Which has better valuation and earnings, AAPL or MP?

Apple has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Apple, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Apple $416.16B 10.90 $112.01B $8.72 35.43 MP Materials $224.44M 32.80 -$85.87M -$0.42 N/A

Is AAPL or MP more profitable?

Apple has a net margin of 27.62% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. Apple's return on equity of 142.29% beat MP Materials' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Apple 27.62% 142.29% 34.42% MP Materials -28.00% -2.27% -1.13%

Does the media favor AAPL or MP?

In the previous week, Apple had 420 more articles in the media than MP Materials. MarketBeat recorded 445 mentions for Apple and 25 mentions for MP Materials. Apple's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that Apple is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Apple 202 Very Positive mention(s) 80 Positive mention(s) 74 Neutral mention(s) 55 Negative mention(s) 24 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MP Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MP or USAR?

MP Materials has higher revenue and earnings than USA Rare Earth. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USA Rare Earth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MP Materials $224.44M 32.80 -$85.87M -$0.42 N/A USA Rare Earth $1.64M 2,033.20 -$297.56M -$3.92 N/A

Does the media prefer MP or USAR?

In the previous week, MP Materials had 9 more articles in the media than USA Rare Earth. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 16 mentions for USA Rare Earth. USA Rare Earth's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that USA Rare Earth is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MP Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral USA Rare Earth 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LAC or MP?

In the previous week, MP Materials had 20 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 5 mentions for Lithium Americas. MP Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.00 indicating that MP Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lithium Americas 1 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral MP Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to SQM or MP?

In the previous week, MP Materials had 8 more articles in the media than Sociedad Quimica y Minera. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 17 mentions for Sociedad Quimica y Minera. Sociedad Quimica y Minera's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that Sociedad Quimica y Minera is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Sociedad Quimica y Minera 7 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MP Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, HBM or MP?

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio HudBay Minerals $2.47B 4.09 $568.50M $1.70 13.37 MP Materials $224.44M 32.80 -$85.87M -$0.42 N/A

Does the media refer more to HBM or MP?

In the previous week, MP Materials had 4 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 21 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment HudBay Minerals 12 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MP Materials 8 Very Positive mention(s) 8 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

MP Materials (MP) Competitors

$41.35 -0.31 (-0.73%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$41.59 +0.23 (+0.57%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

MP vs. AAPL, USAR, LAC, SQM, and HBM

Should you buy MP Materials stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MP Materials with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MP Materials include Apple (AAPL), USA Rare Earth (USAR), Lithium Americas (LAC), Sociedad Quimica y Minera (SQM), and HudBay Minerals (HBM).

How does MP Materials compare to Apple?

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

Apple currently has a consensus target price of $331.60, suggesting a potential upside of 7.35%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $78.21, suggesting a potential upside of 89.12%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Apple.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Apple	2 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	22 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
MP Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Apple has a net margin of 27.62% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. Apple's return on equity of 142.29% beat MP Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Apple	27.62%	142.29%	34.42%
MP Materials	-28.00%	-2.27%	-1.13%

67.7% of Apple shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MP Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Apple shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of MP Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Apple has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Apple, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Apple	$416.16B	10.90	$112.01B	$8.72	35.43
MP Materials	$224.44M	32.80	-$85.87M	-$0.42	N/A

Apple has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Apple had 420 more articles in the media than MP Materials. MarketBeat recorded 445 mentions for Apple and 25 mentions for MP Materials. Apple's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that Apple is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Apple	202 Very Positive mention(s)	80 Positive mention(s)	74 Neutral mention(s)	55 Negative mention(s)	24 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MP Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Apple beats MP Materials on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MP Materials compare to USA Rare Earth?

MP Materials (NYSE:MP) and USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ:USAR) are both mid-cap materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

MP Materials has higher revenue and earnings than USA Rare Earth. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than USA Rare Earth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MP Materials	$224.44M	32.80	-$85.87M	-$0.42	N/A
USA Rare Earth	$1.64M	2,033.20	-$297.56M	-$3.92	N/A

MP Materials has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, USA Rare Earth has a beta of 2.45, indicating that its stock price is 145% more volatile than the broader market.

52.6% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of MP Materials shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.1% of USA Rare Earth shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, MP Materials had 9 more articles in the media than USA Rare Earth. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 16 mentions for USA Rare Earth. USA Rare Earth's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that USA Rare Earth is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MP Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
USA Rare Earth	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MP Materials currently has a consensus price target of $78.21, suggesting a potential upside of 89.12%. USA Rare Earth has a consensus price target of $35.83, suggesting a potential upside of 139.69%. Given USA Rare Earth's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe USA Rare Earth is more favorable than MP Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MP Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
USA Rare Earth	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

USA Rare Earth has a net margin of 0.00% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. MP Materials' return on equity of -2.27% beat USA Rare Earth's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MP Materials	-28.00%	-2.27%	-1.13%
USA Rare Earth	N/A	-15.39%	-10.08%

Summary

MP Materials beats USA Rare Earth on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MP Materials compare to Lithium Americas?

Lithium Americas (NYSE:LAC) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, MP Materials had 20 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 5 mentions for Lithium Americas. MP Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat Lithium Americas' score of 0.00 indicating that MP Materials is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lithium Americas	1 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MP Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Lithium Americas currently has a consensus price target of $5.44, indicating a potential upside of 90.03%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $78.21, indicating a potential upside of 89.12%. Given Lithium Americas' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Lithium Americas is more favorable than MP Materials.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lithium Americas	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.08
MP Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

52.6% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Lithium Americas shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of MP Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MP Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Lithium Americas. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lithium Americas	N/A	N/A	-$122.09M	-$0.41	N/A
MP Materials	$224.44M	32.80	-$85.87M	-$0.42	N/A

Lithium Americas has a beta of 2.47, meaning that its stock price is 147% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Lithium Americas has a net margin of 0.00% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. MP Materials' return on equity of -2.27% beat Lithium Americas' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lithium Americas	N/A	-10.70%	-4.41%
MP Materials	-28.00%	-2.27%	-1.13%

Summary

MP Materials beats Lithium Americas on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MP Materials compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Sociedad Quimica y Minera (NYSE:SQM) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

In the previous week, MP Materials had 8 more articles in the media than Sociedad Quimica y Minera. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 17 mentions for Sociedad Quimica y Minera. Sociedad Quimica y Minera's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that Sociedad Quimica y Minera is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	7 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MP Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

12.4% of Sociedad Quimica y Minera shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of MP Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has a net margin of 15.38% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. Sociedad Quimica y Minera's return on equity of 11.99% beat MP Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	15.38%	11.99%	6.09%
MP Materials	-28.00%	-2.27%	-1.13%

Sociedad Quimica y Minera has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sociedad Quimica y Minera, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	$4.58B	4.18	$588.14M	$2.85	23.51
MP Materials	$224.44M	32.80	-$85.87M	-$0.42	N/A

Sociedad Quimica y Minera presently has a consensus target price of $73.58, suggesting a potential upside of 9.82%. MP Materials has a consensus target price of $78.21, suggesting a potential upside of 89.12%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than Sociedad Quimica y Minera.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sociedad Quimica y Minera	1 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40
MP Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

MP Materials beats Sociedad Quimica y Minera on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MP Materials compare to HudBay Minerals?

HudBay Minerals (NYSE:HBM) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

HudBay Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $31.33, suggesting a potential upside of 37.82%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $78.21, suggesting a potential upside of 89.12%. Given MP Materials' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe MP Materials is more favorable than HudBay Minerals.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
HudBay Minerals	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.85
MP Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	15 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

HudBay Minerals has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

HudBay Minerals has a net margin of 27.48% compared to MP Materials' net margin of -28.00%. HudBay Minerals' return on equity of 9.47% beat MP Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
HudBay Minerals	27.48%	9.47%	5.44%
MP Materials	-28.00%	-2.27%	-1.13%

57.8% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MP Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of HudBay Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of MP Materials shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MP Materials had 4 more articles in the media than HudBay Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for MP Materials and 21 mentions for HudBay Minerals. HudBay Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat MP Materials' score of 0.48 indicating that HudBay Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
HudBay Minerals	12 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MP Materials	8 Very Positive mention(s)	8 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

HudBay Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HudBay Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
HudBay Minerals	$2.47B	4.09	$568.50M	$1.70	13.37
MP Materials	$224.44M	32.80	-$85.87M	-$0.42	N/A

Summary

HudBay Minerals beats MP Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MP Materials News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MP vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MP Materials	Metals & Mining Industry	Materials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$7.42B	$3.53B	$4.64B	$23.71B
Dividend Yield	N/A	5.28%	4.75%	4.20%
P/E Ratio	-98.46	21.24	20.04	31.01
Price / Sales	32.80	7,960.31	4,732.90	13.91
Price / Cash	279.89	28.95	26.49	31.71
Price / Book	3.71	9.64	8.15	4.62
Net Income	-$85.87M	$122.63M	$155.11M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.22%	-0.78%	-0.59%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-23.86%	-3.11%	-2.19%	-0.19%
1 Year Performance	-35.13%	47.32%	37.96%	19.11%

MP Materials Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MP MP Materials	4.225 of 5 stars	$41.35 -0.7%	$78.35 +89.5%	-32.5%	$7.42B	$224.44M	N/A	490	Upcoming Earnings Analyst Forecast
AAPL Apple	4.2991 of 5 stars	$333.07 -1.5%	$327.40 -1.7%	+48.8%	$4.90T	$416.16B	40.31	166,000	Trending News Earnings Report Dividend Announcement Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Down
USAR USA Rare Earth	3.4901 of 5 stars	$13.83 +5.8%	$35.83 +159.1%	+17.6%	$3.05B	$7.34M	N/A	N/A	Gap Up
LAC Lithium Americas	2.2042 of 5 stars	$2.82 +3.9%	$5.44 +93.3%	+11.3%	$981.21M	N/A	N/A	749	News Coverage Analyst Downgrade
SQM Sociedad Quimica y Minera	4.2886 of 5 stars	$68.54 +1.5%	$73.58 +7.4%	+82.4%	$19.44B	$4.58B	23.88	7,739	News Coverage Analyst Forecast Analyst Revision Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MP) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MP Materials (MP) Competitors

MP vs. AAPL, USAR, LAC, SQM, and HBM

How does MP Materials compare to Apple?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to USA Rare Earth?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to Lithium Americas?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to HudBay Minerals?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MP vs. The Competition

MP Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MP Materials (MP) Competitors

MP vs. AAPL, USAR, LAC, SQM, and HBM

How does MP Materials compare to Apple?

Do analysts prefer AAPL or MP?

Is AAPL or MP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of AAPL or MP?

Which has better valuation and earnings, AAPL or MP?

Which has more volatility and risk, AAPL or MP?

Does the media favor AAPL or MP?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to USA Rare Earth?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MP or USAR?

Which has more volatility & risk, MP or USAR?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MP or USAR?

Does the media prefer MP or USAR?

Do analysts rate MP or USAR?

Is MP or USAR more profitable?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to Lithium Americas?

Does the media favor LAC or MP?

Do analysts recommend LAC or MP?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in LAC or MP?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, LAC or MP?

Which has more volatility & risk, LAC or MP?

Is LAC or MP more profitable?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to Sociedad Quimica y Minera?

Does the media refer more to SQM or MP?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SQM or MP?

Which has more volatility & risk, SQM or MP?

Is SQM or MP more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, SQM or MP?

Do analysts rate SQM or MP?

Summary

How does MP Materials compare to HudBay Minerals?

Do analysts prefer HBM or MP?

Which has more risk & volatility, HBM or MP?

Is HBM or MP more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of HBM or MP?

Does the media refer more to HBM or MP?

Which has better earnings and valuation, HBM or MP?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MP vs. The Competition

MP Materials Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools