Free Trial

Solo Brands (SBDS) Competitors

$2.34 +0.05 (+2.18%)
As of 10/9/2026 03:54 PM Eastern

SBDS vs. KMRK, VEEE, NWTG, YMAT, and TRNR

Should you buy Solo Brands stock or one of its competitors? Solo Brands's main competitors and comparable companies include K-Tech Solutions (KMRK), Twin Vee PowerCats (VEEE), Newton Golf (NWTG), J-Star (YMAT), and Interactive Strength (TRNR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Solo Brands compare to K-Tech Solutions?

K-Tech Solutions (NASDAQ:KMRK) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K-Tech Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

K-Tech Solutions has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. K-Tech Solutions' return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K-Tech SolutionsN/A N/A N/A
Solo Brands -32.01%-8.67%-2.30%

In the previous week, K-Tech Solutions had 2 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for K-Tech Solutions and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. K-Tech Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solo Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
K-Tech Solutions Neutral
Solo Brands Neutral

K-Tech Solutions has a beta of 4.81, indicating that its stock price is 381% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, indicating that its stock price is 368% more volatile than the broader market.

K-Tech Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K-Tech Solutions$16.16M1.42$170KN/AN/A
Solo Brands$316.58M0.02-$101.32M-$48.15N/A

Summary

K-Tech Solutions beats Solo Brands on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and Twin Vee PowerCats (NASDAQ:VEEE) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, indicating that its stock price is 368% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Twin Vee PowerCats had 6 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Twin Vee PowerCats and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Twin Vee PowerCats' average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat Solo Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Twin Vee PowerCats is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands Neutral
Twin Vee PowerCats Neutral

Twin Vee PowerCats has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Twin Vee PowerCats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands$316.58M0.02-$101.32M-$48.15N/A
Twin Vee PowerCats$14.82M0.39-$8.61M-$106.89N/A

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats' net margin of -76.31%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Twin Vee PowerCats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solo Brands-32.01% -8.67% -2.30%
Twin Vee PowerCats -76.31%-67.71%-52.33%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Twin Vee PowerCats
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.6% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Solo Brands beats Twin Vee PowerCats on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Newton Golf?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and Newton Golf (NASDAQ:NWTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Newton Golf's net margin of -124.42%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Newton Golf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solo Brands-32.01% -8.67% -2.30%
Newton Golf -124.42%-476.84%-260.68%

Newton Golf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Newton Golf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands$316.58M0.02-$101.32M-$48.15N/A
Newton Golf$8.14M0.61-$6.02M-$1.93N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Newton Golf
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Newton Golf had 5 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Newton Golf and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Newton Golf'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands Neutral
Newton Golf Neutral

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, indicating that its share price is 368% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newton Golf has a beta of 2.47, indicating that its share price is 147% more volatile than the broader market.

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Newton Golf shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Newton Golf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Solo Brands beats Newton Golf on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to J-Star?

J-Star (NASDAQ:YMAT) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and profitability.

J-Star has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
J-Star$9.93M0.42-$20.17MN/AN/A
Solo Brands$316.58M0.02-$101.32M-$48.15N/A

In the previous week, J-Star had 4 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for J-Star and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. J-Star's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solo Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
J-Star Neutral
Solo Brands Neutral

J-Star has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. J-Star's return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
J-StarN/A N/A N/A
Solo Brands -32.01%-8.67%-2.30%

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

J-Star has a beta of 12.54, indicating that its stock price is 1,154% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, indicating that its stock price is 368% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
J-Star
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

J-Star beats Solo Brands on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Interactive Strength?

Interactive Strength (NASDAQ:TRNR) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Interactive Strength's net margin of -159.24%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Interactive Strength's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Interactive Strength-159.24% -469.40% -52.97%
Solo Brands -32.01%-8.67%-2.30%

0.6% of Interactive Strength shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Interactive Strength shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Interactive Strength has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.68, meaning that its stock price is 368% more volatile than the broader market.

Interactive Strength has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands. Solo Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Interactive Strength, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Interactive Strength$20.74M0.16-$23.97M-$306.87N/A
Solo Brands$316.58M0.02-$101.32M-$48.15N/A

In the previous week, Interactive Strength had 2 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Interactive Strength and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Interactive Strength's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Solo Brands' score of 0.00 indicating that Interactive Strength is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Interactive Strength Positive
Solo Brands Neutral

Interactive Strength currently has a consensus price target of $157.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7,435.89%. Given Interactive Strength's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Interactive Strength is more favorable than Solo Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Interactive Strength
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Interactive Strength and Solo Brands tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Solo Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBDS vs. The Competition

MetricSolo BrandsLeisure Products IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$5.88M$3.01B$12.41B$22.94B
Dividend YieldN/A2.61%70.37%3.72%
P/E Ratio-0.04577.2244.9928.60
Price / Sales0.0237.7187.7615.23
Price / Cash0.4318.4331.6337.72
Price / Book0.113.343.984.72
Net Income-$101.32M$80.91M$444.34M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-22.00%-2.81%-0.04%0.35%
1 Month Performance-29.98%-3.59%-2.34%-2.93%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-3.57%-4.15%9.26%

Solo Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBDS
Solo Brands
N/A$2.34
+2.2%
N/AN/A$5.88M$316.58MN/A300
KMRK
K-Tech Solutions
0.1365 of 5 stars
$1.15
+7.0%
N/A-15.1%$20.96M$16.16MN/A19
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
0.6753 of 5 stars
$10.87
-3.5%
N/A-89.5%$6.58M$14.82MN/A70
NWTG
Newton Golf
0.3379 of 5 stars
$1.22
+15.1%
N/A-43.2%$4.87M$8.14MN/A39
YMAT
J-Star
N/A$1.45
-2.4%
N/A-79.0%$4.74M$9.93MN/A65

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SBDS) was last updated on 10/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners