Columbia Sportswear (COLM) Competitors

Columbia Sportswear has higher revenue and earnings than G-III Apparel Group. G-III Apparel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, G-III Apparel Group had 1 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for G-III Apparel Group and 1 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. G-III Apparel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.70 indicating that G-III Apparel Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

92.1% of G-III Apparel Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of G-III Apparel Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

G-III Apparel Group presently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.84%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.01%. Given G-III Apparel Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe G-III Apparel Group is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

G-III Apparel Group pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. G-III Apparel Group pays out 14.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to G-III Apparel Group's net margin of 4.34%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.78% beat G-III Apparel Group's return on equity.

Columbia Sportswear presently has a consensus price target of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.01%. lululemon athletica has a consensus price target of $152.88, suggesting a potential upside of 40.36%. Given lululemon athletica's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe lululemon athletica is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

In the previous week, lululemon athletica had 38 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for lululemon athletica and 1 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. Columbia Sportswear's average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat lululemon athletica's score of 0.43 indicating that Columbia Sportswear is being referred to more favorably in the media.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.2% of lululemon athletica shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of lululemon athletica shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

lululemon athletica has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. lululemon athletica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, lululemon athletica has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

lululemon athletica has a net margin of 13.03% compared to Columbia Sportswear's net margin of 4.98%. lululemon athletica's return on equity of 31.26% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Brunswick had 7 more articles in the media than Columbia Sportswear. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Brunswick and 1 mentions for Columbia Sportswear. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.70 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Sportswear has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $87.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.21%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.01%. Given Brunswick's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Brunswick is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -2.47%. Brunswick's return on equity of 13.30% beat Columbia Sportswear's return on equity.

Brunswick pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Brunswick pays out -83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Brunswick has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Brunswick is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eastman Chemical has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

47.8% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.7% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by institutional investors. 51.9% of Columbia Sportswear shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Eastman Chemical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbia Sportswear has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Eastman Chemical's net margin of 4.62%. Columbia Sportswear's return on equity of 11.78% beat Eastman Chemical's return on equity.

Eastman Chemical has higher revenue and earnings than Columbia Sportswear. Eastman Chemical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Columbia Sportswear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Columbia Sportswear had 1 more articles in the media than Eastman Chemical. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Columbia Sportswear and 0 mentions for Eastman Chemical. Eastman Chemical's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Columbia Sportswear's score of 0.70 indicating that Eastman Chemical is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Columbia Sportswear pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Eastman Chemical pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Columbia Sportswear pays out 38.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Eastman Chemical pays out 97.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Eastman Chemical has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Eastman Chemical is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Columbia Sportswear presently has a consensus target price of $62.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.01%. Eastman Chemical has a consensus target price of $80.25, suggesting a potential upside of 15.58%. Given Eastman Chemical's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Eastman Chemical is more favorable than Columbia Sportswear.