Free Trial

Celsius (CELH) Competitors

Celsius logo
$28.16 +0.76 (+2.76%)
As of 12:55 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CELH vs. MNST, PEP, VITL, COKE, and PRMB

Should you buy Celsius stock or one of its competitors? Celsius's main competitors and comparable companies include Monster Beverage (MNST), PepsiCo (PEP), Vital Farms (VITL), Coca-Cola Consolidated (COKE), and Primo Brands (PRMB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "consumer staples" sector.

How does Celsius compare to Monster Beverage?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Monster Beverage (NASDAQ:MNST) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Monster Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Monster Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$3.05B2.28$108M$0.24114.17
Monster Beverage$8.29B10.31$1.91B$1.0840.42

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 23.08% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius4.24% 36.52% 8.53%
Monster Beverage 23.08%26.02%21.21%

Celsius has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.4% of Monster Beverage shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.1% of Monster Beverage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Celsius presently has a consensus price target of $43.29, suggesting a potential upside of 58.01%. Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $50.10, suggesting a potential upside of 14.78%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Celsius is more favorable than Monster Beverage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Monster Beverage
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.59

In the previous week, Celsius had 7 more articles in the media than Monster Beverage. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Celsius and 16 mentions for Monster Beverage. Monster Beverage's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Celsius' score of 0.14 indicating that Monster Beverage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Monster Beverage
8 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Monster Beverage beats Celsius on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to PepsiCo?

PepsiCo (NASDAQ:PEP) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and risk.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

PepsiCo has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. PepsiCo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PepsiCo$93.93B1.86$8.24B$7.6316.82
Celsius$3.05B2.28$108M$0.24114.17

In the previous week, PepsiCo had 93 more articles in the media than Celsius. MarketBeat recorded 116 mentions for PepsiCo and 23 mentions for Celsius. PepsiCo's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Celsius' score of 0.14 indicating that PepsiCo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
PepsiCo
26 Very Positive mention(s)
31 Positive mention(s)
20 Neutral mention(s)
26 Negative mention(s)
9 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Celsius
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

73.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of PepsiCo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 10.78% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 54.63% beat Celsius' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PepsiCo10.78% 54.63% 10.49%
Celsius 4.24%36.52%8.53%

PepsiCo presently has a consensus price target of $149.30, indicating a potential upside of 16.33%. Celsius has a consensus price target of $43.29, indicating a potential upside of 58.01%. Given Celsius' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Celsius is more favorable than PepsiCo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PepsiCo
1 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
Celsius
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Summary

PepsiCo beats Celsius on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Vital Farms?

Vital Farms (NASDAQ:VITL) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Vital Farms has a beta of 1.08, indicating that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Vital Farms presently has a consensus price target of $17.18, suggesting a potential upside of 82.01%. Celsius has a consensus price target of $43.29, suggesting a potential upside of 58.01%. Given Vital Farms' higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Vital Farms is more favorable than Celsius.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vital Farms
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Celsius
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

In the previous week, Celsius had 23 more articles in the media than Vital Farms. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Celsius and 0 mentions for Vital Farms. Vital Farms' average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Celsius' score of 0.14 indicating that Vital Farms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Vital Farms Neutral
Celsius Neutral

Celsius has higher revenue and earnings than Vital Farms. Vital Farms is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vital Farms$759.44M0.53$66.28M-$0.04N/A
Celsius$3.05B2.28$108M$0.24114.17

Celsius has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Vital Farms' net margin of 0.02%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Vital Farms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vital Farms0.02% 3.46% 2.25%
Celsius 4.24%36.52%8.53%

98.6% of Vital Farms shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of Vital Farms shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Celsius beats Vital Farms on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Coca-Cola Consolidated?

Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) and Coca-Cola Consolidated (NASDAQ:COKE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

Coca-Cola Consolidated has a net margin of 7.15% compared to Celsius' net margin of 4.24%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Coca-Cola Consolidated's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Celsius4.24% 36.52% 8.53%
Coca-Cola Consolidated 7.15%-1,041.59%13.71%

Celsius currently has a consensus target price of $43.29, indicating a potential upside of 58.01%. Given Celsius' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celsius is more favorable than Coca-Cola Consolidated.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Celsius
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Celsius has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coca-Cola Consolidated has a beta of 0.55, meaning that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

61.0% of Celsius shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.2% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Celsius shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Coca-Cola Consolidated shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celsius had 21 more articles in the media than Coca-Cola Consolidated. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Celsius and 2 mentions for Coca-Cola Consolidated. Coca-Cola Consolidated's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Celsius' score of 0.14 indicating that Coca-Cola Consolidated is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Celsius
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Coca-Cola Consolidated
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Coca-Cola Consolidated has higher revenue and earnings than Celsius. Coca-Cola Consolidated is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Celsius$3.05B2.28$108M$0.24114.17
Coca-Cola Consolidated$7.23B1.77$570.58M$7.5425.45

Summary

Celsius beats Coca-Cola Consolidated on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Celsius compare to Primo Brands?

Primo Brands (NYSE:PRMB) and Celsius (NASDAQ:CELH) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Celsius has a net margin of 4.24% compared to Primo Brands' net margin of 1.49%. Celsius' return on equity of 36.52% beat Primo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Primo Brands1.49% 14.24% 4.03%
Celsius 4.24%36.52%8.53%

In the previous week, Celsius had 17 more articles in the media than Primo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Celsius and 6 mentions for Primo Brands. Primo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Celsius' score of 0.14 indicating that Primo Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Primo Brands
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Celsius
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
16 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Celsius has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Primo Brands. Primo Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Celsius, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Primo Brands$6.66B1.05$60.10M$0.2674.35
Celsius$3.05B2.28$108M$0.24114.17

Primo Brands has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celsius has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

87.7% of Primo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.0% of Celsius shares are owned by institutional investors. 32.9% of Primo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Celsius shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Primo Brands presently has a consensus target price of $28.45, indicating a potential upside of 47.19%. Celsius has a consensus target price of $43.29, indicating a potential upside of 58.01%. Given Celsius' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celsius is more favorable than Primo Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Primo Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Celsius
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.62

Summary

Celsius beats Primo Brands on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Celsius News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CELH and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CELH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CELH vs. The Competition

MetricCelsiusBeverages IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$7.12B$22.70B$15.83B$13.28B
Dividend YieldN/A2.72%3.32%16.36%
P/E Ratio117.1715.9713.8226.11
Price / Sales2.3429.18264,297.0881.01
Price / Cash15.7017.3957.1253.72
Price / Book6.153.704.316.31
Net Income$108M$892.07M$841.98M$381.90M
7 Day Performance5.25%0.37%0.70%-1.34%
1 Month Performance1.86%-3.48%-3.05%-4.31%
1 Year Performance-56.19%-7.39%8.77%-0.35%

Celsius Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CELH
Celsius
4.3474 of 5 stars
$28.16
+2.8%
$43.29
+53.8%
-56.4%$7.12B$3.05B117.171,497
MNST
Monster Beverage
3.1619 of 5 stars
$42.14
+1.2%
$50.33
+19.4%
+27.0%$81.54B$8.29B39.026,891
PEP
PepsiCo
4.3774 of 5 stars
$125.60
-0.9%
$151.70
+20.8%
-7.6%$172.96B$93.93B16.46306,000
VITL
Vital Farms
2.4845 of 5 stars
$8.92
-3.9%
$17.18
+92.6%
-78.8%$398.40M$759.44MN/A739
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
1.1971 of 5 stars
$187.11
-1.1%
N/A+60.0%$12.60B$7.23B24.8217,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CELH) was last updated on 10/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners