Open Text Competitors

Cerner (NASDAQ:CERN) and Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Cerner and Open Text's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

83.0% of Cerner shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Open Text shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Cerner shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Open Text shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cerner and Open Text's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cerner has higher revenue and earnings than Open Text. Open Text is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cerner, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Cerner has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Open Text has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Cerner pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Open Text pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Cerner pays out 36.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Open Text pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cerner has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Open Text has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Open Text is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Cerner and Open Text, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cerner currently has a consensus price target of $79.7778, indicating a potential upside of 15.39%. Open Text has a consensus price target of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Open Text's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Open Text is more favorable than Cerner.

Summary

Open Text beats Cerner on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

GoDaddy (NYSE:GDDY) and Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares GoDaddy and Open Text's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.2% of GoDaddy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Open Text shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of GoDaddy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Open Text shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares GoDaddy and Open Text's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Open Text has higher revenue and earnings than GoDaddy. Open Text is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than GoDaddy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

GoDaddy has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Open Text has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for GoDaddy and Open Text, as reported by MarketBeat.

GoDaddy currently has a consensus price target of $99.7143, indicating a potential upside of 22.92%. Open Text has a consensus price target of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Open Text's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Open Text is more favorable than GoDaddy.

Summary

Open Text beats GoDaddy on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Leidos (NYSE:LDOS) and Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) are both large-cap aerospace companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Leidos and Open Text's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

74.2% of Leidos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Open Text shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Leidos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Open Text shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Leidos and Open Text's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Leidos has higher revenue and earnings than Open Text. Open Text is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leidos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Leidos has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Open Text has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Leidos pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Open Text pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Leidos pays out 26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Open Text pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Leidos has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Open Text has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Open Text is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Leidos and Open Text, as reported by MarketBeat.

Leidos currently has a consensus price target of $116.3636, indicating a potential upside of 31.56%. Open Text has a consensus price target of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Leidos' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Leidos is more favorable than Open Text.

Summary

Leidos beats Open Text on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Jack Henry & Associates (NASDAQ:JKHY) and Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends and risk.

Dividends

Jack Henry & Associates pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Open Text pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Open Text pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jack Henry & Associates has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Open Text has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Open Text is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

88.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Open Text shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Jack Henry & Associates shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Open Text shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Jack Henry & Associates and Open Text's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Jack Henry & Associates has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Open Text. Open Text is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jack Henry & Associates, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Jack Henry & Associates and Open Text, as reported by MarketBeat.

Jack Henry & Associates currently has a consensus price target of $176.8889, indicating a potential upside of 19.17%. Open Text has a consensus price target of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Given Open Text's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Open Text is more favorable than Jack Henry & Associates.

Risk & Volatility

Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Open Text has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Jack Henry & Associates and Open Text's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Open Text beats Jack Henry & Associates on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) and CACI International (NYSE:CACI) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.0% of Open Text shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.8% of CACI International shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Open Text shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of CACI International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Open Text and CACI International's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

CACI International has higher revenue and earnings than Open Text. Open Text is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CACI International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Open Text and CACI International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Open Text currently has a consensus target price of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. CACI International has a consensus target price of $286.6364, indicating a potential upside of 29.50%. Given CACI International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe CACI International is more favorable than Open Text.

Risk and Volatility

Open Text has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CACI International has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Open Text and CACI International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CACI International beats Open Text on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Open Text (NASDAQ:OTEX) and Science Applications International (NYSE:SAIC) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Dividends

Open Text pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Science Applications International pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Open Text pays out 28.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Science Applications International pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Open Text has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Science Applications International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Open Text is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

64.0% of Open Text shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of Science Applications International shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.6% of Open Text shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Science Applications International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Open Text and Science Applications International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Open Text has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Science Applications International. Science Applications International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Open Text, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Open Text and Science Applications International, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Open Text currently has a consensus target price of $55.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.52%. Science Applications International has a consensus target price of $99.8750, indicating a potential upside of 15.96%. Given Open Text's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Open Text is more favorable than Science Applications International.

Volatility and Risk

Open Text has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Science Applications International has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Open Text and Science Applications International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Science Applications International beats Open Text on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.