Go Pro

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (PGC) Competitors

Peapack-Gladstone Financial logo
$46.22 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$46.40 +0.19 (+0.40%)
As of 09:02 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

PGC vs. BUSE, FFBC, GSBC, STBA, and THFF

Should you buy Peapack-Gladstone Financial stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Peapack-Gladstone Financial with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Peapack-Gladstone Financial include First Busey (BUSE), First Financial Bancorp. (FFBC), Great Southern Bancorp (GSBC), S&T Bancorp (STBA), and First Financial Corporation Indiana (THFF). These companies are all part of the "regional banks" industry.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Busey?

First Busey (NASDAQ:BUSE) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

First Busey has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 4 more articles in the media than First Busey. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 2 mentions for First Busey. First Busey's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.31 indicating that First Busey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Busey
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

First Busey pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Busey pays out 46.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Busey has raised its dividend for 10 consecutive years. First Busey is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Busey has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Busey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Busey$790.86M3.12$135.26M$2.2512.98
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.84$37.33M$2.4818.64

First Busey presently has a consensus price target of $29.60, suggesting a potential upside of 1.37%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $49.67, suggesting a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Busey.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Busey
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40

First Busey has a net margin of 19.16% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. First Busey's return on equity of 10.19% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Busey19.16% 10.19% 1.36%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 9.60%6.75%0.59%

56.5% of First Busey shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of First Busey shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

First Busey beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Bancorp.?

First Financial Bancorp. (NASDAQ:FFBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

First Financial Bancorp. has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Bancorp. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Financial Bancorp.$1.26B2.87$255.60M$2.8312.18
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.84$37.33M$2.4818.64

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than First Financial Bancorp.. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 5 mentions for First Financial Bancorp.. First Financial Bancorp.'s average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.31 indicating that First Financial Bancorp. is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
First Financial Bancorp.
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

77.2% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Financial Bancorp. shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

First Financial Bancorp. pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Financial Bancorp. pays out 35.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Bancorp. has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. First Financial Bancorp. is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Financial Bancorp. currently has a consensus target price of $33.67, indicating a potential downside of 2.33%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus target price of $49.67, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Financial Bancorp..

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Financial Bancorp.
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40

First Financial Bancorp. has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

First Financial Bancorp. has a net margin of 20.92% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. First Financial Bancorp.'s return on equity of 11.09% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Financial Bancorp.20.92% 11.09% 1.49%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 9.60%6.75%0.59%

Summary

First Financial Bancorp. beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to Great Southern Bancorp?

Great Southern Bancorp (NASDAQ:GSBC) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

Great Southern Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Great Southern Bancorp pays out 27.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Great Southern Bancorp had 4 more articles in the media than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Great Southern Bancorp and 6 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.31 indicating that Great Southern Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Great Southern Bancorp
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Great Southern Bancorp presently has a consensus price target of $65.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.28%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a consensus price target of $49.67, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than Great Southern Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Great Southern Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40

41.7% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Great Southern Bancorp shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Great Southern Bancorp has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. Great Southern Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Great Southern Bancorp$342.78M2.47$70.97M$6.3112.30
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.84$37.33M$2.4818.64

Great Southern Bancorp has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market.

Great Southern Bancorp has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. Great Southern Bancorp's return on equity of 11.29% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Great Southern Bancorp21.33% 11.29% 1.25%
Peapack-Gladstone Financial 9.60%6.75%0.59%

Summary

Great Southern Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to S&T Bancorp?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and S&T Bancorp (NASDAQ:STBA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

S&T Bancorp has higher revenue and earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. S&T Bancorp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.84$37.33M$2.4818.64
S&T Bancorp$568.51M3.09$134.23M$3.5713.66

S&T Bancorp has a net margin of 23.71% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. S&T Bancorp's return on equity of 9.35% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial9.60% 6.75% 0.59%
S&T Bancorp 23.71%9.35%1.38%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. S&T Bancorp pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. S&T Bancorp pays out 41.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&T Bancorp has increased its dividend for 13 consecutive years. S&T Bancorp is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 4 more articles in the media than S&T Bancorp. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 2 mentions for S&T Bancorp. S&T Bancorp's average media sentiment score of 1.43 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.31 indicating that S&T Bancorp is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
S&T Bancorp
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Peapack-Gladstone Financial currently has a consensus price target of $49.67, indicating a potential upside of 7.46%. S&T Bancorp has a consensus price target of $46.60, indicating a potential downside of 4.41%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than S&T Bancorp.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40
S&T Bancorp
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, S&T Bancorp has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of S&T Bancorp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

S&T Bancorp beats Peapack-Gladstone Financial on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Peapack-Gladstone Financial compare to First Financial Corporation Indiana?

Peapack-Gladstone Financial (NASDAQ:PGC) and First Financial Corporation Indiana (NASDAQ:THFF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and dividends.

First Financial Corporation Indiana has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Peapack-Gladstone Financial. First Financial Corporation Indiana is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Peapack-Gladstone Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Peapack-Gladstone Financial$444.61M1.84$37.33M$2.4818.64
First Financial Corporation Indiana$347.56M2.57$79.21M$6.8011.06

First Financial Corporation Indiana has a net margin of 22.82% compared to Peapack-Gladstone Financial's net margin of 9.60%. First Financial Corporation Indiana's return on equity of 12.81% beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Peapack-Gladstone Financial9.60% 6.75% 0.59%
First Financial Corporation Indiana 22.82%12.81%1.39%

In the previous week, Peapack-Gladstone Financial had 1 more articles in the media than First Financial Corporation Indiana. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Peapack-Gladstone Financial and 5 mentions for First Financial Corporation Indiana. First Financial Corporation Indiana's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Peapack-Gladstone Financial's score of 0.31 indicating that First Financial Corporation Indiana is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
First Financial Corporation Indiana
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Peapack-Gladstone Financial currently has a consensus price target of $49.67, suggesting a potential upside of 7.46%. First Financial Corporation Indiana has a consensus price target of $70.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.94%. Given Peapack-Gladstone Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Peapack-Gladstone Financial is more favorable than First Financial Corporation Indiana.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.40
First Financial Corporation Indiana
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

72.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.7% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Peapack-Gladstone Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.0% of First Financial Corporation Indiana shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial has a beta of 0.71, suggesting that its share price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Financial Corporation Indiana has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays an annual dividend of $2.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Peapack-Gladstone Financial pays out 8.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. First Financial Corporation Indiana pays out 32.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. First Financial Corporation Indiana has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. First Financial Corporation Indiana is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Peapack-Gladstone Financial beats First Financial Corporation Indiana on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Peapack-Gladstone Financial News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PGC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PGC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PGC vs. The Competition

MetricPeapack-Gladstone FinancialBANKS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$819.02M$1.20B$14.24B$12.64B
Dividend Yield0.43%2.54%5.70%8.01%
P/E Ratio18.6419.2320.5124.52
Price / Sales1.842.6744.5598.85
Price / Cash16.8324.8919.3449.38
Price / Book1.231.282.266.43
Net Income$37.33M$75.93M$1.13B$331.05M
7 Day Performance-3.39%-0.88%-0.56%-1.34%
1 Month Performance-0.06%1.23%0.78%0.51%
1 Year Performance55.15%25.83%12.55%22.23%

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PGC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial
4.3939 of 5 stars
$46.22
flat
$49.67
+7.5%
+55.2%$819.02M$444.61M18.64500
BUSE
First Busey
4.3283 of 5 stars
$29.32
-0.6%
$29.60
+1.0%
+21.9%$2.48B$1.04B13.031,948
FFBC
First Financial Bancorp.
3.4891 of 5 stars
$34.41
-0.6%
$33.33
-3.1%
+35.4%$3.61B$1.26B12.162,199
GSBC
Great Southern Bancorp
2.2856 of 5 stars
$77.92
-0.7%
$65.00
-16.6%
+28.9%$848.55M$342.78M12.351,075
STBA
S&T Bancorp
2.316 of 5 stars
$48.81
-1.1%
$46.60
-4.5%
+24.4%$1.76B$410.45M13.671,209

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:PGC) was last updated on 7/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners