Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NSLR or CEV?

Neostellar Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Neostellar Capital $157.82M 1.71 $48.81M $4.03 2.53 Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust $7.66M 9.89 N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts rate CEV or OXSQ?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Oxford Square Capital 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CEV or OXSQ?

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oxford Square Capital. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust $7.66M 9.89 N/A N/A N/A Oxford Square Capital $40.34M 3.64 -$18.73M -$0.45 N/A

Do analysts prefer HGBL or CEV?

Heritage Global presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 153.16%. Given Heritage Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Heritage Global is more favorable than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Heritage Global 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HGBL or CEV?

Heritage Global has higher revenue and earnings than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Heritage Global $50.98M 0.81 $3.59M -$0.41 N/A Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust $7.66M 9.89 N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts recommend CEV or ILLR?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Triller Group 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CEV or ILLR?

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Triller Group. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust $7.66M 9.89 N/A N/A N/A Triller Group $21.62M 0.84 -$174.54M -$5.72 N/A

Is CEV or ILLR more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust N/A N/A N/A Triller Group N/A N/A -409.16%

Which has better valuation & earnings, ILLRW or CEV?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Triller Group $21.58M N/A N/A N/A N/A Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust $7.66M 9.89 N/A N/A N/A

Is ILLRW or CEV more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Triller Group N/A N/A N/A Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (CEV) Competitors

$10.77 -0.07 (-0.65%)

As of 01:59 PM Eastern

Compare

CEV vs. NSLR, OXSQ, HGBL, ILLR, and ILLRW

Should you buy Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust stock or one of its competitors? Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's main competitors and comparable companies include Neostellar Capital (NSLR), Oxford Square Capital (OXSQ), Heritage Global (HGBL), Triller Group (ILLR), and Triller Group (ILLRW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "diversified financial services" industry.

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Neostellar Capital?

Neostellar Capital (NASDAQ:NSLR) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:CEV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Neostellar Capital has a net margin of 6,053.56% compared to Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's return on equity of 0.00% beat Neostellar Capital's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Neostellar Capital	6,053.56%	-12.63%	-10.14%
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Neostellar Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Neostellar Capital and 0 mentions for Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust. Neostellar Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Neostellar Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Neostellar Capital	Positive
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Neutral

Neostellar Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Neostellar Capital	$157.82M	1.71	$48.81M	$4.03	2.53
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	$7.66M	9.89	N/A	N/A	N/A

12.9% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.3% of Neostellar Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Neostellar Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Neostellar Capital pays out 6.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Neostellar Capital presently has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 42.02%. Given Neostellar Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Neostellar Capital is more favorable than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Neostellar Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Neostellar Capital has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Neostellar Capital beats Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Oxford Square Capital?

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:CEV) and Oxford Square Capital (NASDAQ:OXSQ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

35.9% of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.4% of Oxford Square Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 6.5% of Oxford Square Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Oxford Square Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Neutral
Oxford Square Capital	Neutral

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Oxford Square Capital	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Oxford Square Capital's net margin of -93.65%. Oxford Square Capital's return on equity of 14.41% beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oxford Square Capital	-93.65%	14.41%	6.81%

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Square Capital has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Oxford Square Capital.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	$7.66M	9.89	N/A	N/A	N/A
Oxford Square Capital	$40.34M	3.64	-$18.73M	-$0.45	N/A

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Oxford Square Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 30.8%. Oxford Square Capital pays out -93.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Oxford Square Capital beats Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Heritage Global?

Heritage Global (NASDAQ:HGBL) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:CEV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and earnings.

Heritage Global has higher revenue and earnings than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Heritage Global	$50.98M	0.81	$3.59M	-$0.41	N/A
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	$7.66M	9.89	N/A	N/A	N/A

33.5% of Heritage Global shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.9% of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.6% of Heritage Global shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Heritage Global presently has a consensus price target of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 153.16%. Given Heritage Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Heritage Global is more favorable than Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Heritage Global	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Heritage Global's average media sentiment score of 1.92 beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's score of 0.00 indicating that Heritage Global is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Heritage Global	Very Positive
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Neutral

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Heritage Global's net margin of -29.63%. Heritage Global's return on equity of 6.12% beat Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Heritage Global	-29.63%	6.12%	4.69%
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Heritage Global has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Heritage Global beats Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:CEV) and Triller Group (NASDAQ:ILLR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Triller Group	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

35.9% of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Triller Group shares are held by institutional investors. 9.5% of Triller Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triller Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Neutral
Triller Group	Neutral

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A
Triller Group	N/A	N/A	-409.16%

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triller Group has a beta of -1.57, meaning that its share price is 257% less volatile than the broader market.

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Triller Group.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	$7.66M	9.89	N/A	N/A	N/A
Triller Group	$21.62M	0.84	-$174.54M	-$5.72	N/A

Summary

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust beats Triller Group on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Triller Group (NASDAQ:ILLRW) and Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:CEV) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Triller Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Triller Group	Neutral
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Neutral

35.9% of Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Triller Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Triller Group	$21.58M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	$7.66M	9.89	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Triller Group and Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust tied by winning 1 of the 2 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CEV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CEV vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	Financial Services Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$75.76M	$27.09B	$14.02B	$24.22B
Dividend Yield	2.35%	6.07%	5.89%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	N/A	20.74	29.64	30.21
Price / Sales	9.89	447.97	513.98	17.58
Price / Cash	N/A	52.42	30.71	19.80
Price / Book	N/A	3.48	2.87	4.90
Net Income	N/A	$1.09B	$1.31B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	1.03%	11.46%	1.28%	0.49%
1 Month Performance	5.69%	12.97%	2.88%	2.85%
1 Year Performance	13.49%	-2.38%	11.56%	14.93%

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CEV Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust	N/A	$10.77 -0.6%	N/A	+14.6%	$75.76M	$7.66M	N/A	N/A
NSLR Neostellar Capital	4.2821 of 5 stars	$10.00 -0.9%	$14.50 +45.0%	N/A	$267.11M	$1.69M	2.48	9	News Coverage
OXSQ Oxford Square Capital	0.438 of 5 stars	$1.40 -1.4%	N/A	-37.4%	$152.95M	$40.34M	N/A	N/A
HGBL Heritage Global	3.8831 of 5 stars	$1.09 -0.9%	$3.00 +175.2%	-41.5%	$38.10M	$50.98M	N/A	60	Gap Up
ILLR Triller Group	0.2963 of 5 stars	$0.93 -5.7%	N/A	-85.3%	$20.29M	$21.62M	N/A	152

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CEV) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (CEV) Competitors

CEV vs. NSLR, OXSQ, HGBL, ILLR, and ILLRW

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Neostellar Capital?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Oxford Square Capital?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Heritage Global?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CEV vs. The Competition

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust (CEV) Competitors

CEV vs. NSLR, OXSQ, HGBL, ILLR, and ILLRW

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Neostellar Capital?

Is NSLR or CEV more profitable?

Does the media prefer NSLR or CEV?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, NSLR or CEV?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in NSLR or CEV?

Is NSLR or CEV a better dividend stock?

Do analysts recommend NSLR or CEV?

Which has more risk & volatility, NSLR or CEV?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Oxford Square Capital?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CEV or OXSQ?

Does the media refer more to CEV or OXSQ?

Do analysts rate CEV or OXSQ?

Is CEV or OXSQ more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CEV or OXSQ?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CEV or OXSQ?

Is CEV or OXSQ a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Heritage Global?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, HGBL or CEV?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HGBL or CEV?

Do analysts prefer HGBL or CEV?

Does the media prefer HGBL or CEV?

Is HGBL or CEV more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, HGBL or CEV?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Do analysts recommend CEV or ILLR?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CEV or ILLR?

Does the media favor CEV or ILLR?

Is CEV or ILLR more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, CEV or ILLR?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CEV or ILLR?

Summary

How does Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust compare to Triller Group?

Does the media refer more to ILLRW or CEV?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in ILLRW or CEV?

Is ILLRW or CEV more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, ILLRW or CEV?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CEV vs. The Competition

Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools