Free Trial

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) Competitors

Black Stone Minerals logo
$13.98 +0.01 (+0.04%)
Closing price 06/12/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.98 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 06/12/2026 06:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BSM vs. CHRD, COP, DVN, EOG, and KRP

Should you buy Black Stone Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Black Stone Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Black Stone Minerals include Chord Energy (CHRD), ConocoPhillips (COP), Devon Energy (DVN), EOG Resources (EOG), and Kimbell Royalty (KRP). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Chord Energy?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chord Energy had 9 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Chord Energy and 1 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Chord Energy's score of 1.17 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Chord Energy
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus target price of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.33%. Chord Energy has a consensus target price of $157.54, suggesting a potential upside of 16.40%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.05, meaning that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chord Energy has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.67% 42.40% 26.26%
Chord Energy -1.25%7.06%4.39%

Black Stone Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.32$299.93M$1.2711.00
Chord Energy$4.88B1.56$44.46M-$1.13N/A

Summary

Black Stone Minerals beats Chord Energy on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 47 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 48 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 1 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat ConocoPhillips' score of 1.18 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
32 Very Positive mention(s)
9 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.31$7.99B$5.8919.79
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.32$299.93M$1.2711.00

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $134.48, indicating a potential upside of 15.35%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips12.10% 11.39% 6.03%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.11, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Black Stone Minerals on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Devon Energy?

Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, suggesting that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Devon Energy presently has a consensus target price of $58.67, indicating a potential upside of 29.61%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
24 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Devon Energy$17.19B1.64$2.64B$3.5912.61
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.32$299.93M$1.2711.00

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 55 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 56 mentions for Devon Energy and 1 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Devon Energy's score of 1.16 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Devon Energy
36 Very Positive mention(s)
11 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Devon Energy pays out 26.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

69.7% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 13.71%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Devon Energy13.71% 15.22% 7.39%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

Summary

Devon Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to EOG Resources?

EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. EOG Resources pays out 40.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 17 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for EOG Resources and 1 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat EOG Resources' score of 1.49 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
EOG Resources
16 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EOG Resources$22.63B3.21$4.98B$10.1613.43
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.32$299.93M$1.2711.00

EOG Resources currently has a consensus price target of $156.32, indicating a potential upside of 14.59%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EOG Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
16 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 23.01%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EOG Resources23.01% 19.25% 11.37%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

EOG Resources has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.05, suggesting that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

EOG Resources beats Black Stone Minerals on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Kimbell Royalty?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

Kimbell Royalty presently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.61%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.33%. Given Kimbell Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Kimbell Royalty's net margin of 22.76%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty22.76% 11.70% 5.78%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Stone Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M4.95$90.95M$0.4633.27
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.32$299.93M$1.2711.00

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.05, indicating that its share price is 95% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kimbell Royalty had 4 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Kimbell Royalty and 1 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.84 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.6%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Black Stone Minerals beats Kimbell Royalty on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Stone Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSM vs. The Competition

MetricBlack Stone MineralsE&P MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.97B$3.18B$10.14B$23.31B
Dividend Yield8.59%9.21%10.42%4.05%
P/E Ratio11.0011.6620.3331.31
Price / Sales6.323.49764.38100.05
Price / Cash7.516.7237.2618.65
Price / Book3.575.734.254.69
Net Income$299.93M$150.80M$4.24B$1.08B
7 Day Performance0.77%-1.09%-1.06%2.07%
1 Month Performance-0.29%0.54%-3.26%3.44%
1 Year Performance0.19%4.09%37.42%24.11%

Black Stone Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
3.7625 of 5 stars
$13.98
+0.0%
$15.00
+7.3%
+0.2%$2.97B$469.92M11.00110
CHRD
Chord Energy
3.8586 of 5 stars
$138.27
+2.6%
$157.54
+13.9%
+27.6%$7.59B$4.88BN/A530
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.6064 of 5 stars
$118.95
+1.5%
$134.48
+13.1%
+20.2%$142.71B$61.55B20.199,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.8951 of 5 stars
$45.11
+1.9%
$58.67
+30.1%
+29.0%$27.52B$17.19B12.562,200
EOG
EOG Resources
4.219 of 5 stars
$140.20
+1.8%
$156.32
+11.5%
+8.7%$73.39B$22.63B13.803,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BSM) was last updated on 6/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners