Go Pro

Stock Analyst Recommendations by Research Firm

This page lists brokerages and sell-side research firms that have issued at least ten buy, hold and sell recommendations in the last twelve months. MarketBeat and its parent company are in no way affiliated with or endorsed by any firm on this list.

FirmTotal Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Sell Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Hold Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Buy Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Strong Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
300 (0.0%)1 (3.3%)24 (80.0%)3 (10.0%)
210 (0.0%)6 (28.6%)11 (52.4%)1 (4.8%)
1330 (0.0%)20 (15.0%)107 (80.5%)5 (3.8%)
1338 (6.0%)31 (23.3%)65 (48.9%)14 (10.5%)
6121 (0.2%)105 (17.2%)327 (53.4%)72 (11.8%)
1150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)115 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
3696 (1.6%)84 (22.8%)249 (67.5%)14 (3.8%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
230 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)23 (100.0%)
170 (0.0%)3 (17.6%)14 (82.4%)0 (0.0%)
9272 (0.2%)201 (21.7%)679 (73.2%)44 (4.7%)
1921281 (14.6%)521 (27.1%)1,059 (55.1%)0 (0.0%)
5543635 (11.5%)1,814 (32.7%)2,836 (51.2%)79 (1.4%)
4141 (0.2%)14 (3.4%)359 (86.7%)3 (0.7%)
10905 (0.5%)137 (12.6%)917 (84.1%)31 (2.8%)
133111 (0.8%)276 (20.7%)979 (73.6%)40 (3.0%)
244418 (0.7%)819 (33.5%)1,231 (50.4%)78 (3.2%)
793150 (18.9%)296 (37.3%)281 (35.4%)30 (3.8%)
142 (14.3%)5 (35.7%)7 (50.0%)0 (0.0%)
310 (0.0%)21 (67.7%)10 (32.3%)0 (0.0%)
110 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)4 (36.4%)4 (36.4%)
202416 (0.8%)169 (8.3%)1,758 (86.9%)50 (2.5%)
10711 (10.3%)3 (2.8%)88 (82.2%)5 (4.7%)
21163 (0.1%)318 (15.0%)1,552 (73.3%)64 (3.0%)
10147 (0.7%)267 (26.3%)367 (36.2%)42 (4.1%)
184613 (0.7%)485 (26.3%)1,244 (67.4%)49 (2.7%)
1371 (0.7%)21 (15.3%)58 (42.3%)7 (5.1%)
344 (11.8%)15 (44.1%)11 (32.4%)0 (0.0%)
2820 (0.0%)16 (5.7%)239 (84.8%)27 (9.6%)
421 (2.4%)13 (31.0%)24 (57.1%)2 (4.8%)
590 (0.0%)8 (13.6%)48 (81.4%)0 (0.0%)
170 (0.0%)3 (17.6%)9 (52.9%)0 (0.0%)
6314200 (3.2%)2,256 (35.7%)3,777 (59.8%)63 (1.0%)
9897 (0.7%)115 (11.6%)798 (80.7%)4 (0.4%)
611 (1.6%)16 (26.2%)11 (18.0%)33 (54.1%)
201 (5.0%)8 (40.0%)9 (45.0%)2 (10.0%)
350 (0.0%)9 (25.7%)0 (0.0%)26 (74.3%)
585 (8.6%)10 (17.2%)30 (51.7%)8 (13.8%)
200 (0.0%)11 (55.0%)8 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)
14712 (8.2%)30 (20.4%)69 (46.9%)1 (0.7%)
This looks like plywood. It's not. (Ad)

AI data centers have a power problem nobody likes to talk about. A single rack of computers can now use more electricity than an entire office building. One new chip, which looks more like a piece of plywood than a processor, delivers similar performance on a fraction of the power. Tech investing veteran George Gilder says that efficiency gap could decide who wins the next stage of AI. Gilder has identified three companies positioned around this power breakthrough, calling them the Trillion Dollar Triangle.tc pixel

See the three companies behind this AI power breakthrough now
680 (0.0%)17 (25.0%)33 (48.5%)2 (2.9%)
3110 (0.0%)60 (19.3%)226 (72.7%)8 (2.6%)
120 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
3260 (0.0%)17 (5.2%)304 (93.3%)5 (1.5%)
160311 (0.7%)546 (34.1%)833 (52.0%)40 (2.5%)
1440 (0.0%)47 (32.6%)80 (55.6%)10 (6.9%)
273 (11.1%)13 (48.1%)11 (40.7%)0 (0.0%)
661 (1.5%)16 (24.2%)39 (59.1%)0 (0.0%)
5816 (1.0%)155 (26.7%)402 (69.2%)4 (0.7%)
255981 (3.2%)933 (36.5%)1,370 (53.5%)0 (0.0%)
183 (16.7%)11 (61.1%)0 (0.0%)4 (22.2%)
17823 (12.9%)56 (31.5%)44 (24.7%)53 (29.8%)
1530 (0.0%)78 (51.0%)54 (35.3%)21 (13.7%)
210146 (2.2%)459 (21.8%)1,077 (51.3%)25 (1.2%)
120 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)8 (66.7%)3 (25.0%)
200 (0.0%)8 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)12 (60.0%)
260 (0.0%)7 (26.9%)6 (23.1%)5 (19.2%)
242 (8.3%)12 (50.0%)5 (20.8%)5 (20.8%)
29712 (4.0%)123 (41.4%)0 (0.0%)162 (54.5%)
660 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)57 (86.4%)0 (0.0%)
6830 (44.1%)8 (11.8%)23 (33.8%)3 (4.4%)
531 (1.9%)18 (34.0%)23 (43.4%)1 (1.9%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (6.7%)0 (0.0%)
11365 (0.4%)136 (12.0%)945 (83.2%)33 (2.9%)
210 (0.0%)2 (9.5%)7 (33.3%)4 (19.0%)
207111 (0.5%)137 (6.6%)1,888 (91.2%)14 (0.7%)
1630 (0.0%)74 (45.4%)86 (52.8%)2 (1.2%)
57627 (4.7%)194 (33.7%)231 (40.1%)63 (10.9%)
113 (27.3%)0 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)5 (45.5%)
130 (0.0%)2 (15.4%)11 (84.6%)0 (0.0%)
530 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
151 (6.7%)8 (53.3%)6 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)
524 (7.7%)19 (36.5%)27 (51.9%)1 (1.9%)
400 (0.0%)16 (40.0%)14 (35.0%)7 (17.5%)
4104133 (3.2%)1,245 (30.3%)2,225 (54.2%)135 (3.3%)
400 (0.0%)7 (17.5%)22 (55.0%)1 (2.5%)
1530 (0.0%)17 (11.1%)125 (81.7%)11 (7.2%)
4610437 (9.5%)1,724 (37.4%)2,382 (51.7%)0 (0.0%)
137646 (3.3%)653 (47.5%)662 (48.1%)8 (0.6%)
14422 (15.3%)65 (45.1%)16 (11.1%)41 (28.5%)
126230 (2.4%)189 (15.0%)981 (77.7%)24 (1.9%)
340 (0.0%)15 (44.1%)15 (44.1%)2 (5.9%)
1573 (1.9%)36 (22.9%)81 (51.6%)37 (23.6%)
3330 (0.0%)27 (8.1%)280 (84.1%)3 (0.9%)
3992 (0.5%)89 (22.3%)233 (58.4%)28 (7.0%)
800 (0.0%)22 (27.5%)18 (22.5%)40 (50.0%)
270 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)25 (92.6%)2 (7.4%)
3320 (0.0%)57 (17.2%)87 (26.2%)8 (2.4%)
301 (3.3%)8 (26.7%)0 (0.0%)21 (70.0%)
2250 (0.0%)43 (19.1%)141 (62.7%)19 (8.4%)
This looks like plywood. It's not. (Ad)

AI data centers have a power problem nobody likes to talk about. A single rack of computers can now use more electricity than an entire office building. One new chip, which looks more like a piece of plywood than a processor, delivers similar performance on a fraction of the power. Tech investing veteran George Gilder says that efficiency gap could decide who wins the next stage of AI. Gilder has identified three companies positioned around this power breakthrough, calling them the Trillion Dollar Triangle.tc pixel

See the three companies behind this AI power breakthrough now
745 (6.8%)7 (9.5%)31 (41.9%)6 (8.1%)
230788 (3.8%)682 (29.6%)1,093 (47.4%)45 (2.0%)
560 (0.0%)22 (39.3%)27 (48.2%)2 (3.6%)
635 (7.9%)10 (15.9%)46 (73.0%)0 (0.0%)
4978604 (12.1%)1,613 (32.4%)2,110 (42.4%)0 (0.0%)
12475 (0.4%)372 (29.8%)682 (54.7%)50 (4.0%)
19212 (0.1%)133 (6.9%)1,768 (92.0%)1 (0.1%)
18612 (6.5%)33 (17.7%)42 (22.6%)3 (1.6%)
620 (0.0%)12 (19.4%)38 (61.3%)12 (19.4%)
731 (1.4%)24 (32.9%)29 (39.7%)15 (20.5%)
201 (5.0%)7 (35.0%)12 (60.0%)0 (0.0%)
603 (5.0%)24 (40.0%)26 (43.3%)3 (5.0%)
4032 (0.5%)49 (12.2%)119 (29.5%)27 (6.7%)
887 (8.0%)40 (45.5%)39 (44.3%)0 (0.0%)
150 (0.0%)1 (6.7%)6 (40.0%)5 (33.3%)
13435 (0.4%)147 (10.9%)1,119 (83.3%)0 (0.0%)
703 (4.3%)12 (17.1%)55 (78.6%)0 (0.0%)
606 (10.0%)30 (50.0%)16 (26.7%)8 (13.3%)
3071 (0.3%)48 (15.6%)246 (80.1%)5 (1.6%)
476 (12.8%)3 (6.4%)17 (36.2%)17 (36.2%)
276938 (1.4%)1,016 (36.7%)1,588 (57.3%)27 (1.0%)
320 (0.0%)7 (21.9%)22 (68.8%)0 (0.0%)
370 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)35 (94.6%)0 (0.0%)
220931 (1.4%)388 (17.6%)1,089 (49.3%)472 (21.4%)
183610 (0.5%)462 (25.2%)683 (37.2%)63 (3.4%)
350 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)31 (88.6%)4 (11.4%)
7654 (0.5%)98 (12.8%)634 (82.9%)21 (2.7%)
10488 (0.8%)178 (17.0%)704 (67.2%)40 (3.8%)
40636 (8.9%)154 (37.9%)114 (28.1%)28 (6.9%)
5137110 (2.1%)1,821 (35.4%)2,985 (58.1%)0 (0.0%)
138860 (4.3%)496 (35.7%)689 (49.6%)46 (3.3%)
545 (9.3%)21 (38.9%)28 (51.9%)0 (0.0%)
1080 (0.0%)41 (38.0%)65 (60.2%)0 (0.0%)
210449 (2.3%)789 (37.5%)1,026 (48.8%)94 (4.5%)
22119 (8.6%)60 (27.1%)105 (47.5%)21 (9.5%)
6808 (1.2%)113 (16.6%)243 (35.7%)0 (0.0%)
100 (0.0%)5 (50.0%)4 (40.0%)1 (10.0%)
170 (0.0%)7 (41.2%)10 (58.8%)0 (0.0%)
190 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)7 (36.8%)12 (63.2%)
111 (9.1%)7 (63.6%)0 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)
7882 (0.3%)282 (35.8%)416 (52.8%)29 (3.7%)
22297 (0.3%)462 (20.7%)1,258 (56.4%)29 (1.3%)
100 (0.0%)3 (30.0%)5 (50.0%)2 (20.0%)
110 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
8597 (0.8%)307 (35.7%)506 (58.9%)4 (0.5%)
3309 (2.7%)95 (28.8%)222 (67.3%)0 (0.0%)
326532 (1.0%)1,096 (33.6%)2,046 (62.7%)68 (2.1%)
95430 (3.1%)270 (28.3%)474 (49.7%)82 (8.6%)
4760 (0.0%)206 (43.3%)256 (53.8%)0 (0.0%)
530 (0.0%)11 (20.8%)0 (0.0%)42 (79.2%)
The trade I’ve been waiting for since 2011 (Ad)

Ross Givens, Director of Research at Traders Agency, is calling for gold to reach $10,000 an ounce this supercycle - and says that may be conservative. Billionaire Pierre Lassonde has argued for $19,000. Former CIA advisor Jim Rickards targets $27,000 based on a federal revaluation of the gold supply. But the bigger opportunity may not be gold itself. A 'backdoor' gold-linked asset has historically multiplied gold's move by 10x or more - returning 846%, 1,668%, 1,847%, and 1,915% in the last supercycle.tc pixel

Watch the free video briefing and learn the No. 1 trade to leverage rising gold
3460453 (13.1%)1,200 (34.7%)1,518 (43.9%)79 (2.3%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)11 (73.3%)4 (26.7%)
1010 (0.0%)2 (2.0%)70 (69.3%)28 (27.7%)
299915 (0.5%)919 (30.6%)1,582 (52.8%)130 (4.3%)
283 (10.7%)6 (21.4%)6 (21.4%)6 (21.4%)
6268181 (2.9%)2,569 (41.0%)2,771 (44.2%)64 (1.0%)
220 (0.0%)3 (13.6%)8 (36.4%)2 (9.1%)
730 (0.0%)6 (8.2%)39 (53.4%)22 (30.1%)
134 (30.8%)3 (23.1%)0 (0.0%)6 (46.2%)
654 (6.2%)20 (30.8%)34 (52.3%)6 (9.2%)
186674,666 (25.0%)7,681 (41.1%)4,874 (26.1%)1,446 (7.7%)
94017 (1.8%)175 (18.6%)729 (77.6%)6 (0.6%)
4607123,253 (50.5%)15,423 (33.5%)7,067 (15.3%)328 (0.7%)
4871303 (6.2%)1,948 (40.0%)2,417 (49.6%)101 (2.1%)
180 (0.0%)3 (16.7%)15 (83.3%)0 (0.0%)
4425 (1.1%)142 (32.1%)256 (57.9%)15 (3.4%)
633 (4.8%)6 (9.5%)2 (3.2%)4 (6.3%)
99161 (6.2%)192 (19.4%)614 (62.0%)48 (4.8%)
104152,382 (22.9%)5,500 (52.8%)0 (0.0%)2,533 (24.3%)
313 (9.7%)14 (45.2%)12 (38.7%)2 (6.5%)