Diamondback Energy (FANG) Competitors

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Viper Energy. Viper Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 45 more articles in the media than Viper Energy. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 25 mentions for Viper Energy. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Viper Energy's score of 0.91 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Viper Energy has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $215.70, suggesting a potential upside of 13.35%. Viper Energy has a consensus target price of $56.43, suggesting a potential upside of 20.11%. Given Viper Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Viper Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 1.87% compared to Viper Energy's net margin of -2.77%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 7.76% beat Viper Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Viper Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Viper Energy pays out -475.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Viper Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of Viper Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Viper Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a net margin of 12.10% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. ConocoPhillips' return on equity of 11.39% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

ConocoPhillips currently has a consensus target price of $133.04, indicating a potential upside of 15.84%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $215.70, indicating a potential upside of 13.35%. Given ConocoPhillips' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 20 more articles in the media than ConocoPhillips. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 50 mentions for ConocoPhillips. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 0.75 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

87.9% of Coterra Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Coterra Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Coterra Energy has a net margin of 22.46% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Coterra Energy's return on equity of 10.43% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Coterra Energy currently has a consensus target price of $37.32, indicating a potential upside of 15.71%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus target price of $215.70, indicating a potential upside of 13.35%. Given Coterra Energy's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coterra Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 53 more articles in the media than Coterra Energy. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 17 mentions for Coterra Energy. Coterra Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.01 indicating that Coterra Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Coterra Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Coterra Energy pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Coterra Energy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Coterra Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Coterra Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Diamondback Energy. Coterra Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Diamondback Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diamondback Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Devon Energy has a net margin of 13.71% compared to Diamondback Energy's net margin of 1.87%. Devon Energy's return on equity of 15.22% beat Diamondback Energy's return on equity.

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Diamondback Energy pays out 488.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Diamondback Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 20 more articles in the media than Devon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 70 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 50 mentions for Devon Energy. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Diamondback Energy's score of 1.01 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Diamondback Energy presently has a consensus target price of $215.70, indicating a potential upside of 13.35%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $55.93, indicating a potential upside of 23.27%. Given Devon Energy's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Diamondback Energy.