Go Pro

Stock Analyst Recommendations by Research Firm

This page lists brokerages and sell-side research firms that have issued at least ten buy, hold and sell recommendations in the last twelve months. MarketBeat and its parent company are in no way affiliated with or endorsed by any firm on this list.

FirmTotal Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Sell Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Hold Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Buy Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
Strong Ratings Issued
(Last 12 Months)
300 (0.0%)1 (3.3%)24 (80.0%)3 (10.0%)
210 (0.0%)6 (28.6%)11 (52.4%)1 (4.8%)
1330 (0.0%)20 (15.0%)107 (80.5%)5 (3.8%)
1338 (6.0%)31 (23.3%)65 (48.9%)14 (10.5%)
6121 (0.2%)105 (17.2%)327 (53.4%)72 (11.8%)
1150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)115 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)
3696 (1.6%)84 (22.8%)249 (67.5%)14 (3.8%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
230 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)23 (100.0%)
170 (0.0%)3 (17.6%)14 (82.4%)0 (0.0%)
Sam Altman’s $4 Trillion IPO Wave (Ad)

Reuters calls it a combination without precedent in U.S. market debuts. Barron's estimates the coming AI IPO wave could be worth 4 trillion dollars, led by OpenAI and Anthropic. Former IPO insider Jason Bodner previously flagged Nvidia before its 7,161% run, Super Micro Computer before its 2,601% run, and The Trade Desk before its 2,572% run. Now he's breaking down how investors can position ahead of the OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs.tc pixel

Click here to see Jason Bodner's full breakdown of the details
9272 (0.2%)201 (21.7%)679 (73.2%)44 (4.7%)
1921281 (14.6%)521 (27.1%)1,059 (55.1%)0 (0.0%)
5543635 (11.5%)1,814 (32.7%)2,836 (51.2%)79 (1.4%)
4141 (0.2%)14 (3.4%)359 (86.7%)3 (0.7%)
10905 (0.5%)137 (12.6%)917 (84.1%)31 (2.8%)
133111 (0.8%)276 (20.7%)979 (73.6%)40 (3.0%)
244418 (0.7%)819 (33.5%)1,231 (50.4%)78 (3.2%)
793150 (18.9%)296 (37.3%)281 (35.4%)30 (3.8%)
142 (14.3%)5 (35.7%)7 (50.0%)0 (0.0%)
310 (0.0%)21 (67.7%)10 (32.3%)0 (0.0%)
110 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)4 (36.4%)4 (36.4%)
202416 (0.8%)169 (8.3%)1,758 (86.9%)50 (2.5%)
10711 (10.3%)3 (2.8%)88 (82.2%)5 (4.7%)
21163 (0.1%)318 (15.0%)1,552 (73.3%)64 (3.0%)
10147 (0.7%)267 (26.3%)367 (36.2%)42 (4.1%)
184613 (0.7%)485 (26.3%)1,244 (67.4%)49 (2.7%)
1371 (0.7%)21 (15.3%)58 (42.3%)7 (5.1%)
344 (11.8%)15 (44.1%)11 (32.4%)0 (0.0%)
2820 (0.0%)16 (5.7%)239 (84.8%)27 (9.6%)
421 (2.4%)13 (31.0%)24 (57.1%)2 (4.8%)
590 (0.0%)8 (13.6%)48 (81.4%)0 (0.0%)
170 (0.0%)3 (17.6%)9 (52.9%)0 (0.0%)
6316200 (3.2%)2,257 (35.7%)3,778 (59.8%)63 (1.0%)
9897 (0.7%)115 (11.6%)798 (80.7%)4 (0.4%)
611 (1.6%)16 (26.2%)11 (18.0%)33 (54.1%)
201 (5.0%)8 (40.0%)9 (45.0%)2 (10.0%)
350 (0.0%)9 (25.7%)0 (0.0%)26 (74.3%)
585 (8.6%)10 (17.2%)30 (51.7%)8 (13.8%)
200 (0.0%)11 (55.0%)8 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)
14712 (8.2%)30 (20.4%)69 (46.9%)1 (0.7%)
BlackRock and Vanguard already own THIS (Ad)

Institutions own roughly 88 percent of an overlooked American oil and natural gas company. BlackRock holds 32 million shares worth about 716 million dollars, while Vanguard owns 48 million shares worth nearly 1.1 billion dollars. The company generates approximately 3.2 billion dollars in operating income against a market value of only about 8 billion dollars, and it has signed a multi-year AI agreement with Palantir to improve equipment reliability and well performance.tc pixel

Click here to learn about this overlooked AI energy stock
680 (0.0%)17 (25.0%)33 (48.5%)2 (2.9%)
3110 (0.0%)60 (19.3%)226 (72.7%)8 (2.6%)
120 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
3260 (0.0%)17 (5.2%)304 (93.3%)5 (1.5%)
160311 (0.7%)546 (34.1%)833 (52.0%)40 (2.5%)
1440 (0.0%)47 (32.6%)80 (55.6%)10 (6.9%)
273 (11.1%)13 (48.1%)11 (40.7%)0 (0.0%)
661 (1.5%)16 (24.2%)39 (59.1%)0 (0.0%)
5816 (1.0%)155 (26.7%)402 (69.2%)4 (0.7%)
256382 (3.2%)935 (36.5%)1,371 (53.5%)0 (0.0%)
183 (16.7%)11 (61.1%)0 (0.0%)4 (22.2%)
17823 (12.9%)56 (31.5%)44 (24.7%)53 (29.8%)
1530 (0.0%)78 (51.0%)54 (35.3%)21 (13.7%)
210146 (2.2%)459 (21.8%)1,077 (51.3%)25 (1.2%)
120 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)8 (66.7%)3 (25.0%)
200 (0.0%)8 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)12 (60.0%)
260 (0.0%)7 (26.9%)6 (23.1%)5 (19.2%)
242 (8.3%)12 (50.0%)5 (20.8%)5 (20.8%)
29712 (4.0%)123 (41.4%)0 (0.0%)162 (54.5%)
660 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)57 (86.4%)0 (0.0%)
6830 (44.1%)8 (11.8%)23 (33.8%)3 (4.4%)
531 (1.9%)18 (34.0%)23 (43.4%)1 (1.9%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (6.7%)0 (0.0%)
11365 (0.4%)136 (12.0%)945 (83.2%)33 (2.9%)
210 (0.0%)2 (9.5%)7 (33.3%)4 (19.0%)
207211 (0.5%)137 (6.6%)1,889 (91.2%)14 (0.7%)
1630 (0.0%)74 (45.4%)86 (52.8%)2 (1.2%)
57627 (4.7%)194 (33.7%)231 (40.1%)63 (10.9%)
113 (27.3%)0 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)5 (45.5%)
130 (0.0%)2 (15.4%)11 (84.6%)0 (0.0%)
530 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
151 (6.7%)8 (53.3%)6 (40.0%)0 (0.0%)
524 (7.7%)19 (36.5%)27 (51.9%)1 (1.9%)
400 (0.0%)16 (40.0%)14 (35.0%)7 (17.5%)
4104133 (3.2%)1,245 (30.3%)2,225 (54.2%)135 (3.3%)
400 (0.0%)7 (17.5%)22 (55.0%)1 (2.5%)
1530 (0.0%)17 (11.1%)125 (81.7%)11 (7.2%)
4610437 (9.5%)1,724 (37.4%)2,382 (51.7%)0 (0.0%)
137646 (3.3%)653 (47.5%)662 (48.1%)8 (0.6%)
14422 (15.3%)65 (45.1%)16 (11.1%)41 (28.5%)
126230 (2.4%)189 (15.0%)981 (77.7%)24 (1.9%)
340 (0.0%)15 (44.1%)15 (44.1%)2 (5.9%)
1573 (1.9%)36 (22.9%)81 (51.6%)37 (23.6%)
3330 (0.0%)27 (8.1%)280 (84.1%)3 (0.9%)
3992 (0.5%)89 (22.3%)233 (58.4%)28 (7.0%)
800 (0.0%)22 (27.5%)18 (22.5%)40 (50.0%)
280 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)26 (92.9%)2 (7.1%)
3320 (0.0%)57 (17.2%)87 (26.2%)8 (2.4%)
301 (3.3%)8 (26.7%)0 (0.0%)21 (70.0%)
2250 (0.0%)43 (19.1%)141 (62.7%)19 (8.4%)
This looks like plywood. It's not. (Ad)

AI data centers have a power problem nobody likes to talk about. A single rack of computers can now use more electricity than an entire office building. One new chip, which looks more like a piece of plywood than a processor, delivers similar performance on a fraction of the power. Tech investing veteran George Gilder says that efficiency gap could decide who wins the next stage of AI. Gilder has identified three companies positioned around this power breakthrough, calling them the Trillion Dollar Triangle.tc pixel

See the three companies behind this AI power breakthrough now
745 (6.8%)7 (9.5%)31 (41.9%)6 (8.1%)
230788 (3.8%)682 (29.6%)1,093 (47.4%)45 (2.0%)
560 (0.0%)22 (39.3%)27 (48.2%)2 (3.6%)
635 (7.9%)10 (15.9%)46 (73.0%)0 (0.0%)
4980605 (12.1%)1,613 (32.4%)2,111 (42.4%)0 (0.0%)
12475 (0.4%)372 (29.8%)682 (54.7%)50 (4.0%)
19212 (0.1%)133 (6.9%)1,768 (92.0%)1 (0.1%)
18612 (6.5%)33 (17.7%)42 (22.6%)3 (1.6%)
620 (0.0%)12 (19.4%)38 (61.3%)12 (19.4%)
731 (1.4%)24 (32.9%)29 (39.7%)15 (20.5%)
201 (5.0%)7 (35.0%)12 (60.0%)0 (0.0%)
603 (5.0%)24 (40.0%)26 (43.3%)3 (5.0%)
4032 (0.5%)49 (12.2%)119 (29.5%)27 (6.7%)
887 (8.0%)40 (45.5%)39 (44.3%)0 (0.0%)
150 (0.0%)1 (6.7%)6 (40.0%)5 (33.3%)
13435 (0.4%)147 (10.9%)1,119 (83.3%)0 (0.0%)
703 (4.3%)12 (17.1%)55 (78.6%)0 (0.0%)
606 (10.0%)30 (50.0%)16 (26.7%)8 (13.3%)
3071 (0.3%)48 (15.6%)246 (80.1%)5 (1.6%)
476 (12.8%)3 (6.4%)17 (36.2%)17 (36.2%)
277038 (1.4%)1,016 (36.7%)1,588 (57.3%)27 (1.0%)
320 (0.0%)7 (21.9%)22 (68.8%)0 (0.0%)
370 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)35 (94.6%)0 (0.0%)
221031 (1.4%)388 (17.6%)1,089 (49.3%)473 (21.4%)
183610 (0.5%)462 (25.2%)683 (37.2%)63 (3.4%)
350 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)31 (88.6%)4 (11.4%)
7654 (0.5%)98 (12.8%)634 (82.9%)21 (2.7%)
10488 (0.8%)178 (17.0%)704 (67.2%)40 (3.8%)
40636 (8.9%)154 (37.9%)114 (28.1%)28 (6.9%)
5137110 (2.1%)1,821 (35.4%)2,985 (58.1%)0 (0.0%)
138860 (4.3%)496 (35.7%)689 (49.6%)46 (3.3%)
545 (9.3%)21 (38.9%)28 (51.9%)0 (0.0%)
1080 (0.0%)41 (38.0%)65 (60.2%)0 (0.0%)
210449 (2.3%)789 (37.5%)1,026 (48.8%)94 (4.5%)
22119 (8.6%)60 (27.1%)105 (47.5%)21 (9.5%)
6808 (1.2%)113 (16.6%)243 (35.7%)0 (0.0%)
100 (0.0%)5 (50.0%)4 (40.0%)1 (10.0%)
170 (0.0%)7 (41.2%)10 (58.8%)0 (0.0%)
190 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)7 (36.8%)12 (63.2%)
111 (9.1%)7 (63.6%)0 (0.0%)3 (27.3%)
7882 (0.3%)282 (35.8%)416 (52.8%)29 (3.7%)
22297 (0.3%)462 (20.7%)1,258 (56.4%)29 (1.3%)
100 (0.0%)3 (30.0%)5 (50.0%)2 (20.0%)
110 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)
8597 (0.8%)307 (35.7%)506 (58.9%)4 (0.5%)
3309 (2.7%)95 (28.8%)222 (67.3%)0 (0.0%)
326532 (1.0%)1,096 (33.6%)2,046 (62.7%)68 (2.1%)
95430 (3.1%)270 (28.3%)474 (49.7%)82 (8.6%)
4760 (0.0%)206 (43.3%)256 (53.8%)0 (0.0%)
530 (0.0%)11 (20.8%)0 (0.0%)42 (79.2%)
stop trying to pick stocks (Ad)

Most traders think their problem is picking better stocks. It's actually time: holding losing positions too long while opportunities pass by. A 5-day framework shifts focus away from six-month predictions and toward a much shorter window, explained in plain English with no complicated formulas. See how the framework works in this free report.tc pixel

Grab your free copy of the 5-Day Cash Flow Trade report
3460453 (13.1%)1,200 (34.7%)1,518 (43.9%)79 (2.3%)
150 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)11 (73.3%)4 (26.7%)
1010 (0.0%)2 (2.0%)70 (69.3%)28 (27.7%)
299915 (0.5%)919 (30.6%)1,583 (52.8%)130 (4.3%)
283 (10.7%)6 (21.4%)6 (21.4%)6 (21.4%)
6268181 (2.9%)2,569 (41.0%)2,771 (44.2%)64 (1.0%)
220 (0.0%)3 (13.6%)8 (36.4%)2 (9.1%)
730 (0.0%)6 (8.2%)39 (53.4%)22 (30.1%)
134 (30.8%)3 (23.1%)0 (0.0%)6 (46.2%)
654 (6.2%)20 (30.8%)34 (52.3%)6 (9.2%)
186674,666 (25.0%)7,681 (41.1%)4,874 (26.1%)1,446 (7.7%)
94017 (1.8%)175 (18.6%)729 (77.6%)6 (0.6%)
4607123,253 (50.5%)15,423 (33.5%)7,067 (15.3%)328 (0.7%)
4871303 (6.2%)1,948 (40.0%)2,417 (49.6%)101 (2.1%)
180 (0.0%)3 (16.7%)15 (83.3%)0 (0.0%)
4425 (1.1%)142 (32.1%)256 (57.9%)15 (3.4%)
633 (4.8%)6 (9.5%)2 (3.2%)4 (6.3%)
99161 (6.2%)192 (19.4%)614 (62.0%)48 (4.8%)
104152,382 (22.9%)5,500 (52.8%)0 (0.0%)2,533 (24.3%)
313 (9.7%)14 (45.2%)12 (38.7%)2 (6.5%)