Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

$41.59 -0.38 (-0.91%)

Closing price 05/13/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$41.58 -0.02 (-0.04%)

As of 04:00 AM Eastern

PGC vs. BUSE, FFBC, GSBC, OCFC, and STBA

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peapack-Gladstone Financial include First Busey (BUSE), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), OceanFirst Financial (OCFC), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

First Busey has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.19% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	9.60%	6.75%	0.59%
First Busey	19.16%	10.19%	1.36%

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Busey pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	$444.61M	1.66	$37.33M	$2.48	16.77
First Busey	$1.04B	2.10	$135.26M	$2.25	11.52

Peapack-Gladstone Financial currently has a consensus price target of $40.50, indicating a potential downside of 2.62%. First Busey has a consensus price target of $27.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.05%. Given First Busey's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe First Busey is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
First Busey	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than First Busey. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 2 mentions for First Busey. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat First Busey's score of 0.83 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
First Busey	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Busey has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

First Busey beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

First Financial Bancorp. currently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.89%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.62%. Given First Financial Bancorp.'s higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe First Financial Bancorp. is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, First Financial Bancorp. had 1 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for First Financial Bancorp. and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.87 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.	$961.73M	3.25	$255.60M	$2.83	10.52
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	$444.61M	1.66	$37.33M	$2.48	16.77

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.	20.92%	11.09%	1.49%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	9.60%	6.75%	0.59%

Summary

First Financial Bancorp. beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, risk and media sentiment.

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $65.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.29%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.62%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Great Southern Bancorp had 1 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.59 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.87 indicating that Great Southern Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp	$342.78M	2.16	$70.97M	$6.31	10.76
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	$444.61M	1.66	$37.33M	$2.48	16.77

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 11.29% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp	21.33%	11.29%	1.25%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	9.60%	6.75%	0.59%

Summary

Great Southern Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to OceanFirst Financial?

OceanFirst Financial (NASDAQ:OCFC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment and earnings.

OceanFirst Financial has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

OceanFirst Financial has a net margin of 10.04% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 6.75% beat OceanFirst Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
OceanFirst Financial	10.04%	5.35%	0.63%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	9.60%	6.75%	0.59%

OceanFirst Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. OceanFirst Financial pays out 68.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

OceanFirst Financial presently has a consensus price target of $21.67, suggesting a potential upside of 19.18%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.62%. Given OceanFirst Financial's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe OceanFirst Financial is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
OceanFirst Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

71.0% of OceanFirst Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of OceanFirst Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than OceanFirst Financial. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 2 mentions for OceanFirst Financial. OceanFirst Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.87 indicating that OceanFirst Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
OceanFirst Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

OceanFirst Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. OceanFirst Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
OceanFirst Financial	$687.16M	1.52	$70.98M	$1.17	15.54
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	$444.61M	1.66	$37.33M	$2.48	16.77

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial beats OceanFirst Financial on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
S&T Bancorp	$568.51M	2.77	$134.23M	$3.57	12.25
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	$444.61M	1.66	$37.33M	$2.48	16.77

65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 23.71% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.35% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
S&T Bancorp	23.71%	9.35%	1.38%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	9.60%	6.75%	0.59%

S&T Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $44.40, suggesting a potential upside of 1.56%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $40.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.62%. Given S&T Bancorp's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe S&T Bancorp is more favorable than Peapack-Gladstone Financial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
S&T Bancorp	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, S&T Bancorp had 2 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for S&T Bancorp and 3 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.87 indicating that S&T Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
S&T Bancorp	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. S&T Bancorp pays out 40.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PGC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Peapack-Gladstone Financial	BANKS Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$743.64M	$1.07B	$13.49B	$12.28B
Dividend Yield	0.48%	2.71%	5.81%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	16.77	16.41	23.13	25.58
Price / Sales	1.66	2.48	180.38	78.22
Price / Cash	15.28	23.65	20.50	55.34
Price / Book	1.10	1.14	2.14	6.66
Net Income	$37.33M	$75.93M	$1.11B	$333.63M
7 Day Performance	-2.42%	-2.12%	-1.14%	-0.12%
1 Month Performance	5.69%	-0.95%	0.14%	3.93%
1 Year Performance	42.53%	20.13%	10.81%	36.07%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PGC Peapack-Gladstone Financial	4.0618 of 5 stars	$41.59 -0.9%	$40.50 -2.6%	+41.5%	$743.64M	$444.61M	16.77	500	Analyst Upgrade
BUSE First Busey	4.2952 of 5 stars	$26.59 +1.4%	$27.50 +3.4%	+15.1%	$2.27B	$1.04B	11.82	1,948	Analyst Upgrade
FFBC First Financial Bancorp.	4.0391 of 5 stars	$30.41 +1.3%	$33.00 +8.5%	+18.1%	$3.19B	$961.73M	10.74	2,199	Positive News
GSBC Great Southern Bancorp	3.0805 of 5 stars	$69.47 +1.1%	$65.00 -6.4%	+15.4%	$761.39M	$342.78M	11.01	1,075	Positive News
OCFC OceanFirst Financial	4.4383 of 5 stars	$18.97 +3.0%	$21.67 +14.2%	+3.1%	$1.09B	$687.16M	16.22	960

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 5/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

PGC vs. BUSE, FFBC, GSBC, OCFC, and STBA

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to OceanFirst Financial?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PGC vs. The Competition

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

PGC vs. BUSE, FFBC, GSBC, OCFC, and STBA

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

Is PGC or BUSE more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PGC or BUSE?

Is PGC or BUSE a better dividend stock?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, PGC or BUSE?

Do analysts prefer PGC or BUSE?

Does the media prefer PGC or BUSE?

Which has more volatility and risk, PGC or BUSE?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

Which has more risk and volatility, FFBC or PGC?

Do analysts recommend FFBC or PGC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in FFBC or PGC?

Is FFBC or PGC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer FFBC or PGC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FFBC or PGC?

Is FFBC or PGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Which has more risk and volatility, GSBC or PGC?

Do analysts recommend GSBC or PGC?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in GSBC or PGC?

Is GSBC or PGC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer GSBC or PGC?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, GSBC or PGC?

Is GSBC or PGC more profitable?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to OceanFirst Financial?

Which has more volatility and risk, OCFC or PGC?

Is OCFC or PGC more profitable?

Is OCFC or PGC a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend OCFC or PGC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in OCFC or PGC?

Does the media favor OCFC or PGC?

Which has better valuation and earnings, OCFC or PGC?

Summary

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

Which has more risk & volatility, STBA or PGC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, STBA or PGC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of STBA or PGC?

Is STBA or PGC more profitable?

Do analysts prefer STBA or PGC?

Does the media refer more to STBA or PGC?

Is STBA or PGC a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PGC vs. The Competition

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools