Free Trial

Phillips 66 (PSX) Competitors

Phillips 66 logo
$132.34 -0.58 (-0.43%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$132.52 +0.18 (+0.13%)
As of 07:50 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Polygon.io. Learn more.

PSX vs. FANG, COP, CVX, DINO, MPC, MUR, PBF, VLO, XOM, and CVI

Should you be buying Phillips 66 stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Phillips 66 include Diamondback Energy (FANG), ConocoPhillips (COP), Chevron (CVX), HF Sinclair (DINO), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Murphy Oil (MUR), PBF Energy (PBF), Valero Energy (VLO), Exxon Mobil (XOM), and CVR Energy (CVI). These companies are all part of the "energy" sector.

Phillips 66 vs. Its Competitors

Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) and Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) are both large-cap energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

Diamondback Energy currently has a consensus price target of $192.55, indicating a potential upside of 29.30%. Phillips 66 has a consensus price target of $140.50, indicating a potential upside of 6.16%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than Phillips 66.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diamondback Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
20 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04
Phillips 66
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55

Diamondback Energy has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Phillips 66 has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its share price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Diamondback Energy had 10 more articles in the media than Phillips 66. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Diamondback Energy and 33 mentions for Phillips 66. Diamondback Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Phillips 66's score of 0.87 indicating that Diamondback Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diamondback Energy
24 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Phillips 66
14 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diamondback Energy has a net margin of 27.25% compared to Phillips 66's net margin of 1.27%. Diamondback Energy's return on equity of 9.48% beat Phillips 66's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diamondback Energy27.25% 9.48% 5.63%
Phillips 66 1.27%4.87%1.90%

Diamondback Energy has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Phillips 66. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Phillips 66, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diamondback Energy$11.07B3.90$3.34B$14.0710.58
Phillips 66$145.50B0.37$2.12B$4.1631.81

Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $4.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Phillips 66 pays an annual dividend of $4.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Diamondback Energy pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Phillips 66 pays out 115.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years and Phillips 66 has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years. Phillips 66 is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

90.0% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of Phillips 66 shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Phillips 66 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats Phillips 66 on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Phillips 66 News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PSX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PSX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

PSX vs. The Competition

MetricPhillips 66OIL REFING&MKTG IndustryEnergy SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$53.72B$32.13B$7.98B$22.15B
Dividend Yield3.61%3.38%10.73%3.57%
P/E Ratio31.8124.6772.6227.73
Price / Sales0.370.551,533.1495.68
Price / Cash10.9613.3936.5424.65
Price / Book1.921.944.634.61
Net Income$2.12B$2.55B$4.28B$1.01B
7 Day Performance-2.73%-0.63%3.07%0.14%
1 Month Performance0.68%3.31%6.80%2.33%
1 Year Performance-4.47%14.19%19.09%13.85%

Phillips 66 Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
PSX
Phillips 66
4.8388 of 5 stars
$132.34
-0.4%
$140.50
+6.2%
-4.1%$53.72B$145.50B31.8113,200Analyst Forecast
FANG
Diamondback Energy
4.7531 of 5 stars
$143.51
-3.2%
$193.39
+34.8%
-23.4%$41.54B$11.07B10.201,983Trending News
Analyst Forecast
Analyst Revision
COP
ConocoPhillips
4.8819 of 5 stars
$95.72
-2.8%
$120.14
+25.5%
-17.2%$119.55B$56.95B12.8511,800Positive News
Analyst Forecast
Analyst Revision
CVX
Chevron
4.6324 of 5 stars
$156.13
-2.5%
$165.05
+5.7%
+2.2%$269.79B$202.79B20.0945,298Trending News
Analyst Forecast
DINO
HF Sinclair
3.4108 of 5 stars
$52.52
-1.4%
$53.25
+1.4%
+11.6%$9.83B$28.58B-114.175,297
MPC
Marathon Petroleum
4.4343 of 5 stars
$196.50
-1.1%
$195.00
-0.8%
+12.4%$59.74B$140.41B29.1518,300Positive News
MUR
Murphy Oil
4.0257 of 5 stars
$28.97
-3.5%
$29.54
+2.0%
-14.9%$4.14B$3.03B15.01690Dividend Announcement
Analyst Forecast
PBF
PBF Energy
2.2324 of 5 stars
$30.88
-5.3%
$26.38
-14.6%
-6.1%$3.57B$33.12B-3.593,855Positive News
VLO
Valero Energy
4.01 of 5 stars
$172.23
-1.9%
$165.00
-4.2%
+14.7%$53.50B$129.88B71.769,922Positive News
Analyst Forecast
XOM
Exxon Mobil
4.8791 of 5 stars
$114.13
-2.6%
$125.00
+9.5%
-8.5%$486.56B$349.59B16.2161,000Trending News
Analyst Forecast
CVI
CVR Energy
1.9088 of 5 stars
$36.82
+1.4%
$26.00
-29.4%
+48.7%$3.70B$7.61B-11.091,595News Coverage
Positive News

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:PSX) was last updated on 10/7/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
From Our Partners