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, HNST or AKA?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, HNST or AKA?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in HNST or AKA?

Do analysts prefer HNST or AKA?

Does the media refer more to HNST or AKA?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Star Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, AKA or SGU?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, AKA or SGU?

Is AKA or SGU more profitable?

Do analysts prefer AKA or SGU?

Does the media favor AKA or SGU?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in AKA or SGU?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Bed Bath & Beyond?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BBBY or AKA?

Which has more risk & volatility, BBBY or AKA?

Does the media favor BBBY or AKA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in BBBY or AKA?

Do analysts rate BBBY or AKA?

Is BBBY or AKA more profitable?

Summary

How does a.k.a. Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Do analysts prefer SHOE or AKA?

Is SHOE or AKA more profitable?

Does the media refer more to SHOE or AKA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, SHOE or AKA?

Which has more volatility & risk, SHOE or AKA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SHOE or AKA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

AKA vs. The Competition

a.k.a. Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools