Designer Brands (DBI) Competitors

Designer Brands logo
$6.13 +0.02 (+0.33%)
Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.11 -0.02 (-0.39%)
As of 07:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DBI vs. SCVL, CTRN, CAL, GCO, and ZUMZ

Should you buy Designer Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Designer Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Designer Brands include Shoe Carnival (SCVL), Citi Trends (CTRN), Caleres (CAL), Genesco (GCO), and Zumiez (ZUMZ). These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does Designer Brands compare to Shoe Carnival?

Shoe Carnival (NASDAQ:SCVL) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Shoe Carnival's score of 0.00 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Shoe Carnival Neutral
Designer Brands Positive

Shoe Carnival has a net margin of 3.31% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Shoe Carnival's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Shoe Carnival3.31% 7.24% 4.19%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

Shoe Carnival has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Shoe Carnival is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Shoe Carnival$1.13B0.42$52.27M$1.3512.91
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.1932.26

Shoe Carnival pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Shoe Carnival pays out 50.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Designer Brands pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Shoe Carnival has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Shoe Carnival is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Shoe Carnival has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Shoe Carnival currently has a consensus price target of $22.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.26%. Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 26.43%. Given Designer Brands' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Shoe Carnival.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Shoe Carnival
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

66.1% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.6% of Shoe Carnival shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Shoe Carnival beats Designer Brands on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 1.42% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Citi Trends' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.35% 8.60% 1.22%
Citi Trends 1.42%2.09%0.51%

Designer Brands presently has a consensus price target of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 26.43%. Citi Trends has a consensus price target of $68.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.87%. Given Designer Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Citi Trends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Citi Trends
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Citi Trends has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Designer Brands. Designer Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.1932.26
Citi Trends$819.96M0.63$5.21M$1.3944.53

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citi Trends has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Citi Trends had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Citi Trends and 0 mentions for Designer Brands. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Citi Trends' score of -0.17 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands Positive
Citi Trends Neutral

Summary

Citi Trends beats Designer Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Caleres?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Caleres (NYSE:CAL) are both small-cap apparel retail companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Caleres shares are held by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Caleres shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Caleres has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Designer Brands. Caleres is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.1932.26
Caleres$2.76B0.15-$6.69M-$0.01N/A

In the previous week, Caleres had 3 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Caleres and 0 mentions for Designer Brands. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Caleres' score of 0.83 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands Positive
Caleres Positive

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Caleres has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

Designer Brands presently has a consensus price target of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.43%. Given Designer Brands' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Caleres.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Caleres
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Caleres pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Designer Brands pays out 105.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Caleres pays out -2,800.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.35% compared to Caleres' net margin of 0.02%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Caleres' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.35% 8.60% 1.22%
Caleres 0.02%7.33%2.21%

Summary

Designer Brands beats Caleres on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Genesco?

Genesco (NYSE:GCO) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Genesco has a net margin of 0.80% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Genesco's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genesco0.80% 2.66% 1.00%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

Genesco has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

94.5% of Genesco shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.1% of Genesco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Genesco had 3 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Genesco and 0 mentions for Designer Brands. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Genesco's score of 0.60 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Genesco Positive
Designer Brands Positive

Genesco currently has a consensus target price of $36.67, indicating a potential upside of 8.10%. Designer Brands has a consensus target price of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.43%. Given Designer Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Genesco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genesco
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Genesco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Genesco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genesco$2.44B0.15$13.27M$1.7319.61
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.1932.26

Summary

Genesco beats Designer Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Zumiez?

Zumiez (NASDAQ:ZUMZ) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Zumiez has a net margin of 1.54% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.35%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 8.60% beat Zumiez's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Zumiez1.54% 4.24% 2.05%
Designer Brands 0.35%8.60%1.22%

Zumiez has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Zumiez had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Zumiez and 0 mentions for Designer Brands. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Zumiez's score of 0.51 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Zumiez Positive
Designer Brands Positive

Zumiez has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Zumiez is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zumiez$929.06M0.33$13.38M$0.8321.69
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.1932.26

95.5% of Zumiez shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 24.3% of Zumiez shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Zumiez currently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.43%. Given Designer Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Zumiez.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Zumiez
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Designer Brands beats Zumiez on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Designer Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DBI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DBI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DBI vs. The Competition

MetricDesigner BrandsRETAIL IndustryRetail SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$311.28M$10.02B$26.10B$23.15B
Dividend Yield3.16%3.06%175.36%4.06%
P/E Ratio32.2615.7219.8331.08
Price / Sales0.111.063.67108.25
Price / Cash4.6712.8115.1018.65
Price / Book1.084.426.114.65
Net Income-$8.37M$377.89M$962.92M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-5.76%-1.98%-1.36%-1.04%
1 Month Performance-13.92%2.01%1.07%0.18%
1 Year Performance165.25%26.47%0.52%24.25%

Designer Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DBI
Designer Brands
4.0774 of 5 stars
$6.13
+0.3%
$7.75
+26.4%
+167.0%$311.28M$2.89B32.2613,000
SCVL
Shoe Carnival
4.9374 of 5 stars
$17.43
0.0%
$22.00
+26.3%
-10.5%$473.11M$1.13B12.915,000
CTRN
Citi Trends
1.1428 of 5 stars
$55.61
+0.7%
$68.00
+22.3%
+117.6%$463.23M$819.96M40.014,700
CAL
Caleres
2.5953 of 5 stars
$13.35
-5.0%
N/A0.0%$448.43M$2.76BN/A10,000
GCO
Genesco
3.8066 of 5 stars
$35.91
-8.4%
$36.67
+2.1%
+60.0%$398.92M$2.44B20.7516,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DBI) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners