NYSE:PANWPalo Alto Networks Competitors & Alternatives

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cisco Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Cisco Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Cisco Systems has a consensus target price of $50.3636, indicating a potential upside of 8.50%. Given Palo Alto Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than Cisco Systems.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Cisco Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.5% of Cisco Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Cisco Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and QUALCOMM (NASDAQ:QCOM) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

QUALCOMM has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. QUALCOMM is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. QUALCOMM has a consensus target price of $92.9524, indicating a potential upside of 0.03%. Given Palo Alto Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than QUALCOMM.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QUALCOMM has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and QUALCOMM's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of QUALCOMM shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of QUALCOMM shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

QUALCOMM beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Motorola Solutions (NYSE:MSI) are both large-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Motorola Solutions has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Motorola Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Palo Alto Networks presently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Motorola Solutions has a consensus target price of $155.3950, indicating a potential upside of 14.25%. Given Motorola Solutions' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Motorola Solutions is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Risk and Volatility

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Motorola Solutions has a beta of 0.66, suggesting that its share price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Motorola Solutions' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Motorola Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Motorola Solutions beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Ciena (NYSE:CIEN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.4% of Ciena shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Ciena shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Ciena's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ciena has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Ciena is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ciena has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Palo Alto Networks and Ciena, as reported by MarketBeat.

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Ciena has a consensus target price of $57.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Palo Alto Networks' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than Ciena.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Ciena's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ciena beats Palo Alto Networks on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and F5 Networks (NASDAQ:FFIV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of F5 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of F5 Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

F5 Networks has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Palo Alto Networks. F5 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, F5 Networks has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks, as reported by MarketBeat.

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. F5 Networks has a consensus target price of $153.4118, indicating a potential upside of 9.82%. Given F5 Networks' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe F5 Networks is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and F5 Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

F5 Networks beats Palo Alto Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Palo Alto Networks (NYSE:PANW) and Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Volatility and Risk

Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Palo Alto Networks. Juniper Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.5% of Juniper Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Palo Alto Networks shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for Palo Alto Networks and Juniper Networks, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Palo Alto Networks currently has a consensus target price of $257.6552, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Juniper Networks has a consensus target price of $24.6190, indicating a potential upside of 9.22%. Given Juniper Networks' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Juniper Networks is more favorable than Palo Alto Networks.

Summary

Juniper Networks beats Palo Alto Networks on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.