Go Pro

Global Indemnity Group (GBLI) Competitors

Global Indemnity Group logo
$29.62 +0.62 (+2.14%)
As of 08/28/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

GBLI vs. KMPR, SAFT, TRUP, UFCS, and DGICA

Should you buy Global Indemnity Group stock or one of its competitors? Global Indemnity Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Kemper (KMPR), Safety Insurance Group (SAFT), Trupanion (TRUP), United Fire Group (UFCS), and Donegal Group (DGICA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Kemper?

Kemper (NYSE:KMPR) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Kemper's net margin of -10.84%. Global Indemnity Group's return on equity of 5.56% beat Kemper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kemper-10.84% 2.89% 0.60%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Kemper pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Kemper pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kemper has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Kemper had 3 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Kemper and 4 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Kemper's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.79 indicating that Kemper is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kemper
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kemper currently has a consensus price target of $43.25, indicating a potential upside of 54.30%. Given Kemper's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kemper is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kemper
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Kemper has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Kemper has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Kemper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kemper$4.79B0.34$143.30M-$8.40N/A
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.96$25.33M$2.3512.60

86.2% of Kemper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Kemper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Kemper and Global Indemnity Group tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Safety Insurance Group?

Safety Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SAFT) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Safety Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Global Indemnity Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safety Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safety Insurance Group$1.26B1.20$99.25M$4.6422.34
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.96$25.33M$2.3512.60

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.17, suggesting that its share price is 83% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safety Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 5.33%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.23% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safety Insurance Group5.33% 7.23% 2.58%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Safety Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Safety Insurance Group pays out 79.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Global Indemnity Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Safety Insurance Group had 3 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Safety Insurance Group and 4 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Safety Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.79 indicating that Safety Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safety Insurance Group
6 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

81.0% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Safety Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Safety Insurance Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Trupanion?

Trupanion (NASDAQ:TRUP) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Trupanion had 11 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Trupanion and 4 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Global Indemnity Group's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Trupanion's score of 0.58 indicating that Global Indemnity Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trupanion
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Trupanion has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Trupanion presently has a consensus price target of $39.20, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Given Trupanion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trupanion
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.17
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 1.53%. Trupanion's return on equity of 5.96% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trupanion1.53% 5.96% 2.55%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Global Indemnity Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trupanion. Global Indemnity Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trupanion$1.44B0.90$19.43M$0.5355.89
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.96$25.33M$2.3512.60

37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.6% of Trupanion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Trupanion beats Global Indemnity Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to United Fire Group?

United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 2 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for United Fire Group and 4 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 1.67 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.79 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
United Fire Group
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

United Fire Group presently has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 2.74%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Indemnity Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Global Indemnity Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
United Fire Group$1.39B1.00$118.19M$5.3810.03
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.96$25.33M$2.3512.60

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Global Indemnity Group's net margin of 7.50%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
United Fire Group9.57% 15.19% 3.69%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Summary

United Fire Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 16 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Donegal Group?

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and Donegal Group (NASDAQ:DGICA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.0% of Donegal Group shares are held by institutional investors. 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Donegal Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.41, indicating that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Donegal Group has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Donegal Group's net margin of 7.38%. Donegal Group's return on equity of 10.65% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Indemnity Group7.50% 5.56% 2.28%
Donegal Group 7.38%10.65%2.83%

In the previous week, Donegal Group had 5 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Donegal Group and 4 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Donegal Group's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.79 indicating that Donegal Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Donegal Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Donegal Group has a consensus target price of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.95%. Given Donegal Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Donegal Group is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Donegal Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Donegal Group pays an annual dividend of $0.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Donegal Group pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Donegal Group has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years.

Donegal Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Donegal Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.96$25.33M$2.3512.60
Donegal Group$978.01M0.73$79.34M$1.939.97

Summary

Donegal Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Indemnity Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GBLI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GBLI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GBLI vs. The Competition

MetricGlobal Indemnity GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$423.67M$19.33B$14.00B$12.94B
Dividend Yield4.83%3.23%5.89%11.02%
P/E Ratio12.6015.9826.7425.45
Price / Sales0.9630.82516.0695.45
Price / Cash9.1312.6339.0754.21
Price / Book0.612.092.196.14
Net Income$25.33M$1.80B$1.31B$348.86M
7 Day Performance8.66%0.78%0.90%-0.80%
1 Month Performance7.75%1.57%2.77%5.56%
1 Year Performance-0.20%10.52%11.55%15.57%

Global Indemnity Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group
3.9272 of 5 stars
$29.62
+2.1%
N/A+0.5%$423.67M$450.10M12.60360
KMPR
Kemper
4.7317 of 5 stars
$26.77
+2.1%
$43.67
+63.1%
-47.5%$1.58B$4.55BN/A7,400
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
3.4533 of 5 stars
$103.56
+0.3%
N/A+40.6%$1.52B$1.27B22.32550
TRUP
Trupanion
2.7754 of 5 stars
$31.10
+3.8%
$41.60
+33.8%
-35.9%$1.36B$1.52B58.681,121
UFCS
United Fire Group
3.8149 of 5 stars
$52.79
-1.6%
$52.50
-0.5%
+75.1%$1.36B$1.47B9.811,090

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GBLI) was last updated on 8/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners