McDonald's (MCD) Competitors

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McDonald's has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

McDonald's has a net margin of 31.85% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 9.15%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 56.61% beat McDonald's' return on equity.

In the previous week, McDonald's had 21 more articles in the media than PepsiCo. MarketBeat recorded 101 mentions for McDonald's and 80 mentions for PepsiCo. PepsiCo's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat McDonald's' score of 0.67 indicating that PepsiCo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

73.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of McDonald's shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of McDonald's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PepsiCo pays an annual dividend of $5.69 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. McDonald's pays an annual dividend of $7.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. PepsiCo pays out 89.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McDonald's pays out 62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PepsiCo has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years and McDonald's has increased its dividend for 49 consecutive years. PepsiCo is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

McDonald's has lower revenue, but higher earnings than PepsiCo. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PepsiCo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

PepsiCo currently has a consensus price target of $170.26, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. McDonald's has a consensus price target of $340.93, indicating a potential upside of 20.17%. Given McDonald's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe McDonald's is more favorable than PepsiCo.

McDonald's has higher revenue and earnings than Papa John's International. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Papa John's International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Papa John's International presently has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.21%. McDonald's has a consensus price target of $340.93, suggesting a potential upside of 20.17%. Given Papa John's International's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Papa John's International is more favorable than McDonald's.

Papa John's International has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, McDonald's has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Papa John's International pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. McDonald's pays an annual dividend of $7.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Papa John's International pays out 206.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McDonald's pays out 62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Papa John's International has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and McDonald's has increased its dividend for 49 consecutive years.

In the previous week, McDonald's had 90 more articles in the media than Papa John's International. MarketBeat recorded 101 mentions for McDonald's and 11 mentions for Papa John's International. McDonald's' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Papa John's International's score of 0.33 indicating that McDonald's is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

McDonald's has a net margin of 31.85% compared to Papa John's International's net margin of 1.44%. Papa John's International's return on equity of -11.16% beat McDonald's' return on equity.

70.3% of McDonald's shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Papa John's International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of McDonald's shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

McDonald's pays an annual dividend of $7.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Starbucks pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. McDonald's pays out 62.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Starbucks pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. McDonald's has raised its dividend for 49 consecutive years and Starbucks has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. McDonald's is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

McDonald's has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Starbucks. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Starbucks has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

70.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of McDonald's shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Starbucks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

McDonald's presently has a consensus price target of $340.93, suggesting a potential upside of 20.17%. Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given McDonald's' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe McDonald's is more favorable than Starbucks.

In the previous week, McDonald's had 28 more articles in the media than Starbucks. MarketBeat recorded 101 mentions for McDonald's and 73 mentions for Starbucks. Starbucks' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat McDonald's' score of 0.67 indicating that Starbucks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

McDonald's has a net margin of 31.85% compared to Starbucks' net margin of 3.89%. Starbucks' return on equity of -29.24% beat McDonald's' return on equity.

In the previous week, Tesla had 142 more articles in the media than McDonald's. MarketBeat recorded 243 mentions for Tesla and 101 mentions for McDonald's. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat McDonald's' score of 0.67 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

McDonald's has a net margin of 31.85% compared to Tesla's net margin of 3.95%. Tesla's return on equity of 4.89% beat McDonald's' return on equity.

McDonald's has a beta of 0.43, indicating that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tesla has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its stock price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500.

McDonald's has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tesla. McDonald's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

70.3% of McDonald's shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.2% of Tesla shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of McDonald's shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.9% of Tesla shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

McDonald's presently has a consensus price target of $340.93, suggesting a potential upside of 20.17%. Tesla has a consensus price target of $398.42, suggesting a potential downside of 0.08%. Given McDonald's' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe McDonald's is more favorable than Tesla.