Go Pro

WhiteHawk Income (WHK) Competitors

WhiteHawk Income logo
$27.76 +0.32 (+1.17%)
As of 02:57 PM Eastern

WHK vs. TALO, NOG, BKV, MNR, and VET

Should you buy WhiteHawk Income stock or one of its competitors? WhiteHawk Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Talos Energy (TALO), Northern Oil and Gas (NOG), BKV (BKV), Mach Natural Resources (MNR), and Vermilion Energy (VET). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Talos Energy?

Talos Energy (NYSE:TALO) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation and risk.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Talos Energy's net margin of -20.46%. WhiteHawk Income's return on equity of 0.00% beat Talos Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Talos Energy-20.46% -1.94% -0.75%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Talos Energy had 13 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Talos Energy and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. Talos Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of 0.51 indicating that Talos Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Talos Energy
13 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WhiteHawk Income
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WhiteHawk Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Talos Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Talos Energy$1.78B1.62-$494.29M-$2.38N/A
WhiteHawk IncomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Talos Energy currently has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.94%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus price target of $31.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. Given WhiteHawk Income's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHawk Income is more favorable than Talos Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Talos Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
WhiteHawk Income
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

89.4% of Talos Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Talos Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Talos Energy beats WhiteHawk Income on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Northern Oil and Gas?

Northern Oil and Gas (NYSE:NOG) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and dividends.

Northern Oil and Gas has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Northern Oil and Gas$2.48B1.13$38.76M-$5.18N/A
WhiteHawk IncomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Northern Oil and Gas pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.8%. WhiteHawk Income pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Northern Oil and Gas pays out -34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Northern Oil and Gas has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Northern Oil and Gas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Northern Oil and Gas' net margin of -25.35%. Northern Oil and Gas' return on equity of 18.69% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Northern Oil and Gas-25.35% 18.69% 6.85%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Northern Oil and Gas had 7 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Northern Oil and Gas and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. Northern Oil and Gas' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of 0.51 indicating that Northern Oil and Gas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Northern Oil and Gas
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WhiteHawk Income
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Northern Oil and Gas presently has a consensus price target of $30.63, suggesting a potential upside of 16.36%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus price target of $31.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Northern Oil and Gas' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Northern Oil and Gas is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Northern Oil and Gas
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11
WhiteHawk Income
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

98.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of Northern Oil and Gas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Northern Oil and Gas beats WhiteHawk Income on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to BKV?

WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) and BKV (NYSE:BKV) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and media sentiment.

BKV has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHawk IncomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
BKV$1.01B2.70$179.16M$2.749.09

In the previous week, BKV had 2 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for BKV and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. BKV's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of 0.51 indicating that BKV is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHawk Income
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BKV
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

BKV has a net margin of 17.73% compared to WhiteHawk Income's net margin of 0.00%. BKV's return on equity of 6.67% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHawk IncomeN/A N/A N/A
BKV 17.73%6.67%3.73%

WhiteHawk Income presently has a consensus target price of $31.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. BKV has a consensus target price of $34.25, indicating a potential upside of 37.55%. Given BKV's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BKV is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHawk Income
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83
BKV
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Summary

BKV beats WhiteHawk Income on 8 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Mach Natural Resources?

Mach Natural Resources (NYSE:MNR) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Mach Natural Resources currently has a consensus target price of $17.60, suggesting a potential upside of 39.46%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus target price of $31.40, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Mach Natural Resources' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Mach Natural Resources is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mach Natural Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
WhiteHawk Income
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

78.4% of Mach Natural Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 87.8% of Mach Natural Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mach Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHawk Income.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mach Natural Resources$1.18B1.79$142.98M$0.5921.39
WhiteHawk IncomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, WhiteHawk Income had 1 more articles in the media than Mach Natural Resources. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income and 2 mentions for Mach Natural Resources. Mach Natural Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of 0.51 indicating that Mach Natural Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mach Natural Resources
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
WhiteHawk Income
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mach Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.4%. WhiteHawk Income pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Mach Natural Resources pays out 244.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mach Natural Resources has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Mach Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Mach Natural Resources has a net margin of 7.44% compared to WhiteHawk Income's net margin of 0.00%. Mach Natural Resources' return on equity of 16.06% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mach Natural Resources7.44% 16.06% 8.23%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Mach Natural Resources beats WhiteHawk Income on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHawk Income compare to Vermilion Energy?

Vermilion Energy (NYSE:VET) and WhiteHawk Income (NYSE:WHK) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Vermilion Energy had 5 more articles in the media than WhiteHawk Income. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Vermilion Energy and 3 mentions for WhiteHawk Income. Vermilion Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.63 beat WhiteHawk Income's score of 0.51 indicating that Vermilion Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vermilion Energy
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
WhiteHawk Income
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Vermilion Energy currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.16%. WhiteHawk Income has a consensus target price of $31.40, indicating a potential upside of 13.11%. Given Vermilion Energy's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Vermilion Energy is more favorable than WhiteHawk Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vermilion Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
WhiteHawk Income
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.83

31.9% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.6% of Vermilion Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Vermilion Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. WhiteHawk Income pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Vermilion Energy pays out -18.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vermilion Energy has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Vermilion Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

WhiteHawk Income has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Vermilion Energy's net margin of -22.48%. Vermilion Energy's return on equity of 5.26% beat WhiteHawk Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vermilion Energy-22.48% 5.26% 2.15%
WhiteHawk Income N/A N/A N/A

WhiteHawk Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vermilion Energy.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vermilion Energy$1.30B1.54-$467.78M-$2.11N/A
WhiteHawk IncomeN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Vermilion Energy beats WhiteHawk Income on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WhiteHawk Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WHK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WHK vs. The Competition

MetricWhiteHawk IncomeOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$764.79M$11.54B$10.10B$23.83B
Dividend Yield1.66%11.22%11.49%3.72%
P/E RatioN/A18.6721.7929.48
Price / SalesN/A523.65429.0619.36
Price / CashN/A39.5935.9819.75
Price / BookN/A4.514.094.77
Net IncomeN/A$5.27B$4.33B$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.25%1.53%1.55%-1.88%
1 Month Performance5.57%6.05%5.70%0.66%
1 Year PerformanceN/A35.68%37.30%11.93%

WhiteHawk Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WHK
WhiteHawk Income
2.9125 of 5 stars
$27.76
+1.2%
$31.40
+13.1%
N/A$764.79MN/AN/A13
TALO
Talos Energy
2.2586 of 5 stars
$17.49
+0.1%
$18.50
+5.8%
+74.7%$2.92B$1.98BN/A440
NOG
Northern Oil and Gas
3.2674 of 5 stars
$27.30
-0.1%
$30.63
+12.2%
-0.5%$2.91B$2.48BN/A30
BKV
BKV
3.8757 of 5 stars
$24.24
+0.2%
$34.25
+41.3%
+3.4%$2.65B$1.01B8.85356
MNR
Mach Natural Resources
4.4183 of 5 stars
$12.71
flat
$17.60
+38.5%
-12.2%$2.12B$1.18B21.54N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WHK) was last updated on 9/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners