NYSEAMERICAN:LEU

Centrus Energy Competitors

$21.82

+0.32 (+1.49 %)

(As of 04/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$21.50

Now: $21.82▼

$22.74

50-Day Range

$17.80

MA: $23.63▼

$27.91

52-Week Range

$5.89

Now: $21.82▼

$30.97

Volume63,385 shs

Average Volume143,739 shs

Market Capitalization$291.95 million

P/E Ratio7.74

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta3.71

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) Vs. PLL, SLCA, USLM, UUUU, IPI, and GAU

Should you be buying LEU stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Centrus Energy, including Piedmont Lithium (PLL), U.S. Silica (SLCA), United States Lime & Minerals (USLM), Energy Fuels (UUUU), Intrepid Potash (IPI), and Galiano Gold (GAU).

Centrus Energy vs. Piedmont Lithium Stock

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59
Piedmont Lithium	N/A	N/A	$-5,670,000.00	($0.68)	-98.84

Piedmont Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centrus Energy. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
Piedmont Lithium	0	0	4	0	3.00

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.03%. Given Piedmont Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%
Piedmont Lithium	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Piedmont Lithium on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy vs. U.S. Silica Stock

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and U.S. Silica (NYSE:SLCA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%
U.S. Silica	-42.97%	-0.69%	-0.19%

Volatility and Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, meaning that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Silica has a beta of 3.22, meaning that its stock price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
U.S. Silica	1	3	3	0	2.29

Centrus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. U.S. Silica has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential downside of 31.44%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than U.S. Silica.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59
U.S. Silica	$1.47 billion	0.55	$-329,080,000.00	($0.64)	-17.09

Centrus Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats U.S. Silica on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy vs. United States Lime & Minerals Stock

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United States Lime & Minerals	16.47%	11.49%	10.08%
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United States Lime & Minerals	0	0	0	0	N/A
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00

Centrus Energy has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Centrus Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United States Lime & Minerals	$158.28 million	5.07	$26.06 million	N/A	N/A
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59

United States Lime & Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centrus Energy.

Volatility and Risk

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Centrus Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy vs. Energy Fuels Stock

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%
Energy Fuels	-1,640.41%	-22.51%	-17.57%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59
Energy Fuels	$5.86 million	126.41	$-37,980,000.00	($0.40)	-13.18

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its share price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
Energy Fuels	0	1	3	0	2.75

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy vs. Intrepid Potash Stock

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
Intrepid Potash	1	1	1	0	2.00

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 20.79%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59
Intrepid Potash	$220.07 million	1.76	$13.63 million	$1.00	28.87

Intrepid Potash has higher revenue and earnings than Centrus Energy. Centrus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%
Intrepid Potash	-12.34%	-4.43%	-3.27%

Volatility & Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Centrus Energy vs. Galiano Gold Stock

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Galiano Gold (NYSEMKT:GAU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy	$209.70 million	1.39	$-16,500,000.00	($2.54)	-8.59
Galiano Gold	$161.92 million	0.00	$-167,930,000.00	$0.01	N/A

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Galiano Gold. Centrus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galiano Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.6% of Galiano Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Centrus Energy	0	0	2	0	3.00
Galiano Gold	0	2	3	0	2.60

Centrus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Galiano Gold has a consensus target price of $2.4333, suggesting a potential upside of ∞. Given Galiano Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galiano Gold is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Centrus Energy	15.81%	-10.64%	7.28%
Galiano Gold	N/A	24.67%	24.16%

Volatility & Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galiano Gold has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Galiano Gold on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.