Columbia Sportswear (COLM) Competitors

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to G-III Apparel Group's net margin of 4.34%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.20% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbia Sportswear currently has a consensus target price of $65.40, indicating a potential upside of 8.40%. G-III Apparel Group has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential downside of 2.31%. Given Columbia Sportswear's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than G-III Apparel Group.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 8 more articles in the media than G-III Apparel Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 7 mentions for G-III Apparel Group. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat G-III Apparel Group's score of 0.79 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Columbia Sportswear has higher revenue and earnings than G-III Apparel Group. G-III Apparel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. G-III Apparel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. G-III Apparel Group pays out 14.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Columbia Sportswear currently has a consensus price target of $65.40, indicating a potential upside of 8.40%. lululemon athletica has a consensus price target of $148.54, indicating a potential upside of 22.69%. Given lululemon athletica's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe lululemon athletica is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

lululemon athletica has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 6.05%. lululemon athletica's return on equity of 31.26% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

lululemon athletica has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, lululemon athletica has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, lululemon athletica had 12 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for lululemon athletica and 15 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.81 indicating that lululemon athletica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of lululemon athletica shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of lululemon athletica shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Columbia Sportswear currently has a consensus target price of $65.40, indicating a potential upside of 8.40%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.67%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbia Sportswear has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 10 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 5 mentions for Brunswick. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Brunswick's score of 0.71 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brunswick pays out -134.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Chemical, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear currently has a consensus price target of $65.40, indicating a potential upside of 8.40%. Eastman Chemical has a consensus price target of $79.17, indicating a potential upside of 6.69%. Given Columbia Sportswear's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than Eastman Chemical.

Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Columbia Sportswear pays out 31.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical pays out 87.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Eastman Chemical has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 6.05% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.99%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.20% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 6 more articles in the media than Eastman Chemical. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 9 mentions for Eastman Chemical. Eastman Chemical's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.81 indicating that Eastman Chemical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.