ProAssurance Competitors

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.84, meaning that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ProAssurance and Berkshire Hathaway's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Berkshire Hathaway, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and Berkshire Hathaway's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 38.9% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and Berkshire Hathaway, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. Given ProAssurance's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ProAssurance is more favorable than Berkshire Hathaway.

Summary

Berkshire Hathaway beats ProAssurance on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and The Progressive (NYSE:PGR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Progressive has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProAssurance and The Progressive's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Progressive has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Progressive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and The Progressive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of The Progressive shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of The Progressive shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

ProAssurance pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. The Progressive pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. ProAssurance pays out -24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Progressive pays out 68.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ProAssurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Progressive has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and The Progressive, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. The Progressive has a consensus target price of $95.7692, indicating a potential upside of 11.42%. Given The Progressive's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Progressive is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Summary

The Progressive beats ProAssurance on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and The Travelers Companies (NYSE:TRV) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProAssurance and The Travelers Companies' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and The Travelers Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of The Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of The Travelers Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

ProAssurance pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. The Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. ProAssurance pays out -24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ProAssurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. The Travelers Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and The Travelers Companies, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. The Travelers Companies has a consensus target price of $135.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.08%. Given ProAssurance's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ProAssurance is more favorable than The Travelers Companies.

Summary

The Travelers Companies beats ProAssurance on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and The Allstate (NYSE:ALL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Allstate has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProAssurance and The Allstate's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Allstate, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and The Allstate's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of The Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of The Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

ProAssurance pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. The Allstate pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. ProAssurance pays out -24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Allstate pays out 20.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ProAssurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Allstate has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. The Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and The Allstate, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. The Allstate has a consensus target price of $119.0714, indicating a potential upside of 11.70%. Given The Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Allstate is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Summary

The Allstate beats ProAssurance on 15 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, indicating that its share price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares ProAssurance and Cincinnati Financial's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cincinnati Financial has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and Cincinnati Financial's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

ProAssurance pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. ProAssurance pays out -24.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ProAssurance has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 39 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and Cincinnati Financial, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. Cincinnati Financial has a consensus target price of $77.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.32%. Given ProAssurance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe ProAssurance is more favorable than Cincinnati Financial.

Summary

Cincinnati Financial beats ProAssurance on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

ProAssurance (NYSE:PRA) and Markel (NYSE:MKL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares ProAssurance and Markel's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

ProAssurance has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Markel has a beta of 0.67, meaning that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.5% of ProAssurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.6% of Markel shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of ProAssurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Markel shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares ProAssurance and Markel's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Markel has higher revenue and earnings than ProAssurance. ProAssurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Markel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for ProAssurance and Markel, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

ProAssurance presently has a consensus target price of $23.00, indicating a potential downside of 7.07%. Markel has a consensus target price of $1,143.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.05%. Given Markel's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Markel is more favorable than ProAssurance.

Summary

Markel beats ProAssurance on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.