S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
S&P 500   3,841.47 (-0.30%)
DOW   30,996.98 (-0.57%)
QQQ   325.42 (-0.29%)
AAPL   139.07 (+1.61%)
MSFT   225.95 (+0.44%)
FB   274.50 (+0.60%)
GOOGL   1,892.56 (+0.45%)
AMZN   3,292.23 (-0.45%)
TSLA   846.64 (+0.20%)
NVDA   548.50 (-1.12%)
BABA   258.62 (-0.53%)
CGC   33.80 (+0.72%)
GE   11.11 (+0.36%)
MU   82.28 (-3.21%)
AMD   92.79 (+1.38%)
NIO   61.95 (+6.19%)
T   28.93 (+0.35%)
F   11.52 (-0.09%)
ACB   10.65 (-4.66%)
BA   205.84 (-0.76%)
DIS   172.78 (+0.88%)
NFLX   565.17 (-2.53%)
GILD   66.94 (-0.06%)
Log in
NYSE:JWN

Nordstrom Competitors

$37.37
+1.13 (+3.12 %)
(As of 01/22/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$35.40
Now: $37.37
$37.38
50-Day Range
$29.33
MA: $32.46
$38.02
52-Week Range
$11.72
Now: $37.37
$41.31
Volume2.56 million shs
Average Volume5.19 million shs
Market Capitalization$5.89 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.44

Competitors

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) Vs. FTCH, EXPE, KMX, QSR, TSCO, and ULTA

Should you be buying JWN stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "retail/wholesale" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nordstrom, including Farfetch (FTCH), Expedia Group (EXPE), CarMax (KMX), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Tractor Supply (TSCO), and Ulta Beauty (ULTA).

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Farfetch (NYSE:FTCH) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Farfetch, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
Farfetch021102.85

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Farfetch has a consensus target price of $51.5385, indicating a potential downside of 18.19%. Given Farfetch's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Farfetch is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Farfetch has a beta of 3.53, suggesting that its share price is 253% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Farfetch shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Farfetch's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
Farfetch$1.02 billion20.95$-385,300,000.00($1.21)-52.07

Nordstrom has higher revenue and earnings than Farfetch. Farfetch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordstrom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Farfetch's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
Farfetch-77.29%-81.22%-31.98%

Summary

Nordstrom beats Farfetch on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Expedia Group (NASDAQ:EXPE) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Expedia Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
Expedia Group1171202.37

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Expedia Group has a consensus target price of $123.0690, indicating a potential downside of 9.85%. Given Expedia Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Expedia Group is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expedia Group has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Expedia Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Expedia Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Expedia Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
Expedia Group$12.07 billion1.60$565 million$4.9127.80

Expedia Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expedia Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Expedia Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
Expedia Group-30.64%-21.33%-3.99%

Summary

Expedia Group beats Nordstrom on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and CarMax (NYSE:KMX) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and CarMax, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
CarMax211312.76

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. CarMax has a consensus target price of $108.6250, indicating a potential downside of 8.44%. Given CarMax's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CarMax is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CarMax has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of CarMax shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of CarMax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and CarMax's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
CarMax$20.32 billion0.95$888.43 million$5.3322.26

CarMax has higher revenue and earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CarMax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and CarMax's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
CarMax4.01%20.30%3.77%

Summary

CarMax beats Nordstrom on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
Restaurant Brands International151902.72

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $64.9091, indicating a potential upside of 8.04%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.26$643 million$2.7222.09

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Nordstrom on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Tractor Supply, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
Tractor Supply017812.38

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Tractor Supply has a consensus target price of $137.96, indicating a potential downside of 11.35%. Given Tractor Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tractor Supply is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Tractor Supply shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Tractor Supply's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
Tractor Supply$8.35 billion2.17$562.35 million$4.6833.25

Tractor Supply has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tractor Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Tractor Supply's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
Tractor Supply7.62%46.65%12.23%

Summary

Tractor Supply beats Nordstrom on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nordstrom49201.87
Ulta Beauty091602.64

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus target price of $276.36, indicating a potential downside of 7.86%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nordstrom$15.52 billion0.38$496 million$3.3711.09
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion2.28$705.95 million$11.9125.18

Ulta Beauty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nordstrom-4.57%-77.24%-3.56%
Ulta Beauty3.63%15.94%5.59%

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Nordstrom on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nordstrom Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Farfetch logo
FTCH
Farfetch
1.5$63.00+1.5%$21.39 billion$1.02 billion-18.26Analyst Report
News Coverage
Expedia Group logo
EXPE
Expedia Group
1.4$136.52+1.7%$19.31 billion$12.07 billion-8.74Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
CarMax logo
KMX
CarMax
1.8$118.64+1.4%$19.28 billion$20.32 billion26.13Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
Restaurant Brands International logo
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
2.1$60.08+0.8%$18.29 billion$5.60 billion32.65Analyst Downgrade
Tractor Supply logo
TSCO
Tractor Supply
1.8$155.62+0.3%$18.13 billion$8.35 billion24.16Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Ulta Beauty logo
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
1.8$299.92+0.1%$16.90 billion$7.40 billion75.74Analyst Report
Burlington Stores logo
BURL
Burlington Stores
1.2$252.25+0.7%$16.71 billion$7.29 billion-97.02Analyst Report
Tiffany & Co. logo
TIF
Tiffany & Co.
1.9$131.46+0.0%$15.96 billion$4.42 billion64.44
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$121.98+2.4%$15.90 billion$7.81 billion-127.06Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Domino's Pizza logo
DPZ
Domino's Pizza
1.9$380.37+0.2%$14.99 billion$3.62 billion32.59Analyst Report
L Brands logo
LB
L Brands
1.3$45.28+1.4%$12.59 billion$12.91 billion-58.05Analyst Downgrade
Advance Auto Parts logo
AAP
Advance Auto Parts
1.9$163.76+1.8%$11.11 billion$9.71 billion23.80
Five Below logo
FIVE
Five Below
1.4$189.67+0.5%$10.60 billion$1.85 billion97.27Analyst Report
RH logo
RH
RH
1.2$502.02+0.2%$10.24 billion$2.65 billion64.03Analyst Report
Stitch Fix logo
SFIX
Stitch Fix
1.4$96.92+15.3%$10.16 billion$1.71 billion-170.04Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Williams-Sonoma logo
WSM
Williams-Sonoma
1.7$132.32+4.2%$10.14 billion$5.90 billion25.50Analyst Upgrade
Tapestry logo
TPR
Tapestry
1.6$34.33+1.7%$9.52 billion$4.96 billion-21.46Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
MNSO
MINISO Group
1.7$30.38+0.2%$9.23 billion$1.28 billion0.00Analyst Report
News Coverage
Lithia Motors logo
LAD
Lithia Motors
2.6$338.03+2.2%$8.97 billion$12.67 billion22.39News Coverage
The Gap logo
GPS
The Gap
1.3$22.59+0.1%$8.45 billion$16.38 billion-7.74Analyst Report
Levi Strauss & Co. logo
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
1.3$20.80+0.2%$8.26 billion$5.76 billion-86.66Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Fiverr International logo
FVRR
Fiverr International
1.2$243.75+0.9%$7.56 billion$107.07 million-566.85Analyst Downgrade
Casey's General Stores logo
CASY
Casey's General Stores
1.8$197.41+0.6%$7.29 billion$9.18 billion22.38
Kohl's logo
KSS
Kohl's
1.3$45.18+0.9%$7.12 billion$19.97 billion-28.96Analyst Report
Performance Food Group logo
PFGC
Performance Food Group
1.7$51.54+0.2%$6.88 billion$25.09 billion-44.43Analyst Report
AutoNation logo
AN
AutoNation
1.0$76.69+0.7%$6.74 billion$21.34 billion17.47
CPRI
Capri
1.6$44.34+1.6%$6.68 billion$5.55 billion-16.36Analyst Upgrade
Herbalife Nutrition logo
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition
2.0$49.66+1.8%$6.54 billion$4.88 billion19.25
DICK'S Sporting Goods logo
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods
2.1$68.12+0.5%$6.10 billion$8.75 billion16.78Analyst Report
Tempur Sealy International logo
TPX
Tempur Sealy International
1.4$28.84+0.7%$5.95 billion$3.11 billion24.65
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$79.71+1.7%$5.54 billion$2.76 billion102.19Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
Penske Automotive Group logo
PAG
Penske Automotive Group
2.0$65.32+1.2%$5.25 billion$23.18 billion11.83
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.8$42.88+0.7%$5.01 billion$7.28 billion23.56
Foot Locker logo
FL
Foot Locker
2.7$47.55+0.6%$4.96 billion$8.01 billion14.15Analyst Upgrade
QRTEB
Qurate Retail
0.8$11.75+0.1%$4.90 billion$13.46 billion7.26
Qurate Retail logo
QRTEA
Qurate Retail
1.8$11.73+0.7%$4.89 billion$13.46 billion7.24
BIGC
BigCommerce
1.1$71.25+0.1%$4.83 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Gap Up
The Wendy's logo
WEN
The Wendy's
2.2$20.85+1.9%$4.67 billion$1.71 billion43.44Analyst Report
Wingstop logo
WING
Wingstop
1.5$155.44+0.9%$4.61 billion$199.68 million161.92Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Shake Shack logo
SHAK
Shake Shack
1.3$111.21+1.9%$4.61 billion$594.52 million-165.98Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Analyst Revision
GameStop logo
GME
GameStop
0.9$65.01+33.8%$4.53 billion$6.47 billion-15.30Insider Selling
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
TripAdvisor logo
TRIP
TripAdvisor
1.1$33.19+1.3%$4.46 billion$1.56 billion-21.98Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Up
JMIA
Jumia Technologies
0.8$56.96+20.0%$4.35 billion$180.10 million-16.70High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.3$231.13+2.6%$4.21 billion$571.85 million28.64
VVNT
Vivint Smart Home
1.2$20.58+0.4%$4.08 billionN/A147.00
American Eagle Outfitters logo
AEO
American Eagle Outfitters
1.6$24.28+1.4%$4.03 billion$4.31 billion-19.12Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Macy's logo
M
Macy's
1.4$12.88+4.3%$4.00 billion$24.56 billion-1.06Analyst Report
News Coverage
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição logo
CBD
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição
1.5$13.79+2.9%$3.68 billion$13.76 billion31.34Gap Up
Bed Bath & Beyond logo
BBBY
Bed Bath & Beyond
0.9$30.21+11.1%$3.66 billion$11.16 billion-16.51High Trading Volume
Gap Up
BMC Stock logo
BMCH
BMC Stock
1.1$53.68+0.0%$3.61 billion$3.63 billion27.67
This page was last updated on 1/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.