Starbucks (SBUX) Competitors

Domino's Pizza has a beta of 1.02, meaning that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Starbucks has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Starbucks has higher revenue and earnings than Domino's Pizza. Domino's Pizza is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Starbucks had 50 more articles in the media than Domino's Pizza. MarketBeat recorded 73 mentions for Starbucks and 23 mentions for Domino's Pizza. Starbucks' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Domino's Pizza's score of -0.13 indicating that Starbucks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

94.6% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Domino's Pizza shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Starbucks shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Domino's Pizza has a net margin of 11.89% compared to Starbucks' net margin of 3.89%. Domino's Pizza's return on equity of -15.04% beat Starbucks' return on equity.

Domino's Pizza pays an annual dividend of $7.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Starbucks pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Domino's Pizza pays out 45.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Starbucks pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Domino's Pizza has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Starbucks has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Domino's Pizza is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Domino's Pizza presently has a consensus target price of $421.35, suggesting a potential upside of 29.78%. Starbucks has a consensus target price of $107.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Domino's Pizza's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Domino's Pizza is more favorable than Starbucks.

Alphabet has a net margin of 37.92% compared to Starbucks' net margin of 3.89%. Alphabet's return on equity of 38.99% beat Starbucks' return on equity.

Alphabet currently has a consensus price target of $406.71, suggesting a potential upside of 2.11%. Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Alphabet's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Alphabet is more favorable than Starbucks.

Alphabet has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Starbucks has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Alphabet had 209 more articles in the media than Starbucks. MarketBeat recorded 282 mentions for Alphabet and 73 mentions for Starbucks. Alphabet's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Starbucks' score of 0.79 indicating that Alphabet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Alphabet pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Starbucks pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Alphabet pays out 6.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Starbucks pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Alphabet has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Starbucks has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Starbucks is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

40.0% of Alphabet shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Starbucks shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Alphabet shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Starbucks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Alphabet has higher revenue and earnings than Starbucks. Alphabet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Starbucks currently has a consensus price target of $107.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.53%. PayPal has a consensus price target of $56.47, suggesting a potential upside of 22.09%. Given PayPal's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PayPal is more favorable than Starbucks.

Starbucks has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, PayPal has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

72.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of PayPal shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Starbucks shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of PayPal shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Starbucks pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. PayPal pays an annual dividend of $0.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Starbucks pays out 187.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PayPal pays out 10.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Starbucks has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Starbucks is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

PayPal has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Starbucks. PayPal is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Starbucks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

PayPal has a net margin of 15.00% compared to Starbucks' net margin of 3.89%. PayPal's return on equity of 25.02% beat Starbucks' return on equity.

In the previous week, PayPal had 49 more articles in the media than Starbucks. MarketBeat recorded 122 mentions for PayPal and 73 mentions for Starbucks. Starbucks' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat PayPal's score of 0.53 indicating that Starbucks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Tesla currently has a consensus price target of $398.42, indicating a potential downside of 0.08%. Starbucks has a consensus price target of $107.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. Given Starbucks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Starbucks is more favorable than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 1.79, indicating that its share price is 79% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Starbucks has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Tesla had 170 more articles in the media than Starbucks. MarketBeat recorded 243 mentions for Tesla and 73 mentions for Starbucks. Starbucks' average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Tesla's score of 0.78 indicating that Starbucks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.95% compared to Starbucks' net margin of 3.89%. Tesla's return on equity of 4.89% beat Starbucks' return on equity.

66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.3% of Starbucks shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Starbucks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than Starbucks. Starbucks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.