S&P 500   3,920.63 (+1.01%)
DOW   31,930.97 (+1.25%)
QQQ   321.77 (+0.09%)
AAPL   124.29 (-1.25%)
MSFT   233.19 (-0.03%)
FB   264.52 (-0.50%)
GOOGL   2,073.74 (+0.66%)
AMZN   3,152.50 (-1.31%)
TSLA   728.62 (+4.26%)
NVDA   571.77 (+1.08%)
BABA   249.79 (-1.17%)
CGC   35.68 (+1.05%)
GE   13.12 (+4.21%)
MU   90.91 (+3.04%)
NIO   51.38 (+4.62%)
AMD   86.08 (+1.58%)
T   29.38 (+0.69%)
F   12.02 (+3.44%)
ACB   11.44 (+2.05%)
DIS   199.27 (+1.11%)
BA   227.67 (+7.33%)
NFLX   550.80 (+0.85%)
BAC   36.27 (+2.11%)
S&P 500   3,920.63 (+1.01%)
DOW   31,930.97 (+1.25%)
QQQ   321.77 (+0.09%)
AAPL   124.29 (-1.25%)
MSFT   233.19 (-0.03%)
FB   264.52 (-0.50%)
GOOGL   2,073.74 (+0.66%)
AMZN   3,152.50 (-1.31%)
TSLA   728.62 (+4.26%)
NVDA   571.77 (+1.08%)
BABA   249.79 (-1.17%)
CGC   35.68 (+1.05%)
GE   13.12 (+4.21%)
MU   90.91 (+3.04%)
NIO   51.38 (+4.62%)
AMD   86.08 (+1.58%)
T   29.38 (+0.69%)
F   12.02 (+3.44%)
ACB   11.44 (+2.05%)
DIS   199.27 (+1.11%)
BA   227.67 (+7.33%)
NFLX   550.80 (+0.85%)
BAC   36.27 (+2.11%)
S&P 500   3,920.63 (+1.01%)
DOW   31,930.97 (+1.25%)
QQQ   321.77 (+0.09%)
AAPL   124.29 (-1.25%)
MSFT   233.19 (-0.03%)
FB   264.52 (-0.50%)
GOOGL   2,073.74 (+0.66%)
AMZN   3,152.50 (-1.31%)
TSLA   728.62 (+4.26%)
NVDA   571.77 (+1.08%)
BABA   249.79 (-1.17%)
CGC   35.68 (+1.05%)
GE   13.12 (+4.21%)
MU   90.91 (+3.04%)
NIO   51.38 (+4.62%)
AMD   86.08 (+1.58%)
T   29.38 (+0.69%)
F   12.02 (+3.44%)
ACB   11.44 (+2.05%)
DIS   199.27 (+1.11%)
BA   227.67 (+7.33%)
NFLX   550.80 (+0.85%)
BAC   36.27 (+2.11%)
S&P 500   3,920.63 (+1.01%)
DOW   31,930.97 (+1.25%)
QQQ   321.77 (+0.09%)
AAPL   124.29 (-1.25%)
MSFT   233.19 (-0.03%)
FB   264.52 (-0.50%)
GOOGL   2,073.74 (+0.66%)
AMZN   3,152.50 (-1.31%)
TSLA   728.62 (+4.26%)
NVDA   571.77 (+1.08%)
BABA   249.79 (-1.17%)
CGC   35.68 (+1.05%)
GE   13.12 (+4.21%)
MU   90.91 (+3.04%)
NIO   51.38 (+4.62%)
AMD   86.08 (+1.58%)
T   29.38 (+0.69%)
F   12.02 (+3.44%)
ACB   11.44 (+2.05%)
DIS   199.27 (+1.11%)
BA   227.67 (+7.33%)
NFLX   550.80 (+0.85%)
BAC   36.27 (+2.11%)
Log in
NYSE:OXM

Oxford Industries Competitors

$79.17
+2.23 (+2.90 %)
(As of 02/24/2021 01:05 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$77.90
Now: $79.17
$79.78
50-Day Range
$64.38
MA: $71.11
$76.58
52-Week Range
$30.37
Now: $79.17
$77.27
Volume591 shs
Average Volume92,672 shs
Market Capitalization$1.34 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend Yield1.31%
Beta1.61

Competitors

Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) Vs. VFC, TPR, RL, COLM, PVH, and HBI

Should you be buying OXM stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "apparel accessories & luxury goods" are considered alternatives and competitors to Oxford Industries, including V.F. (VFC), Tapestry (TPR), Ralph Lauren (RL), Columbia Sportswear (COLM), PVH (PVH), and Hanesbrands (HBI).

Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) and V.F. (NYSE:VFC) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Oxford Industries and V.F., as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Oxford Industries02302.60
V.F.151402.65

Oxford Industries currently has a consensus price target of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. V.F. has a consensus price target of $88.1765, indicating a potential upside of 8.10%. Given V.F.'s stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe V.F. is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Risk & Volatility

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, V.F. has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Oxford Industries and V.F.'s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33
V.F.$10.49 billion3.04$679.45 million$2.6830.37

V.F. has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than V.F., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Oxford Industries and V.F.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%
V.F.-0.52%16.44%4.78%

Dividends

Oxford Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. V.F. pays an annual dividend of $1.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Oxford Industries pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. V.F. pays out 73.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Oxford Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and V.F. has raised its dividend for 49 consecutive years. V.F. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of V.F. shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of V.F. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

V.F. beats Oxford Industries on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Tapestry and Oxford Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tapestry061802.75
Oxford Industries02302.60

Tapestry presently has a consensus target price of $33.3913, indicating a potential downside of 19.40%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. Given Oxford Industries' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Oxford Industries is more favorable than Tapestry.

