Universal Insurance (UVE) Competitors

80.3% of Lemonade shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.2% of Lemonade shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Universal Insurance has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -14.19%. Universal Insurance's return on equity of 37.67% beat Lemonade's return on equity.

Lemonade has a beta of 1.87, meaning that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Insurance has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Lemonade currently has a consensus price target of $63.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.91%. Universal Insurance has a consensus price target of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.39%. Given Lemonade's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lemonade is more favorable than Universal Insurance.

Universal Insurance has higher revenue and earnings than Lemonade. Lemonade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Universal Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lemonade had 3 more articles in the media than Universal Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lemonade and 3 mentions for Universal Insurance. Lemonade's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Universal Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Lemonade is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Universal Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Palomar pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Universal Insurance pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Palomar pays out 24.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

66.6% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Palomar shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Palomar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Palomar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Universal Insurance. Universal Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Universal Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.39%. Palomar has a consensus target price of $162.75, indicating a potential upside of 28.33%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than Universal Insurance.

Palomar has a net margin of 18.61% compared to Universal Insurance's net margin of 13.49%. Universal Insurance's return on equity of 37.67% beat Palomar's return on equity.

In the previous week, Palomar had 14 more articles in the media than Universal Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Palomar and 3 mentions for Universal Insurance. Palomar's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Universal Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Palomar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Universal Insurance has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the broader market.

Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Universal Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Assured Guaranty pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Insurance pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assured Guaranty has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Assured Guaranty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Insurance has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to Universal Insurance's net margin of 13.49%. Universal Insurance's return on equity of 37.67% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

Assured Guaranty presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 31.68%. Universal Insurance has a consensus target price of $45.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.39%. Given Assured Guaranty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than Universal Insurance.

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty and Assured Guaranty both had 3 articles in the media. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Universal Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Assured Guaranty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Insurance. Universal Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Assured Guaranty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.6% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Universal Insurance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Slide Insurance has a net margin of 40.02% compared to Universal Insurance's net margin of 13.49%. Slide Insurance's return on equity of 50.69% beat Universal Insurance's return on equity.

Slide Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Universal Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Slide Insurance pays out 6.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Universal Insurance pays out 8.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Slide Insurance has a beta of 0.13, suggesting that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Universal Insurance has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Slide Insurance had 2 more articles in the media than Universal Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Slide Insurance and 3 mentions for Universal Insurance. Universal Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Slide Insurance's score of -0.11 indicating that Universal Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

66.6% of Universal Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 50.8% of Slide Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Universal Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Slide Insurance presently has a consensus target price of $25.40, suggesting a potential upside of 3.13%. Universal Insurance has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.39%. Given Slide Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Slide Insurance is more favorable than Universal Insurance.

Slide Insurance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Universal Insurance. Universal Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Slide Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.