MP Materials Competitors

Cleveland-Cliffs (NYSE:CLF) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cleveland-Cliffs presently has a consensus price target of $21.44, indicating a potential upside of 3.52%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Profitability

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.6% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cleveland-Cliffs shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Cleveland-Cliffs and MP Materials' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cleveland-Cliffs has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Summary

MP Materials beats Cleveland-Cliffs on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Turquoise Hill Resources (NYSE:TRQ) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Turquoise Hill Resources presently has a consensus target price of $21.3571, indicating a potential upside of 2.24%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Turquoise Hill Resources.

Profitability

This table compares Turquoise Hill Resources and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Turquoise Hill Resources beats MP Materials on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. (NYSE:BVN) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. presently has a consensus target price of $11.75, indicating a potential upside of 8.29%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A..

Profitability

This table compares Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

MP Materials beats Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A.A. on 7 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Hudbay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

67.4% of Hudbay Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

MP Materials has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hudbay Minerals.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Hudbay Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $11.3364, indicating a potential upside of 25.82%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given MP Materials' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Hudbay Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares Hudbay Minerals and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Pretium Resources (NYSE:PVG) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both mid-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.2% of Pretium Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Pretium Resources and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pretium Resources has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Pretium Resources and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Pretium Resources presently has a consensus target price of $18.8929, indicating a potential upside of 70.21%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Pretium Resources' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pretium Resources is more favorable than MP Materials.

Profitability

This table compares Pretium Resources and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pretium Resources beats MP Materials on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Lithium Americas and MP Materials, as reported by MarketBeat.

Lithium Americas presently has a consensus target price of $20.3214, indicating a potential upside of 60.52%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $38.20, indicating a potential upside of 44.26%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than MP Materials.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

8.1% of Lithium Americas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.3% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Lithium Americas and MP Materials' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Lithium Americas and MP Materials' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Lithium Americas has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials.

Summary

MP Materials beats Lithium Americas on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.