NYSEAMERICAN:LEU

Centrus Energy Competitors

$21.82
+0.32 (+1.49 %)
(As of 04/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$21.50
Now: $21.82
$22.74
50-Day Range
$17.80
MA: $23.63
$27.91
52-Week Range
$5.89
Now: $21.82
$30.97
Volume63,385 shs
Average Volume143,739 shs
Market Capitalization$291.95 million
P/E Ratio7.74
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta3.71

Competitors

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) Vs. PLL, SLCA, USLM, UUUU, IPI, and GAU

Should you be buying LEU stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "mining & quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels" are considered alternatives and competitors to Centrus Energy, including Piedmont Lithium (PLL), U.S. Silica (SLCA), United States Lime & Minerals (USLM), Energy Fuels (UUUU), Intrepid Potash (IPI), and Galiano Gold (GAU).

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Piedmont Lithium (NASDAQ:PLL) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/A$-5,670,000.00($0.68)-98.84

Piedmont Lithium has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Centrus Energy. Piedmont Lithium is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Centrus Energy00203.00
Piedmont Lithium00403.00

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Piedmont Lithium has a consensus price target of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.03%. Given Piedmont Lithium's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Piedmont Lithium is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Piedmont Lithium shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Piedmont Lithium's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%
Piedmont LithiumN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Piedmont Lithium on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and U.S. Silica (NYSE:SLCA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%
U.S. Silica-42.97%-0.69%-0.19%

Volatility and Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, meaning that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, U.S. Silica has a beta of 3.22, meaning that its stock price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.7% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.9% of U.S. Silica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings for Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Centrus Energy00203.00
U.S. Silica13302.29

Centrus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. U.S. Silica has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential downside of 31.44%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than U.S. Silica.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Centrus Energy and U.S. Silica's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59
U.S. Silica$1.47 billion0.55$-329,080,000.00($0.64)-17.09

Centrus Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than U.S. Silica. U.S. Silica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats U.S. Silica on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

United States Lime & Minerals (NASDAQ:USLM) and Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) are both small-cap construction companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
United States Lime & Minerals16.47%11.49%10.08%
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
United States Lime & Minerals0000N/A
Centrus Energy00203.00

Centrus Energy has a consensus price target of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Given Centrus Energy's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than United States Lime & Minerals.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares United States Lime & Minerals and Centrus Energy's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United States Lime & Minerals$158.28 million5.07$26.06 millionN/AN/A
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59

United States Lime & Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Centrus Energy.

Volatility and Risk

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

27.4% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 2.8% of United States Lime & Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

United States Lime & Minerals beats Centrus Energy on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Energy Fuels (NYSEAMERICAN:UUUU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%
Energy Fuels-1,640.41%-22.51%-17.57%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 22.3% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Energy Fuels shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59
Energy Fuels$5.86 million126.41$-37,980,000.00($0.40)-13.18

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Energy Fuels. Energy Fuels is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Centrus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its share price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energy Fuels has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Centrus Energy and Energy Fuels, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Centrus Energy00203.00
Energy Fuels01302.75

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Energy Fuels has a consensus price target of $6.8750, indicating a potential upside of 30.46%. Given Energy Fuels' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Energy Fuels is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Energy Fuels on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Intrepid Potash (NYSE:IPI) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Centrus Energy00203.00
Intrepid Potash11102.00

Centrus Energy presently has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 14.57%. Intrepid Potash has a consensus price target of $22.8667, indicating a potential downside of 20.79%. Given Centrus Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Centrus Energy is more favorable than Intrepid Potash.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59
Intrepid Potash$220.07 million1.76$13.63 million$1.0028.87

Intrepid Potash has higher revenue and earnings than Centrus Energy. Centrus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrepid Potash, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.8% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.4% of Intrepid Potash shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Intrepid Potash's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%
Intrepid Potash-12.34%-4.43%-3.27%

Volatility & Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, indicating that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Intrepid Potash has a beta of 2.26, indicating that its stock price is 126% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Centrus Energy (NYSEAMERICAN:LEU) and Galiano Gold (NYSEMKT:GAU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Centrus Energy$209.70 million1.39$-16,500,000.00($2.54)-8.59
Galiano Gold$161.92 million0.00$-167,930,000.00$0.01N/A

Centrus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Galiano Gold. Centrus Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galiano Gold, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

23.3% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.6% of Galiano Gold shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.2% of Centrus Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Centrus Energy00203.00
Galiano Gold02302.60

Centrus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Galiano Gold has a consensus target price of $2.4333, suggesting a potential upside of ∞. Given Galiano Gold's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Galiano Gold is more favorable than Centrus Energy.

Profitability

This table compares Centrus Energy and Galiano Gold's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Centrus Energy15.81%-10.64%7.28%
Galiano GoldN/A24.67%24.16%

Volatility & Risk

Centrus Energy has a beta of 3.71, suggesting that its stock price is 271% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galiano Gold has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Centrus Energy beats Galiano Gold on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.


Centrus Energy Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Piedmont Lithium logo
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
0.9$67.21+0.5%$1.06 billionN/A-98.84
U.S. Silica logo
SLCA
U.S. Silica
1.2$10.94+1.9%$812.91 million$1.47 billion-1.95Upcoming Earnings
Gap Down
United States Lime & Minerals logo
USLM
United States Lime & Minerals
1.0$142.00+0.7%$802.73 million$158.28 million30.87
Energy Fuels logo
UUUU
Energy Fuels
1.4$5.27+4.9%$740.78 million$5.86 million-17.00Gap Down
Intrepid Potash logo
IPI
Intrepid Potash
0.8$28.87+1.4%$388.36 million$220.07 million-15.36Analyst Downgrade
Galiano Gold logo
GAU
Galiano Gold
1.4N/AN/A$260.11 million$161.92 million6.44
Ciner Resources logo
CINR
Ciner Resources
0.9$12.62+1.9%$249.46 million$522.80 million15.21
Gold Standard Ventures logo
GSV
Gold Standard Ventures
1.3$0.58+1.7%$208.30 millionN/A-14.57
ZEN Graphene Solutions logo
ZENYF
ZEN Graphene Solutions
0.4$1.58+1.3%$136.25 millionN/A-158.38
Smart Sand logo
SND
Smart Sand
1.0$2.36+3.0%$102.45 million$233.07 million2.17News Coverage
Gap Down
JETMF
Global Crossing Airlines Group
0.5$1.66+1.0%$47.46 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
SMPR
Standard Metals Processing
0.5$0.08+23.6%$11.35 millionN/A0.00Gap Down
AMNL
Applied Minerals
0.4$0.02+0.5%$3.61 million$490,000.00-0.61
Select Sands logo
SLSDF
Select Sands
0.8$0.04+0.0%$3.23 million$4.36 million-0.46Gap Up
EMESQ
Emerge Energy Services
0.0$0.01+6.9%$0.00$313.59 million0.00Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/23/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.