Go Pro

Black Stone Minerals (BSM) Competitors

Black Stone Minerals logo
$13.76 -0.03 (-0.18%)
Closing price 07/2/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.87 +0.11 (+0.79%)
As of 07/2/2026 08:00 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BSM vs. CHRD, COP, DVN, EOG, and KRP

Should you buy Black Stone Minerals stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Black Stone Minerals with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Black Stone Minerals include Chord Energy (CHRD), ConocoPhillips (COP), Devon Energy (DVN), EOG Resources (EOG), and Kimbell Royalty (KRP). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Chord Energy?

Chord Energy (NASDAQ:CHRD) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both mid-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Chord Energy has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

Chord Energy pays an annual dividend of $5.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Chord Energy pays out -460.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chord Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Black Stone Minerals has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Chord Energy. Chord Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Black Stone Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Chord Energy$4.88B1.31$44.46M-$1.13N/A
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.22$299.93M$1.2710.84

In the previous week, Chord Energy and Chord Energy both had 2 articles in the media. Chord Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.62 indicating that Chord Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Chord Energy
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Chord Energy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Chord Energy's net margin of -1.25%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Chord Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Chord Energy-1.25% 7.06% 4.39%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

Chord Energy currently has a consensus target price of $157.08, indicating a potential upside of 38.61%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.97%. Given Chord Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Chord Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Chord Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.69
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Summary

Chord Energy and Black Stone Minerals tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to ConocoPhillips?

ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

82.4% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, ConocoPhillips had 7 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for ConocoPhillips and 2 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. ConocoPhillips' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.62 indicating that ConocoPhillips is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ConocoPhillips
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $3.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. ConocoPhillips pays out 57.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

ConocoPhillips has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

ConocoPhillips presently has a consensus target price of $134.76, indicating a potential upside of 28.79%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus target price of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.97%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ConocoPhillips
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.61
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to ConocoPhillips' net margin of 12.10%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat ConocoPhillips' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ConocoPhillips12.10% 11.39% 6.03%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ConocoPhillips, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ConocoPhillips$61.55B2.07$7.99B$5.8917.77
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.22$299.93M$1.2710.84

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats Black Stone Minerals on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Devon Energy?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

Black Stone Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $59.38, suggesting a potential upside of 46.85%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
Devon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
24 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.90

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Devon Energy's net margin of 13.71%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Devon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.67% 42.40% 26.26%
Devon Energy 13.71%15.22%7.39%

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of Devon Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Devon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Devon Energy had 30 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for Devon Energy and 2 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. Devon Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.62 indicating that Devon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Devon Energy
14 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 35.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Devon Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Devon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.22$299.93M$1.2710.84
Devon Energy$17.19B1.46$2.64B$3.5911.26

Summary

Devon Energy beats Black Stone Minerals on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to EOG Resources?

Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and risk.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to EOG Resources' net margin of 23.01%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat EOG Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Black Stone Minerals61.67% 42.40% 26.26%
EOG Resources 23.01%19.25%11.37%

In the previous week, EOG Resources had 12 more articles in the media than Black Stone Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for EOG Resources and 2 mentions for Black Stone Minerals. EOG Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Black Stone Minerals' score of 0.62 indicating that EOG Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
EOG Resources
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, indicating that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 0.25, indicating that its share price is 75% less volatile than the broader market.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Black Stone Minerals. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EOG Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.22$299.93M$1.2710.84
EOG Resources$23.50B2.96$4.98B$10.1612.87

Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources pays out 40.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years.

14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of EOG Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of EOG Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Black Stone Minerals presently has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $155.25, suggesting a potential upside of 18.69%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
EOG Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
16 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Summary

EOG Resources beats Black Stone Minerals on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Black Stone Minerals compare to Kimbell Royalty?

Kimbell Royalty (NYSE:KRP) and Black Stone Minerals (NYSE:BSM) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Kimbell Royalty currently has a consensus price target of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.10%. Black Stone Minerals has a consensus price target of $15.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.97%. Given Kimbell Royalty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kimbell Royalty is more favorable than Black Stone Minerals.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kimbell Royalty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Black Stone Minerals
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

Kimbell Royalty pays an annual dividend of $1.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Black Stone Minerals pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.7%. Kimbell Royalty pays out 356.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Black Stone Minerals pays out 94.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Kimbell Royalty has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Black Stone Minerals has a beta of 0.04, suggesting that its stock price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

25.8% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kimbell Royalty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.7% of Black Stone Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Black Stone Minerals has a net margin of 61.67% compared to Kimbell Royalty's net margin of 22.76%. Black Stone Minerals' return on equity of 42.40% beat Kimbell Royalty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kimbell Royalty22.76% 11.70% 5.78%
Black Stone Minerals 61.67%42.40%26.26%

In the previous week, Black Stone Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Kimbell Royalty. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Black Stone Minerals and 1 mentions for Kimbell Royalty. Black Stone Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Kimbell Royalty's score of 0.00 indicating that Black Stone Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kimbell Royalty
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Black Stone Minerals
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Black Stone Minerals has higher revenue and earnings than Kimbell Royalty. Black Stone Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimbell Royalty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kimbell Royalty$333.83M4.68$90.95M$0.4631.53
Black Stone Minerals$469.92M6.22$299.93M$1.2710.84

Summary

Black Stone Minerals beats Kimbell Royalty on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Black Stone Minerals News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSM vs. The Competition

MetricBlack Stone MineralsE&P MLP IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.93B$3.16B$9.73B$23.54B
Dividend Yield8.70%9.50%10.67%3.98%
P/E Ratio10.8411.7818.3731.55
Price / Sales6.223.44688.8521.71
Price / Cash7.426.6237.9825.36
Price / Book3.525.674.094.81
Net Income$299.93M$150.80M$4.25B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.87%0.22%-0.16%0.56%
1 Month Performance-0.79%-1.15%-6.48%4.54%
1 Year Performance4.60%5.70%26.94%18.23%

Black Stone Minerals Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSM
Black Stone Minerals
4.0319 of 5 stars
$13.77
-0.2%
$15.00
+9.0%
+4.6%$2.93B$469.92M10.84110
CHRD
Chord Energy
4.1217 of 5 stars
$124.45
+1.1%
$157.54
+26.6%
+8.6%$6.93B$4.88BN/A530
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.3884 of 5 stars
$109.60
+1.7%
$134.32
+22.6%
+11.0%$131.26B$61.55B18.619,900
DVN
Devon Energy
4.8426 of 5 stars
$43.03
+2.2%
$58.52
+36.0%
+21.8%$26.17B$17.19B11.992,200
EOG
EOG Resources
4.5311 of 5 stars
$132.67
+2.1%
$156.00
+17.6%
+5.1%$69.23B$23.50B13.063,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BSM) was last updated on 7/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners