Go Pro

Designer Brands (DBI) Competitors

Designer Brands logo
$5.85 -0.14 (-2.40%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.91 +0.06 (+1.04%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:56 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DBI vs. MYTE, LUXE, CTRN, OXM, and SFIX

Should you buy Designer Brands stock or one of its competitors? Designer Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), LuxExperience B.V. (LUXE), Citi Trends (CTRN), Oxford Industries (OXM), and Stitch Fix (SFIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does Designer Brands compare to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.?

MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (NYSE:MYTE) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 15 more articles in the media than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Designer Brands and 0 mentions for MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. Neutral
Designer Brands Positive

MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.$881.44M0.72-$26.95M-$0.43N/A
Designer Brands$2.89B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.77

Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.19%. Given Designer Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s net margin of -3.98%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.-3.98% -5.88% -3.63%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

Summary

Designer Brands beats MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to LuxExperience B.V.?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and LuxExperience B.V. (NYSE:LUXE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings and risk.

Designer Brands presently has a consensus target price of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.19%. LuxExperience B.V. has a consensus target price of $9.75, indicating a potential upside of 31.85%. Given LuxExperience B.V.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe LuxExperience B.V. is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
LuxExperience B.V.
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17

LuxExperience B.V. has a net margin of 17.93% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.59%. LuxExperience B.V.'s return on equity of 35.63% beat Designer Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.59% 9.31% 1.35%
LuxExperience B.V. 17.93%35.63%21.07%

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 11 more articles in the media than LuxExperience B.V.. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Designer Brands and 4 mentions for LuxExperience B.V.. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat LuxExperience B.V.'s score of 0.13 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LuxExperience B.V.
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

LuxExperience B.V. has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Designer Brands. LuxExperience B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.77
LuxExperience B.V.$1.37B0.46$620.57M$4.091.81

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are owned by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LuxExperience B.V. has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LuxExperience B.V. beats Designer Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and risk.

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.59%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Citi Trends' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Citi Trends0.84% 8.11% 2.00%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 6 more articles in the media than Citi Trends. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Designer Brands and 9 mentions for Citi Trends. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.86 indicating that Citi Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Citi Trends
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Citi Trends has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Designer Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Citi Trends$819.96M0.62$5.21M$0.8273.93
Designer Brands$2.89B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.77

Citi Trends presently has a consensus target price of $81.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.62%. Designer Brands has a consensus target price of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.19%. Given Citi Trends' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Citi Trends is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Citi Trends
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Citi Trends beats Designer Brands on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Designer Brands currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.19%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.77%. Given Oxford Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Oxford Industries is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Oxford Industries
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Oxford Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Designer Brands pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Oxford Industries pays out -549.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oxford Industries has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Oxford Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Oxford Industries' net margin of -0.46%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Oxford Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.59% 9.31% 1.35%
Oxford Industries -0.46%4.88%1.99%

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Oxford Industries and 15 mentions for Designer Brands. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.16 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Oxford Industries
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.77
Oxford Industries$1.47B0.32-$27.89M-$0.51N/A

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Designer Brands beats Oxford Industries on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Stitch Fix?

Stitch Fix (NASDAQ:SFIX) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

71.0% of Stitch Fix shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.1% of Stitch Fix shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 12 more articles in the media than Stitch Fix. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Designer Brands and 3 mentions for Stitch Fix. Stitch Fix's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.86 indicating that Stitch Fix is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stitch Fix
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Stitch Fix currently has a consensus price target of $5.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.49%. Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.19%. Given Stitch Fix's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Stitch Fix is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stitch Fix
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Stitch Fix's net margin of -1.43%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stitch Fix-1.43% -9.35% -3.78%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.27, meaning that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Stitch Fix. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stitch Fix$1.27B0.31-$28.74M-$0.08N/A
Designer Brands$2.89B0.10-$8.37M$0.1930.77

Summary

Designer Brands beats Stitch Fix on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Designer Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DBI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DBI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DBI vs. The Competition

MetricDesigner BrandsSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$304.15M$10.62B$12.55B$23.20B
Dividend Yield3.34%122.71%56.79%3.56%
P/E Ratio20.8824.1545.6528.69
Price / Sales0.1015.1991.48102.56
Price / Cash4.4312.7628.6133.82
Price / Book0.995.374.084.74
Net Income-$8.37M$439.64M$445.67M$1.07B
7 Day Performance11.35%-2.87%-2.30%-1.99%
1 Month Performance-4.48%-5.31%-3.95%-2.68%
1 Year Performance28.65%-7.85%-6.12%10.45%

Designer Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DBI
Designer Brands
3.0008 of 5 stars
$5.85
-2.4%
$6.50
+11.2%
+28.8%$304.15M$2.89B20.8813,000
MYTE
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
N/A$7.64
-0.8%
N/A-19.6%$654.74M$881.44MN/A1,240
LUXE
LuxExperience B.V.
2.6922 of 5 stars
$7.45
-2.5%
$9.75
+30.9%
N/A$638.47M$1.37B1.824,262
CTRN
Citi Trends
2.5257 of 5 stars
$67.87
-0.3%
$81.00
+19.3%
+79.5%$565.36M$819.96M82.774,700
OXM
Oxford Industries
3.9029 of 5 stars
$37.82
-1.2%
$40.00
+5.8%
-38.7%$564.65M$1.48BN/A6,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DBI) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners