Go Pro

Four Leaf Acquisition (FORL) Competitors

Four Leaf Acquisition logo
$11.00 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/20/2026

FORL vs. DTSQ, ANTA, NOEM, BVC, and PCSC

Should you buy Four Leaf Acquisition stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Four Leaf Acquisition with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Four Leaf Acquisition include DT Cloud Star Acquisition (DTSQ), Antalpha Platform (ANTA), CO2 Energy Transition (NOEM), Bitventures (BVC), and Perceptive Capital Solutions (PCSC). These companies are all part of the "trading" industry.

How does Four Leaf Acquisition compare to DT Cloud Star Acquisition?

Four Leaf Acquisition (NASDAQ:FORL) and DT Cloud Star Acquisition (NASDAQ:DTSQ) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, DT Cloud Star Acquisition had 1 more articles in the media than Four Leaf Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for DT Cloud Star Acquisition and 1 mentions for Four Leaf Acquisition. DT Cloud Star Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Four Leaf Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that DT Cloud Star Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Four Leaf Acquisition
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
DT Cloud Star Acquisition
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
DT Cloud Star AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Four Leaf Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DT Cloud Star Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, suggesting that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
DT Cloud Star Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Four Leaf Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
DT Cloud Star Acquisition
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

73.0% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 33.2% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 52.9% of DT Cloud Star Acquisition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

DT Cloud Star Acquisition beats Four Leaf Acquisition on 4 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Four Leaf Acquisition compare to Antalpha Platform?

Four Leaf Acquisition (NASDAQ:FORL) and Antalpha Platform (NASDAQ:ANTA) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

Antalpha Platform has a consensus target price of $9.50, indicating a potential upside of 141.67%. Given Antalpha Platform's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Antalpha Platform is more favorable than Four Leaf Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Four Leaf Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Antalpha Platform
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Antalpha Platform has a net margin of 22.72% compared to Four Leaf Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. Antalpha Platform's return on equity of 14.27% beat Four Leaf Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
Antalpha Platform 22.72%14.27%1.13%

73.0% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.2% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Four Leaf Acquisition and Four Leaf Acquisition both had 1 articles in the media. Four Leaf Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Antalpha Platform's score of -0.27 indicating that Four Leaf Acquisition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Four Leaf Acquisition
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Antalpha Platform
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Four Leaf Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Antalpha Platform has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Antalpha Platform has higher revenue and earnings than Four Leaf Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Antalpha Platform$86.81M1.05$24.43M$0.745.31

Summary

Antalpha Platform beats Four Leaf Acquisition on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Four Leaf Acquisition compare to CO2 Energy Transition?

CO2 Energy Transition (NASDAQ:NOEM) and Four Leaf Acquisition (NASDAQ:FORL) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

CO2 Energy Transition has a beta of 0.02, indicating that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Four Leaf Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its share price is 101% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CO2 Energy TransitionN/AN/A$1.65M$0.1665.78
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CO2 Energy Transition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Four Leaf Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Four Leaf Acquisition had 1 more articles in the media than CO2 Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Four Leaf Acquisition and 0 mentions for CO2 Energy Transition. CO2 Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Four Leaf Acquisition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CO2 Energy Transition Neutral
Four Leaf Acquisition Neutral

73.0% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are owned by institutional investors. 33.2% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Four Leaf Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat CO2 Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CO2 Energy TransitionN/A -89.54% 2.16%
Four Leaf Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Four Leaf Acquisition beats CO2 Energy Transition on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Four Leaf Acquisition compare to Bitventures?

Four Leaf Acquisition (NASDAQ:FORL) and Bitventures (NASDAQ:BVC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation and risk.

Four Leaf Acquisition has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bitventures.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Bitventures$28.02M3.34-$5.37MN/AN/A

Four Leaf Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, meaning that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitventures has a beta of -1.09, meaning that its stock price is 209% less volatile than the broader market.

73.0% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 33.2% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 84.6% of Bitventures shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Four Leaf Acquisition had 1 more articles in the media than Bitventures. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Four Leaf Acquisition and 0 mentions for Bitventures. Four Leaf Acquisition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bitventures'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Four Leaf Acquisition Neutral
Bitventures Neutral

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Four Leaf Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Bitventures
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
Bitventures N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Four Leaf Acquisition beats Bitventures on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Four Leaf Acquisition compare to Perceptive Capital Solutions?

Four Leaf Acquisition (NASDAQ:FORL) and Perceptive Capital Solutions (NASDAQ:PCSC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Four Leaf Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Perceptive Capital Solutions
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Perceptive Capital SolutionsN/AN/A$840K-$0.06N/A

Four Leaf Acquisition has a beta of -0.01, indicating that its stock price is 101% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Perceptive Capital Solutions has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Four Leaf Acquisition's return on equity of 0.00% beat Perceptive Capital Solutions' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Four Leaf AcquisitionN/A N/A N/A
Perceptive Capital Solutions N/A -2.70%-0.84%

In the previous week, Four Leaf Acquisition and Four Leaf Acquisition both had 1 articles in the media. Perceptive Capital Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Four Leaf Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that Perceptive Capital Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Four Leaf Acquisition Neutral
Perceptive Capital Solutions Positive

73.0% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by institutional investors. 33.2% of Four Leaf Acquisition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.1% of Perceptive Capital Solutions shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Four Leaf Acquisition beats Perceptive Capital Solutions on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Four Leaf Acquisition News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FORL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FORL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FORL vs. The Competition

MetricFour Leaf AcquisitionUNCLASSIFIED IndustryFinancial SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$26.07M$149.23M$6.14B$12.44B
Dividend YieldN/AN/A5.24%9.39%
P/E RatioN/A39.1129.5624.19
Price / SalesN/A204.741,139.2794.29
Price / CashN/A2,548.9688.7447.25
Price / BookN/A43.116.686.26
Net IncomeN/A-$17.90M$1.13B$331.52M
7 Day PerformanceN/A1.26%-0.23%-1.19%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-0.25%-0.10%-1.35%
1 Year Performance-4.47%-5.73%14.50%18.74%

Four Leaf Acquisition Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FORL
Four Leaf Acquisition
N/A$11.00
flat
N/AN/A$26.07MN/AN/AN/A
DTSQ
DT Cloud Star Acquisition
1.8997 of 5 stars
$11.36
-0.2%
N/A+9.0%$101.29MN/AN/AN/A
ANTA
Antalpha Platform
4.0182 of 5 stars
$4.36
-0.5%
$9.50
+117.9%
-65.8%$101.18M$86.81M5.8996
NOEM
CO2 Energy Transition
N/A$10.49
+0.1%
N/A+4.5%$100.49MN/A65.57N/A
BVC
Bitventures
N/A$11.44
-2.3%
N/AN/A$98.36M$28.02MN/A6

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FORL) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners