Does the media refer more to KNSL or UFCS?

In the previous week, Kinsale Capital Group had 2 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinsale Capital Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. Kinsale Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Kinsale Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kinsale Capital Group 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive United Fire Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor UFCS or SIGI?

In the previous week, Selective Insurance Group had 5 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Selective Insurance Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. Selective Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Selective Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment United Fire Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Selective Insurance Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend UFCS or WTM?

United Fire Group currently has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score United Fire Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 White Mountains Insurance Group 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Does the media favor ARX or UFCS?

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 5 more articles in the media than Accelerant. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Fire Group and 2 mentions for Accelerant. Accelerant's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Accelerant is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Accelerant 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive United Fire Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor LMND or UFCS?

In the previous week, Lemonade had 14 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Lemonade and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Lemonade's score of 0.61 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Lemonade 11 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive United Fire Group 4 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

$53.24 -1.74 (-3.16%)

As of 03:29 PM Eastern

Compare

UFCS vs. KNSL, SIGI, WTM, ARX, and LMND

Should you buy United Fire Group stock or one of its competitors? United Fire Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Kinsale Capital Group (KNSL), Selective Insurance Group (SIGI), White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM), Accelerant (ARX), and Lemonade (LMND). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does United Fire Group compare to Kinsale Capital Group?

Kinsale Capital Group (NYSE:KNSL) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kinsale Capital Group had 2 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kinsale Capital Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. Kinsale Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Kinsale Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kinsale Capital Group	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
United Fire Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

85.4% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Kinsale Capital Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinsale Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kinsale Capital Group	$1.87B	4.38	$503.61M	$24.68	14.59
United Fire Group	$1.47B	0.93	$118.19M	$5.38	9.90

Kinsale Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 4.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinsale Capital Group has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 28.49% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 25.54% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kinsale Capital Group	28.49%	25.54%	8.15%
United Fire Group	9.57%	15.19%	3.69%

Kinsale Capital Group presently has a consensus target price of $368.78, suggesting a potential upside of 2.40%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.39%. Given Kinsale Capital Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kinsale Capital Group is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kinsale Capital Group	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.90
United Fire Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Kinsale Capital Group beats United Fire Group on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Selective Insurance Group?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and Selective Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SIGI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.9% of Selective Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Selective Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

Selective Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Selective Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group	$1.47B	0.93	$118.19M	$5.38	9.90
Selective Insurance Group	$5.34B	1.01	$466.41M	$8.06	11.22

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Selective Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Selective Insurance Group has raised its dividend for 11 consecutive years. Selective Insurance Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

United Fire Group currently has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.39%. Selective Insurance Group has a consensus target price of $100.33, suggesting a potential upside of 10.98%. Given Selective Insurance Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Selective Insurance Group is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Fire Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Selective Insurance Group	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.13

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Selective Insurance Group's net margin of 9.10%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Fire Group	9.57%	15.19%	3.69%
Selective Insurance Group	9.10%	14.51%	3.22%

In the previous week, Selective Insurance Group had 5 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Selective Insurance Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. Selective Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Selective Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Selective Insurance Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Selective Insurance Group beats United Fire Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and White Mountains Insurance Group (NYSE:WTM) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and valuation.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.29% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.57%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
United Fire Group	9.57%	15.19%	3.69%
White Mountains Insurance Group	29.29%	5.11%	2.37%

White Mountains Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group	$1.47B	0.93	$118.19M	$5.38	9.90
White Mountains Insurance Group	$3.74B	1.31	$1.11B	$439.40	4.66

United Fire Group currently has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
United Fire Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
White Mountains Insurance Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, White Mountains Insurance Group had 1 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
White Mountains Insurance Group	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

United Fire Group beats White Mountains Insurance Group on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Accelerant?

Accelerant (NYSE:ARX) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Accelerant's net margin of -113.08%. Accelerant's return on equity of 42.79% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Accelerant	-113.08%	42.79%	3.68%
United Fire Group	9.57%	15.19%	3.69%

Accelerant currently has a consensus target price of $18.95, indicating a potential downside of 4.56%. United Fire Group has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Accelerant.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Accelerant	1 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
United Fire Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Accelerant has a beta of 0.08, meaning that its share price is 92% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 5 more articles in the media than Accelerant. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for United Fire Group and 2 mentions for Accelerant. Accelerant's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.69 indicating that Accelerant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Accelerant	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
United Fire Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 66.6% of Accelerant shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Accelerant. Accelerant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Accelerant	$1.14B	3.77	-$1.35B	-$6.65	N/A
United Fire Group	$1.47B	0.93	$118.19M	$5.38	9.90

Summary

United Fire Group beats Accelerant on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does United Fire Group compare to Lemonade?

Lemonade (NYSE:LMND) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Lemonade's net margin of -14.19%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Lemonade's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Lemonade	-14.19%	-26.78%	-7.08%
United Fire Group	9.57%	15.19%	3.69%

Lemonade has a beta of 1.87, meaning that its stock price is 87% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lemonade had 14 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Lemonade and 7 mentions for United Fire Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Lemonade's score of 0.61 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Lemonade	11 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
United Fire Group	4 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

80.3% of Lemonade shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of Lemonade shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Lemonade. Lemonade is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Lemonade	$975M	3.89	-$165.50M	-$1.83	N/A
United Fire Group	$1.47B	0.93	$118.19M	$5.38	9.90

Lemonade currently has a consensus price target of $64.50, indicating a potential upside of 31.61%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.39%. Given Lemonade's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Lemonade is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Lemonade	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
United Fire Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

United Fire Group beats Lemonade on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get United Fire Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding UFCS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

UFCS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	United Fire Group	Insurance Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.37B	$18.97B	$13.96B	$12.80B
Dividend Yield	1.43%	3.18%	5.89%	9.15%
P/E Ratio	9.91	16.49	25.81	25.24
Price / Sales	0.93	22.77	506.45	107.75
Price / Cash	10.82	12.65	39.94	52.39
Price / Book	1.44	2.04	2.76	6.33
Net Income	$118.19M	$1.80B	$1.32B	$357.86M
7 Day Performance	-2.93%	-1.49%	3.28%	-0.12%
1 Month Performance	-2.26%	-0.79%	0.55%	-1.01%
1 Year Performance	72.75%	9.48%	10.53%	11.72%

United Fire Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
UFCS United Fire Group	2.8083 of 5 stars	$53.24 -3.2%	$52.50 -1.4%	+77.5%	$1.37B	$1.47B	9.91	1,090	News Coverage Insider Trade
KNSL Kinsale Capital Group	2.9583 of 5 stars	$372.86 -2.6%	$368.78 -1.1%	-18.9%	$8.72B	$2.00B	15.11	470	Positive News
SIGI Selective Insurance Group	4.2592 of 5 stars	$92.19 -1.1%	$100.33 +8.8%	+14.0%	$5.55B	$5.47B	11.44	2,800	Positive News Analyst Revision
WTM White Mountains Insurance Group	1.903 of 5 stars	$2,100.96 -0.5%	N/A	+16.6%	$5.04B	$2.98B	4.78	1,648	Positive News
ARX Accelerant	1.7748 of 5 stars	$19.90 +1.0%	$18.95 -4.8%	-1.5%	$4.28B	$912.90M	N/A	862	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:UFCS) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

UFCS vs. KNSL, SIGI, WTM, ARX, and LMND

How does United Fire Group compare to Kinsale Capital Group?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Selective Insurance Group?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Accelerant?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Lemonade?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

UFCS vs. The Competition

United Fire Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

UFCS vs. KNSL, SIGI, WTM, ARX, and LMND

How does United Fire Group compare to Kinsale Capital Group?

Which has more volatility and risk, KNSL or UFCS?

Does the media refer more to KNSL or UFCS?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in KNSL or UFCS?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, KNSL or UFCS?

Is KNSL or UFCS a better dividend stock?

Is KNSL or UFCS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend KNSL or UFCS?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Selective Insurance Group?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in UFCS or SIGI?

Which has more volatility and risk, UFCS or SIGI?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, UFCS or SIGI?

Is UFCS or SIGI a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate UFCS or SIGI?

Is UFCS or SIGI more profitable?

Does the media favor UFCS or SIGI?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to White Mountains Insurance Group?

Is UFCS or WTM more profitable?

Which has better earnings & valuation, UFCS or WTM?

Do analysts recommend UFCS or WTM?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of UFCS or WTM?

Does the media prefer UFCS or WTM?

Is UFCS or WTM a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, UFCS or WTM?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Accelerant?

Is ARX or UFCS more profitable?

Do analysts recommend ARX or UFCS?

Which has more volatility and risk, ARX or UFCS?

Does the media favor ARX or UFCS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in ARX or UFCS?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, ARX or UFCS?

Summary

How does United Fire Group compare to Lemonade?

Is LMND or UFCS more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, LMND or UFCS?

Does the media favor LMND or UFCS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LMND or UFCS?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, LMND or UFCS?

Do analysts prefer LMND or UFCS?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

UFCS vs. The Competition

United Fire Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools