Go Pro

Designer Brands (DBI) Competitors

Designer Brands logo
$5.76 +0.02 (+0.35%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

DBI vs. MYTE, LUXE, CTRN, OXM, and SFIX

Should you buy Designer Brands stock or one of its competitors? Designer Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), LuxExperience B.V. (LUXE), Citi Trends (CTRN), Oxford Industries (OXM), and Stitch Fix (SFIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does Designer Brands compare to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.?

MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (NYSE:MYTE) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.$881.44M0.76-$26.95M-$0.43N/A
Designer Brands$2.90B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.32

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 34.55%. Given Designer Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.35% compared to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s net margin of -3.98%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.-3.98% -5.88% -3.63%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 1 more articles in the media than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Designer Brands and 0 mentions for MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Designer Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. Neutral
Designer Brands Neutral

Summary

Designer Brands beats MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to LuxExperience B.V.?

LuxExperience B.V. (NYSE:LUXE) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

LuxExperience B.V. presently has a consensus target price of $9.75, indicating a potential upside of 25.81%. Designer Brands has a consensus target price of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 34.55%. Given Designer Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than LuxExperience B.V..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LuxExperience B.V.
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

LuxExperience B.V. has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. LuxExperience B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LuxExperience B.V.$1.37B0.49$620.57M$4.091.89
Designer Brands$2.90B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.32

LuxExperience B.V. has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

LuxExperience B.V. has a net margin of 17.93% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. LuxExperience B.V.'s return on equity of 35.63% beat Designer Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LuxExperience B.V.17.93% 35.63% 21.07%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

10.1% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LuxExperience B.V. had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LuxExperience B.V. and 1 mentions for Designer Brands. LuxExperience B.V.'s average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that LuxExperience B.V. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LuxExperience B.V.
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

LuxExperience B.V. beats Designer Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Designer Brands presently has a consensus price target of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 34.55%. Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $73.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.80%. Given Designer Brands' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Citi Trends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Citi Trends
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Citi Trends has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Designer Brands. Designer Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.90B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.32
Citi Trends$819.96M0.73$5.21M$1.3951.59

Citi Trends has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Citi Trends' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.35% 8.60% 1.22%
Citi Trends 1.42%2.09%0.51%

In the previous week, Citi Trends had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Citi Trends and 1 mentions for Designer Brands. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Citi Trends is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Citi Trends
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citi Trends has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Citi Trends beats Designer Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Designer Brands currently has a consensus target price of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 34.55%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.22%. Given Designer Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Oxford Industries
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.88

Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Oxford Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.7%. Designer Brands pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oxford Industries pays out -106.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oxford Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Oxford Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Oxford Industries' net margin of -2.65%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Oxford Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.35% 8.60% 1.22%
Oxford Industries -2.65%4.55%1.87%

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 4 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for Designer Brands. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Oxford Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Oxford Industries
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.90B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.32
Oxford Industries$1.48B0.37-$27.89M-$2.64N/A

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Designer Brands beats Oxford Industries on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Stitch Fix?

Stitch Fix (NASDAQ:SFIX) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Stitch Fix. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stitch Fix$1.27B0.35-$28.74M-$0.08N/A
Designer Brands$2.90B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.32

71.0% of Stitch Fix shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 16.1% of Stitch Fix shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stitch Fix and Stitch Fix both had 1 articles in the media. Stitch Fix's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Stitch Fix is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stitch Fix
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Stitch Fix's net margin of -1.43%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stitch Fix-1.43% -9.35% -3.78%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

Stitch Fix presently has a consensus price target of $5.13, indicating a potential upside of 53.44%. Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 34.55%. Given Stitch Fix's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Stitch Fix is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stitch Fix
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Designer Brands beats Stitch Fix on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Designer Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DBI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DBI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DBI vs. The Competition

MetricDesigner BrandsSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$291.97M$11.45B$13.23B$24.31B
Dividend Yield3.48%120.58%56.57%3.70%
P/E Ratio30.3226.2746.9630.31
Price / Sales0.1018.7888.8520.99
Price / Cash4.2513.5629.1332.49
Price / Book1.025.693.936.77
Net Income-$8.37M$438.66M$445.72M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.06%-1.32%-0.26%-0.65%
1 Month Performance7.36%2.31%2.74%3.38%
1 Year Performance61.93%-4.12%-1.57%14.90%

Designer Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DBI
Designer Brands
3.7573 of 5 stars
$5.76
+0.3%
$7.75
+34.5%
+61.9%$291.97M$2.90B30.3213,000
MYTE
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
N/A$8.10
flat
N/A-4.3%$694.16M$881.44MN/A1,240
LUXE
LuxExperience B.V.
3.1397 of 5 stars
$7.63
-5.8%
$9.50
+24.5%
N/A$653.97M$2.43B1.874,262
CTRN
Citi Trends
0.5015 of 5 stars
$76.18
+2.7%
$73.00
-4.2%
+120.0%$634.58M$819.96M54.814,700
OXM
Oxford Industries
4.0199 of 5 stars
$36.42
-2.2%
$40.00
+9.8%
-22.7%$543.68M$1.48BN/A6,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DBI) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners