Enova International Competitors

Discover Financial Services (NYSE:DFS) and Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Discover Financial Services and Enova International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Discover Financial Services currently has a consensus price target of $85.1176, suggesting a potential downside of 13.03%. Enova International has a consensus price target of $38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Enova International's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enova International is more favorable than Discover Financial Services.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

84.7% of Discover Financial Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.6% of Enova International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Discover Financial Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of Enova International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk and Volatility

Discover Financial Services has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enova International has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Discover Financial Services and Enova International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Discover Financial Services and Enova International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Discover Financial Services has higher revenue and earnings than Enova International. Enova International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Discover Financial Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Discover Financial Services beats Enova International on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) and Santander Consumer USA (NYSE:SC) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Risk & Volatility

Enova International has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Santander Consumer USA has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Enova International and Santander Consumer USA, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Enova International currently has a consensus price target of $38.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.63%. Santander Consumer USA has a consensus price target of $24.25, indicating a potential downside of 4.38%. Given Enova International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enova International is more favorable than Santander Consumer USA.

Profitability

This table compares Enova International and Santander Consumer USA's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

75.6% of Enova International shares are held by institutional investors. 7.5% of Enova International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Santander Consumer USA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Enova International and Santander Consumer USA's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Santander Consumer USA has higher revenue and earnings than Enova International. Enova International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Santander Consumer USA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Enova International beats Santander Consumer USA on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

OneMain (NYSE:OMF) and Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares OneMain and Enova International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

OneMain has higher revenue and earnings than Enova International. OneMain is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enova International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

85.1% of OneMain shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.6% of Enova International shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of OneMain shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of Enova International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

OneMain has a beta of 2.28, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enova International has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares OneMain and Enova International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for OneMain and Enova International, as provided by MarketBeat.

OneMain currently has a consensus target price of $49.7692, indicating a potential upside of 3.21%. Enova International has a consensus target price of $38.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Enova International's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enova International is more favorable than OneMain.

Summary

OneMain beats Enova International on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Credit Acceptance (NASDAQ:CACC) and Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

71.4% of Credit Acceptance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.6% of Enova International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.2% of Credit Acceptance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of Enova International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Credit Acceptance has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enova International has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its share price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Credit Acceptance and Enova International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Credit Acceptance and Enova International's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Credit Acceptance has higher revenue and earnings than Enova International. Enova International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Credit Acceptance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Credit Acceptance and Enova International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Credit Acceptance currently has a consensus target price of $288.50, suggesting a potential downside of 23.77%. Enova International has a consensus target price of $38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Enova International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Enova International is more favorable than Credit Acceptance.

Summary

Enova International beats Credit Acceptance on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

SLM (NASDAQ:SLM) and Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for SLM and Enova International, as provided by MarketBeat.

SLM currently has a consensus target price of $16.4167, suggesting a potential upside of 3.06%. Enova International has a consensus target price of $38.00, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Enova International's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enova International is more favorable than SLM.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

95.7% of SLM shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.6% of Enova International shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of SLM shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.5% of Enova International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares SLM and Enova International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares SLM and Enova International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

SLM has higher revenue and earnings than Enova International. Enova International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SLM, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

SLM has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enova International has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its share price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

SLM beats Enova International on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Enova International (NYSE:ENVA) and Open Lending (NASDAQ:LPRO) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Enova International and Open Lending, as reported by MarketBeat.

Enova International currently has a consensus price target of $38.00, indicating a potential upside of 20.63%. Open Lending has a consensus price target of $39.4545, indicating a potential downside of 3.70%. Given Enova International's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Enova International is more favorable than Open Lending.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Enova International and Open Lending's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Enova International has higher revenue and earnings than Open Lending.

Profitability

This table compares Enova International and Open Lending's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Enova International has a beta of 1.8, indicating that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Open Lending has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

75.6% of Enova International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.5% of Open Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 7.5% of Enova International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 20.0% of Open Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Enova International beats Open Lending on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.