Cullen/Frost Bankers Competitors

Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) and Truist Financial (NYSE:TFC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Truist Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Truist Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and Truist Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and Truist Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Truist Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. Truist Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cullen/Frost Bankers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and target prices for Cullen/Frost Bankers and Truist Financial, as provided by MarketBeat.

Cullen/Frost Bankers currently has a consensus target price of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. Truist Financial has a consensus target price of $53.0833, indicating a potential downside of 11.56%. Given Truist Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Truist Financial is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Risk & Volatility

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Truist Financial has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Cullen/Frost Bankers pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Truist Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Truist Financial pays out 41.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cullen/Frost Bankers has increased its dividend for 25 consecutive years and Truist Financial has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Truist Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Truist Financial beats Cullen/Frost Bankers on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

The PNC Financial Services Group (NYSE:PNC) and Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for The PNC Financial Services Group and Cullen/Frost Bankers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

The PNC Financial Services Group presently has a consensus target price of $160.1176, indicating a potential downside of 11.15%. Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus target price of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. Given The PNC Financial Services Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe The PNC Financial Services Group is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Profitability

This table compares The PNC Financial Services Group and Cullen/Frost Bankers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.6% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of The PNC Financial Services Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dividends

The PNC Financial Services Group pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. The PNC Financial Services Group pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The PNC Financial Services Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cullen/Frost Bankers has raised its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Cullen/Frost Bankers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares The PNC Financial Services Group and Cullen/Frost Bankers' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

The PNC Financial Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. The PNC Financial Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cullen/Frost Bankers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

The PNC Financial Services Group has a beta of 1.38, indicating that its share price is 38% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cullen/Frost Bankers beats The PNC Financial Services Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

First Republic Bank (NYSE:FRC) and Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and risk.

Dividends

First Republic Bank pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. First Republic Bank pays out 13.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Republic Bank has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Cullen/Frost Bankers has raised its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Cullen/Frost Bankers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for First Republic Bank and Cullen/Frost Bankers, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

First Republic Bank presently has a consensus target price of $136.1333, indicating a potential downside of 20.76%. Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus target price of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. Given First Republic Bank's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe First Republic Bank is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Profitability

This table compares First Republic Bank and Cullen/Frost Bankers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

First Republic Bank has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares First Republic Bank and Cullen/Frost Bankers' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

First Republic Bank has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. Cullen/Frost Bankers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Republic Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.5% of First Republic Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

First Republic Bank beats Cullen/Frost Bankers on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Fifth Third Bancorp (NASDAQ:FITB) and Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Dividends

Fifth Third Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Fifth Third Bancorp pays out 39.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Fifth Third Bancorp has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Cullen/Frost Bankers has raised its dividend for 25 consecutive years. Fifth Third Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Fifth Third Bancorp and Cullen/Frost Bankers, as provided by MarketBeat.

Fifth Third Bancorp presently has a consensus target price of $34.4605, indicating a potential downside of 10.35%. Cullen/Frost Bankers has a consensus target price of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. Given Fifth Third Bancorp's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fifth Third Bancorp is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Profitability

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Cullen/Frost Bankers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Fifth Third Bancorp has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Fifth Third Bancorp and Cullen/Frost Bankers' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Fifth Third Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. Fifth Third Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cullen/Frost Bankers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.2% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Fifth Third Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fifth Third Bancorp beats Cullen/Frost Bankers on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) and SVB Financial Group (NASDAQ:SIVB) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of SVB Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of SVB Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cullen/Frost Bankers and SVB Financial Group, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cullen/Frost Bankers currently has a consensus price target of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. SVB Financial Group has a consensus price target of $434.5333, indicating a potential downside of 12.69%. Given SVB Financial Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SVB Financial Group is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Profitability

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and SVB Financial Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and SVB Financial Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SVB Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. Cullen/Frost Bankers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SVB Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SVB Financial Group has a beta of 2.14, indicating that its stock price is 114% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SVB Financial Group beats Cullen/Frost Bankers on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cullen/Frost Bankers (NYSE:CFR) and Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

81.4% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.7% of Regions Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Cullen/Frost Bankers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Regions Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Cullen/Frost Bankers and Regions Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cullen/Frost Bankers currently has a consensus price target of $83.5556, indicating a potential downside of 24.28%. Regions Financial has a consensus price target of $18.4722, indicating a potential downside of 12.99%. Given Regions Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Regions Financial is more favorable than Cullen/Frost Bankers.

Profitability

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and Regions Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Cullen/Frost Bankers and Regions Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Regions Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Cullen/Frost Bankers. Regions Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cullen/Frost Bankers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Cullen/Frost Bankers pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Regions Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Cullen/Frost Bankers pays out 42.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Regions Financial pays out 40.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cullen/Frost Bankers has raised its dividend for 25 consecutive years and Regions Financial has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regions Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Risk and Volatility

Cullen/Frost Bankers has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Regions Financial has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Regions Financial beats Cullen/Frost Bankers on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.