Global Indemnity Group Competitors

Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.B) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Berkshire Hathaway and Global Indemnity Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

38.9% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Berkshire Hathaway and Global Indemnity Group's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Profitability

This table compares Berkshire Hathaway and Global Indemnity Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Berkshire Hathaway beats Global Indemnity Group on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and The Progressive (NYSE:PGR) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Global Indemnity Group and The Progressive, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Progressive has a consensus price target of $96.3077, suggesting a potential upside of 8.88%. Given The Progressive's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Progressive is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.5% of The Progressive shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of The Progressive shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Progressive has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Progressive's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Progressive has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Profitability

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Progressive's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. The Progressive pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. The Progressive pays out 68.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Progressive has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

The Progressive beats Global Indemnity Group on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and The Travelers Companies (NYSE:TRV) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation and risk.

Volatility and Risk

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Global Indemnity Group and The Travelers Companies, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $135.20, suggesting a potential downside of 10.32%. Given The Travelers Companies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe The Travelers Companies is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Dividends

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. The Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $3.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. The Travelers Companies pays out 35.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Travelers Companies has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Travelers Companies' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 81.8% of The Travelers Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of The Travelers Companies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Travelers Companies' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

The Travelers Companies beats Global Indemnity Group on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and The Allstate (NYSE:ALL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends and valuation.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Allstate's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for Global Indemnity Group and The Allstate, as provided by MarketBeat.

The Allstate has a consensus price target of $119.0714, suggesting a potential upside of 9.80%. Given The Allstate's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Allstate is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Volatility & Risk

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Allstate has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Global Indemnity Group and The Allstate's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.0% of The Allstate shares are owned by institutional investors. 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of The Allstate shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. The Allstate pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. The Allstate pays out 20.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and The Allstate has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Summary

The Allstate beats Global Indemnity Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cincinnati Financial (NASDAQ:CINF) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cincinnati Financial and Global Indemnity Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cincinnati Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

65.3% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 7.4% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial has increased its dividend for 39 consecutive years and Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Cincinnati Financial and Global Indemnity Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cincinnati Financial currently has a consensus target price of $77.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.01%. Given Cincinnati Financial's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Profitability

This table compares Cincinnati Financial and Global Indemnity Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cincinnati Financial beats Global Indemnity Group on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Markel (NYSE:MKL) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

74.6% of Markel shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Markel shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 43.9% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Markel and Global Indemnity Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations for Markel and Global Indemnity Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Markel presently has a consensus target price of $1,143.75, suggesting a potential upside of 1.59%. Given Markel's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Markel is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Volatility and Risk

Markel has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Markel and Global Indemnity Group's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Markel has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group.

Summary

Markel beats Global Indemnity Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.