United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

42.4% of Mercury General shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.5% of Mercury General shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Mercury General has a net margin of 14.77% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. Mercury General's return on equity of 31.98% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Mercury General has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercury General has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. Mercury General is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Mercury General pays an annual dividend of $1.27 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Mercury General pays out 7.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Mercury General had 2 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mercury General and 4 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Mercury General's score of 0.49 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.17%. Given United Fire Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Mercury General.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 2 more articles in the media than RLI. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for United Fire Group and 2 mentions for RLI. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat RLI's score of 0.75 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

77.9% of RLI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of RLI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

RLI has a net margin of 22.22% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. RLI's return on equity of 17.61% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

RLI currently has a consensus price target of $63.20, suggesting a potential upside of 14.08%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.17%. Given RLI's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe RLI is more favorable than United Fire Group.

RLI has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RLI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

RLI has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

RLI pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. RLI pays out 15.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. RLI has increased its dividend for 51 consecutive years. United Fire Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

82.9% of Selective Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Selective Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Selective Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Selective Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Selective Insurance Group's net margin of 9.10%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity.

Selective Insurance Group currently has a consensus price target of $99.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.82%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.17%. Given Selective Insurance Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Selective Insurance Group is more favorable than United Fire Group.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 2 more articles in the media than Selective Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for United Fire Group and 2 mentions for Selective Insurance Group. Selective Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.82 indicating that Selective Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Selective Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Selective Insurance Group pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Selective Insurance Group has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Selective Insurance Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.17%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, White Mountains Insurance Group and White Mountains Insurance Group both had 4 articles in the media. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.54 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.