Does the media favor OXM or FOSL?

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.20 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Industries 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate VRA or FOSL?

Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Vera Bradley. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vera Bradley 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Fossil Group 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media prefer VRA or FOSL?

In the previous week, Vera Bradley and Vera Bradley both had 1 articles in the media. Vera Bradley's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Vera Bradley is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vera Bradley 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate ICON or FOSL?

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Icon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Icon Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Fossil Group 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Which has better earnings and valuation, TPR or FOSL?

Tapestry has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tapestry $7.85B 3.71 $183.20M $3.12 46.22 Fossil Group $1.00B 0.25 -$78.30M -$1.14 N/A

Is TPR or FOSL more profitable?

Tapestry has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Tapestry's return on equity of 229.70% beat Fossil Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Tapestry 8.44% 229.70% 22.06% Fossil Group -6.19% -48.51% -7.06%

Does the media prefer TPR or FOSL?

In the previous week, Tapestry had 11 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Tapestry and 1 mentions for Fossil Group. Tapestry's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Tapestry is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tapestry 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

$4.23 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.24 +0.00 (+0.12%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

Should you buy Fossil Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fossil Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fossil Group include Movado Group (MOV), Oxford Industries (OXM), Vera Bradley (VRA), Icon Energy (ICON), and Tapestry (TPR). These companies are all part of the "apparel accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Movado Group (NYSE:MOV) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.1% of Movado Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 30.8% of Movado Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Movado Group has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

Movado Group has a net margin of 4.70% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Movado Group's return on equity of 7.13% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%
Movado Group	4.70%	7.13%	4.81%

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 1 more articles in the media than Movado Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fossil Group and 0 mentions for Movado Group. Movado Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Movado Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group	Neutral
Movado Group	Positive

Movado Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Movado Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A
Movado Group	$671.31M	1.24	$26.55M	$1.40	26.82

Fossil Group presently has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.48%. Movado Group has a consensus target price of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.52%. Given Fossil Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Movado Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Movado Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

Summary

Movado Group beats Fossil Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Oxford Industries currently has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.48%. Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -2.65% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Oxford Industries' return on equity of 4.55% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Industries	-2.65%	4.55%	1.87%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 2 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Oxford Industries and 1 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.20 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Industries	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fossil Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Industries	$1.48B	0.35	-$27.89M	-$2.64	N/A
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Oxford Industries beats Fossil Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Vera Bradley (NASDAQ:VRA) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Vera Bradley has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Vera Bradley is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fossil Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vera Bradley	$269.65M	0.41	-$47.84M	-$0.69	N/A
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Vera Bradley.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vera Bradley	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Vera Bradley and Vera Bradley both had 1 articles in the media. Vera Bradley's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Vera Bradley is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vera Bradley	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

59.9% of Vera Bradley shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of Vera Bradley shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fossil Group has a net margin of -6.19% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of -7.02%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -6.66% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vera Bradley	-7.02%	-6.66%	-3.65%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Summary

Fossil Group beats Vera Bradley on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Icon Energy has a beta of 5.74, suggesting that its stock price is 474% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Icon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.06	-$4.20M	-$23.98	N/A
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Fossil Group had 1 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Fossil Group and 0 mentions for Icon Energy. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy	Neutral
Fossil Group	Neutral

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Icon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Summary

Icon Energy and Fossil Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

Tapestry currently has a consensus price target of $167.65, suggesting a potential upside of 16.27%. Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 65.48%. Given Fossil Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Tapestry.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tapestry	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

90.8% of Tapestry shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Tapestry shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Tapestry had 11 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Tapestry and 1 mentions for Fossil Group. Tapestry's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.34 indicating that Tapestry is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tapestry	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Tapestry has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Tapestry's return on equity of 229.70% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tapestry	8.44%	229.70%	22.06%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Tapestry has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Tapestry has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tapestry	$7.85B	3.71	$183.20M	$3.12	46.22
Fossil Group	$1.00B	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Summary

Tapestry beats Fossil Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fossil Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FOSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FOSL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fossil Group	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$249.99M	$10.20B	$26.80B	$12.41B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.08%	175.36%	6.14%
P/E Ratio	-3.71	15.47	21.31	24.94
Price / Sales	0.25	1.07	3.54	94.44
Price / Cash	N/A	12.07	14.16	59.26
Price / Book	2.66	4.38	6.38	6.46
Net Income	-$78.30M	$378.06M	$960.18M	$336.81M
7 Day Performance	1.44%	0.07%	1.22%	2.55%
1 Month Performance	1.93%	-1.32%	16.57%	0.32%
1 Year Performance	153.29%	15.78%	0.08%	25.76%

Fossil Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FOSL Fossil Group	3.3666 of 5 stars	$4.23 flat	$7.00 +65.5%	+167.7%	$249.99M	$1.00B	N/A	4,500
MOV Movado Group	4.0183 of 5 stars	$39.23 -0.5%	$40.00 +2.0%	+139.3%	$866.09M	$671.31M	28.02	1,386	Positive News
OXM Oxford Industries	4.483 of 5 stars	$34.69 +0.0%	$40.00 +15.3%	-15.1%	$517.79M	$1.48B	N/A	6,000
VRA Vera Bradley	2.0768 of 5 stars	$3.85 -3.3%	N/A	+66.5%	$109.46M	$273.70M	N/A	1,360	Positive News
ICON Icon Energy	0.347 of 5 stars	$0.97 +3.6%	N/A	-92.2%	$674K	$13.38M	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FOSL) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of FOSL or MOV?

Which has more volatility & risk, FOSL or MOV?

Is FOSL or MOV more profitable?

Does the media prefer FOSL or MOV?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FOSL or MOV?

Do analysts rate FOSL or MOV?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Do analysts rate OXM or FOSL?

Is OXM or FOSL more profitable?

Does the media favor OXM or FOSL?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OXM or FOSL?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, OXM or FOSL?

Which has more risk & volatility, OXM or FOSL?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Which has more risk & volatility, VRA or FOSL?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, VRA or FOSL?

Do analysts rate VRA or FOSL?

Does the media prefer VRA or FOSL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of VRA or FOSL?

Is VRA or FOSL more profitable?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Which has more risk & volatility, ICON or FOSL?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ICON or FOSL?

Do analysts rate ICON or FOSL?

Does the media prefer ICON or FOSL?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ICON or FOSL?

Is ICON or FOSL more profitable?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Do analysts prefer TPR or FOSL?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TPR or FOSL?

Does the media prefer TPR or FOSL?

Is TPR or FOSL more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TPR or FOSL?

Which has better earnings and valuation, TPR or FOSL?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools