Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

$4.26 +0.18 (+4.29%)

As of 01:01 PM Eastern

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

Should you buy Fossil Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fossil Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fossil Group include Movado Group (MOV), Oxford Industries (OXM), Vera Bradley (VRA), Icon Energy (ICON), and Tapestry (TPR). These companies are all part of the "apparel accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Movado Group (NYSE:MOV) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

72.1% of Movado Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.8% of Movado Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Movado Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Movado Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Movado Group	$671.31M	0.93	$26.55M	$1.16	24.31
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 11 more articles in the media than Movado Group. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Fossil Group and 3 mentions for Movado Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Movado Group's score of 0.25 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Movado Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fossil Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Movado Group has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Movado Group presently has a consensus target price of $30.75, suggesting a potential upside of 9.06%. Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.51%. Given Fossil Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Movado Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Movado Group	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Movado Group has a net margin of 3.96% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Movado Group's return on equity of 6.09% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Movado Group	3.96%	6.09%	4.07%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Summary

Movado Group beats Fossil Group on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Oxford Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fossil Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A
Oxford Industries	$1.48B	0.41	-$27.89M	-$1.94	N/A

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 13 more articles in the media than Oxford Industries. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Fossil Group and 1 mentions for Oxford Industries. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.00 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Oxford Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Fossil Group currently has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.51%. Oxford Industries has a consensus price target of $38.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.18%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Oxford Industries	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.71

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Oxford Industries' return on equity of 5.68% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%
Oxford Industries	-1.89%	5.68%	2.41%

Summary

Fossil Group and Oxford Industries tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Vera Bradley (NASDAQ:VRA) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

59.9% of Vera Bradley shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of Vera Bradley shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.51%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Vera Bradley.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vera Bradley	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.7, suggesting that its share price is 70% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.64, suggesting that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 12 more articles in the media than Vera Bradley. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Fossil Group and 2 mentions for Vera Bradley. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Vera Bradley's score of 0.05 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vera Bradley	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fossil Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Vera Bradley has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vera Bradley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vera Bradley	$269.65M	0.36	-$47.84M	-$1.72	N/A
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Fossil Group has a net margin of -6.19% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of -17.74%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -12.00% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vera Bradley	-17.74%	-12.00%	-6.48%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Summary

Fossil Group beats Vera Bradley on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its share price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon Energy has a beta of 5.39, indicating that its share price is 439% more volatile than the broader market.

Icon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A

Icon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.08	-$4.20M	-$23.65	N/A

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 14 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Fossil Group and 0 mentions for Icon Energy. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Icon Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group	Neutral
Icon Energy	Neutral

Fossil Group currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.51%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Fossil Group beats Icon Energy on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

90.8% of Tapestry shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tapestry shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Tapestry has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Tapestry's return on equity of 229.70% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tapestry	8.44%	229.70%	22.06%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Tapestry has a beta of 1.45, indicating that its stock price is 45% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.64, indicating that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Tapestry currently has a consensus price target of $160.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.58%. Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 64.51%. Given Fossil Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Tapestry.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tapestry	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Tapestry has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tapestry	$7.01B	4.01	$183.20M	$3.12	44.55
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

In the previous week, Tapestry had 2 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Tapestry and 14 mentions for Fossil Group. Tapestry's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.29 indicating that Tapestry is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tapestry	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fossil Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Tapestry beats Fossil Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fossil Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FOSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FOSL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fossil Group	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$251.47M	$9.66B	$27.03B	$12.34B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.99%	178.44%	5.33%
P/E Ratio	-3.73	16.05	19.51	25.65
Price / Sales	0.25	1.09	4.05	85.61
Price / Cash	N/A	11.92	14.93	56.16
Price / Book	3.02	3.93	5.18	7.06
Net Income	-$78.30M	$350.89M	$957.86M	$335.04M
7 Day Performance	4.80%	3.36%	3.39%	2.60%
1 Month Performance	-19.87%	-9.52%	-1.65%	1.42%
1 Year Performance	174.52%	20.40%	0.79%	35.67%

Fossil Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FOSL Fossil Group	3.0976 of 5 stars	$4.26 +4.3%	$7.00 +64.5%	+172.0%	$251.47M	$1.00B	N/A	4,500	Insider Trade
MOV Movado Group	3.1788 of 5 stars	$26.65 +0.3%	$30.75 +15.4%	+63.1%	$589.54M	$671.31M	23.02	1,386	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings
OXM Oxford Industries	1.7736 of 5 stars	$38.07 -1.6%	$38.00 -0.2%	-27.0%	$566.64M	$1.48B	N/A	6,000
VRA Vera Bradley	1.1472 of 5 stars	$3.28 -4.8%	N/A	+71.6%	$93.14M	$269.65M	N/A	1,360	Gap Down
ICON Icon Energy	0.5605 of 5 stars	$1.31 -6.4%	N/A	-83.6%	$904K	$11.26M	N/A	N/A	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FOSL) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MOV or FOSL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MOV or FOSL?

Does the media favor MOV or FOSL?

Which has more volatility and risk, MOV or FOSL?

Do analysts rate MOV or FOSL?

Is MOV or FOSL more profitable?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, FOSL or OXM?

Which has more risk and volatility, FOSL or OXM?

Does the media prefer FOSL or OXM?

Do analysts recommend FOSL or OXM?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FOSL or OXM?

Is FOSL or OXM more profitable?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in VRA or FOSL?

Do analysts prefer VRA or FOSL?

Which has more risk and volatility, VRA or FOSL?

Does the media favor VRA or FOSL?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, VRA or FOSL?

Is VRA or FOSL more profitable?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Which has more volatility & risk, FOSL or ICON?

Is FOSL or ICON more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FOSL or ICON?

Does the media refer more to FOSL or ICON?

Do analysts recommend FOSL or ICON?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FOSL or ICON?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TPR or FOSL?

Is TPR or FOSL more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, TPR or FOSL?

Do analysts rate TPR or FOSL?

Which has better valuation and earnings, TPR or FOSL?

Does the media favor TPR or FOSL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools