Rimini Street (RMNI) Competitors

95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Rimini Street shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.0% of Rimini Street shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASGN currently has a consensus price target of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 11.25%. Rimini Street has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 45.41%. Given Rimini Street's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Rimini Street is more favorable than ASGN.

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Rimini Street's net margin of 1.69%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat Rimini Street's return on equity.

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than Rimini Street. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rimini Street, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rimini Street had 6 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Rimini Street and 0 mentions for ASGN. Rimini Street's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat ASGN's score of 0.00 indicating that Rimini Street is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ASGN has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rimini Street has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Rimini Street shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.0% of Rimini Street shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rimini Street has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rimini Street, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rimini Street has a net margin of 1.69% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -65.20%. BigBear.ai's return on equity of -13.44% beat Rimini Street's return on equity.

BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.35, suggesting that its stock price is 235% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rimini Street has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

BigBear.ai presently has a consensus target price of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 83.42%. Rimini Street has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 45.41%. Given BigBear.ai's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than Rimini Street.

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 3 more articles in the media than Rimini Street. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for BigBear.ai and 6 mentions for Rimini Street. Rimini Street's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.32 indicating that Rimini Street is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

82.5% of Rackspace Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Rimini Street shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Rackspace Technology shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.0% of Rimini Street shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Rimini Street has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rackspace Technology. Rackspace Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rimini Street, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Rackspace Technology had 34 more articles in the media than Rimini Street. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Rackspace Technology and 6 mentions for Rimini Street. Rimini Street's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Rackspace Technology's score of 0.17 indicating that Rimini Street is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Rackspace Technology has a beta of 3.05, suggesting that its stock price is 205% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rimini Street has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Rimini Street has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Rackspace Technology's net margin of -5.88%. Rackspace Technology's return on equity of 0.00% beat Rimini Street's return on equity.

Rackspace Technology currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 14.94%. Rimini Street has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 45.41%. Given Rimini Street's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Rimini Street is more favorable than Rackspace Technology.

71.2% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Rimini Street shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Grid Dynamics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.0% of Rimini Street shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Rimini Street had 3 more articles in the media than Grid Dynamics. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Rimini Street and 3 mentions for Grid Dynamics. Grid Dynamics' average media sentiment score of 1.77 beat Rimini Street's score of 1.00 indicating that Grid Dynamics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Rimini Street has higher revenue and earnings than Grid Dynamics. Rimini Street is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Grid Dynamics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Rimini Street has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Grid Dynamics' net margin of 0.68%. Grid Dynamics' return on equity of 1.90% beat Rimini Street's return on equity.

Grid Dynamics currently has a consensus price target of $9.40, suggesting a potential upside of 17.21%. Rimini Street has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 45.41%. Given Rimini Street's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Rimini Street is more favorable than Grid Dynamics.

Grid Dynamics has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rimini Street has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.