Does the media refer more to MOV or FOSL?

In the previous week, Movado Group had 4 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Movado Group and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Movado Group's score of 0.86 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Movado Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer OXM or FOSL?

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 21 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Oxford Industries and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.41 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Oxford Industries 3 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 10 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate VRA or FOSL?

Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Vera Bradley. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vera Bradley 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Fossil Group 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media favor VRA or FOSL?

In the previous week, Vera Bradley had 8 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vera Bradley and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Vera Bradley's score of 0.37 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Vera Bradley 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ICON or FOSL?

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Icon Energy. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Icon Energy 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Fossil Group 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Does the media refer more to ICON or FOSL?

In the previous week, Icon Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Icon Energy and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Icon Energy 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better earnings and valuation, FOSL or TPR?

Tapestry has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fossil Group $995.87M 0.25 -$78.30M -$1.14 N/A Tapestry $7.85B 3.69 $183.20M $3.12 45.93

Is FOSL or TPR more profitable?

Tapestry has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Tapestry's return on equity of 229.70% beat Fossil Group's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fossil Group -6.19% -48.51% -7.06% Tapestry 8.44% 229.70% 22.06%

Does the media prefer FOSL or TPR?

In the previous week, Tapestry had 19 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Tapestry and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Tapestry's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Tapestry is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fossil Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Tapestry 15 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

$4.16 -0.05 (-1.07%)

As of 02:46 PM Eastern

Compare

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

Should you buy Fossil Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Fossil Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Fossil Group include Movado Group (MOV), Oxford Industries (OXM), Vera Bradley (VRA), Icon Energy (ICON), and Tapestry (TPR). These companies are all part of the "apparel accessories & luxury goods" industry.

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Movado Group (NYSE:MOV) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends and profitability.

Movado Group has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Movado Group has a net margin of 4.70% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Movado Group's return on equity of 7.13% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Movado Group	4.70%	7.13%	4.81%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Movado Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Movado Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Movado Group	$681.94M	1.21	$26.55M	$1.40	26.77
Fossil Group	$995.87M	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

72.1% of Movado Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 30.8% of Movado Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Movado Group currently has a consensus target price of $40.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.74%. Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Movado Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Movado Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Movado Group had 4 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Movado Group and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Movado Group's score of 0.86 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Movado Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Movado Group beats Fossil Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Oxford Industries (NYSE:OXM) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

91.2% of Oxford Industries shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Oxford Industries shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oxford Industries has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Industries presently has a consensus target price of $40.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.76%. Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Oxford Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Oxford Industries	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Oxford Industries had 21 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Oxford Industries and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Oxford Industries' score of 0.41 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Oxford Industries	3 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	10 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Oxford Industries has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Oxford Industries' return on equity of 5.68% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Oxford Industries	-1.89%	5.68%	2.41%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Oxford Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Oxford Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fossil Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Oxford Industries	$1.48B	0.36	-$27.89M	-$1.94	N/A
Fossil Group	$995.87M	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Summary

Oxford Industries beats Fossil Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Vera Bradley (NASDAQ:VRA) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Fossil Group has a net margin of -6.19% compared to Vera Bradley's net margin of -17.74%. Vera Bradley's return on equity of -12.00% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vera Bradley	-17.74%	-12.00%	-6.48%
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Vera Bradley has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vera Bradley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vera Bradley	$269.65M	0.36	-$47.84M	-$1.72	N/A
Fossil Group	$995.87M	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

59.9% of Vera Bradley shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.1% of Fossil Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of Vera Bradley shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Vera Bradley has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Fossil Group has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Vera Bradley.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vera Bradley	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, Vera Bradley had 8 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Vera Bradley and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Fossil Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Vera Bradley's score of 0.37 indicating that Fossil Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Vera Bradley	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Fossil Group beats Vera Bradley on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) are both small-cap apparel accessories & luxury goods companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Icon Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy	$11.26M	0.05	-$4.20M	-$23.65	N/A
Fossil Group	$995.87M	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A

Icon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Icon Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Icon Energy	N/A	N/A	N/A
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%

Icon Energy has a beta of 5.75, meaning that its share price is 475% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fossil Group has a beta of 1.62, meaning that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Fossil Group has a consensus price target of $7.00, suggesting a potential upside of 67.66%. Given Fossil Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Icon Energy	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Icon Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Icon Energy and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Icon Energy beats Fossil Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Fossil Group (NASDAQ:FOSL) and Tapestry (NYSE:TPR) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Fossil Group currently has a consensus target price of $7.00, indicating a potential upside of 67.66%. Tapestry has a consensus target price of $161.22, indicating a potential upside of 12.50%. Given Fossil Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Fossil Group is more favorable than Tapestry.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fossil Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Tapestry	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Tapestry has higher revenue and earnings than Fossil Group. Fossil Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tapestry, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fossil Group	$995.87M	0.25	-$78.30M	-$1.14	N/A
Tapestry	$7.85B	3.69	$183.20M	$3.12	45.93

Fossil Group has a beta of 1.62, indicating that its stock price is 62% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tapestry has a beta of 1.42, indicating that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

Tapestry has a net margin of 8.44% compared to Fossil Group's net margin of -6.19%. Tapestry's return on equity of 229.70% beat Fossil Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fossil Group	-6.19%	-48.51%	-7.06%
Tapestry	8.44%	229.70%	22.06%

61.1% of Fossil Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Tapestry shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Fossil Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Tapestry shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tapestry had 19 more articles in the media than Fossil Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Tapestry and 2 mentions for Fossil Group. Tapestry's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Fossil Group's score of 0.93 indicating that Tapestry is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fossil Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Tapestry	15 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Tapestry beats Fossil Group on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Fossil Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FOSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FOSL vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Fossil Group	RETAIL Industry	Retail Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$246.75M	$10.26B	$26.75B	$11.87B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.07%	178.44%	5.62%
P/E Ratio	-3.66	15.60	19.97	24.00
Price / Sales	0.25	1.11	3.79	86.25
Price / Cash	N/A	12.27	14.56	54.72
Price / Book	2.63	4.51	6.25	6.79
Net Income	-$78.30M	$377.89M	$963.17M	$337.41M
7 Day Performance	2.58%	1.13%	2.15%	-1.35%
1 Month Performance	-6.18%	4.50%	2.87%	1.44%
1 Year Performance	206.99%	25.07%	0.68%	25.96%

Fossil Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FOSL Fossil Group	3.3812 of 5 stars	$4.16 -1.1%	$7.00 +68.5%	+197.9%	$244.92M	$995.87M	N/A	4,500
MOV Movado Group	4.4385 of 5 stars	$36.28 -3.9%	$40.00 +10.3%	+124.2%	$812.77M	$671.31M	26.29	1,386	Analyst Revision
OXM Oxford Industries	3.6218 of 5 stars	$42.70 -4.1%	$42.50 -0.5%	-20.0%	$634.62M	$1.48B	N/A	6,000	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Gap Down
VRA Vera Bradley	1.2246 of 5 stars	$3.26 -1.2%	N/A	+35.3%	$92.71M	$269.65M	N/A	1,360	News Coverage Earnings Report Gap Up
ICON Icon Energy	1.4095 of 5 stars	$1.04 -4.6%	N/A	-89.9%	$720K	$11.26M	N/A	N/A	Earnings Report Short Interest Decrease Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FOSL) was last updated on 6/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Fossil Group (FOSL) Competitors

FOSL vs. MOV, OXM, VRA, ICON, and TPR

How does Fossil Group compare to Movado Group?

Which has more volatility & risk, MOV or FOSL?

Is MOV or FOSL more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MOV or FOSL?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in MOV or FOSL?

Do analysts rate MOV or FOSL?

Does the media refer more to MOV or FOSL?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Oxford Industries?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in OXM or FOSL?

Which has more volatility & risk, OXM or FOSL?

Do analysts recommend OXM or FOSL?

Does the media prefer OXM or FOSL?

Is OXM or FOSL more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, OXM or FOSL?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Vera Bradley?

Is VRA or FOSL more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, VRA or FOSL?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in VRA or FOSL?

Which has more risk and volatility, VRA or FOSL?

Do analysts rate VRA or FOSL?

Does the media favor VRA or FOSL?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Icon Energy?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ICON or FOSL?

Is ICON or FOSL more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, ICON or FOSL?

Do analysts prefer ICON or FOSL?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of ICON or FOSL?

Does the media refer more to ICON or FOSL?

Summary

How does Fossil Group compare to Tapestry?

Do analysts rate FOSL or TPR?

Which has better earnings and valuation, FOSL or TPR?

Which has more risk and volatility, FOSL or TPR?

Is FOSL or TPR more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in FOSL or TPR?

Does the media prefer FOSL or TPR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

FOSL vs. The Competition

Fossil Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools