Do analysts prefer FXHO or FLEX?

Flex has a consensus price target of $114.20, indicating a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Flex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flex is more favorable than UTime. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score UTime 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Flex 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.92

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, FXHO or FLEX?

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than UTime. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UTime $196.39M 0.01 N/A N/A N/A Flex $27.91B 1.52 $880M $2.59 44.30

Is FXHO or FLEX more profitable?

Flex has a net margin of 3.32% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat UTime's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UTime N/A N/A N/A Flex 3.32% 23.15% 5.50%

Does the media favor FXHO or FLEX?

In the previous week, Flex had 21 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Flex and 1 mentions for UTime. Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UTime 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Flex 8 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 12 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend FXHO or CLS?

Celestica has a consensus price target of $439.81, indicating a potential upside of 31.26%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than UTime. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score UTime 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Celestica 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 21 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FXHO or CLS?

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than UTime. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UTime $196.39M 0.01 N/A N/A N/A Celestica $12.39B 3.11 $832.50M $9.62 34.83

Is FXHO or CLS more profitable?

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat UTime's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UTime N/A N/A N/A Celestica 7.16% 39.96% 11.06%

Does the media refer more to FXHO or CLS?

In the previous week, Celestica had 17 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Celestica and 1 mentions for UTime. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UTime 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Celestica 8 Very Positive mention(s) 4 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FXHO or JBL?

Jabil has a consensus target price of $441.78, indicating a potential upside of 41.72%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than UTime. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score UTime 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Jabil 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, FXHO or JBL?

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than UTime. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UTime $196.39M 0.01 N/A N/A N/A Jabil $29.80B 1.10 $657M $8.01 38.92

Is FXHO or JBL more profitable?

Jabil has a net margin of 2.57% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Jabil's return on equity of 83.93% beat UTime's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UTime N/A N/A N/A Jabil 2.57% 83.93% 5.65%

Does the media favor FXHO or JBL?

In the previous week, Jabil had 7 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Jabil and 1 mentions for UTime. Jabil's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Jabil is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UTime 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Jabil 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FN or FXHO?

Fabrinet presently has a consensus price target of $649.50, suggesting a potential upside of 53.93%. Given Fabrinet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than UTime. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Fabrinet 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 7 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.70 UTime 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, FN or FXHO?

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than UTime. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Fabrinet $4.64B 3.26 $473.03M $13.05 32.33 UTime $196.39M 0.01 N/A N/A N/A

Is FN or FXHO more profitable?

Fabrinet has a net margin of 10.19% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 21.23% beat UTime's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Fabrinet 10.19% 21.23% 13.96% UTime N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer FN or FXHO?

In the previous week, Fabrinet had 9 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Fabrinet and 1 mentions for UTime. Fabrinet's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Fabrinet is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fabrinet 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive UTime 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer FXHO or SANM?

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $198.33, indicating a potential downside of 4.37%. Given Sanmina's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than UTime. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score UTime 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Sanmina 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80

Which has better valuation and earnings, FXHO or SANM?

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than UTime. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UTime $196.39M 0.01 N/A N/A N/A Sanmina $8.13B 1.37 $245.89M $5.59 37.10

Is FXHO or SANM more profitable?

Sanmina has a net margin of 2.41% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Sanmina's return on equity of 19.08% beat UTime's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UTime N/A N/A N/A Sanmina 2.41% 19.08% 5.75%

Does the media favor FXHO or SANM?

In the previous week, Sanmina had 7 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Sanmina and 1 mentions for UTime. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UTime 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Sanmina 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

UTime (FXHO) Competitors

$11.85 +0.07 (+0.59%)

As of 02:00 PM Eastern

Compare

FXHO vs. FLEX, CLS, JBL, FN, and SANM

Should you buy UTime stock or one of its competitors? UTime's main competitors and comparable companies include Flex (FLEX), Celestica (CLS), Jabil (JBL), Fabrinet (FN), and Sanmina (SANM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electronic manufacturing services" industry.

How does UTime compare to Flex?

UTime (NASDAQ:FXHO) and Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Flex has a net margin of 3.32% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Flex's return on equity of 23.15% beat UTime's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UTime	N/A	N/A	N/A
Flex	3.32%	23.15%	5.50%

UTime has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Flex has a consensus price target of $114.20, indicating a potential downside of 0.48%. Given Flex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flex is more favorable than UTime.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UTime	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Flex	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

In the previous week, Flex had 21 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Flex and 1 mentions for UTime. Flex's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Flex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UTime	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Flex	8 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	12 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

1.1% of UTime shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.3% of Flex shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.6% of UTime shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Flex shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Flex has higher revenue and earnings than UTime.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UTime	$196.39M	0.01	N/A	N/A	N/A
Flex	$27.91B	1.52	$880M	$2.59	44.30

Summary

Flex beats UTime on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UTime compare to Celestica?

UTime (NASDAQ:FXHO) and Celestica (NYSE:CLS) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

Celestica has a consensus price target of $439.81, indicating a potential upside of 31.26%. Given Celestica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Celestica is more favorable than UTime.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UTime	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Celestica	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	21 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Celestica has a net margin of 7.16% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Celestica's return on equity of 39.96% beat UTime's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UTime	N/A	N/A	N/A
Celestica	7.16%	39.96%	11.06%

Celestica has higher revenue and earnings than UTime.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UTime	$196.39M	0.01	N/A	N/A	N/A
Celestica	$12.39B	3.11	$832.50M	$9.62	34.83

1.1% of UTime shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Celestica shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.6% of UTime shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Celestica shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Celestica had 17 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Celestica and 1 mentions for UTime. Celestica's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Celestica is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UTime	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Celestica	8 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UTime has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Celestica has a beta of 2.04, indicating that its share price is 104% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Celestica beats UTime on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UTime compare to Jabil?

UTime (NASDAQ:FXHO) and Jabil (NYSE:JBL) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Jabil had 7 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Jabil and 1 mentions for UTime. Jabil's average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Jabil is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UTime	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Jabil	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Jabil has a consensus target price of $441.78, indicating a potential upside of 41.72%. Given Jabil's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Jabil is more favorable than UTime.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UTime	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Jabil	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Jabil has higher revenue and earnings than UTime.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UTime	$196.39M	0.01	N/A	N/A	N/A
Jabil	$29.80B	1.10	$657M	$8.01	38.92

UTime has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jabil has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the broader market.

1.1% of UTime shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Jabil shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.6% of UTime shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Jabil shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Jabil has a net margin of 2.57% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Jabil's return on equity of 83.93% beat UTime's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UTime	N/A	N/A	N/A
Jabil	2.57%	83.93%	5.65%

Summary

Jabil beats UTime on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UTime compare to Fabrinet?

Fabrinet (NYSE:FN) and UTime (NASDAQ:FXHO) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and risk.

Fabrinet has a net margin of 10.19% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Fabrinet's return on equity of 21.23% beat UTime's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fabrinet	10.19%	21.23%	13.96%
UTime	N/A	N/A	N/A

Fabrinet has higher revenue and earnings than UTime.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fabrinet	$4.64B	3.26	$473.03M	$13.05	32.33
UTime	$196.39M	0.01	N/A	N/A	N/A

Fabrinet has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UTime has a beta of 0.31, indicating that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Fabrinet presently has a consensus price target of $649.50, suggesting a potential upside of 53.93%. Given Fabrinet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Fabrinet is more favorable than UTime.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fabrinet	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.70
UTime	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Fabrinet had 9 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Fabrinet and 1 mentions for UTime. Fabrinet's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Fabrinet is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fabrinet	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
UTime	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

97.4% of Fabrinet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.1% of UTime shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Fabrinet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.6% of UTime shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Fabrinet beats UTime on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UTime compare to Sanmina?

UTime (NASDAQ:FXHO) and Sanmina (NASDAQ:SANM) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Sanmina has higher revenue and earnings than UTime.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UTime	$196.39M	0.01	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sanmina	$8.13B	1.37	$245.89M	$5.59	37.10

In the previous week, Sanmina had 7 more articles in the media than UTime. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Sanmina and 1 mentions for UTime. Sanmina's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat UTime's score of 0.51 indicating that Sanmina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UTime	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Sanmina	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

1.1% of UTime shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.7% of Sanmina shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.6% of UTime shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Sanmina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of $198.33, indicating a potential downside of 4.37%. Given Sanmina's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sanmina is more favorable than UTime.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UTime	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Sanmina	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

UTime has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sanmina has a beta of 1.6, meaning that its stock price is 60% more volatile than the broader market.

Sanmina has a net margin of 2.41% compared to UTime's net margin of 0.00%. Sanmina's return on equity of 19.08% beat UTime's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UTime	N/A	N/A	N/A
Sanmina	2.41%	19.08%	5.75%

Summary

Sanmina beats UTime on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UTime News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FXHO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

FXHO vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	UTime	Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.10M	$9.00B	$30.06B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.23%	2.73%	9.14%
P/E Ratio	N/A	24.35	76.26	25.46
Price / Sales	0.01	41.64	589.73	92.84
Price / Cash	N/A	31.18	46.84	35.62
Price / Book	N/A	4.83	7.82	6.44
Net Income	N/A	$203.38M	$703.05M	$358.18M
7 Day Performance	-4.74%	0.91%	1.01%	1.04%
1 Month Performance	28.03%	-4.24%	-1.85%	-0.44%
1 Year Performance	-99.78%	813.99%	186.07%	13.84%

UTime Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
FXHO UTime	0.9169 of 5 stars	$11.85 +0.6%	N/A	-99.8%	$2.10M	$196.39M	N/A	220	Gap Down
FLEX Flex	3.043 of 5 stars	$106.01 -0.8%	$114.20 +7.7%	+96.7%	$39.12B	$29.27B	40.89	149,686
CLS Celestica	4.7563 of 5 stars	$278.65 -4.8%	$439.81 +57.8%	+28.8%	$32.07B	$15.59B	28.99	29,591	Analyst Downgrade
JBL Jabil	4.9986 of 5 stars	$299.51 +0.1%	$453.67 +51.5%	+47.9%	$31.37B	$33.59B	37.38	135,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
FN Fabrinet	4.9258 of 5 stars	$393.97 -2.0%	$649.50 +64.9%	+10.0%	$14.11B	$4.64B	30.17	21,521	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:FXHO) was last updated on 9/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

UTime (FXHO) Competitors