Free Trial

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

Peapack-Gladstone Financial logo
$46.00 -0.54 (-1.15%)
As of 12:30 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PGC vs. BUSE, DCOM, GSBC, OCFC, and STBA

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? Peapack-Gladstone Financial's main competitors and comparable companies include First Busey (BUSE), Dime Community Bancshares (DCOM), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), OceanFirst Financial (OCFC), and S&T Bancorp (STBA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Busey$1.04B2.31$135.26M$2.4511.90
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.86$37.33M$3.3313.97

56.5% of First Busey shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of First Busey shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, First Busey and First Busey both had 2 articles in the media. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat First Busey's score of 0.00 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Busey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

First Busey has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

First Busey has a net margin of 21.13% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 12.69%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.29% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Busey21.13% 10.29% 1.38%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 12.69%9.12%0.79%

First Busey presently has a consensus target price of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.35%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.07%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Busey pays out 42.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

First Busey and Peapack-Gladstone Financial tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Dime Community Bancshares?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and Dime Community Bancshares (NASDAQ:DCOM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Dime Community Bancshares pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dime Community Bancshares pays out 32.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Dime Community Bancshares has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Dime Community Bancshares is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dime Community Bancshares has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dime Community Bancshares had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Dime Community Bancshares and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Dime Community Bancshares' score of 0.21 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Dime Community Bancshares
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Dime Community Bancshares shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dime Community Bancshares has a net margin of 15.15% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 12.69%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial12.69% 9.12% 0.79%
Dime Community Bancshares 15.15%9.12%0.83%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial presently has a consensus price target of $56.33, indicating a potential upside of 21.07%. Dime Community Bancshares has a consensus price target of $45.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.71%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Dime Community Bancshares.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Dime Community Bancshares
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Dime Community Bancshares has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Dime Community Bancshares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.86$37.33M$3.3313.97
Dime Community Bancshares$509.18M3.66$110.68M$3.0813.84

Summary

Dime Community Bancshares beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Great Southern Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 1 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Great Southern Bancorp's score of 0.71 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Great Southern Bancorp currently has a consensus target price of $74.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.70%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.07%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 30.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Great Southern Bancorp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp$342.78M2.61$70.97M$5.7314.30
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.86$37.33M$3.3313.97

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 19.85% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 12.69%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 10.62% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp19.85% 10.62% 1.21%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 12.69%9.12%0.79%

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Great Southern Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to OceanFirst Financial?

OceanFirst Financial (NASDAQ:OCFC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

OceanFirst Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. OceanFirst Financial pays out 111.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a net margin of 12.69% compared to OceanFirst Financial's net margin of 5.28%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity of 9.12% beat OceanFirst Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
OceanFirst Financial5.28% 6.55% 0.72%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 12.69%9.12%0.79%

71.0% of OceanFirst Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.4% of OceanFirst Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

OceanFirst Financial has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

OceanFirst Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than OceanFirst Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
OceanFirst Financial$687.16M2.57$70.98M$0.7225.36
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.86$37.33M$3.3313.97

In the previous week, OceanFirst Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for OceanFirst Financial and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. OceanFirst Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.75 indicating that OceanFirst Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
OceanFirst Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

OceanFirst Financial currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.05%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.07%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than OceanFirst Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
OceanFirst Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial beats OceanFirst Financial on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

S&T Bancorp currently has a consensus price target of $52.20, suggesting a potential upside of 1.60%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $56.33, suggesting a potential upside of 21.07%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

S&T Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&T Bancorp$568.51M3.19$134.23M$3.9413.04
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.86$37.33M$3.3313.97

S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. S&T Bancorp pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 6.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, S&T Bancorp had 3 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for S&T Bancorp and 2 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Peapack-Gladstone Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat S&T Bancorp's score of 0.72 indicating that Peapack-Gladstone Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
S&T Bancorp
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.74, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 25.10% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 12.69%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 10.11% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
S&T Bancorp25.10% 10.11% 1.46%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 12.69%9.12%0.79%

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PGC vs. The Competition

MetricPeapack-Gladstone FinancialBanks IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$815.49M$22.99B$14.02B$11.95B
Dividend Yield0.42%3.09%4.83%4.41%
P/E Ratio13.8117.6321.2730.61
Price / Sales1.832.614.785.93
Price / Cash17.2414.7020.4622.89
Price / Book1.231.341.843.96
Net Income$37.33M$2.61B$1.32B$381.23M
7 Day Performance-1.11%0.80%0.18%-1.46%
1 Month Performance6.05%1.76%-0.09%-7.01%
1 Year Performance77.04%20.50%4.99%-6.58%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
3.9078 of 5 stars
$46.00
-1.1%
$56.33
+22.5%
+81.1%$815.49M$444.61M13.81682
BUSE
First Busey
3.0929 of 5 stars
$30.20
-0.6%
$31.00
+2.7%
+26.8%$2.49B$1.04B12.481,948
DCOM
Dime Community Bancshares
3.9156 of 5 stars
$42.48
-1.1%
$45.50
+7.1%
+58.1%$1.87B$489.44M17.99902
GSBC
Great Southern Bancorp
2.468 of 5 stars
$81.50
+0.0%
$74.00
-9.2%
+43.3%$888.03M$342.78M14.221,075
OCFC
OceanFirst Financial
4.0647 of 5 stars
$16.67
+1.1%
$19.00
+14.0%
+2.2%$1.61B$687.16M19.62954

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 11/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners