Free Trial

United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

United Fire Group logo
$44.33 -0.45 (-1.00%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$44.33 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05:40 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

UFCS vs. KNSL, RLI, AGO, HTH, and STC

Should you buy United Fire Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares United Fire Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with United Fire Group include Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL), RLI (RLI), Assured Guaranty (AGO), Hilltop (HTH), and Stewart Information Services (STC). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does United Fire Group compare to Kinsale Capital Group?

Kinsale Capital Group (NYSE:KNSL) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kinsale Capital Group had 6 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Kinsale Capital Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. Kinsale Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat United Fire Group's score of 1.16 indicating that Kinsale Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kinsale Capital Group
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Fire Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kinsale Capital Group currently has a consensus target price of $390.18, indicating a potential upside of 27.65%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.05%. Given Kinsale Capital Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kinsale Capital Group is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kinsale Capital Group
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 27.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 25.82% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kinsale Capital Group27.48% 25.82% 8.20%
United Fire Group 9.16%14.65%3.51%

Kinsale Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinsale Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinsale Capital Group$1.87B3.76$503.61M$22.7213.45
United Fire Group$1.39B0.82$118.19M$4.968.94

85.4% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinsale Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinsale Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Kinsale Capital Group beats United Fire Group on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to RLI?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and RLI (NYSE:RLI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

United Fire Group currently has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.05%. RLI has a consensus price target of $61.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.93%. Given RLI's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe RLI is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
RLI
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14

RLI has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RLI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group$1.39B0.82$118.19M$4.968.94
RLI$1.88B2.44$403.34M$4.2811.69

In the previous week, RLI had 8 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for RLI and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. RLI's average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat United Fire Group's score of 1.16 indicating that RLI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
RLI
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. RLI pays an annual dividend of $0.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. RLI pays out 15.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RLI has increased its dividend for 51 consecutive years.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RLI has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.9% of RLI shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.4% of RLI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

RLI has a net margin of 20.81% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. RLI's return on equity of 17.72% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Fire Group9.16% 14.65% 3.51%
RLI 20.81%17.72%5.13%

Summary

RLI beats United Fire Group on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Assured Guaranty?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and Assured Guaranty (NYSE:AGO) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 40.45% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.65% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Fire Group9.16% 14.65% 3.51%
Assured Guaranty 40.45%6.98%3.25%

United Fire Group currently has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.05%. Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $92.33, suggesting a potential upside of 24.53%. Given Assured Guaranty's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Assured Guaranty
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Assured Guaranty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Fire Group. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group$1.39B0.82$118.19M$4.968.94
Assured Guaranty$1.11B2.96$503M$8.718.51

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 1 more articles in the media than Assured Guaranty. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Fire Group and 6 mentions for Assured Guaranty. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat United Fire Group's score of 1.16 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Assured Guaranty
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assured Guaranty has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Assured Guaranty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Assured Guaranty beats United Fire Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Hilltop?

Hilltop (NYSE:HTH) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, earnings and valuation.

Hilltop has a net margin of 10.13% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.65% beat Hilltop's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hilltop10.13% 7.32% 1.03%
United Fire Group 9.16%14.65%3.51%

57.1% of Hilltop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 29.9% of Hilltop shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hilltop pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Hilltop pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hilltop has increased its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hilltop is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hilltop has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilltop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hilltop$1.63B1.36$165.59M$2.6414.30
United Fire Group$1.39B0.82$118.19M$4.968.94

Hilltop has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 4 more articles in the media than Hilltop. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Fire Group and 3 mentions for Hilltop. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Hilltop's score of 0.49 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hilltop
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
United Fire Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hilltop presently has a consensus price target of $37.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.66%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.05%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Hilltop.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hilltop
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Summary

United Fire Group beats Hilltop on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Stewart Information Services?

Stewart Information Services (NYSE:STC) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

Stewart Information Services currently has a consensus target price of $83.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.43%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 15.05%. Given Stewart Information Services' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Stewart Information Services is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stewart Information Services
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Stewart Information Services had 3 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Stewart Information Services and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Stewart Information Services' score of 1.00 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stewart Information Services
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
United Fire Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Stewart Information Services pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Stewart Information Services pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stewart Information Services has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Stewart Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

96.9% of Stewart Information Services shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Stewart Information Services shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Stewart Information Services' net margin of 4.19%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.65% beat Stewart Information Services' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stewart Information Services4.19% 10.07% 5.17%
United Fire Group 9.16%14.65%3.51%

United Fire Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stewart Information Services. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stewart Information Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stewart Information Services$2.92B0.68$115.54M$4.4814.54
United Fire Group$1.39B0.82$118.19M$4.968.94

Summary

Stewart Information Services and United Fire Group tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get United Fire Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for UFCS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UFCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

UFCS vs. The Competition

MetricUnited Fire GroupINS IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.14B$56.74B$13.55B$12.58B
Dividend Yield1.78%1.94%5.77%5.26%
P/E Ratio8.9410.0623.9926.28
Price / Sales0.821.61149.86114.77
Price / Cash8.7112.1319.8956.90
Price / Book1.201.872.167.33
Net Income$118.19M$4.24B$1.13B$337.06M
7 Day Performance-6.02%-3.96%0.69%3.43%
1 Month Performance11.30%-2.80%1.12%7.24%
1 Year Performance54.41%2.80%12.33%37.98%

United Fire Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
UFCS
United Fire Group
4.4981 of 5 stars
$44.33
-1.0%
$51.00
+15.0%
+58.9%$1.14B$1.39B8.941,090
KNSL
Kinsale Capital Group
4.4474 of 5 stars
$310.59
-0.5%
$390.18
+25.6%
-34.3%$7.20B$1.87B13.67470
RLI
RLI
4.8912 of 5 stars
$52.56
-0.9%
$61.50
+17.0%
-31.7%$4.87B$1.88B12.281,193
AGO
Assured Guaranty
4.8614 of 5 stars
$76.93
-2.2%
$92.33
+20.0%
-11.8%$3.48B$1.11B8.83410
HTH
Hilltop
2.9416 of 5 stars
$37.23
-0.3%
$37.50
+0.7%
+27.4%$2.18B$1.63B14.103,550

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:UFCS) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners