Go Pro

Designer Brands (DBI) Competitors

Designer Brands logo
$6.03 -0.03 (-0.56%)
As of 12:49 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DBI vs. MYTE, LUXE, CTRN, CAL, and OXM

Should you buy Designer Brands stock or one of its competitors? Designer Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (MYTE), LuxExperience B.V. (LUXE), Citi Trends (CTRN), Caleres (CAL), and Oxford Industries (OXM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel retail" industry.

How does Designer Brands compare to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. (NYSE:MYTE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s net margin of -3.98%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.59% 9.31% 1.35%
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. -3.98%-5.88%-3.63%

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.1% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are owned by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.2821.52
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.$881.44M0.97-$26.95M-$0.43N/A

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Designer Brands had 1 more articles in the media than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Designer Brands and 0 mentions for MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.. Designer Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.'s score of 0.00 indicating that Designer Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands Positive
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. Neutral

Designer Brands currently has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Designer Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than MYT Netherlands Parent B.V..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Designer Brands beats MYT Netherlands Parent B.V. on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to LuxExperience B.V.?

LuxExperience B.V. (NYSE:LUXE) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to LuxExperience B.V.'s net margin of -6.54%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat LuxExperience B.V.'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LuxExperience B.V.-6.54% -9.88% -5.82%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

LuxExperience B.V. has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

10.1% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of LuxExperience B.V. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, LuxExperience B.V. had 2 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for LuxExperience B.V. and 1 mentions for Designer Brands. LuxExperience B.V.'s average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.50 indicating that LuxExperience B.V. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
LuxExperience B.V.
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

LuxExperience B.V. presently has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 8.87%. Designer Brands has a consensus target price of $6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Designer Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than LuxExperience B.V..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
LuxExperience B.V.
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Designer Brands has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LuxExperience B.V.. LuxExperience B.V. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LuxExperience B.V.$2.92B0.29-$195.62M-$1.43N/A
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.2821.52

Summary

Designer Brands beats LuxExperience B.V. on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Citi Trends?

Citi Trends (NASDAQ:CTRN) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Citi Trends has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Designer Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citi Trends, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Citi Trends$819.96M0.50$5.21M$0.8259.68
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.2821.52

In the previous week, Citi Trends and Citi Trends both had 1 articles in the media. Citi Trends' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.50 indicating that Citi Trends is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Citi Trends
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.6% of Citi Trends shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Citi Trends has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.59%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Citi Trends' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Citi Trends0.84% 8.11% 2.00%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

Citi Trends currently has a consensus price target of $81.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.51%. Designer Brands has a consensus price target of $6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Citi Trends' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Citi Trends is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Citi Trends
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Citi Trends has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its share price is 82% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Citi Trends beats Designer Brands on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Caleres?

Caleres (NYSE:CAL) and Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Caleres has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Designer Brands has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Caleres has a net margin of 1.85% compared to Designer Brands' net margin of 0.59%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Caleres' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Caleres1.85% 7.84% 2.42%
Designer Brands 0.59%9.31%1.35%

Designer Brands has a consensus target price of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 12.01%. Given Designer Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Designer Brands is more favorable than Caleres.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Caleres
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Caleres has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Designer Brands. Caleres is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Caleres$2.76B0.15-$6.69M$1.507.96
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.2821.52

98.4% of Caleres shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Caleres shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Caleres and Caleres both had 1 articles in the media. Caleres' average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.50 indicating that Caleres is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Caleres
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Caleres pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Caleres pays out 18.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Designer Brands pays out 71.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Caleres beats Designer Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Designer Brands compare to Oxford Industries?

Designer Brands (NYSE:DBI) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk and profitability.

Designer Brands currently has a consensus target price of $6.75, suggesting a potential upside of 12.01%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $35.25, suggesting a potential upside of 39.58%. Given Oxford Industries' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Industries is more favorable than Designer Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Designer Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Oxford Industries
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Designer Brands has a net margin of 0.59% compared to Oxford Industries' net margin of -0.46%. Designer Brands' return on equity of 9.31% beat Oxford Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Designer Brands0.59% 9.31% 1.35%
Oxford Industries -0.46%4.88%1.99%

Designer Brands has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

88.8% of Designer Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 67.3% of Designer Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Designer Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Designer Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Designer Brands$2.89B0.11-$8.37M$0.2821.52
Oxford Industries$1.48B0.26-$27.89M-$0.51N/A

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 5 more articles in the media than Designer Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for Designer Brands. Oxford Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Designer Brands' score of 0.50 indicating that Oxford Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Designer Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Oxford Industries
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Designer Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Oxford Industries pays an annual dividend of $2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Designer Brands pays out 71.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oxford Industries pays out -549.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Oxford Industries has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Oxford Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Designer Brands and Oxford Industries tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Designer Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DBI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DBI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DBI vs. The Competition

MetricDesigner BrandsSpecialty Retail IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$307.49M$10.30B$12.23B$22.66B
Dividend Yield3.31%208.84%69.35%3.74%
P/E Ratio21.4824.9144.1627.77
Price / Sales0.1116.8793.1920.12
Price / Cash4.4712.9828.1739.56
Price / Book1.025.313.914.64
Net Income-$8.37M$441.51M$445.63M$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.94%-0.44%-0.80%-1.12%
1 Month Performance15.55%-3.73%-4.34%-5.08%
1 Year Performance69.41%-8.30%-7.53%5.71%

Designer Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DBI
Designer Brands
4.0387 of 5 stars
$6.03
-0.6%
$6.75
+12.0%
+69.9%$307.49M$2.89B21.4813,000
MYTE
MYT Netherlands Parent B.V.
N/A$9.66
-4.2%
N/A+17.3%$827.85M$881.44MN/A1,240
LUXE
LuxExperience B.V.
2.2688 of 5 stars
$9.40
-2.7%
$10.25
+9.0%
N/A$805.92M$2.92BN/A4,262
CTRN
Citi Trends
1.67 of 5 stars
$54.03
-2.4%
$81.00
+49.9%
+58.5%$450.61M$819.96M65.894,700
CAL
Caleres
2.8404 of 5 stars
$12.78
+7.3%
N/A-7.2%$441.04M$2.76B8.5210,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DBI) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners