Do analysts recommend PRA or ACGL?

Arch Capital Group has a consensus target price of $106.81, indicating a potential upside of 13.99%. Given Arch Capital Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arch Capital Group is more favorable than ProAssurance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ProAssurance 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Arch Capital Group 1 Sell rating(s) 7 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.44

Do analysts prefer PLMR or PRA?

Palomar currently has a consensus price target of $147.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.28%. Given Palomar's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Palomar is more favorable than ProAssurance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Palomar 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.67 ProAssurance 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PLMR or PRA?

Palomar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProAssurance. Palomar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Palomar $980.27M 3.14 $197.07M $7.18 16.17 ProAssurance $1.10B 1.16 $50.92M $1.25 19.72

Is PLMR or PRA more profitable?

Palomar has a net margin of 20.11% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. Palomar's return on equity of 22.62% beat ProAssurance's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Palomar 20.11% 22.62% 6.60% ProAssurance 5.99% 6.82% 1.64%

Do analysts recommend PRA or AFG?

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $145.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.85%. Given American Financial Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than ProAssurance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score ProAssurance 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 American Financial Group 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Do analysts prefer WTM or PRA?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score White Mountains Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 ProAssurance 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend RLI or PRA?

RLI currently has a consensus price target of $61.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.16%. Given RLI's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe RLI is more favorable than ProAssurance. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score RLI 1 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.14 ProAssurance 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, RLI or PRA?

RLI has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. RLI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio RLI $1.88B 2.63 $403.34M $4.28 12.59 ProAssurance $1.10B 1.16 $50.92M $1.25 19.72

Is RLI or PRA more profitable?

RLI has a net margin of 20.81% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. RLI's return on equity of 17.72% beat ProAssurance's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets RLI 20.81% 17.72% 5.13% ProAssurance 5.99% 6.82% 1.64%

ProAssurance (PRA) Competitors

$24.65 +0.11 (+0.45%)

As of 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

PRA vs. ACGL, PLMR, AFG, WTM, and RLI

Should you buy ProAssurance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ProAssurance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ProAssurance include Arch Capital Group (ACGL), Palomar (PLMR), American Financial Group (AFG), White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM), and RLI (RLI). These companies are all part of the "ins - prop&caslty" industry.

How does ProAssurance compare to Arch Capital Group?

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and Arch Capital Group (NASDAQ:ACGL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Arch Capital Group has a consensus target price of $106.81, indicating a potential upside of 13.99%. Given Arch Capital Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Arch Capital Group is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ProAssurance	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Arch Capital Group	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.44

Arch Capital Group has a net margin of 24.64% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. Arch Capital Group's return on equity of 17.61% beat ProAssurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ProAssurance	5.99%	6.82%	1.64%
Arch Capital Group	24.64%	17.61%	5.08%

In the previous week, Arch Capital Group had 9 more articles in the media than ProAssurance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Arch Capital Group and 0 mentions for ProAssurance. Arch Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat ProAssurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Arch Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ProAssurance	Neutral
Arch Capital Group	Positive

Arch Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. Arch Capital Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ProAssurance	$1.10B	1.16	$50.92M	$1.25	19.72
Arch Capital Group	$19.93B	1.64	$4.40B	$13.02	7.20

85.6% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of ProAssurance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Arch Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Arch Capital Group has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Arch Capital Group beats ProAssurance on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProAssurance compare to Palomar?

Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) and ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Palomar has a net margin of 20.11% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. Palomar's return on equity of 22.62% beat ProAssurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Palomar	20.11%	22.62%	6.60%
ProAssurance	5.99%	6.82%	1.64%

Palomar has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProAssurance has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Palomar currently has a consensus price target of $147.75, indicating a potential upside of 27.28%. Given Palomar's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Palomar is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Palomar	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
ProAssurance	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Palomar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ProAssurance. Palomar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Palomar	$980.27M	3.14	$197.07M	$7.18	16.17
ProAssurance	$1.10B	1.16	$50.92M	$1.25	19.72

90.3% of Palomar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of ProAssurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Palomar shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of ProAssurance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Palomar had 9 more articles in the media than ProAssurance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Palomar and 0 mentions for ProAssurance. Palomar's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat ProAssurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Palomar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Palomar	Positive
ProAssurance	Neutral

Summary

Palomar beats ProAssurance on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProAssurance compare to American Financial Group?

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and American Financial Group (NYSE:AFG) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

85.6% of ProAssurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of ProAssurance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, American Financial Group had 1 more articles in the media than ProAssurance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for American Financial Group and 0 mentions for ProAssurance. American Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat ProAssurance's score of 0.00 indicating that American Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
ProAssurance	Neutral
American Financial Group	Positive

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.02, meaning that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, American Financial Group has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

American Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. American Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ProAssurance	$1.10B	1.16	$50.92M	$1.25	19.72
American Financial Group	$8.17B	1.39	$842M	$10.52	13.02

American Financial Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 19.50% beat ProAssurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ProAssurance	5.99%	6.82%	1.64%
American Financial Group	10.76%	19.50%	2.82%

American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $145.00, indicating a potential upside of 5.85%. Given American Financial Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ProAssurance	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
American Financial Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Summary

American Financial Group beats ProAssurance on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProAssurance compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, White Mountains Insurance Group had 1 more articles in the media than ProAssurance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group and 0 mentions for ProAssurance. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled ProAssurance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group	Neutral
ProAssurance	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
ProAssurance	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group	$2.83B	1.77	$1.11B	$406.57	4.98
ProAssurance	$1.10B	1.16	$50.92M	$1.25	19.72

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of ProAssurance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 28.44% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.19% beat ProAssurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group	28.44%	9.19%	4.27%
ProAssurance	5.99%	6.82%	1.64%

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProAssurance has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its stock price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

White Mountains Insurance Group beats ProAssurance on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ProAssurance compare to RLI?

RLI (NYSE:RLI) and ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

RLI currently has a consensus price target of $61.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.16%. Given RLI's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe RLI is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
RLI	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
ProAssurance	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

RLI has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ProAssurance has a beta of 0.02, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

RLI has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. RLI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ProAssurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
RLI	$1.88B	2.63	$403.34M	$4.28	12.59
ProAssurance	$1.10B	1.16	$50.92M	$1.25	19.72

RLI has a net margin of 20.81% compared to ProAssurance's net margin of 5.99%. RLI's return on equity of 17.72% beat ProAssurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
RLI	20.81%	17.72%	5.13%
ProAssurance	5.99%	6.82%	1.64%

77.9% of RLI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.6% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of RLI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, RLI had 2 more articles in the media than ProAssurance. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for RLI and 0 mentions for ProAssurance. RLI's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat ProAssurance's score of 0.00 indicating that RLI is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
RLI	Neutral
ProAssurance	Neutral

Summary

RLI beats ProAssurance on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ProAssurance News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

PRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ProAssurance	INS Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.27B	$59.32B	$13.96B	$23.13B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.86%	5.74%	4.06%
P/E Ratio	19.72	10.96	20.23	31.08
Price / Sales	1.16	1.68	139.71	20.72
Price / Cash	12.99	12.39	19.54	18.65
Price / Book	0.94	2.02	2.25	4.65
Net Income	$50.92M	$4.24B	$1.14B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.31%	1.58%	-0.19%	-1.05%
1 Month Performance	0.14%	2.47%	1.15%	0.18%
1 Year Performance	7.55%	9.60%	15.52%	24.24%

ProAssurance Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
PRA ProAssurance	1.5979 of 5 stars	$24.65 +0.4%	N/A	+7.4%	$1.27B	$1.10B	19.72	1,036
ACGL Arch Capital Group	4.5666 of 5 stars	$92.58 +1.2%	$106.81 +15.4%	+2.1%	$31.97B	$19.93B	7.11	8,000	Positive News
PLMR Palomar	4.6649 of 5 stars	$114.07 +0.9%	$147.75 +29.5%	-28.3%	$3.00B	$875.97M	15.89	150	Positive News Analyst Revision
AFG American Financial Group	3.8974 of 5 stars	$134.53 +0.5%	$145.00 +7.8%	+8.4%	$11.12B	$8.17B	12.79	8,500	Positive News Analyst Revision
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group	2.0631 of 5 stars	$2,034.90 +0.2%	N/A	+14.9%	$5.03B	$3.74B	5.01	1,648	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:PRA) was last updated on 6/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ProAssurance (PRA) Competitors

PRA vs. ACGL, PLMR, AFG, WTM, and RLI

How does ProAssurance compare to Arch Capital Group?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to Palomar?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to American Financial Group?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to RLI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRA vs. The Competition

ProAssurance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

ProAssurance (PRA) Competitors

PRA vs. ACGL, PLMR, AFG, WTM, and RLI

How does ProAssurance compare to Arch Capital Group?

Do analysts recommend PRA or ACGL?

Is PRA or ACGL more profitable?

Does the media refer more to PRA or ACGL?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, PRA or ACGL?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in PRA or ACGL?

Which has more risk & volatility, PRA or ACGL?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to Palomar?

Is PLMR or PRA more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, PLMR or PRA?

Do analysts prefer PLMR or PRA?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, PLMR or PRA?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in PLMR or PRA?

Does the media prefer PLMR or PRA?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to American Financial Group?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in PRA or AFG?

Does the media refer more to PRA or AFG?

Which has more risk and volatility, PRA or AFG?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PRA or AFG?

Is PRA or AFG more profitable?

Do analysts recommend PRA or AFG?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

Does the media prefer WTM or PRA?

Do analysts prefer WTM or PRA?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WTM or PRA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WTM or PRA?

Is WTM or PRA more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, WTM or PRA?

Summary

How does ProAssurance compare to RLI?

Do analysts recommend RLI or PRA?

Which has more risk & volatility, RLI or PRA?

Which has better valuation and earnings, RLI or PRA?

Is RLI or PRA more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of RLI or PRA?

Does the media refer more to RLI or PRA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

PRA vs. The Competition

ProAssurance Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools