Free Trial

WhiteHawk Income (WHK) Competitors

WhiteHawk Income logo
$26.26 -0.12 (-0.45%)
Closing price 10/9/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$27.13 +0.87 (+3.31%)
As of 10/9/2026 07:56 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WHK vs. TALO, GPOR, NOG, BKV, and VET

Should you buy WhiteHawk Income stock or one of its competitors? WhiteHawk Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Talos Energy (TALO), Gulfport Energy (GPOR), Northern Oil and Gas (NOG), BKV (BKV), and Vermilion Energy (VET). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Talos Energy?

WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) and Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

WhiteHawk Income currently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Talos Energy has a consensus target price of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 13.26%. Given WhiteHawk Income's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe WhiteHawk Income is more favorable than Talos Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHawk Income
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Talos Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

WhiteHawk Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Talos Energy. WhiteHawk Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Talos Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHawk Income$67.60M10.70-$3.59M-$0.25N/A
Talos Energy$1.78B1.57-$494.29M-$2.38N/A

In the previous week, Talos Energy had 4 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Talos Energy and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. Talos Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of -0.33 indicating that Talos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHawk Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Talos Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.4% of Talos Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Talos Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Talos Energy's net margin of -20.46%. WhiteHawk Income's return on equity of 0.00% beat Talos Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHawk IncomeN/A N/A N/A
Talos Energy -20.46%-1.94%-0.75%

Summary

Talos Energy beats WhiteHawk Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Gulfport Energy?

Gulfport Energy (NYSE:GPOR) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Gulfport Energy had 1 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gulfport Energy and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. Gulfport Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of -0.33 indicating that Gulfport Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gulfport Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WhiteHawk Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gulfport Energy has a net margin of 32.28% compared to WhiteHawk Income's net margin of 0.00%. Gulfport Energy's return on equity of 21.87% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gulfport Energy32.28% 21.87% 13.08%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

Gulfport Energy presently has a consensus target price of $208.50, indicating a potential upside of 28.30%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Gulfport Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gulfport Energy is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gulfport Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38
WhiteHawk Income
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

Gulfport Energy has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income. WhiteHawk Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gulfport Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gulfport Energy$1.42B2.02$427.81M$25.006.50
WhiteHawk Income$67.60M10.70-$3.59M-$0.25N/A

Summary

Gulfport Energy beats WhiteHawk Income on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Northern Oil and Gas?

Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE:NOG) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Oil and Gas-25.35% 18.69% 6.85%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

Northern Oil and Gas has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income. WhiteHawk Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northern Oil and Gas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Oil and Gas$2.48B1.07$38.76M-$5.18N/A
WhiteHawk Income$67.60M10.70-$3.59M-$0.25N/A

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.02%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
WhiteHawk Income
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas and Northern Oil and Gas both had 3 articles in the media. Northern Oil and Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of -0.33 indicating that Northern Oil and Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Oil and Gas
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WhiteHawk Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.3%. WhiteHawk Income pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WhiteHawk Income pays out -176.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Northern Oil and Gas beats WhiteHawk Income on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to BKV?

WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) and BKV (NYSE:BKV) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

In the previous week, BKV had 10 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for BKV and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. BKV's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of -0.33 indicating that BKV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHawk Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
BKV
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WhiteHawk Income currently has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. BKV has a consensus price target of $33.56, suggesting a potential upside of 38.69%. Given BKV's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BKV is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHawk Income
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
BKV
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.09

BKV has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income. WhiteHawk Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BKV, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHawk Income$67.60M10.70-$3.59M-$0.25N/A
BKV$1.01B2.62$179.16M$2.748.83

BKV has a net margin of 17.73% compared to WhiteHawk Income's net margin of 0.00%. BKV's return on equity of 6.67% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHawk IncomeN/A N/A N/A
BKV 17.73%6.67%3.73%

Summary

BKV beats WhiteHawk Income on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Vermilion Energy?

WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) and Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Vermilion Energy's return on equity of 5.26% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHawk IncomeN/A N/A N/A
Vermilion Energy -22.48%5.26%2.15%

In the previous week, WhiteHawk Income had 2 more articles in the media than Vermilion Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income and 1 mentions for Vermilion Energy. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of -0.33 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHawk Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Vermilion Energy
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WhiteHawk Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Vermilion Energy. WhiteHawk Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vermilion Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHawk Income$67.60M10.70-$3.59M-$0.25N/A
Vermilion Energy$1.30B1.39-$467.78M-$2.11N/A

WhiteHawk Income currently has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 21.86%. Vermilion Energy has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.42%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHawk Income
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Vermilion Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHawk Income pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. WhiteHawk Income pays out -176.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy pays out -18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Vermilion Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Vermilion Energy beats WhiteHawk Income on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WhiteHawk Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WHK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WHK vs. The Competition

MetricWhiteHawk IncomeOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$723.07M$11.58B$10.10B$23.09B
Dividend Yield1.68%10.20%10.68%3.72%
P/E Ratio-105.0417.1220.3928.61
Price / Sales10.70640.10523.2721.77
Price / CashN/A40.9937.0919.30
Price / BookN/A4.524.094.72
Net Income-$3.59M$5.27B$4.35B$1.07B
7 Day Performance2.80%0.49%0.66%0.35%
1 Month Performance-7.68%-1.64%-1.91%-3.40%
1 Year PerformanceN/A32.50%33.84%9.40%

WhiteHawk Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WHK
WhiteHawk Income
3.8009 of 5 stars
$26.26
-0.5%
$32.00
+21.9%
N/A$723.07M$67.60MN/A13
TALO
Talos Energy
3.1122 of 5 stars
$16.78
0.0%
$19.00
+13.2%
+85.2%$2.80B$1.78BN/A700
GPOR
Gulfport Energy
3.8344 of 5 stars
$154.36
0.0%
$210.50
+36.4%
-7.5%$2.73B$1.42B6.17245
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
3.7968 of 5 stars
$23.87
+0.2%
$31.00
+29.9%
+12.6%$2.54B$2.48BN/A64
BKV
BKV
3.7302 of 5 stars
$21.59
+0.1%
$33.56
+55.4%
+18.1%$2.36B$1.01B7.88452

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WHK) was last updated on 10/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners