Nordstrom Competitors

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Farfetch (NYSE:FTCH) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Farfetch, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Farfetch has a consensus target price of $51.5385, indicating a potential downside of 18.19%. Given Farfetch's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Farfetch is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Farfetch has a beta of 3.53, suggesting that its share price is 253% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.7% of Farfetch shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Farfetch's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Nordstrom has higher revenue and earnings than Farfetch. Farfetch is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nordstrom, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Farfetch's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Nordstrom beats Farfetch on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Expedia Group (NASDAQ:EXPE) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Expedia Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Expedia Group has a consensus target price of $123.0690, indicating a potential downside of 9.85%. Given Expedia Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Expedia Group is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expedia Group has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Expedia Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Expedia Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Expedia Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Expedia Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expedia Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Expedia Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Expedia Group beats Nordstrom on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and CarMax (NYSE:KMX) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and CarMax, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. CarMax has a consensus target price of $108.6250, indicating a potential downside of 8.44%. Given CarMax's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CarMax is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CarMax has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its share price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of CarMax shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of CarMax shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and CarMax's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CarMax has higher revenue and earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CarMax, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and CarMax's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CarMax beats Nordstrom on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Restaurant Brands International has a consensus target price of $64.9091, indicating a potential upside of 8.04%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Restaurant Brands International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Restaurant Brands International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Restaurant Brands International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Nordstrom on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Tractor Supply, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Tractor Supply has a consensus target price of $137.96, indicating a potential downside of 11.35%. Given Tractor Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Tractor Supply is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.3% of Tractor Supply shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Tractor Supply's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Tractor Supply has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tractor Supply, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Tractor Supply's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Tractor Supply beats Nordstrom on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nordstrom (NYSE:JWN) and Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty, as provided by MarketBeat.

Nordstrom presently has a consensus target price of $30.50, indicating a potential downside of 18.38%. Ulta Beauty has a consensus target price of $276.36, indicating a potential downside of 7.86%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Nordstrom.

Risk & Volatility

Nordstrom has a beta of 2.44, suggesting that its share price is 144% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.73, suggesting that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

63.3% of Nordstrom shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.8% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of Nordstrom shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ulta Beauty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Nordstrom. Nordstrom is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ulta Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Nordstrom and Ulta Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Nordstrom on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.