Risk & Volatility

Tapestry has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tapestry and Oxford Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tapestry$4.96 billion2.31$-652,100,000.00$0.9742.59
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33

Oxford Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tapestry. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Tapestry and Oxford Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tapestry-9.22%11.91%3.91%
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

85.9% of Tapestry shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tapestry shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Oxford Industries beats Tapestry on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ralph Lauren (NYSE:RL) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Ralph Lauren and Oxford Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ralph Lauren08902.53
Oxford Industries02302.60

Ralph Lauren presently has a consensus target price of $109.8235, indicating a potential downside of 7.55%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. Given Ralph Lauren's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Ralph Lauren is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Risk & Volatility

Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Ralph Lauren and Oxford Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ralph Lauren$6.16 billion1.41$384.30 million$6.5618.09
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33

Ralph Lauren has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Ralph Lauren is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Ralph Lauren and Oxford Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ralph Lauren-1.74%5.14%1.86%
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

65.4% of Ralph Lauren shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.3% of Ralph Lauren shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ralph Lauren beats Oxford Industries on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear (NASDAQ:COLM) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Columbia Sportswear and Oxford Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Columbia Sportswear06502.45
Oxford Industries02302.60

Columbia Sportswear presently has a consensus target price of $99.8889, indicating a potential downside of 5.63%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. Given Columbia Sportswear's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Risk & Volatility

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Columbia Sportswear and Oxford Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Columbia Sportswear$3.04 billion2.31$330.49 million$4.7222.46
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33

Columbia Sportswear has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Columbia Sportswear and Oxford Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Columbia Sportswear4.97%7.30%4.61%
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

40.6% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.2% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Columbia Sportswear beats Oxford Industries on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

PVH (NYSE:PVH) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk and profitability.

Risk & Volatility

PVH has a beta of 2.33, indicating that its stock price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.7% of PVH shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of PVH shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PVH and Oxford Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PVH$9.91 billion0.73$417.30 million$9.5410.69
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33

PVH has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. PVH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for PVH and Oxford Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
PVH171002.50
Oxford Industries02302.60

PVH presently has a consensus target price of $90.80, indicating a potential downside of 10.44%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. Given PVH's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe PVH is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Profitability

This table compares PVH and Oxford Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
PVH-14.99%0.52%0.19%
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%

Summary

PVH beats Oxford Industries on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hanesbrands (NYSE:HBI) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Hanesbrands and Oxford Industries, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hanesbrands14412.50
Oxford Industries02302.60

Hanesbrands presently has a consensus target price of $15.65, indicating a potential downside of 14.20%. Oxford Industries has a consensus target price of $67.80, indicating a potential downside of 15.02%. Given Hanesbrands' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hanesbrands is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Dividends

Hanesbrands pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Oxford Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Hanesbrands pays out 34.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oxford Industries pays out 23.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hanesbrands has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Oxford Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.2% of Hanesbrands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Hanesbrands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hanesbrands and Oxford Industries' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hanesbrands$6.97 billion0.91$600.72 million$1.7610.30
Oxford Industries$1.12 billion1.19$68.49 million$4.3218.33

Hanesbrands has higher revenue and earnings than Oxford Industries. Hanesbrands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oxford Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Hanesbrands has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.61, meaning that its share price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Hanesbrands and Oxford Industries' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hanesbrands6.68%52.04%7.15%
Oxford Industries-8.26%-2.98%-1.36%

Summary

Hanesbrands beats Oxford Industries on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


Oxford Industries Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
V.F. logo
VFC
V.F.
2.6$81.39+2.1%$31.23 billion$10.49 billion-626.08
Tapestry logo
TPR
Tapestry
1.6$41.31+1.6%$11.29 billion$4.96 billion-25.82Analyst Upgrade
Ralph Lauren logo
RL
Ralph Lauren
1.8$118.65+1.3%$8.56 billion$6.16 billion-94.92
Columbia Sportswear logo
COLM
Columbia Sportswear
1.5$105.99+1.3%$6.92 billion$3.04 billion57.60Analyst Report
Insider Selling
PVH logo
PVH
PVH
1.5$101.94+4.8%$6.90 billion$9.91 billion-6.36
Hanesbrands logo
HBI
Hanesbrands
2.5$18.13+0.7%$6.28 billion$6.97 billion14.62
Carter's logo
CRI
Carter's
1.4$92.16+0.1%$4.03 billion$3.52 billion30.32Upcoming Earnings
G-III Apparel Group logo
GIII
G-III Apparel Group
1.6$29.61+1.6%$1.41 billion$3.16 billion43.54
Fossil Group logo
FOSL
Fossil Group
0.9$15.30+3.5%$814.83 million$2.22 billion-7.81
Movado Group logo
MOV
Movado Group
1.2$22.25+1.8%$506.79 million$700.97 million-3.72
Vera Bradley logo
VRA
Vera Bradley
1.1$9.39+0.6%$311.75 million$495.21 million72.24
Iconix Brand Group logo
ICON
Iconix Brand Group
0.5$2.57+4.7%$31.90 million$148.98 million-0.26News Coverage
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 2/24/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.