V.F. (VFC) Competitors

V.F. currently has a consensus price target of $17.31, indicating a potential upside of 20.79%. Steven Madden has a consensus price target of $51.80, indicating a potential upside of 12.68%. Given V.F.'s higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe V.F. is more favorable than Steven Madden.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 5.23% compared to V.F.'s net margin of 2.88%. V.F.'s return on equity of 18.91% beat Steven Madden's return on equity.

V.F. has higher revenue and earnings than Steven Madden. V.F. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steven Madden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

V.F. has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steven Madden has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market.

V.F. pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Steven Madden pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. V.F. pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

86.8% of V.F. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.9% of Steven Madden shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of V.F. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Steven Madden shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, V.F. had 15 more articles in the media than Steven Madden. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for V.F. and 2 mentions for Steven Madden. V.F.'s average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Steven Madden's score of 0.38 indicating that V.F. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

V.F. has higher revenue and earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than V.F., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, V.F. had 10 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for V.F. and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat V.F.'s score of 0.72 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

V.F. pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. V.F. pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

V.F. has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

86.8% of V.F. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of V.F. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

V.F. has a net margin of 2.88% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. V.F.'s return on equity of 18.91% beat Brunswick's return on equity.

V.F. presently has a consensus price target of $17.31, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Brunswick has a consensus price target of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.43%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than V.F..

Ralph Lauren has lower revenue, but higher earnings than V.F.. V.F. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ralph Lauren, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

V.F. has a beta of 1.56, meaning that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ralph Lauren has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Ralph Lauren has a net margin of 11.76% compared to V.F.'s net margin of 2.88%. Ralph Lauren's return on equity of 39.10% beat V.F.'s return on equity.

In the previous week, V.F. had 12 more articles in the media than Ralph Lauren. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for V.F. and 5 mentions for Ralph Lauren. V.F.'s average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Ralph Lauren's score of 0.72 indicating that V.F. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

V.F. pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Ralph Lauren pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. V.F. pays out 52.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ralph Lauren pays out 25.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Ralph Lauren has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

V.F. currently has a consensus target price of $17.31, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Ralph Lauren has a consensus target price of $449.00, suggesting a potential upside of 23.47%. Given Ralph Lauren's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ralph Lauren is more favorable than V.F..

86.8% of V.F. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Ralph Lauren shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of V.F. shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 37.2% of Ralph Lauren shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, V.F. had 15 more articles in the media than Amer Sports. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for V.F. and 2 mentions for Amer Sports. V.F.'s average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Amer Sports' score of 0.00 indicating that V.F. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Amer Sports has lower revenue, but higher earnings than V.F.. V.F. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Amer Sports, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Amer Sports has a net margin of 7.35% compared to V.F.'s net margin of 2.88%. V.F.'s return on equity of 18.91% beat Amer Sports' return on equity.

86.8% of V.F. shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Amer Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of V.F. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

V.F. has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Amer Sports has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its stock price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

V.F. presently has a consensus price target of $17.31, suggesting a potential upside of 20.79%. Amer Sports has a consensus price target of $44.77, suggesting a potential upside of 64.73%. Given Amer Sports' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Amer Sports is more favorable than V.F..