Go Pro

Solo Brands (SBDS) Competitors

$4.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/7/2026 02:48 PM Eastern

SBDS vs. KBSX, KMRK, VEEE, YMAT, and NWTG

Should you buy Solo Brands stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Solo Brands with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Solo Brands include FST (KBSX), K-Tech Solutions (KMRK), Twin Vee PowerCats (VEEE), J-Star (YMAT), and Newton Golf (NWTG). These companies are all part of the "leisure products" industry.

How does Solo Brands compare to FST?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and FST (NASDAQ:KBSX) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

FST has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. FST is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands$316.58M0.03-$101.32M-$55.36N/A
FST$47.97M0.77-$1.50M-$0.01N/A

FST has a net margin of -0.90% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. FST's return on equity of 1.66% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solo Brands-32.01% -8.67% -2.30%
FST -0.90%1.66%0.40%

In the previous week, FST had 1 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for FST and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled FST'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands Neutral
FST Neutral

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of FST shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.6% of FST shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.69, suggesting that its share price is 369% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FST has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

FST has a consensus target price of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 308.16%. Given FST's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FST is more favorable than Solo Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FST
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

FST beats Solo Brands on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to K-Tech Solutions?

K-Tech Solutions (NASDAQ:KMRK) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

K-Tech Solutions has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. K-Tech Solutions' return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
K-Tech SolutionsN/A N/A N/A
Solo Brands -32.01%-8.67%-2.30%

In the previous week, K-Tech Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Solo Brands'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
K-Tech Solutions Neutral
Solo Brands Neutral

K-Tech Solutions has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
K-Tech Solutions$18.61M1.25$490KN/AN/A
Solo Brands$316.58M0.03-$101.32M-$55.36N/A

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
K-Tech Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

K-Tech Solutions beats Solo Brands on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Twin Vee PowerCats?

Twin Vee PowerCats (NASDAQ:VEEE) and Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

15.6% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 18.2% of Twin Vee PowerCats shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Twin Vee PowerCats has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Solo Brands. Twin Vee PowerCats is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Twin Vee PowerCats$14.82M0.36-$8.61M-$106.89N/A
Solo Brands$316.58M0.03-$101.32M-$55.36N/A

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Twin Vee PowerCats' net margin of -76.31%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Twin Vee PowerCats' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Twin Vee PowerCats-76.31% -66.47% -53.14%
Solo Brands -32.01%-8.67%-2.30%

In the previous week, Twin Vee PowerCats had 1 more articles in the media than Solo Brands. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Twin Vee PowerCats and 0 mentions for Solo Brands. Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Twin Vee PowerCats' score of -1.29 indicating that Solo Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Twin Vee PowerCats Negative
Solo Brands Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Twin Vee PowerCats
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solo Brands has a beta of 4.69, indicating that its stock price is 369% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Solo Brands beats Twin Vee PowerCats on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to J-Star?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and J-Star (NASDAQ:YMAT) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

J-Star has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands$316.58M0.03-$101.32M-$55.36N/A
J-Star$9.93M0.64-$20.17MN/AN/A

J-Star has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solo Brands' net margin of -32.01%. J-Star's return on equity of 0.00% beat Solo Brands' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solo Brands-32.01% -8.67% -2.30%
J-Star N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
J-Star
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat J-Star's score of -0.44 indicating that Solo Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands Neutral
J-Star Neutral

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

J-Star beats Solo Brands on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solo Brands compare to Newton Golf?

Solo Brands (NYSE:SBDS) and Newton Golf (NASDAQ:NWTG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solo Brands
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Newton Golf
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Solo Brands has a net margin of -32.01% compared to Newton Golf's net margin of -103.02%. Solo Brands' return on equity of -8.67% beat Newton Golf's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solo Brands-32.01% -8.67% -2.30%
Newton Golf -103.02%-476.84%-184.18%

In the previous week, Solo Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Newton Golf'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solo Brands Neutral
Newton Golf Neutral

Newton Golf has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Solo Brands. Newton Golf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solo Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solo Brands$316.58M0.03-$101.32M-$55.36N/A
Newton Golf$8.14M0.65-$6.02M-$1.78N/A

84.5% of Solo Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Newton Golf shares are held by institutional investors. 4.0% of Solo Brands shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Newton Golf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Solo Brands has a beta of 4.69, suggesting that its share price is 369% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Newton Golf has a beta of 2.46, suggesting that its share price is 146% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Solo Brands beats Newton Golf on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Solo Brands News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SBDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SBDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SBDS vs. The Competition

MetricSolo BrandsLeisure Products IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$10.24M$3.24B$13.36B$24.16B
Dividend YieldN/A2.41%53.98%3.69%
P/E Ratio-0.06572.3146.7529.13
Price / Sales0.0336.5590.7514.39
Price / Cash0.4318.4719.3119.37
Price / Book0.203.654.554.91
Net Income-$101.32M$82.14M$443.65M$1.06B
7 Day Performance2.56%1.42%0.76%1.35%
1 Month Performance15.94%6.61%1.93%2.32%
1 Year PerformanceN/A2.51%3.10%20.14%

Solo Brands Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SBDS
Solo Brands
0.0762 of 5 stars
$4.00
flat
N/AN/A$10.24M$316.58MN/A300
KBSX
FST
2.1826 of 5 stars
$0.88
-1.9%
$4.00
+353.0%
-38.5%$33.97M$47.97MN/AN/A
KMRK
K-Tech Solutions
N/A$1.07
+11.3%
N/A-23.0%$18.75M$18.61MN/A19
VEEE
Twin Vee PowerCats
0.5781 of 5 stars
$11.70
-7.0%
N/A-89.1%$6.66M$14.82MN/A120
YMAT
J-Star
N/A$1.88
+5.6%
N/A-91.6%$5.70M$9.93MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SBDS) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners