Do analysts prefer SBDS or KMRK?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 K-Tech Solutions 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, SBDS or KMRK?

K-Tech Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Solo Brands $316.58M 0.02 -$101.32M -$48.15 N/A K-Tech Solutions $16.16M 1.23 $170K N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend SBDS or NWTG?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Newton Golf 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is SBDS or NWTG more profitable?

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Newton Golf's net margin of -124.42%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Newton Golf's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Solo Brands -32.01% -8.67% -2.30% Newton Golf -124.42% -476.84% -260.68%

Do analysts recommend VEEE or SBDS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Twin Vee PowerCats 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Do analysts recommend SBDS or YMAT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 J-Star 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SBDS or YMAT?

J-Star has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Solo Brands $316.58M 0.02 -$101.32M -$48.15 N/A J-Star $9.93M 0.44 -$20.17M N/A N/A

Is SBDS or YMAT more profitable?

J-Star has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. J-Star's return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Solo Brands -32.01% -8.67% -2.30% J-Star N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend TRNR or SBDS?

Interactive Strength currently has a consensus price target of $157.50, indicating a potential upside of 5,150.00%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Solo Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Interactive Strength 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Solo Brands 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Solo Brands (SBDS) Competitors

$2.84 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 09/18/2026

Compare

SBDS vs. KMRK, NWTG, VEEE, YMAT, and TRNR

Should you buy Solo Brands stock or one of its competitors? Solo Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include K-Tech Solutions (KMRK), Newton Golf (NWTG), Twin Vee PowerCats (VEEE), J-Star (YMAT), and Interactive Strength (TRNR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Solo Brands compare to K-Tech Solutions?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and K-Tech Solutions (NASDAQ:KMRK) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

K-Tech Solutions has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. K-Tech Solutions' return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%
K-Tech Solutions	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled K-Tech Solutions'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands	Neutral
K-Tech Solutions	Neutral

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.66, indicating that its stock price is 366% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, K-Tech Solutions has a beta of 4.9, indicating that its stock price is 390% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
K-Tech Solutions	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

K-Tech Solutions has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A
K-Tech Solutions	$16.16M	1.23	$170K	N/A	N/A

Summary

K-Tech Solutions beats Solo Brands on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Newton Golf?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and Newton Golf (NASDAQ:NWTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Newton Golf shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Newton Golf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Newton Golf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Newton Golf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A
Newton Golf	$8.14M	0.66	-$6.02M	-$1.93	N/A

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.66, suggesting that its share price is 366% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newton Golf has a beta of 2.51, suggesting that its share price is 151% more volatile than the broader market.

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Newton Golf's net margin of -124.42%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Newton Golf's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%
Newton Golf	-124.42%	-476.84%	-260.68%

In the previous week, Newton Golf's average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Solo Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Newton Golf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands	Neutral
Newton Golf	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Newton Golf	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Summary

Solo Brands beats Newton Golf on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Twin Vee PowerCats (NASDAQ:VEEE) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, profitability and dividends.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Twin Vee PowerCats	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Twin Vee PowerCats has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands. Twin Vee PowerCats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Twin Vee PowerCats	$14.82M	0.34	-$8.61M	-$106.89	N/A
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A

In the previous week, Twin Vee PowerCats' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solo Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Twin Vee PowerCats	Neutral
Solo Brands	Neutral

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats' net margin of -76.31%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Twin Vee PowerCats' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Twin Vee PowerCats	-76.31%	-67.71%	-52.33%
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.66, indicating that its share price is 366% more volatile than the broader market.

15.6% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Solo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Solo Brands beats Twin Vee PowerCats on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to J-Star?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and J-Star (NASDAQ:YMAT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends and earnings.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
J-Star	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.66, meaning that its stock price is 366% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, J-Star has a beta of 12.43, meaning that its stock price is 1,143% more volatile than the broader market.

J-Star has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A
J-Star	$9.93M	0.44	-$20.17M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, J-Star had 1 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for J-Star and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled J-Star'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands	Neutral
J-Star	Neutral

J-Star has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. J-Star's return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%
J-Star	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

J-Star beats Solo Brands on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Interactive Strength?

Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Interactive Strength	-159.24%	-469.40%	-52.97%
Solo Brands	-32.01%	-8.67%	-2.30%

0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Solo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Interactive Strength has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands. Solo Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Interactive Strength	$11.53M	0.42	-$23.97M	-$306.87	N/A
Solo Brands	$316.58M	0.02	-$101.32M	-$48.15	N/A

Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.66, indicating that its stock price is 366% more volatile than the broader market.

Interactive Strength currently has a consensus price target of $157.50, indicating a potential upside of 5,150.00%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Solo Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Interactive Strength	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Solo Brands	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solo Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Interactive Strength	Neutral
Solo Brands	Neutral

Summary

Solo Brands beats Interactive Strength on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Solo Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SBDS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Solo Brands	Leisure Products Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$7.29M	$3.02B	$12.48B	$23.10B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.60%	61.18%	3.62%
P/E Ratio	-0.05	575.79	44.26	28.19
Price / Sales	0.02	37.24	93.50	20.34
Price / Cash	0.43	18.03	28.39	36.36
Price / Book	0.14	3.56	3.96	4.67
Net Income	-$101.32M	$81.71M	$445.74M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-15.02%	-2.68%	-1.62%	-1.64%
1 Month Performance	-18.86%	-5.72%	-4.59%	-3.60%
1 Year Performance	N/A	-7.26%	-7.86%	8.41%

Solo Brands Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SBDS Solo Brands	N/A	$2.84 flat	N/A	N/A	$7.29M	$316.58M	N/A	300	Gap Up
KMRK K-Tech Solutions	N/A	$1.02 +7.4%	N/A	-34.2%	$18.52M	$16.16M	N/A	19	Positive News Gap Down
NWTG Newton Golf	0.914 of 5 stars	$1.17 +2.6%	N/A	-41.8%	$5.24M	$8.14M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage
VEEE Twin Vee PowerCats	0.6837 of 5 stars	$8.58 -2.1%	N/A	-90.4%	$5.12M	$14.82M	N/A	120	Short Interest Decrease
YMAT J-Star	N/A	$1.36 -6.8%	N/A	-78.6%	$4.67M	$9.93M	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SBDS) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Solo Brands (SBDS) Competitors

SBDS vs. KMRK, NWTG, VEEE, YMAT, and TRNR

How does Solo Brands compare to K-Tech Solutions?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Newton Golf?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to J-Star?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Interactive Strength?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SBDS vs. The Competition

Solo Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Solo Brands (SBDS) Competitors

SBDS vs. KMRK, NWTG, VEEE, YMAT, and TRNR

How does Solo Brands compare to K-Tech Solutions?

Is SBDS or KMRK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to SBDS or KMRK?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in SBDS or KMRK?

Which has more risk & volatility, SBDS or KMRK?

Do analysts prefer SBDS or KMRK?

Which has better earnings and valuation, SBDS or KMRK?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Newton Golf?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in SBDS or NWTG?

Which has better valuation & earnings, SBDS or NWTG?

Which has more risk & volatility, SBDS or NWTG?

Is SBDS or NWTG more profitable?

Does the media favor SBDS or NWTG?

Do analysts recommend SBDS or NWTG?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Do analysts recommend VEEE or SBDS?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, VEEE or SBDS?

Does the media prefer VEEE or SBDS?

Is VEEE or SBDS more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, VEEE or SBDS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in VEEE or SBDS?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to J-Star?

Do analysts recommend SBDS or YMAT?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in SBDS or YMAT?

Which has more risk and volatility, SBDS or YMAT?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, SBDS or YMAT?

Does the media refer more to SBDS or YMAT?

Is SBDS or YMAT more profitable?

Summary

How does Solo Brands compare to Interactive Strength?

Is TRNR or SBDS more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TRNR or SBDS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, TRNR or SBDS?

Which has more risk & volatility, TRNR or SBDS?

Do analysts recommend TRNR or SBDS?

Does the media favor TRNR or SBDS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SBDS vs. The Competition

Solo Brands Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools