Log in

NYSE:PANWPalo Alto Networks Competitors & Alternatives

$235.91
+5.38 (+2.33 %)
(As of 07/6/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$232.11
Now: $235.91
$238.53
50-Day Range
$221.85
MA: $230.35
$239.86
52-Week Range
$125.47
Now: $235.91
$251.10
Volume1.02 million shs
Average Volume1.50 million shs
Market Capitalization$23.52 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.19

Competitors

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) Vs. CSCO, QCOM, MSI, CIEN, FFIV, and JNPR

Should you be buying PANW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sub-industry of "communications equipment" are considered alternatives and competitors to Palo Alto Networks, including Cisco Systems (CSCO), QUALCOMM (QCOM), Motorola Solutions (MSI), Ciena (CIEN), F5 Networks (FFIV), and Juniper Networks (JNPR).

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
Cisco Systems$51.90 billion3.78$11.62 billion$2.8516.29

Cisco Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Cisco Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
Cisco Systems0131402.52

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Cisco Systems has a consensus target price of $50.3636, indicating a potential upside of 8.50%. Given Palo Alto Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than Cisco Systems.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
Cisco Systems21.32%36.47%13.65%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Cisco Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cisco Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
QUALCOMM$24.27 billion4.31$4.39 billion$2.8432.72

QUALCOMM has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. QUALCOMM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
QUALCOMM451502.46

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. QUALCOMM has a consensus target price of $92.9524, indicating a potential upside of 0.03%. Given Palo Alto Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than QUALCOMM.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QUALCOMM has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
QUALCOMM16.36%69.92%9.49%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of QUALCOMM shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of QUALCOMM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

QUALCOMM beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Motorola Solutions (NYSE:MSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
Motorola Solutions$7.89 billion2.93$868 million$7.4418.28

Motorola Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Motorola Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
Motorola Solutions131102.67

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Motorola Solutions has a consensus target price of $155.3950, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Motorola Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorola Solutions is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
Motorola Solutions11.60%-146.43%12.82%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Motorola Solutions beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Ciena shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Ciena's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
Ciena$3.57 billion2.43$253.43 million$1.8430.74

Ciena has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Ciena is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Palo Alto Networks and Ciena, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
Ciena141502.70

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Ciena has a consensus target price of $57.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Palo Alto Networks' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than Ciena.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Ciena's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
Ciena8.78%16.18%9.20%

Summary

Ciena beats Palo Alto Networks on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and F5 Networks (NASDAQ:FFIV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of F5 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of F5 Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
F5 Networks$2.24 billion3.79$427.73 million$8.2416.95

F5 Networks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Palo Alto Networks. F5 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, F5 Networks has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
F5 Networks18902.44

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. F5 Networks has a consensus target price of $153.4118, indicating a potential upside of 9.82%. Given F5 Networks' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe F5 Networks is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
F5 Networks14.77%24.67%12.12%

Summary

F5 Networks beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palo Alto Networks$2.90 billion8.11$-81,900,000.00$0.63374.46
Juniper Networks$4.45 billion1.68$345 million$1.2118.63

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Juniper Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Juniper Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Palo Alto Networks-7.01%-6.50%-1.31%
Juniper Networks7.53%8.93%4.64%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Palo Alto Networks0102202.69
Juniper Networks48802.20

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Juniper Networks has a consensus target price of $24.6190, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Given Juniper Networks' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Juniper Networks is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Summary

Juniper Networks beats Palo Alto Networks on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Cisco Systems logo
CSCO
Cisco Systems
2.1$46.42+1.7%$192.66 billion$51.90 billion18.42
QUALCOMM logo
QCOM
QUALCOMM
2.3$92.92+1.1%$103.35 billion$24.27 billion27.49Decrease in Short Interest
Motorola Solutions logo
MSI
Motorola Solutions
2.3$136.01+0.7%$22.97 billion$7.89 billion26.16
Ciena logo
CIEN
Ciena
1.6$56.57+5.9%$8.59 billion$3.57 billion27.60Decrease in Short Interest
F5 Networks logo
FFIV
F5 Networks
1.4$139.70+0.8%$8.42 billion$2.24 billion24.86
Juniper Networks logo
JNPR
Juniper Networks
1.8$22.54+0.0%$7.57 billion$4.45 billion23.24
Echostar logo
SATS
Echostar
1.8$26.45+0.0%$2.59 billion$1.89 billion-19.45
ViaSat logo
VSAT
ViaSat
1.9$37.46+2.1%$2.28 billion$2.31 billion-3,742.26Increase in Short Interest
InterDigital Wireless logo
IDCC
InterDigital Wireless
2.1$57.43+3.5%$1.79 billion$318.92 million76.57Increase in Short Interest
Infinera logo
INFN
Infinera
1.9$6.25+5.4%$1.10 billion$1.30 billion-3.08
Calix logo
CALX
Calix
1.9$14.46+0.4%$818.79 million$424.33 million-55.62Increase in Short Interest
NetGear logo
NTGR
NetGear
1.7$24.61+0.8%$718.12 million$998.76 million91.15Increase in Short Interest
Plantronics logo
PLT
Plantronics
1.7$14.70+0.7%$598.05 million$1.70 billion-0.72Decrease in Short Interest
Ribbon Communications logo
RBBN
Ribbon Communications
1.4$4.16+4.3%$576.19 million$563.11 million-3.56
ADTRAN logo
ADTN
ADTRAN
1.4$11.24+6.4%$504.51 million$530.06 million-8.52Decrease in Short Interest
Extreme Networks logo
EXTR
Extreme Networks
2.3$4.12+0.2%$495.26 million$995.79 million-4.04Increase in Short Interest
Harmonic logo
HLIT
Harmonic
1.4$4.97+2.2%$469.38 million$402.87 million-27.61
Comtech Telecomm. logo
CMTL
Comtech Telecomm.
2.2$16.24+1.2%$396.50 million$671.80 million33.14Increase in Short Interest
Digi International logo
DGII
Digi International
1.9$11.19+0.1%$324.01 million$254.20 million50.87
CalAmp logo
CAMP
CalAmp
2.2$7.73+2.6%$265.68 million$366.11 million-3.08
KVH Industries logo
KVHI
KVH Industries
1.8$8.43+0.5%$151.68 million$157.89 million4.44
PC Tel logo
PCTI
PC Tel
2.3$6.81+3.5%$126.53 million$90.62 million37.84Decrease in Short Interest
Bel Fuse logo
BELFB
Bel Fuse
1.7$9.89+2.7%$120.52 million$492.41 million-8.83
Aviat Networks logo
AVNW
Aviat Networks
1.5$20.23+8.1%$100.20 million$243.86 million38.90High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
AWRE
Aware
1.1$3.07+0.7%$66.07 million$12.20 million-6.82Decrease in Short Interest
TESSCO Technologies logo
TESS
TESSCO Technologies
0.9$5.34+1.3%$46.92 million$540.30 million-2.11
WRLS
Pensare Acquisition
0.8$3.55+10.4%$36.10 millionN/A0.00High Trading Volume
Westell Technologies logo
WSTL
Westell Technologies
0.6$0.84+6.0%$12.49 million$29.96 million-1.29High Trading Volume
Increase in Short Interest
This page was last updated on 7/7/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for $1.00

Sign up for MarketBeat All Access to gain access to MarketBeat's full suite of research tools:

  • Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

    View the latest news, buy/sell ratings, SEC filings and insider transactions for your stocks. Compare your portfolio performance to leading indices and get personalized stock ideas based on your portfolio.

  • Stock Ideas and Recommendations

    Get daily stock ideas top-performing Wall Street analysts. Get short term trading ideas from the MarketBeat Idea Engine. View which stocks are hot on social media with MarketBeat's trending stocks report.

  • Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

    Identify stocks that meet your criteria using seven unique stock screeners. See what's happening in the market right now with MarketBeat's real-time news feed. Export data to Excel for your own analysis.

Start Your Risk-Free Trial Subscription Here

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.