Lineage (LINE) Competitors

59.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by institutional investors. 6.9% of Texas Pacific Land shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 71.9% of Lineage shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Texas Pacific Land has a net margin of 60.03% compared to Lineage's net margin of -2.72%. Texas Pacific Land's return on equity of 35.52% beat Lineage's return on equity.

Texas Pacific Land pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Lineage pays an annual dividend of $2.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Texas Pacific Land pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lineage pays out -343.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Texas Pacific Land has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Lineage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Texas Pacific Land has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lineage. Lineage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Texas Pacific Land, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Texas Pacific Land has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lineage has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Texas Pacific Land currently has a consensus target price of $639.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.60%. Lineage has a consensus target price of $43.28, suggesting a potential upside of 5.87%. Given Texas Pacific Land's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Texas Pacific Land is more favorable than Lineage.

In the previous week, Texas Pacific Land had 21 more articles in the media than Lineage. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Texas Pacific Land and 3 mentions for Lineage. Texas Pacific Land's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Lineage's score of 0.92 indicating that Texas Pacific Land is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Nomura has higher revenue and earnings than Lineage. Lineage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nomura, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lineage had 3 more articles in the media than Nomura. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Lineage and 0 mentions for Nomura. Lineage's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Nomura's score of 0.00 indicating that Lineage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Nomura pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Lineage pays an annual dividend of $2.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Nomura pays out 35.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Lineage pays out -343.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lineage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

15.1% of Nomura shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Nomura shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 71.9% of Lineage shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Nomura has a net margin of 7.64% compared to Lineage's net margin of -2.72%. Nomura's return on equity of 9.70% beat Lineage's return on equity.

Lineage has a consensus price target of $43.28, suggesting a potential upside of 5.87%. Given Lineage's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Lineage is more favorable than Nomura.

Nomura has a beta of 0.71, meaning that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lineage has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Futu had 20 more articles in the media than Lineage. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Futu and 3 mentions for Lineage. Lineage's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Futu's score of 0.03 indicating that Lineage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Lineage presently has a consensus price target of $43.28, indicating a potential upside of 5.87%. Futu has a consensus price target of $161.52, indicating a potential upside of 79.95%. Given Futu's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Futu is more favorable than Lineage.

Lineage has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Futu has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Futu has a net margin of 49.63% compared to Lineage's net margin of -2.72%. Futu's return on equity of 32.24% beat Lineage's return on equity.

Lineage pays an annual dividend of $2.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Futu pays an annual dividend of $2.55 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Lineage pays out -343.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Futu pays out 24.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Lineage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Futu has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lineage. Lineage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Futu, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlyle Group presently has a consensus target price of $62.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.47%. Lineage has a consensus target price of $43.28, indicating a potential upside of 5.87%. Given Carlyle Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carlyle Group is more favorable than Lineage.

55.9% of Carlyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. 26.3% of Carlyle Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 71.9% of Lineage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.89, indicating that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lineage has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Carlyle Group had 8 more articles in the media than Lineage. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Carlyle Group and 3 mentions for Lineage. Lineage's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Carlyle Group's score of 0.27 indicating that Lineage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Carlyle Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lineage. Lineage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Carlyle Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Lineage pays an annual dividend of $2.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Carlyle Group pays out 95.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lineage pays out -343.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Carlyle Group has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Lineage is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Carlyle Group has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Lineage's net margin of -2.72%. Carlyle Group's return on equity of 20.95% beat Lineage's return on equity.