| 30 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (3.3%) | 24 (80.0%) | 3 (10.0%) |
| 21 | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (28.6%) | 11 (52.4%) | 1 (4.8%) |
| 133 | 0 (0.0%) | 20 (15.0%) | 107 (80.5%) | 5 (3.8%) |
| 129 | 8 (6.2%) | 28 (21.7%) | 64 (49.6%) | 14 (10.9%) |
| 610 | 1 (0.2%) | 105 (17.2%) | 325 (53.3%) | 72 (11.8%) |
| 115 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 115 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 369 | 6 (1.6%) | 84 (22.8%) | 249 (67.5%) | 14 (3.8%) |
| 15 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 23 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 23 (100.0%) |
| 16 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (12.5%) | 14 (87.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Get the Latest News and Ratings for Your Stocks Enter your email address below to receive the latest headlines and analysts' recommendations for your stocks with our free daily email newsletter.
|
| 927 | 2 (0.2%) | 201 (21.7%) | 679 (73.2%) | 44 (4.7%) |
| 1918 | 280 (14.6%) | 520 (27.1%) | 1,058 (55.2%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 5527 | 632 (11.4%) | 1,809 (32.7%) | 2,828 (51.2%) | 79 (1.4%) |
| 414 | 1 (0.2%) | 14 (3.4%) | 359 (86.7%) | 3 (0.7%) |
| 1090 | 5 (0.5%) | 137 (12.6%) | 917 (84.1%) | 31 (2.8%) |
| 1320 | 11 (0.8%) | 275 (20.8%) | 969 (73.4%) | 40 (3.0%) |
| 2439 | 18 (0.7%) | 816 (33.5%) | 1,230 (50.4%) | 78 (3.2%) |
| 792 | 150 (18.9%) | 295 (37.2%) | 281 (35.5%) | 30 (3.8%) |
| 14 | 2 (14.3%) | 5 (35.7%) | 7 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 31 | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (67.7%) | 10 (32.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 11 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (27.3%) | 4 (36.4%) | 4 (36.4%) |
| 2016 | 16 (0.8%) | 169 (8.4%) | 1,751 (86.9%) | 50 (2.5%) |
| 107 | 11 (10.3%) | 3 (2.8%) | 88 (82.2%) | 5 (4.7%) |
| 2109 | 3 (0.1%) | 318 (15.1%) | 1,544 (73.2%) | 65 (3.1%) |
| 1014 | 7 (0.7%) | 267 (26.3%) | 367 (36.2%) | 42 (4.1%) |
| 1837 | 13 (0.7%) | 484 (26.3%) | 1,236 (67.3%) | 49 (2.7%) |
| 137 | 1 (0.7%) | 21 (15.3%) | 58 (42.3%) | 7 (5.1%) |
| 34 | 4 (11.8%) | 15 (44.1%) | 11 (32.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 281 | 0 (0.0%) | 16 (5.7%) | 238 (84.7%) | 27 (9.6%) |
| 41 | 1 (2.4%) | 13 (31.7%) | 23 (56.1%) | 2 (4.9%) |
| 59 | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (13.6%) | 48 (81.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 17 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (17.6%) | 9 (52.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 6294 | 200 (3.2%) | 2,252 (35.8%) | 3,761 (59.8%) | 63 (1.0%) |
| 987 | 7 (0.7%) | 115 (11.7%) | 796 (80.6%) | 4 (0.4%) |
| 61 | 1 (1.6%) | 16 (26.2%) | 11 (18.0%) | 33 (54.1%) |
| 20 | 1 (5.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 9 (45.0%) | 2 (10.0%) |
| 35 | 0 (0.0%) | 9 (25.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 26 (74.3%) |
| 58 | 5 (8.6%) | 10 (17.2%) | 30 (51.7%) | 8 (13.8%) |
| 20 | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (55.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 147 | 12 (8.2%) | 30 (20.4%) | 69 (46.9%) | 1 (0.7%) |
The end may be near for these iconic stocks (Ad) Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are triggering a historic wealth transfer already underway in 2026. Household names like Intuit (-57%), Boston Scientific (-49%), and Tractor Supply (-40%) are cratering, while lesser-known companies like Sandisk (+573%) and Rackspace (+444%) surge.
Chaikin has identified specific stocks he believes investors should sell before they fall further - and the names may surprise you. He's also pinpointing a company tapped as Nvidia's self-driving partner and a potential AI megadeal that could split into three high-growth stocks.
Stream his free presentation to get every buy and sell recommendation with no membership or credit card required. Watch Marc Chaikin's free presentation and get his full buy-and-sell list today |
| 68 | 0 (0.0%) | 17 (25.0%) | 33 (48.5%) | 2 (2.9%) |
| 311 | 0 (0.0%) | 60 (19.3%) | 226 (72.7%) | 8 (2.6%) |
| 12 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 326 | 0 (0.0%) | 17 (5.2%) | 304 (93.3%) | 5 (1.5%) |
| 1601 | 11 (0.7%) | 544 (34.0%) | 833 (52.0%) | 40 (2.5%) |
| 144 | 0 (0.0%) | 47 (32.6%) | 80 (55.6%) | 10 (6.9%) |
| 27 | 3 (11.1%) | 13 (48.1%) | 11 (40.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 66 | 1 (1.5%) | 16 (24.2%) | 39 (59.1%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 581 | 6 (1.0%) | 155 (26.7%) | 402 (69.2%) | 4 (0.7%) |
| 2555 | 81 (3.2%) | 933 (36.5%) | 1,367 (53.5%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 18 | 3 (16.7%) | 11 (61.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (22.2%) |
| 178 | 23 (12.9%) | 56 (31.5%) | 44 (24.7%) | 53 (29.8%) |
| 153 | 0 (0.0%) | 78 (51.0%) | 54 (35.3%) | 21 (13.7%) |
| 2101 | 46 (2.2%) | 459 (21.8%) | 1,077 (51.3%) | 25 (1.2%) |
| 12 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (66.7%) | 3 (25.0%) |
| 20 | 0 (0.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (60.0%) |
| 26 | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (26.9%) | 6 (23.1%) | 5 (19.2%) |
| 23 | 2 (8.7%) | 12 (52.2%) | 4 (17.4%) | 5 (21.7%) |
| 297 | 12 (4.0%) | 123 (41.4%) | 0 (0.0%) | 162 (54.5%) |
| 66 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 57 (86.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 68 | 30 (44.1%) | 8 (11.8%) | 23 (33.8%) | 3 (4.4%) |
| 53 | 1 (1.9%) | 18 (34.0%) | 23 (43.4%) | 1 (1.9%) |
| 15 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1133 | 5 (0.4%) | 136 (12.0%) | 942 (83.1%) | 33 (2.9%) |
| 21 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (9.5%) | 7 (33.3%) | 4 (19.0%) |
| 2060 | 11 (0.5%) | 135 (6.6%) | 1,880 (91.3%) | 14 (0.7%) |
| 161 | 0 (0.0%) | 74 (46.0%) | 84 (52.2%) | 2 (1.2%) |
| 573 | 26 (4.5%) | 194 (33.9%) | 229 (40.0%) | 63 (11.0%) |
| 11 | 3 (27.3%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (27.3%) | 5 (45.5%) |
| 13 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (15.4%) | 11 (84.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 53 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 15 | 1 (6.7%) | 8 (53.3%) | 6 (40.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 52 | 4 (7.7%) | 19 (36.5%) | 27 (51.9%) | 1 (1.9%) |
| 40 | 0 (0.0%) | 16 (40.0%) | 14 (35.0%) | 7 (17.5%) |
| 4090 | 133 (3.3%) | 1,239 (30.3%) | 2,218 (54.2%) | 135 (3.3%) |
| 40 | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (17.5%) | 22 (55.0%) | 1 (2.5%) |
| 152 | 0 (0.0%) | 17 (11.2%) | 124 (81.6%) | 11 (7.2%) |
| 4601 | 436 (9.5%) | 1,724 (37.5%) | 2,374 (51.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1375 | 46 (3.3%) | 652 (47.4%) | 662 (48.1%) | 8 (0.6%) |
| 144 | 22 (15.3%) | 65 (45.1%) | 16 (11.1%) | 41 (28.5%) |
| 1259 | 30 (2.4%) | 187 (14.9%) | 980 (77.8%) | 24 (1.9%) |
| 34 | 0 (0.0%) | 15 (44.1%) | 15 (44.1%) | 2 (5.9%) |
| 155 | 2 (1.3%) | 36 (23.2%) | 80 (51.6%) | 37 (23.9%) |
| 333 | 0 (0.0%) | 27 (8.1%) | 280 (84.1%) | 3 (0.9%) |
| 398 | 2 (0.5%) | 89 (22.4%) | 233 (58.5%) | 28 (7.0%) |
| 80 | 0 (0.0%) | 22 (27.5%) | 18 (22.5%) | 40 (50.0%) |
| 27 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 25 (92.6%) | 2 (7.4%) |
| 330 | 0 (0.0%) | 57 (17.3%) | 87 (26.4%) | 8 (2.4%) |
| 30 | 1 (3.3%) | 8 (26.7%) | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (70.0%) |
| 225 | 0 (0.0%) | 43 (19.1%) | 141 (62.7%) | 19 (8.4%) |
Why the Treasury still prices gold at 42 dollars an ounce (Ad) The U.S. Treasury still values its gold reserves at 42.22 dollars an ounce, a price set in 1973. Gold trades near 4,500 dollars today, a 113-to-1 gap between book value and market reality.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said he wants to monetize the asset side of the balance sheet. A revaluation could add more than 1 trillion dollars to the government's books overnight.
Certain gold miners still trade as if gold were under 2,000 dollars, even as prices near record highs. See the four gold miners positioned ahead of a potential Treasury revaluation. |
| 73 | 5 (6.8%) | 6 (8.2%) | 31 (42.5%) | 6 (8.2%) |
| 2298 | 88 (3.8%) | 679 (29.5%) | 1,090 (47.4%) | 45 (2.0%) |
| 55 | 0 (0.0%) | 21 (38.2%) | 27 (49.1%) | 2 (3.6%) |
| 63 | 5 (7.9%) | 10 (15.9%) | 46 (73.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 4952 | 597 (12.1%) | 1,611 (32.5%) | 2,097 (42.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1248 | 5 (0.4%) | 372 (29.8%) | 682 (54.6%) | 52 (4.2%) |
| 1918 | 2 (0.1%) | 131 (6.8%) | 1,767 (92.1%) | 1 (0.1%) |
| 186 | 12 (6.5%) | 33 (17.7%) | 42 (22.6%) | 3 (1.6%) |
| 62 | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (19.4%) | 38 (61.3%) | 12 (19.4%) |
| 73 | 1 (1.4%) | 24 (32.9%) | 29 (39.7%) | 15 (20.5%) |
| 20 | 1 (5.0%) | 7 (35.0%) | 12 (60.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 60 | 3 (5.0%) | 24 (40.0%) | 26 (43.3%) | 3 (5.0%) |
| 402 | 2 (0.5%) | 49 (12.2%) | 118 (29.4%) | 27 (6.7%) |
| 88 | 7 (8.0%) | 40 (45.5%) | 39 (44.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 15 | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (6.7%) | 6 (40.0%) | 5 (33.3%) |
| 1337 | 5 (0.4%) | 146 (10.9%) | 1,114 (83.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 70 | 3 (4.3%) | 12 (17.1%) | 55 (78.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 60 | 6 (10.0%) | 30 (50.0%) | 16 (26.7%) | 8 (13.3%) |
| 307 | 1 (0.3%) | 48 (15.6%) | 246 (80.1%) | 5 (1.6%) |
| 47 | 6 (12.8%) | 3 (6.4%) | 17 (36.2%) | 17 (36.2%) |
| 2765 | 38 (1.4%) | 1,016 (36.7%) | 1,584 (57.3%) | 27 (1.0%) |
| 29 | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (24.1%) | 20 (69.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 37 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 35 (94.6%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2207 | 31 (1.4%) | 387 (17.5%) | 1,088 (49.3%) | 472 (21.4%) |
| 1835 | 10 (0.5%) | 462 (25.2%) | 681 (37.1%) | 64 (3.5%) |
| 35 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 31 (88.6%) | 4 (11.4%) |
| 765 | 4 (0.5%) | 98 (12.8%) | 634 (82.9%) | 21 (2.7%) |
| 1046 | 8 (0.8%) | 176 (16.8%) | 704 (67.3%) | 40 (3.8%) |
| 403 | 36 (8.9%) | 153 (38.0%) | 112 (27.8%) | 28 (6.9%) |
| 5124 | 110 (2.1%) | 1,817 (35.5%) | 2,976 (58.1%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 1386 | 60 (4.3%) | 496 (35.8%) | 687 (49.6%) | 46 (3.3%) |
| 53 | 5 (9.4%) | 20 (37.7%) | 28 (52.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 108 | 0 (0.0%) | 41 (38.0%) | 65 (60.2%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 2103 | 49 (2.3%) | 789 (37.5%) | 1,025 (48.7%) | 94 (4.5%) |
| 220 | 19 (8.6%) | 60 (27.3%) | 104 (47.3%) | 21 (9.5%) |
| 676 | 8 (1.2%) | 113 (16.7%) | 241 (35.7%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 10 | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | 4 (40.0%) | 1 (10.0%) |
| 17 | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (41.2%) | 10 (58.8%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 19 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (36.8%) | 12 (63.2%) |
| 11 | 1 (9.1%) | 7 (63.6%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (27.3%) |
| 787 | 2 (0.3%) | 282 (35.8%) | 415 (52.7%) | 29 (3.7%) |
| 2227 | 7 (0.3%) | 462 (20.7%) | 1,258 (56.5%) | 29 (1.3%) |
| 10 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (30.0%) | 5 (50.0%) | 2 (20.0%) |
| 11 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 859 | 7 (0.8%) | 307 (35.7%) | 506 (58.9%) | 4 (0.5%) |
| 330 | 9 (2.7%) | 95 (28.8%) | 222 (67.3%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 3257 | 32 (1.0%) | 1,094 (33.6%) | 2,040 (62.6%) | 68 (2.1%) |
| 954 | 30 (3.1%) | 270 (28.3%) | 474 (49.7%) | 82 (8.6%) |
| 475 | 0 (0.0%) | 206 (43.4%) | 256 (53.9%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 53 | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (20.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 42 (79.2%) |
This looks like plywood. It's not. (Ad) AI data centers have a power problem nobody likes to talk about. A single rack of computers can now use more electricity than an entire office building.
One new chip, which looks more like a piece of plywood than a processor, delivers similar performance on a fraction of the power. Tech investing veteran George Gilder says that efficiency gap could decide who wins the next stage of AI.
Gilder has identified three companies positioned around this power breakthrough, calling them the Trillion Dollar Triangle. See the three companies behind this AI power breakthrough now |
| 3451 | 451 (13.1%) | 1,196 (34.7%) | 1,515 (43.9%) | 79 (2.3%) |
| 15 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 11 (73.3%) | 4 (26.7%) |
| 101 | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (2.0%) | 70 (69.3%) | 28 (27.7%) |
| 2997 | 15 (0.5%) | 919 (30.7%) | 1,582 (52.8%) | 130 (4.3%) |
| 28 | 3 (10.7%) | 6 (21.4%) | 6 (21.4%) | 6 (21.4%) |
| 6245 | 181 (2.9%) | 2,567 (41.1%) | 2,752 (44.1%) | 64 (1.0%) |
| 22 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (13.6%) | 8 (36.4%) | 2 (9.1%) |
| 73 | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (8.2%) | 39 (53.4%) | 22 (30.1%) |
| 13 | 4 (30.8%) | 3 (23.1%) | 0 (0.0%) | 6 (46.2%) |
| 63 | 4 (6.3%) | 20 (31.7%) | 32 (50.8%) | 6 (9.5%) |
| 18779 | 4,691 (25.0%) | 7,722 (41.1%) | 4,911 (26.2%) | 1,455 (7.7%) |
| 938 | 17 (1.8%) | 175 (18.7%) | 727 (77.5%) | 6 (0.6%) |
| 46004 | 23,219 (50.5%) | 15,410 (33.5%) | 7,047 (15.3%) | 328 (0.7%) |
| 4869 | 303 (6.2%) | 1,948 (40.0%) | 2,415 (49.6%) | 101 (2.1%) |
| 17 | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (17.6%) | 14 (82.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| 441 | 5 (1.1%) | 142 (32.2%) | 255 (57.8%) | 15 (3.4%) |
| 63 | 3 (4.8%) | 6 (9.5%) | 2 (3.2%) | 4 (6.3%) |
| 991 | 61 (6.2%) | 192 (19.4%) | 614 (62.0%) | 48 (4.8%) |
| 10415 | 2,382 (22.9%) | 5,500 (52.8%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2,533 (24.3%) |
| 31 | 3 (9.7%) | 14 (45.2%) | 12 (38.7%) | 2 (6.5%) |