Go Pro

United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

United Fire Group logo
$52.79 -0.85 (-1.58%)
Closing price 08/19/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$52.68 -0.12 (-0.22%)
As of 04:33 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UFCS vs. KNSL, WTM, ARX, LMND, and PLMR

Should you buy United Fire Group stock or one of its competitors? United Fire Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL), White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM), Accelerant (ARX), Lemonade (LMND), and Palomar (PLMR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does United Fire Group compare to Kinsale Capital Group?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and Kinsale Capital Group (NYSE:KNSL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Kinsale Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 4.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinsale Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Kinsale Capital Group had 8 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Kinsale Capital Group and 3 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Kinsale Capital Group's score of 0.95 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kinsale Capital Group
7 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Fire Group presently has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.55%. Kinsale Capital Group has a consensus target price of $368.78, suggesting a potential downside of 3.09%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Kinsale Capital Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Kinsale Capital Group
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 28.49% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 25.54% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Fire Group9.57% 15.19% 3.69%
Kinsale Capital Group 28.49%25.54%8.15%

Kinsale Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinsale Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group$1.39B0.98$118.19M$5.389.81
Kinsale Capital Group$1.87B4.63$503.61M$24.6815.42

Summary

Kinsale Capital Group beats United Fire Group on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
White Mountains Insurance Group29.29% 5.11% 2.37%
United Fire Group 9.57%15.19%3.69%

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, White Mountains Insurance Group and White Mountains Insurance Group both had 3 articles in the media. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.00 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
United Fire Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
White Mountains Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
White Mountains Insurance Group$3.74B1.36$1.11B$439.404.84
United Fire Group$1.39B0.98$118.19M$5.389.81

Summary

United Fire Group beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Accelerant?

Accelerant (NYSE:ARX) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 66.6% of Accelerant shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Accelerant currently has a consensus price target of $18.95, indicating a potential downside of 3.04%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Accelerant.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Accelerant
1 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Accelerant's net margin of -113.08%. Accelerant's return on equity of 42.79% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Accelerant-113.08% 42.79% 3.68%
United Fire Group 9.57%15.19%3.69%

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Accelerant. Accelerant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Accelerant$912.90M4.67-$1.35B-$6.65N/A
United Fire Group$1.39B0.98$118.19M$5.389.81

In the previous week, Accelerant had 28 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 31 mentions for Accelerant and 3 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Accelerant's score of 0.55 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Accelerant
11 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Fire Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

United Fire Group beats Accelerant on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Lemonade?

Lemonade (NYSE:LMND) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -14.19%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Lemonade's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lemonade-14.19% -26.78% -7.08%
United Fire Group 9.57%15.19%3.69%

In the previous week, Lemonade had 7 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Lemonade and 3 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Lemonade's score of 0.51 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lemonade
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Fire Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lemonade. Lemonade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lemonade$737.90M5.37-$165.50M-$1.83N/A
United Fire Group$1.39B0.98$118.19M$5.389.81

Lemonade currently has a consensus price target of $64.50, indicating a potential upside of 26.01%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Lemonade's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Lemonade is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lemonade
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Lemonade has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

80.3% of Lemonade shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of Lemonade shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

United Fire Group beats Lemonade on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Palomar?

Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

90.3% of Palomar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Palomar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Palomar presently has a consensus target price of $162.75, indicating a potential upside of 28.27%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.55%. Given Palomar's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Palomar
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Palomar has higher earnings, but lower revenue than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Palomar$875.97M3.81$197.07M$7.4417.05
United Fire Group$1.39B0.98$118.19M$5.389.81

Palomar has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Palomar had 3 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Palomar and 3 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Palomar's score of 0.72 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Palomar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Fire Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Palomar has a net margin of 18.61% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. Palomar's return on equity of 23.28% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Palomar18.61% 23.28% 6.45%
United Fire Group 9.57%15.19%3.69%

Summary

Palomar beats United Fire Group on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get United Fire Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UFCS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UFCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UFCS vs. The Competition

MetricUnited Fire GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.38B$19.27B$13.95B$12.86B
Dividend Yield1.49%3.29%5.88%10.29%
P/E Ratio9.8115.6729.3524.23
Price / Sales0.9830.74519.57101.64
Price / Cash10.3712.4037.4352.73
Price / Book1.392.062.156.25
Net Income$118.19M$1.80B$1.31B$348.04M
7 Day Performance-1.73%-0.84%-0.76%-0.17%
1 Month Performance2.76%1.71%1.28%2.66%
1 Year Performance69.42%9.69%11.48%21.01%

United Fire Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UFCS
United Fire Group
3.9462 of 5 stars
$52.79
-1.6%
$52.50
-0.5%
+72.7%$1.38B$1.39B9.811,090
KNSL
Kinsale Capital Group
3.4126 of 5 stars
$378.88
+0.5%
$362.11
-4.4%
-17.5%$8.59B$2.00B15.35470
WTM
White Mountains Insurance Group
1.4184 of 5 stars
$2,135.74
-0.3%
N/A+17.3%$5.11B$3.74B4.861,648
ARX
Accelerant
2.5229 of 5 stars
$19.59
+0.4%
$18.95
-3.2%
-31.5%$4.26B$912.90MN/AN/A
LMND
Lemonade
3.1963 of 5 stars
$52.78
-0.4%
$64.11
+21.5%
-10.3%$4.10B$975MN/A1,282

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:UFCS) was last updated on 8/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners