General Mills (GIS) Competitors

Campbell's has higher earnings, but lower revenue than General Mills. General Mills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Campbell's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

52.3% of Campbell's shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of General Mills shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Campbell's shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of General Mills shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Campbell's pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.0%. General Mills pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Campbell's pays out 77.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. General Mills pays out -1,355.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Mills has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Campbell's presently has a consensus price target of $21.20, suggesting a potential downside of 5.44%. General Mills has a consensus price target of $39.16, suggesting a potential upside of 5.23%. Given General Mills' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe General Mills is more favorable than Campbell's.

In the previous week, General Mills had 12 more articles in the media than Campbell's. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for General Mills and 4 mentions for Campbell's. Campbell's' average media sentiment score of 1.49 beat General Mills' score of 1.12 indicating that Campbell's is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Campbell's has a net margin of 6.12% compared to General Mills' net margin of -0.48%. General Mills' return on equity of 21.37% beat Campbell's' return on equity.

Campbell's has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Mills has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Interparfums has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Mills has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Interparfums had 1 more articles in the media than General Mills. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Interparfums and 16 mentions for General Mills. General Mills' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Interparfums' score of 0.29 indicating that General Mills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Interparfums has higher earnings, but lower revenue than General Mills. General Mills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interparfums, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Interparfums has a net margin of 11.17% compared to General Mills' net margin of -0.48%. General Mills' return on equity of 21.37% beat Interparfums' return on equity.

Interparfums pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. General Mills pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Interparfums pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. General Mills pays out -1,355.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Interparfums has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and General Mills has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. General Mills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

55.6% of Interparfums shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of General Mills shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.6% of Interparfums shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of General Mills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Interparfums presently has a consensus price target of $119.43, suggesting a potential downside of 0.05%. General Mills has a consensus price target of $39.16, suggesting a potential upside of 5.23%. Given General Mills' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe General Mills is more favorable than Interparfums.

General Mills has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kraft Heinz. General Mills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kraft Heinz, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

General Mills presently has a consensus price target of $39.16, indicating a potential upside of 5.23%. Kraft Heinz has a consensus price target of $23.63, indicating a potential downside of 5.23%. Given General Mills' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe General Mills is more favorable than Kraft Heinz.

In the previous week, Kraft Heinz had 30 more articles in the media than General Mills. MarketBeat recorded 46 mentions for Kraft Heinz and 16 mentions for General Mills. General Mills' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Kraft Heinz's score of 0.60 indicating that General Mills is being referred to more favorably in the media.

75.7% of General Mills shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of General Mills shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Kraft Heinz shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

General Mills has a net margin of -0.48% compared to Kraft Heinz's net margin of -13.64%. General Mills' return on equity of 21.37% beat Kraft Heinz's return on equity.

General Mills has a beta of -0.03, meaning that its share price is 103% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market.

General Mills pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Kraft Heinz pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. General Mills pays out -1,355.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kraft Heinz pays out -55.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. General Mills has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. General Mills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. General Mills pays an annual dividend of $2.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. General Mills pays out -1,355.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark has raised its dividend for 54 consecutive years and General Mills has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. General Mills is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Kimberly-Clark had 25 more articles in the media than General Mills. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Kimberly-Clark and 16 mentions for General Mills. General Mills' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Kimberly-Clark's score of 0.56 indicating that General Mills is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of General Mills shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of General Mills shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kimberly-Clark has higher earnings, but lower revenue than General Mills. General Mills is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimberly-Clark, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, General Mills has a beta of -0.03, indicating that its stock price is 103% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus price target of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 9.17%. General Mills has a consensus price target of $39.16, suggesting a potential upside of 5.23%. Given Kimberly-Clark's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than General Mills.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.79% compared to General Mills' net margin of -0.48%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat General Mills' return on equity.