Go Pro

Global Indemnity Group (GBLI) Competitors

Global Indemnity Group logo
$26.08 -1.43 (-5.20%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 03:54 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$25.91 -0.17 (-0.65%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GBLI vs. KMPR, SAFT, UFCS, ASIC, and DGICA

Should you buy Global Indemnity Group stock or one of its competitors? Global Indemnity Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Kemper (KMPR), Safety Insurance Group (SAFT), United Fire Group (UFCS), Ategrity Specialty (ASIC), and Donegal Group (DGICA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "property & casualty insurance" industry.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Kemper?

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and Kemper (NYSE:KMPR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kemper has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kemper had 1 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Kemper and 2 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Kemper's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Kemper is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kemper
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.2% of Kemper shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Kemper shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Kemper has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Kemper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.85$25.33M$2.3511.10
Kemper$4.55B0.34$143.30M-$8.40N/A

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Kemper pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kemper pays out -15.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Kemper has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Kemper's net margin of -10.84%. Global Indemnity Group's return on equity of 5.56% beat Kemper's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Indemnity Group7.50% 5.56% 2.28%
Kemper -10.84%2.89%0.60%

Kemper has a consensus target price of $43.25, indicating a potential upside of 63.07%. Given Kemper's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Kemper is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kemper
3 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

Summary

Global Indemnity Group and Kemper tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Safety Insurance Group?

Safety Insurance Group (NASDAQ:SAFT) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Safety Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Global Indemnity Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safety Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Safety Insurance Group$1.26B1.20$99.25M$4.6422.31
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.85$25.33M$2.3511.10

In the previous week, Global Indemnity Group had 1 more articles in the media than Safety Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Global Indemnity Group and 1 mentions for Safety Insurance Group. Safety Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Safety Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Safety Insurance Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Safety Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Safety Insurance Group pays out 79.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Global Indemnity Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.16, suggesting that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

81.0% of Safety Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Safety Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Safety Insurance Group's net margin of 5.33%. Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 7.23% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Safety Insurance Group5.33% 7.23% 2.58%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Safety Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Safety Insurance Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to United Fire Group?

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and United Fire Group (NASDAQ:UFCS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

In the previous week, Global Indemnity Group and Global Indemnity Group both had 2 articles in the media. United Fire Group's average media sentiment score of 0.16 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.00 indicating that United Fire Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
United Fire Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Indemnity Group has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Global Indemnity Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.47%. Given United Fire Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
United Fire Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.50

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Global Indemnity Group's net margin of 7.50%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 15.19% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Indemnity Group7.50% 5.56% 2.28%
United Fire Group 9.57%15.19%3.69%

United Fire Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.85$25.33M$2.3511.10
United Fire Group$1.39B1.01$118.19M$5.3810.11

Summary

United Fire Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Ategrity Specialty?

Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) and Ategrity Specialty (NYSE:ASIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.42, meaning that its share price is 58% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ategrity Specialty has a beta of -0.62, meaning that its share price is 162% less volatile than the broader market.

Ategrity Specialty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Global Indemnity Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ategrity Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.85$25.33M$2.3511.10
Ategrity Specialty$424.34M3.13$74M$2.1412.95

Ategrity Specialty has a consensus target price of $28.88, suggesting a potential upside of 4.20%. Given Ategrity Specialty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ategrity Specialty is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Ategrity Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Ategrity Specialty had 1 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ategrity Specialty and 2 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Ategrity Specialty's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Ategrity Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Ategrity Specialty
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 84.7% of Ategrity Specialty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ategrity Specialty has a net margin of 21.06% compared to Global Indemnity Group's net margin of 7.50%. Ategrity Specialty's return on equity of 17.12% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Indemnity Group7.50% 5.56% 2.28%
Ategrity Specialty 21.06%17.12%7.03%

Summary

Ategrity Specialty beats Global Indemnity Group on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Indemnity Group compare to Donegal Group?

Donegal Group (NASDAQ:DGICA) and Global Indemnity Group (NASDAQ:GBLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Donegal Group had 9 more articles in the media than Global Indemnity Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Donegal Group and 2 mentions for Global Indemnity Group. Donegal Group's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Global Indemnity Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Donegal Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Donegal Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Indemnity Group
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Donegal Group has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Indemnity Group has a beta of 0.42, indicating that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Indemnity Group has a net margin of 7.50% compared to Donegal Group's net margin of 7.38%. Donegal Group's return on equity of 10.65% beat Global Indemnity Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Donegal Group7.38% 10.65% 2.83%
Global Indemnity Group 7.50%5.56%2.28%

Donegal Group pays an annual dividend of $0.77 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Global Indemnity Group pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.4%. Donegal Group pays out 39.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Indemnity Group pays out 59.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Donegal Group has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Global Indemnity Group has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Donegal Group currently has a consensus price target of $20.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.78%. Given Donegal Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Donegal Group is more favorable than Global Indemnity Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Donegal Group
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Global Indemnity Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

28.0% of Donegal Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Donegal Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.1% of Global Indemnity Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Donegal Group has higher revenue and earnings than Global Indemnity Group. Donegal Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Indemnity Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Donegal Group$978.01M0.71$79.34M$1.939.70
Global Indemnity Group$450.10M0.85$25.33M$2.3511.10

Summary

Donegal Group beats Global Indemnity Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Indemnity Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GBLI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GBLI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GBLI vs. The Competition

MetricGlobal Indemnity GroupInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$401.90M$19.28B$13.86B$13.13B
Dividend Yield5.09%3.20%5.94%12.94%
P/E Ratio11.1016.4025.2925.39
Price / Sales0.8530.41501.58114.04
Price / Cash8.6612.2140.8551.66
Price / Book0.532.052.736.33
Net Income$25.33M$1.80B$1.31B$358.24M
7 Day Performance-12.34%-0.57%-0.62%1.17%
1 Month Performance-4.05%-0.44%0.04%-2.59%
1 Year Performance-12.76%8.53%8.84%5.97%

Global Indemnity Group Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GBLI
Global Indemnity Group
3.3322 of 5 stars
$26.08
-5.2%
N/A-12.7%$401.90M$450.10M11.10286
KMPR
Kemper
4.6396 of 5 stars
$27.52
-1.1%
$43.25
+57.2%
-49.8%$1.62B$4.55BN/A7,400
SAFT
Safety Insurance Group
3.4769 of 5 stars
$103.55
+0.0%
N/A+42.6%$1.52B$1.26B22.32568
UFCS
United Fire Group
3.0435 of 5 stars
$54.82
-0.1%
$52.50
-4.2%
+67.4%$1.41B$1.39B10.19846
ASIC
Ategrity Specialty
3.2557 of 5 stars
$28.33
-1.2%
$28.88
+1.9%
N/A$1.36B$424.34M13.24203

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GBLI) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners