Do analysts recommend CIA or AFL?

Aflac has a consensus target price of $112.27, suggesting a potential downside of 4.22%. Given Aflac's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aflac is more favorable than Citizens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Citizens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Aflac 2 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has better earnings & valuation, CIA or AFL?

Aflac has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Aflac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citizens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Citizens $255.62M 1.13 $14.59M $0.35 16.37 Aflac $17.16B 3.48 $3.65B $8.81 13.30

Is CIA or AFL more profitable?

Aflac has a net margin of 25.60% compared to Citizens' net margin of 7.12%. Aflac's return on equity of 13.88% beat Citizens' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Citizens 7.12% 7.21% 0.96% Aflac 25.60% 13.88% 3.34%

Does the media favor CIA or AFL?

In the previous week, Aflac had 21 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Aflac and 1 mentions for Citizens. Citizens' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Aflac's score of 0.85 indicating that Citizens is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Citizens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Aflac 12 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MET or CIA?

MetLife currently has a consensus target price of $95.62, indicating a potential upside of 12.92%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MetLife is more favorable than Citizens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MetLife 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 11 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.93 Citizens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MET or CIA?

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Citizens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MetLife $77.08B 0.71 $3.38B $5.16 16.41 Citizens $255.62M 1.13 $14.59M $0.35 16.37

Is MET or CIA more profitable?

Citizens has a net margin of 7.12% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Citizens' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MetLife 4.66% 22.60% 0.88% Citizens 7.12% 7.21% 0.96%

Does the media refer more to MET or CIA?

In the previous week, MetLife had 44 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for MetLife and 1 mentions for Citizens. Citizens' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat MetLife's score of 0.46 indicating that Citizens is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MetLife 18 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 17 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 3 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Citizens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate PRU or CIA?

Prudential Financial currently has a consensus price target of $101.92, suggesting a potential downside of 5.56%. Given Prudential Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than Citizens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Prudential Financial 5 Sell rating(s) 11 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.69 Citizens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media prefer PRU or CIA?

In the previous week, Prudential Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Prudential Financial and 1 mentions for Citizens. Prudential Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Prudential Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Prudential Financial 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Citizens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer UNM or CIA?

Unum Group currently has a consensus price target of $93.83, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Given Unum Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Unum Group is more favorable than Citizens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Unum Group 0 Sell rating(s) 6 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 Citizens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, UNM or CIA?

Unum Group has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Citizens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Unum Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Unum Group $13.08B 1.09 $738.50M $4.60 19.46 Citizens $255.62M 1.13 $14.59M $0.35 16.37

Is UNM or CIA more profitable?

Citizens has a net margin of 7.12% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 5.86%. Unum Group's return on equity of 12.60% beat Citizens' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Unum Group 5.86% 12.60% 2.20% Citizens 7.12% 7.21% 0.96%

Does the media prefer UNM or CIA?

In the previous week, Unum Group had 8 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Unum Group and 1 mentions for Citizens. Unum Group's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Unum Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Unum Group 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Citizens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend PRI or CIA?

Primerica currently has a consensus target price of $297.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.67%. Given Primerica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Primerica is more favorable than Citizens. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Primerica 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.38 Citizens 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PRI or CIA?

Primerica has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Primerica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citizens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Primerica $3.29B 2.69 $751.23M $23.85 11.93 Citizens $255.62M 1.13 $14.59M $0.35 16.37

Is PRI or CIA more profitable?

Primerica has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Citizens' net margin of 7.12%. Primerica's return on equity of 32.32% beat Citizens' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Primerica 22.99% 32.32% 5.21% Citizens 7.12% 7.21% 0.96%

Does the media refer more to PRI or CIA?

In the previous week, Primerica had 6 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Primerica and 1 mentions for Citizens. Primerica's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Primerica is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Primerica 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Citizens 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Citizens (CIA) Competitors

$5.73 -0.45 (-7.27%)

Closing price 06/30/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$5.74 +0.00 (+0.07%)

As of 06/30/2026 07:42 PM Eastern

Compare

CIA vs. AFL, MET, PRU, UNM, and PRI

Should you buy Citizens stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Citizens with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Citizens include Aflac (AFL), MetLife (MET), Prudential Financial (PRU), Unum Group (UNM), and Primerica (PRI). These companies are all part of the "life & health insurance" industry.

How does Citizens compare to Aflac?

Citizens (NYSE:CIA) and Aflac (NYSE:AFL) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Aflac has a consensus target price of $112.27, suggesting a potential downside of 4.22%. Given Aflac's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aflac is more favorable than Citizens.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Citizens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Aflac	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, Aflac had 21 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Aflac and 1 mentions for Citizens. Citizens' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Aflac's score of 0.85 indicating that Citizens is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Citizens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Aflac	12 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Aflac has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Aflac is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citizens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Citizens	$255.62M	1.13	$14.59M	$0.35	16.37
Aflac	$17.16B	3.48	$3.65B	$8.81	13.30

Aflac has a net margin of 25.60% compared to Citizens' net margin of 7.12%. Aflac's return on equity of 13.88% beat Citizens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Citizens	7.12%	7.21%	0.96%
Aflac	25.60%	13.88%	3.34%

13.7% of Citizens shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.4% of Aflac shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Citizens shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Aflac shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Citizens has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aflac has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Aflac beats Citizens on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Citizens compare to MetLife?

MetLife (NYSE:MET) and Citizens (NYSE:CIA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, MetLife had 44 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 45 mentions for MetLife and 1 mentions for Citizens. Citizens' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat MetLife's score of 0.46 indicating that Citizens is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MetLife	18 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	17 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	3 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Citizens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MetLife currently has a consensus target price of $95.62, indicating a potential upside of 12.92%. Given MetLife's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe MetLife is more favorable than Citizens.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MetLife	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.93
Citizens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Citizens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MetLife	$77.08B	0.71	$3.38B	$5.16	16.41
Citizens	$255.62M	1.13	$14.59M	$0.35	16.37

Citizens has a net margin of 7.12% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.66%. MetLife's return on equity of 22.60% beat Citizens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MetLife	4.66%	22.60%	0.88%
Citizens	7.12%	7.21%	0.96%

MetLife has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citizens has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

95.0% of MetLife shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Citizens shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of MetLife shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Citizens shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MetLife beats Citizens on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Citizens compare to Prudential Financial?

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) and Citizens (NYSE:CIA) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Citizens has a net margin of 7.12% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 5.83%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 16.33% beat Citizens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Prudential Financial	5.83%	16.33%	0.68%
Citizens	7.12%	7.21%	0.96%

Prudential Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Prudential Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citizens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Prudential Financial	$57.68B	0.65	$3.58B	$9.72	11.10
Citizens	$255.62M	1.13	$14.59M	$0.35	16.37

Prudential Financial has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citizens has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Prudential Financial currently has a consensus price target of $101.92, suggesting a potential downside of 5.56%. Given Prudential Financial's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Prudential Financial is more favorable than Citizens.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Prudential Financial	5 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.69
Citizens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

56.8% of Prudential Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Citizens shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Prudential Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Citizens shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Prudential Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Prudential Financial and 1 mentions for Citizens. Prudential Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Prudential Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Prudential Financial	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Citizens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Prudential Financial beats Citizens on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Citizens compare to Unum Group?

Unum Group (NYSE:UNM) and Citizens (NYSE:CIA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Citizens has a net margin of 7.12% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 5.86%. Unum Group's return on equity of 12.60% beat Citizens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Unum Group	5.86%	12.60%	2.20%
Citizens	7.12%	7.21%	0.96%

Unum Group has a beta of 0.24, indicating that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citizens has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

86.6% of Unum Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Citizens shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Unum Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Citizens shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Unum Group currently has a consensus price target of $93.83, suggesting a potential upside of 4.83%. Given Unum Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Unum Group is more favorable than Citizens.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Unum Group	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Citizens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Unum Group has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Citizens is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Unum Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Unum Group	$13.08B	1.09	$738.50M	$4.60	19.46
Citizens	$255.62M	1.13	$14.59M	$0.35	16.37

In the previous week, Unum Group had 8 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Unum Group and 1 mentions for Citizens. Unum Group's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Unum Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Unum Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Citizens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Unum Group beats Citizens on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Citizens compare to Primerica?

Primerica (NYSE:PRI) and Citizens (NYSE:CIA) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Primerica has a net margin of 22.99% compared to Citizens' net margin of 7.12%. Primerica's return on equity of 32.32% beat Citizens' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Primerica	22.99%	32.32%	5.21%
Citizens	7.12%	7.21%	0.96%

90.9% of Primerica shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.7% of Citizens shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Primerica shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Citizens shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Primerica has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Citizens has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Primerica has higher revenue and earnings than Citizens. Primerica is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Citizens, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Primerica	$3.29B	2.69	$751.23M	$23.85	11.93
Citizens	$255.62M	1.13	$14.59M	$0.35	16.37

In the previous week, Primerica had 6 more articles in the media than Citizens. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Primerica and 1 mentions for Citizens. Primerica's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat Citizens' score of 0.87 indicating that Primerica is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Primerica	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Citizens	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Primerica currently has a consensus target price of $297.80, indicating a potential upside of 4.67%. Given Primerica's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Primerica is more favorable than Citizens.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Primerica	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.38
Citizens	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Primerica beats Citizens on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Citizens News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CIA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CIA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Citizens	INS Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$310.85M	$15.86B	$13.87B	$23.41B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.65%	5.69%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	16.37	8.84	20.42	31.92
Price / Sales	1.13	1.39	127.57	21.80
Price / Cash	15.71	9.53	19.75	25.04
Price / Book	1.23	1.37	2.25	4.80
Net Income	$14.59M	$1.06B	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-2.67%	0.32%	0.72%	1.35%
1 Month Performance	7.06%	1.78%	1.59%	0.57%
1 Year Performance	59.64%	10.32%	13.37%	22.01%

Citizens Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CIA Citizens	1.6345 of 5 stars	$5.73 -7.3%	N/A	+62.4%	$310.85M	$255.62M	16.37	220
AFL Aflac	4.2408 of 5 stars	$118.90 +2.0%	$112.27 -5.6%	+11.1%	$59.32B	$17.16B	13.50	12,716
MET MetLife	4.8686 of 5 stars	$88.22 +0.8%	$95.31 +8.0%	+5.3%	$56.34B	$77.08B	17.10	46,000	Trending News
PRU Prudential Financial	2.8024 of 5 stars	$108.75 +0.5%	$101.50 -6.7%	+0.5%	$37.57B	$57.68B	11.19	36,824
UNM Unum Group	4.8653 of 5 stars	$91.46 +1.0%	$93.83 +2.6%	+10.8%	$14.47B	$13.08B	19.88	10,910	Positive News Options Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CIA) was last updated on 7/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Citizens (CIA) Competitors