Free Trial

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) Competitors

Black Stone Minerals logo
$13.69 -0.55 (-3.88%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.80 +0.11 (+0.82%)
As of 07:55 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BSM vs. CHRD, COP, CVE, DVN, and EOG

Should you be buying Black Stone Minerals stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Black Stone Minerals include Chord Energy (CHRD), ConocoPhillips (COP), Cenovus Energy (CVE), Devon Energy (DVN), and EOG Resources (EOG). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Chord Energy?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.29%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $152.23, suggesting a potential upside of 2.06%. Given Black Stone Minerals' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Black Stone Minerals is more favorable than Chord Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Chord Energy and 8 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Chord Energy
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out 825.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Black Stone Minerals is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 0.91%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.82% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.67% 41.82% 26.50%
Chord Energy 0.91%6.71%4.26%

Black Stone Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chord Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.18$299.93M$1.2810.69
Chord Energy$4.88B1.73$44.46M$0.63236.76

Summary

Black Stone Minerals and Chord Energy tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to ConocoPhillips?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.8% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.82% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.67% 41.82% 26.50%
ConocoPhillips 12.10%11.39%6.03%

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.29%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus target price of $133.04, indicating a potential upside of 7.88%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
16 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.70

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 60 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 68 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 8 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ConocoPhillips
33 Very Positive mention(s)
8 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
8 Negative mention(s)
5 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.18$299.93M$1.2810.69
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.44$7.99B$5.8920.94

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Cenovus Energy?

Cenovus Energy (NYSE:CVE) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

Cenovus Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Cenovus Energy pays out 38.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cenovus Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Cenovus Energy's net margin of 7.92%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.82% beat Cenovus Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cenovus Energy7.92% 13.25% 6.88%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%41.82%26.50%

Cenovus Energy currently has a consensus target price of $29.67, suggesting a potential downside of 2.65%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.29%. Given Black Stone Minerals' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Black Stone Minerals is more favorable than Cenovus Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cenovus Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.14
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

51.2% of Cenovus Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 17.8% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cenovus Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cenovus Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cenovus Energy$35.57B1.61$2.81B$1.5319.92
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.18$299.93M$1.2810.69

Cenovus Energy has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Cenovus Energy had 5 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Cenovus Energy and 8 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Cenovus Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Cenovus Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Cenovus Energy
8 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Cenovus Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus price target of $55.59, indicating a potential upside of 9.11%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.29%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 45 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 53 mentions for Devon Energy and 8 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
28 Very Positive mention(s)
15 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 15.37%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.82% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy15.37% 16.28% 7.93%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%41.82%26.50%

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. Devon Energy pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B1.84$2.64B$4.1712.22
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.18$299.93M$1.2810.69

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.43, meaning that its stock price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its stock price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Devon Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to EOG Resources?

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 30 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for EOG Resources and 8 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. EOG Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.37 indicating that EOG Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EOG Resources
23 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.8%. EOG Resources pays out 44.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 93.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources$22.63B3.34$4.98B$9.1115.47
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.18$299.93M$1.2810.69

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $153.68, suggesting a potential upside of 9.07%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.29%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EOG Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 22.00%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.82% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EOG Resources22.00% 18.67% 11.25%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%41.82%26.50%

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.07, meaning that its share price is 93% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

EOG Resources beats Black Stone Minerals on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Stone Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSM vs. The Competition

MetricBlack Stone MineralsE&P MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.02B$3.19B$10.78B$22.94B
Dividend Yield8.43%8.63%10.18%4.03%
P/E Ratio9.3712.1915.6828.60
Price / Sales6.183.451,019.7923.58
Price / Cash7.666.6237.4019.03
Price / Book3.505.794.444.68
Net Income$299.93M$150.80M$4.24B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-2.90%1.78%1.70%0.89%
1 Month Performance-6.55%-0.98%5.31%6.56%
1 Year Performance-4.02%2.41%66.02%31.66%

Black Stone Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
3.3276 of 5 stars
$13.69
-3.9%
$14.00
+2.3%
N/A$3.02B$469.92M9.37110
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.0999 of 5 stars
$137.69
+1.8%
$152.23
+10.6%
N/A$7.67B$4.88B218.56530
COP
ConocoPhillips
2.7888 of 5 stars
$121.82
+0.0%
$132.44
+8.7%
N/A$148.41B$61.55B19.219,900
CVE
Cenovus Energy
2.6096 of 5 stars
$26.80
+1.9%
$29.67
+10.7%
N/A$49.29B$35.57B17.517,211
DVN
Devon Energy
4.6272 of 5 stars
$48.26
+0.7%
$54.14
+12.2%
N/A$29.77B$17.19B11.572,200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BSM) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners