NYSE:WWW

Wolverine World Wide Competitors

$38.84
-0.64 (-1.62 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$38.01
Now: $38.84
$39.07
50-Day Range
$34.48
MA: $38.47
$41.42
52-Week Range
$15.56
Now: $38.84
$41.80
Volume470,957 shs
Average Volume452,224 shs
Market Capitalization$3.21 billion
P/E Ratio55.49
Dividend Yield1.01%
Beta1.59

Competitors

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) Vs. SNA, IHG, MTN, TTC, OZON, and ZNGA

Should you be buying WWW stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer discretionary" are considered alternatives and competitors to Wolverine World Wide, including Snap-on (SNA), InterContinental Hotels Group (IHG), Vail Resorts (MTN), The Toro (TTC), Ozon (OZON), and Zynga (ZNGA).

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and Snap-on (NYSE:SNA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Snap-on's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26
Snap-on$3.73 billion3.42$693.50 million$12.2619.13

Snap-on has higher revenue and earnings than Wolverine World Wide. Wolverine World Wide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Snap-on, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Wolverine World Wide pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Snap-on pays an annual dividend of $4.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Wolverine World Wide pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Snap-on pays out 40.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wolverine World Wide has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Snap-on has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Snap-on is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Volatility and Risk

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.59, meaning that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Snap-on has a beta of 1.29, meaning that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Wolverine World Wide and Snap-on, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wolverine World Wide04602.60
Snap-on22302.14

Wolverine World Wide currently has a consensus price target of $33.30, indicating a potential downside of 14.26%. Snap-on has a consensus price target of $155.20, indicating a potential downside of 33.84%. Given Wolverine World Wide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Wolverine World Wide is more favorable than Snap-on.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Snap-on shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Snap-on shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Snap-on's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%
Snap-on16.95%17.17%10.12%

Summary

Snap-on beats Wolverine World Wide on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and InterContinental Hotels Group (NYSE:IHG) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and InterContinental Hotels Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26
InterContinental Hotels Group$2.08 billion6.10$385 million$3.0123.03

InterContinental Hotels Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Wolverine World Wide. Wolverine World Wide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than InterContinental Hotels Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, InterContinental Hotels Group has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Wolverine World Wide and InterContinental Hotels Group, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wolverine World Wide04602.60
InterContinental Hotels Group611101.72

Wolverine World Wide currently has a consensus price target of $33.30, indicating a potential downside of 14.26%. Given Wolverine World Wide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Wolverine World Wide is more favorable than InterContinental Hotels Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of InterContinental Hotels Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and InterContinental Hotels Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%
InterContinental Hotels GroupN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Wolverine World Wide beats InterContinental Hotels Group on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and Vail Resorts (NYSE:MTN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Vail Resorts' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%
Vail Resorts2.82%3.91%1.15%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by institutional investors. 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Vail Resorts shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vail Resorts has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its share price is 26% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Vail Resorts' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26
Vail Resorts$1.96 billion6.36$98.83 million$3.1997.27

Wolverine World Wide has higher revenue and earnings than Vail Resorts. Wolverine World Wide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vail Resorts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Wolverine World Wide and Vail Resorts, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wolverine World Wide04602.60
Vail Resorts010702.41

Wolverine World Wide currently has a consensus price target of $33.30, indicating a potential downside of 14.26%. Vail Resorts has a consensus price target of $289.1538, indicating a potential downside of 6.81%. Given Vail Resorts' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vail Resorts is more favorable than Wolverine World Wide.

Summary

Wolverine World Wide beats Vail Resorts on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and The Toro (NYSE:TTC) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Dividends

Wolverine World Wide pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. The Toro pays an annual dividend of $1.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Wolverine World Wide pays out 17.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Toro pays out 34.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Wolverine World Wide has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Toro has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Wolverine World Wide is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Profitability

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and The Toro's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%
The Toro9.76%32.24%11.95%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.5% of The Toro shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of The Toro shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its stock price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Toro has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and The Toro's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26
The Toro$3.38 billion3.61$329.70 million$3.0237.54

The Toro has higher revenue and earnings than Wolverine World Wide. Wolverine World Wide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Toro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Wolverine World Wide and The Toro, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wolverine World Wide04602.60
The Toro04102.20

Wolverine World Wide currently has a consensus target price of $33.30, indicating a potential downside of 14.26%. The Toro has a consensus target price of $95.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.21%. Given Wolverine World Wide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Wolverine World Wide is more favorable than The Toro.

Summary

Wolverine World Wide beats The Toro on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and Ozon (NASDAQ:OZON) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and valuation.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Wolverine World Wide and Ozon, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Wolverine World Wide04602.60
Ozon03302.50

Wolverine World Wide currently has a consensus target price of $33.30, indicating a potential downside of 14.26%. Ozon has a consensus target price of $51.00, indicating a potential downside of 14.83%. Given Wolverine World Wide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Wolverine World Wide is more favorable than Ozon.

Profitability

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Ozon's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%
OzonN/AN/AN/A

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Wolverine World Wide and Ozon's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26
OzonN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Wolverine World Wide has higher revenue and earnings than Ozon.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wolverine World Wide beats Ozon on 9 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Zynga (NASDAQ:ZNGA) and Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Zynga and Wolverine World Wide, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Zynga121602.79
Wolverine World Wide04602.60

Zynga presently has a consensus target price of $11.9605, suggesting a potential upside of 14.13%. Wolverine World Wide has a consensus target price of $33.30, suggesting a potential downside of 14.26%. Given Zynga's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zynga is more favorable than Wolverine World Wide.

Risk and Volatility

Zynga has a beta of 0.26, suggesting that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.59, suggesting that its share price is 59% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Zynga and Wolverine World Wide's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Zynga-1.72%-2.06%-1.07%
Wolverine World Wide3.00%17.74%5.25%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Zynga and Wolverine World Wide's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Zynga$1.32 billion8.59$41.92 million($0.06)-174.67
Wolverine World Wide$2.27 billion1.41$128.50 million$2.2517.26

Wolverine World Wide has higher revenue and earnings than Zynga. Zynga is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolverine World Wide, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.6% of Zynga shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.4% of Zynga shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.9% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wolverine World Wide beats Zynga on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Wolverine World Wide Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$234.57-0.6%$12.77 billion$3.73 billion21.92Upcoming Earnings
InterContinental Hotels Group logo
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group
1.0$69.31-3.6%$12.70 billion$2.08 billion23.03Decrease in Short Interest
Vail Resorts logo
MTN
Vail Resorts
1.1$310.29-1.1%$12.49 billion$1.96 billion272.18Unusual Options Activity
The Toro logo
TTC
The Toro
1.8$113.38-0.4%$12.20 billion$3.38 billion37.30
OZON
Ozon
0.7$59.88-2.2%$12.20 billionN/A0.00Increase in Short Interest
Gap Up
Zynga logo
ZNGA
Zynga
1.8$10.48-1.0%$11.35 billion$1.32 billion-349.33Analyst Report
Insider Selling
iQIYI logo
IQ
iQIYI
1.3$14.15-6.0%$11.09 billion$4.12 billion-9.01Analyst Downgrade
Analyst Revision
Cable One logo
CABO
Cable One
1.6$1,817.48-0.2%$10.97 billion$1.17 billion42.31
Formula One Group logo
FWONK
Formula One Group
1.3$45.97-0.1%$10.66 billion$2.02 billion-13.93
Dolby Laboratories logo
DLB
Dolby Laboratories
1.8$99.61-1.6%$10.12 billion$1.16 billion44.27
Bright Horizons Family Solutions logo
BFAM
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
1.1$163.26-0.9%$9.92 billion$2.06 billion132.73Analyst Upgrade
Under Armour logo
UAA
Under Armour
1.2$21.23-2.2%$9.66 billion$5.27 billion-12.95
Formula One Group logo
FWONA
Formula One Group
1.0$40.89-0.3%$9.48 billion$2.02 billion-12.39
Deckers Outdoor logo
DECK
Deckers Outdoor
1.8$327.85-2.9%$9.24 billion$2.13 billion29.78
Melco Resorts & Entertainment logo
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment
1.2$18.78-1.8%$9.12 billion$5.74 billion-8.99News Coverage
Ralph Lauren logo
RL
Ralph Lauren
1.8$119.44-2.3%$8.73 billion$6.16 billion-95.55
Norwegian Cruise Line logo
NCLH
Norwegian Cruise Line
1.3$26.75-4.6%$8.49 billion$6.46 billion-1.95Analyst Upgrade
Pearson logo
PSO
Pearson
1.5$11.07-2.8%$8.34 billion$4.94 billion14.96Gap Up
Churchill Downs logo
CHDN
Churchill Downs
1.8$210.96-1.7%$8.13 billion$1.33 billion-87.53Decrease in Short Interest
Under Armour logo
UA
Under Armour
0.8$17.79-1.6%$8.10 billion$5.27 billion-10.85
Hyatt Hotels logo
H
Hyatt Hotels
0.9$79.88-3.1%$8.09 billion$5.02 billion-42.95
Brunswick logo
BC
Brunswick
2.4$102.12-2.8%$7.96 billion$4.11 billion23.75
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. logo
TV
Grupo Televisa, S.A.B.
0.9$13.41-0.4%$7.75 billion$5.27 billion-58.30Upcoming Earnings
Planet Fitness logo
PLNT
Planet Fitness
1.8$84.06-3.3%$7.28 billion$688.80 million1,201.03Analyst Report
YETI logo
YETI
YETI
1.7$83.23-2.3%$7.26 billion$913.73 million106.71
PVH logo
PVH
PVH
1.5$101.90-2.0%$7.25 billion$9.91 billion-6.35
Columbia Sportswear logo
COLM
Columbia Sportswear
1.7$108.78-2.0%$7.22 billion$3.04 billion59.12
Marriott Vacations Worldwide logo
VAC
Marriott Vacations Worldwide
1.2$173.57-0.5%$7.16 billion$4.36 billion-42.96
Mattel logo
MAT
Mattel
1.7$20.47-1.8%$7.14 billion$4.50 billion-2,047.00Upcoming Earnings
Boyd Gaming logo
BYD
Boyd Gaming
1.4$63.06-1.1%$7.07 billion$3.33 billion-108.72Upcoming Earnings
Hanesbrands logo
HBI
Hanesbrands
2.3$19.76-1.7%$6.90 billion$6.97 billion15.94Decrease in Short Interest
Skechers U.S.A. logo
SKX
Skechers U.S.A.
1.5$43.48-1.1%$6.86 billion$5.22 billion63.94Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts logo
WH
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts
1.9$71.46-3.6%$6.67 billion$2.05 billion-148.88Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Revision
Nexstar Media Group logo
NXST
Nexstar Media Group
1.9$150.68-1.7%$6.54 billion$3.04 billion12.69
Gildan Activewear logo
GIL
Gildan Activewear
1.3$32.85-0.6%$6.52 billion$2.82 billion-24.89Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Leggett & Platt logo
LEG
Leggett & Platt
2.4$48.79-0.7%$6.50 billion$4.75 billion28.70Analyst Downgrade
WillScot Mobile Mini logo
WSC
WillScot Mobile Mini
1.7$28.30-1.2%$6.48 billion$1.06 billion176.89Analyst Report
Reynolds Consumer Products logo
REYN
Reynolds Consumer Products
1.9$30.53-1.9%$6.40 billion$3.03 billion17.06News Coverage
BJ's Wholesale Club logo
BJ
BJ's Wholesale Club
1.2$44.04-0.9%$6.05 billion$13.19 billion16.75News Coverage
Choice Hotels International logo
CHH
Choice Hotels International
1.0$108.74-2.4%$6.04 billion$1.11 billion55.48Analyst Report
News Coverage
Grand Canyon Education logo
LOPE
Grand Canyon Education
1.8$112.74-0.8%$5.28 billion$778.64 million21.72
Crocs logo
CROX
Crocs
1.7$75.07-3.7%$4.91 billion$1.23 billion34.28Upcoming Earnings
Sonos logo
SONO
Sonos
1.4$39.59-8.1%$4.74 billion$1.33 billion-158.36
Skillz logo
SKLZ
Skillz
1.6$12.55-12.4%$4.64 billionN/A0.00Gap Up
TEGNA logo
TGNA
TEGNA
1.9$20.65-1.1%$4.56 billion$2.30 billion14.14
World Wrestling Entertainment logo
WWE
World Wrestling Entertainment
2.3$56.58-0.3%$4.40 billion$960.40 million33.88Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Announcement
Carter's logo
CRI
Carter's
1.2$97.46-0.9%$4.28 billion$3.52 billion32.06Analyst Report
Madison Square Garden Sports logo
MSGS
Madison Square Garden Sports
1.4$176.60-1.4%$4.26 billion$603.32 million-32.46Decrease in Short Interest
AMC Entertainment logo
AMC
AMC Entertainment
1.2$9.28-4.1%$4.18 billion$5.47 billion-0.27
Carnival Co. & logo
CUK
Carnival Co. &
0.6$22.04-4.5%$4.09 billion$20.83 billion-2.14Analyst Report
Insider Selling
News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.