Columbia Sportswear (COLM) Competitors

G-III Apparel Group currently has a consensus price target of $29.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.19%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.66%. Given Columbia Sportswear's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than G-III Apparel Group.

G-III Apparel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. G-III Apparel Group pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to G-III Apparel Group's net margin of 2.28%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.78% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 5 more articles in the media than G-III Apparel Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 4 mentions for G-III Apparel Group. G-III Apparel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.40 indicating that G-III Apparel Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Columbia Sportswear has higher revenue and earnings than G-III Apparel Group. Columbia Sportswear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than G-III Apparel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.1% of G-III Apparel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of G-III Apparel Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear presently has a consensus price target of $62.67, indicating a potential downside of 3.66%. lululemon athletica has a consensus price target of $197.09, indicating a potential upside of 56.38%. Given lululemon athletica's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe lululemon athletica is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, lululemon athletica has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

lululemon athletica has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

lululemon athletica has a net margin of 14.22% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 4.98%. lululemon athletica's return on equity of 34.82% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

In the previous week, lululemon athletica had 37 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for lululemon athletica and 9 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.40 indicating that lululemon athletica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of lululemon athletica shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of lululemon athletica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 2 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.40 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.69%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.66%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Eastman Chemical pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.62%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.78% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 5 more articles in the media than Eastman Chemical. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 4 mentions for Eastman Chemical. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Eastman Chemical's score of 0.35 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Eastman Chemical presently has a consensus target price of $80.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.23%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 3.66%. Given Eastman Chemical's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Eastman Chemical is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.