Go Pro

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) Competitors

Black Stone Minerals logo
$14.44 +0.06 (+0.42%)
As of 12:22 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BSM vs. CHRD, COP, DVN, EOG, and MGY

Should you buy Black Stone Minerals stock or one of its competitors? Black Stone Minerals's main competitors and comparable companies include Chord Energy (CHRD), ConocoPhillips (COP), Devon Energy (DVN), EOG Resources (EOG), and Magnolia Oil & Gas (MGY). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Chord Energy?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.88%. Chord Energy has a consensus price target of $152.54, suggesting a potential upside of 11.33%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Chord Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 105.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.72% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of 13.42%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.48% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.72% 41.48% 25.30%
Chord Energy 13.42%10.18%6.24%

Black Stone Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.53$299.93M$1.2111.93
Chord Energy$4.88B1.54$44.46M$14.929.18

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 10 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Chord Energy and 7 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Chord Energy's score of 0.71 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Chord Energy
11 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Chord Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and institutional ownership.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $137.68, indicating a potential upside of 8.50%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.88%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.68
Black Stone Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. ConocoPhillips pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 105.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.48$7.99B$7.5616.78
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.53$299.93M$1.2111.93

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, meaning that its stock price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.72% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 14.22%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.48% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips14.22% 14.72% 7.77%
Black Stone Minerals 61.72%41.48%25.30%

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 27 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 7 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.80 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
16 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Devon Energy?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.53$299.93M$1.2111.93
Devon Energy$17.19B2.90$2.64B$4.2110.78

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 105.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 30.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.72% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 16.67%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.48% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.72% 41.48% 25.30%
Devon Energy 16.67%14.93%7.91%

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 31 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 38 mentions for Devon Energy and 7 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.60 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.80 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Devon Energy
33 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.88%. Devon Energy has a consensus target price of $59.60, suggesting a potential upside of 31.32%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
23 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Summary

Devon Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to EOG Resources?

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.72% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 25.44%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.48% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EOG Resources25.44% 23.44% 13.58%
Black Stone Minerals 61.72%41.48%25.30%

In the previous week, EOG Resources and EOG Resources both had 7 articles in the media. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat EOG Resources' score of 0.66 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EOG Resources
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. EOG Resources pays out 31.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 105.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources$26.64B2.81$4.98B$12.8511.09
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.53$299.93M$1.2111.93

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $156.21, suggesting a potential upside of 9.64%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.88%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EOG Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48
Black Stone Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

EOG Resources beats Black Stone Minerals on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Magnolia Oil & Gas?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Magnolia Oil & Gas (NYSE:MGY) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, earnings and dividends.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.72% compared to Magnolia Oil & Gas' net margin of 28.77%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 41.48% beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.72% 41.48% 25.30%
Magnolia Oil & Gas 28.77%21.04%14.46%

In the previous week, Magnolia Oil & Gas had 11 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Magnolia Oil & Gas and 7 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Magnolia Oil & Gas' score of 0.68 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Magnolia Oil & Gas
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Magnolia Oil & Gas has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Magnolia Oil & Gas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.53$299.93M$1.2111.93
Magnolia Oil & Gas$1.31B3.69$325.25M$2.2811.47

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.7% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Magnolia Oil & Gas shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 105.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Magnolia Oil & Gas pays out 31.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Magnolia Oil & Gas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Black Stone Minerals presently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.88%. Magnolia Oil & Gas has a consensus target price of $31.58, suggesting a potential upside of 20.75%. Given Magnolia Oil & Gas' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Magnolia Oil & Gas is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Magnolia Oil & Gas
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Magnolia Oil & Gas has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Magnolia Oil & Gas beats Black Stone Minerals on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Stone Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSM vs. The Competition

MetricBlack Stone MineralsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.07B$11.14B$9.74B$24.28B
Dividend Yield8.85%11.34%11.58%3.69%
P/E Ratio11.9416.2820.1030.23
Price / Sales6.53484.04396.4520.54
Price / Cash7.7839.7136.0833.80
Price / Book3.773.172.986.64
Net Income$299.93M$5.27B$4.32B$1.06B
7 Day Performance2.68%3.16%3.48%0.56%
1 Month Performance0.77%4.27%4.29%3.17%
1 Year Performance15.95%35.45%38.86%18.64%

Black Stone Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
3.4803 of 5 stars
$14.44
+0.4%
$15.00
+3.9%
+13.8%$3.07B$469.92M11.94110
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.7961 of 5 stars
$139.33
-0.7%
$152.38
+9.4%
+32.7%$7.90B$4.88BN/A530
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.3462 of 5 stars
$119.21
-1.1%
$134.16
+12.5%
+30.4%$146.78B$61.55B20.249,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.8872 of 5 stars
$44.59
-1.2%
$59.56
+33.6%
+32.4%$28.04B$17.19B12.422,200
EOG
EOG Resources
3.7789 of 5 stars
$145.69
-2.0%
$155.57
+6.8%
+18.6%$79.20B$22.63B14.343,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BSM) was last updated on 8/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners