Columbia Sportswear (COLM) Competitors

92.1% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, G-III Apparel Group had 3 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for G-III Apparel Group and 5 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat G-III Apparel Group's score of 0.29 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

G-III Apparel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. G-III Apparel Group pays out 13.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to G-III Apparel Group's net margin of 4.75%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.20% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity.

Columbia Sportswear has higher revenue and earnings than G-III Apparel Group. G-III Apparel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

G-III Apparel Group presently has a consensus target price of $34.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.70%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $65.40, suggesting a potential upside of 14.90%. Given G-III Apparel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe G-III Apparel Group is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

In the previous week, lululemon athletica had 85 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 90 mentions for lululemon athletica and 5 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat lululemon athletica's score of -0.17 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

lululemon athletica has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

lululemon athletica has a net margin of 12.78% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 6.05%. lululemon athletica's return on equity of 27.69% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

lululemon athletica currently has a consensus price target of $111.54, indicating a potential upside of 12.70%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $65.40, indicating a potential upside of 14.90%. Given Columbia Sportswear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than lululemon athletica.

lululemon athletica has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

85.2% of lululemon athletica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of lululemon athletica shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear and Columbia Sportswear both had 5 articles in the media. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.78 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Columbia Sportswear presently has a consensus target price of $65.40, suggesting a potential upside of 14.90%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 24.51%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

Columbia Sportswear has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Eastman Chemical had 12 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Eastman Chemical and 5 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. Eastman Chemical's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.78 indicating that Eastman Chemical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.99%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.20% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.07, indicating that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

Eastman Chemical currently has a consensus target price of $79.17, suggesting a potential upside of 16.33%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $65.40, suggesting a potential upside of 14.90%. Given Eastman Chemical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Eastman Chemical is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Eastman Chemical pays out 87.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.