Performance Shipping (DCIX) Competitors

KNOT Offshore Partners has a net margin of 6.38% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -11.89%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 8.25% beat KNOT Offshore Partners' return on equity.

KNOT Offshore Partners has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Shipping. Performance Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KNOT Offshore Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

KNOT Offshore Partners has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.53%. Given KNOT Offshore Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe KNOT Offshore Partners is more favorable than Performance Shipping.

1.9% of Performance Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.8% of KNOT Offshore Partners shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, KNOT Offshore Partners had 2 more articles in the media than Performance Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for KNOT Offshore Partners and 0 mentions for Performance Shipping. KNOT Offshore Partners' average media sentiment score of 0.10 beat Performance Shipping's score of 0.00 indicating that KNOT Offshore Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Performance Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. KNOT Offshore Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Performance Shipping pays out 1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. KNOT Offshore Partners pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Performance Shipping is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Seanergy Maritime has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Shipping. Performance Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seanergy Maritime, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

29.4% of Seanergy Maritime shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.9% of Performance Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Seanergy Maritime shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Seanergy Maritime had 1 more articles in the media than Performance Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seanergy Maritime and 0 mentions for Performance Shipping. Seanergy Maritime's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Performance Shipping's score of 0.00 indicating that Seanergy Maritime is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Seanergy Maritime pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Performance Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Seanergy Maritime pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Performance Shipping pays out 1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Seanergy Maritime has a net margin of 13.08% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -11.89%. Seanergy Maritime's return on equity of 8.35% beat Performance Shipping's return on equity.

Seanergy Maritime presently has a consensus price target of $17.00, suggesting a potential upside of 5.03%. Given Seanergy Maritime's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Seanergy Maritime is more favorable than Performance Shipping.

In the previous week, Diana Shipping had 4 more articles in the media than Performance Shipping. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Diana Shipping and 0 mentions for Performance Shipping. Diana Shipping's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Performance Shipping's score of 0.00 indicating that Diana Shipping is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Performance Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Diana Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Performance Shipping pays out 1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Diana Shipping pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Performance Shipping is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

1.9% of Performance Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.7% of Diana Shipping shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diana Shipping has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Shipping. Performance Shipping is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diana Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Diana Shipping has a net margin of 8.35% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -11.89%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 8.25% beat Diana Shipping's return on equity.

In the previous week, VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Performance Shipping's score of 0.00 indicating that VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is being referred to more favorably in the media.

1.9% of Performance Shipping shares are held by institutional investors. 9.8% of VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has higher revenue and earnings than Performance Shipping. VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Performance Shipping, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF is more favorable than Performance Shipping.

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF has a net margin of -2.49% compared to Performance Shipping's net margin of -11.89%. Performance Shipping's return on equity of 8.25% beat VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF's return on equity.

VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays an annual dividend of $0.11 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Performance Shipping pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF pays out -22.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Performance Shipping pays out 1.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.