NYSE:MP

MP Materials Competitors

$26.48
-1.21 (-4.37 %)
(As of 05/10/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$25.73
$28.00
50-Day Range
$27.44
$45.99
52-Week Range
$9.78
$51.77
Volume6.90 million shs
Average Volume5.40 million shs
Market Capitalization$4.52 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
BetaN/A

Competitors

MP Materials (NYSE:MP) Vs. CLF, TRQ, BVN, HBM, PVG, and LAC

Should you be buying MP stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "metal mining" are considered alternatives and competitors to MP Materials, including Cleveland-Cliffs (CLF), Turquoise Hill Resources (TRQ), Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (BVN), Hudbay Minerals (HBM), Pretium Resources (PVG), and Lithium Americas (LAC).

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Cleveland-Cliffs03302.50
MP Materials02302.60

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $21.44, indicating a potential upside of 3.52%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Profitability

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Cleveland-Cliffs-3.38%-2.69%-0.35%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.6% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cleveland-Cliffs$1.99 billion5.20$292.80 million$1.1218.49
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Cleveland-Cliffs has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Summary

MP Materials beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Turquoise Hill Resources$1.17 billion3.61$-150,460,000.00N/AN/A
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Turquoise Hill Resources03402.57
MP Materials02302.60

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus target price of $21.3571, indicating a potential upside of 2.24%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Turquoise Hill Resources42.70%4.76%2.95%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats MP Materials on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (NYSE:BVN) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.$867.89 million3.18$-12,210,000.00($0.01)-1,085.00
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.01002.00
MP Materials02302.60

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. presently has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Profitability

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.-19.14%-4.24%-3.08%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Summary

MP Materials beats Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hudbay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hudbay Minerals$1.24 billion1.90$-343,810,000.00($0.19)-47.42
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hudbay Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Hudbay Minerals011002.91
MP Materials02302.60

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $11.3364, indicating a potential upside of 25.82%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Hudbay Minerals-14.02%-7.32%-2.87%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Pretium Resources (NYSE:PVG) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.2% of Pretium Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pretium Resources and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pretium Resources$484.54 million4.30$40.92 million$0.5520.18
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Pretium Resources has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Pretium Resources and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Pretium Resources04402.50
MP Materials02302.60

Pretium Resources presently has a consensus target price of $18.8929, indicating a potential upside of 70.21%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Pretium Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than MP Materials.

Profitability

This table compares Pretium Resources and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Pretium Resources15.38%16.09%9.83%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Pretium Resources beats MP Materials on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Lithium Americas and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lithium Americas03402.57
MP Materials02302.60

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus target price of $20.3214, indicating a potential upside of 60.52%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than MP Materials.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

8.1% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Lithium Americas and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lithium AmericasN/A-22.88%-10.85%
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/A

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lithium Americas and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas$4.84 million313.53$51.67 million($0.22)-57.55
MP MaterialsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Lithium Americas has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Summary

MP Materials beats Lithium Americas on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.


MP Materials Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Cleveland-Cliffs logo
CLF
Cleveland-Cliffs
1.5$20.71-2.0%$10.34 billion$1.99 billion-73.96Analyst Upgrade
Gap Up
Turquoise Hill Resources logo
TRQ
Turquoise Hill Resources
1.2$20.89-1.4%$4.20 billion$1.17 billion10.77Upcoming Earnings
Gap Up
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. logo
BVN
Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A.
0.9$10.85-4.5%$2.76 billion$867.89 million-21.27Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
Hudbay Minerals logo
HBM
Hudbay Minerals
1.8$9.01-2.4%$2.36 billion$1.24 billion-15.27
Pretium Resources logo
PVG
Pretium Resources
2.0$11.10-3.2%$2.08 billion$484.54 million22.65Earnings Announcement
Lithium Americas logo
LAC
Lithium Americas
1.1$12.66-5.3%$1.52 billion$4.84 million-34.22Earnings Announcement
Nexa Resources logo
NEXA
Nexa Resources
1.4$10.60-2.2%$1.40 billion$2.33 billion-2.29
EMX Royalty logo
EMX
EMX Royalty
0.0$3.54-1.7%$301.68 million$3.83 million-70.80
Westwater Resources logo
WWR
Westwater Resources
1.0$3.77-9.0%$121.91 millionN/A-1.31Upcoming Earnings
U.S. Gold logo
USAU
U.S. Gold
1.4$10.83-0.1%$76.45 millionN/A-3.42
Opiant Pharmaceuticals logo
OPNT
Opiant Pharmaceuticals
0.5$12.60-0.8%$54.57 million$40.52 million-125.99
LEXX
Lexaria Bioscience
0.0$6.22-0.6%$31.75 million$380,000.000.00High Trading Volume
This page was last updated on 5/11/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.