Free Trial

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

Fossil Group logo
$6.95 +0.05 (+0.72%)
As of 02:16 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FOSL vs. CPRI, CRI, GIII, GOOS, and MOV

Should you buy Fossil Group stock or one of its competitors? Fossil Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Capri (CPRI), Carter's (CRI), G-III Apparel Group (GIII), Canada Goose (GOOS), and Movado Group (MOV). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "apparel, accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does Fossil Group compare to Capri?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Capri (NYSE:CPRI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Capri has a net margin of 4.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -7.09%. Capri's return on equity of 297.36% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fossil Group-7.09% -59.76% -7.53%
Capri 4.44%297.36%5.12%

Capri has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capri, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group$1.00B0.41-$78.30M-$1.28N/A
Capri$3.47B0.49$137M$1.3011.48

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capri has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 5 more articles in the media than Capri. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fossil Group and 0 mentions for Capri. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Capri's score of 0.50 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group Positive
Capri Positive

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.3% of Capri shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Fossil Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Capri shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fossil Group presently has a consensus target price of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.06%. Capri has a consensus target price of $21.93, suggesting a potential upside of 46.95%. Given Capri's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Capri is more favorable than Fossil Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fossil Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Capri
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Summary

Capri beats Fossil Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Carter's?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Carter's (NYSE:CRI) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

Carter's has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carter's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group$1.00B0.41-$78.30M-$1.28N/A
Carter's$2.98B0.39$91.80M$5.345.89

Carter's has a net margin of 6.55% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -7.09%. Carter's' return on equity of 12.78% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fossil Group-7.09% -59.76% -7.53%
Carter's 6.55%12.78%4.67%

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.55, meaning that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Carter's has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Fossil Group currently has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.06%. Carter's has a consensus price target of $39.38, suggesting a potential upside of 25.12%. Given Fossil Group's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Carter's.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fossil Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Carter's
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

In the previous week, Carter's had 4 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Carter's and 5 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Carter's' score of 0.41 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Carter's
2 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Carter's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carter's beats Fossil Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to G-III Apparel Group?

G-III Apparel Group (NASDAQ:GIII) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

G-III Apparel Group has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than G-III Apparel Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
G-III Apparel Group$2.96B0.40$67.35M$3.049.05
Fossil Group$1.00B0.41-$78.30M-$1.28N/A

G-III Apparel Group has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -7.09%. G-III Apparel Group's return on equity of 5.53% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
G-III Apparel Group4.75% 5.53% 3.71%
Fossil Group -7.09%-59.76%-7.53%

G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market.

G-III Apparel Group currently has a consensus price target of $34.75, indicating a potential upside of 26.36%. Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 34.06%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than G-III Apparel Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
G-III Apparel Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Fossil Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, G-III Apparel Group had 1 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for G-III Apparel Group and 5 mentions for Fossil Group. G-III Apparel Group's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.75 indicating that G-III Apparel Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
G-III Apparel Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Fossil Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

92.1% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Fossil Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

G-III Apparel Group beats Fossil Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Canada Goose?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Canada Goose (NYSE:GOOS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Fossil Group presently has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 34.06%. Canada Goose has a consensus price target of $11.78, suggesting a potential upside of 49.04%. Given Canada Goose's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than Fossil Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fossil Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Canada Goose
4 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Canada Goose has a net margin of 3.65% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -7.09%. Canada Goose's return on equity of 14.28% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fossil Group-7.09% -59.76% -7.53%
Canada Goose 3.65%14.28%4.56%

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.6% of Canada Goose shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Fossil Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Canada Goose shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Fossil Group and Fossil Group both had 5 articles in the media. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Canada Goose's score of 0.56 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Canada Goose
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Canada Goose has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Canada Goose, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group$1.00B0.41-$78.30M-$1.28N/A
Canada Goose$1.54B0.50$16.29M$0.3920.27

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Canada Goose has a beta of 1.65, suggesting that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Canada Goose beats Fossil Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Movado Group (NYSE:MOV) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Fossil Group presently has a consensus target price of $9.25, indicating a potential upside of 34.06%. Movado Group has a consensus target price of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.10%. Given Fossil Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Movado Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Fossil Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Movado Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.55, indicating that its share price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Movado Group has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Movado Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Movado Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group$1.00B0.41-$78.30M-$1.28N/A
Movado Group$671.31M1.07$26.55M$1.8017.91

Movado Group has a net margin of 6.00% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -7.09%. Movado Group's return on equity of 8.49% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Fossil Group-7.09% -59.76% -7.53%
Movado Group 6.00%8.49%5.78%

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Movado Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Fossil Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Movado Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Movado Group had 7 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Movado Group and 5 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Movado Group's score of 0.35 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Movado Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Movado Group beats Fossil Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fossil Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FOSL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FOSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FOSL vs. The Competition

MetricFossil GroupTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$411.01M$10.16B$12.53B$12.91B
Dividend YieldN/A2.70%79.04%19.59%
P/E Ratio-5.4322.7545.7525.26
Price / Sales0.429.5694.5775.17
Price / CashN/A188.3831.6552.75
Price / Book4.373.814.046.00
Net Income-$78.30M$462.50M$442.88M$380.56M
7 Day Performance-0.71%2.04%0.72%-3.34%
1 Month Performance37.90%3.06%-0.99%-5.89%
1 Year Performance85.33%6.84%-4.92%-5.56%

Fossil Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FOSL
Fossil Group
4.0103 of 5 stars
$6.95
+0.7%
$9.25
+33.1%
+160.4%$411.01M$985.17MN/A4,500
CPRI
Capri
4.7799 of 5 stars
$14.71
+1.5%
$21.93
+49.1%
-25.4%$1.67B$3.45B11.3011,200
CRI
Carter's
3.7951 of 5 stars
$33.54
+3.8%
$40.88
+21.9%
+0.7%$1.23B$2.98B6.2815,400
GIII
G-III Apparel Group
4.8223 of 5 stars
$27.04
+0.2%
$34.75
+28.5%
+3.7%$1.16B$2.96B8.894,500
GOOS
Canada Goose
3.9309 of 5 stars
$7.70
+1.1%
$11.78
+53.0%
-41.4%$751.50M$1.54B19.734,289

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FOSL) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners