Do analysts recommend PAX or MPV?

Patria Investments presently has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 25.94%. Given Patria Investments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Patria Investments 3 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.60 Barings Participation Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, PAX or MPV?

Patria Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Patria Investments $399.23M 1.69 $73.40M $0.44 23.01 Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Does the media refer more to PAX or MPV?

In the previous week, Patria Investments and Patria Investments both had 2 articles in the media. Barings Participation Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Patria Investments' score of -0.49 indicating that Barings Participation Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Patria Investments 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Barings Participation Investors 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MPV or PFLT?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 41.31%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Barings Participation Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPV or PFLT?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A PennantPark Floating Rate Capital $61.93M 11.11 $66.36M $0.51 13.60

Do analysts rate MPV or FAC?

Factorial Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 103.92%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Barings Participation Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Factorial Energy 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPV or FAC?

Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Factorial Energy N/A N/A $6.22M -$0.66 N/A

Is MPV or FAC more profitable?

Barings Participation Investors' return on equity of 0.00% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A Factorial Energy N/A -41.99% -1.91%

Does the media refer more to MPV or FAC?

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Participation Investors. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Barings Participation Investors. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Barings Participation Investors' score of 0.58 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Barings Participation Investors 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Factorial Energy 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MPV or NMFC?

New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.62%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Barings Participation Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 New Mountain Finance 1 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.80

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPV or NMFC?

New Mountain Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Barings Participation Investors. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A New Mountain Finance -$53.58M -12.26 $16.49M -$0.47 N/A

Does the media favor MPV or NMFC?

In the previous week, Barings Participation Investors and Barings Participation Investors both had 2 articles in the media. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Barings Participation Investors' score of 0.58 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Barings Participation Investors 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive New Mountain Finance 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer MPV or SLRC?

SLR Investment has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.50%. Given SLR Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Barings Participation Investors 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 SLR Investment 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MPV or SLRC?

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Barings Participation Investors N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A SLR Investment $218.54M 2.90 $92.54M $1.35 8.60

Does the media prefer MPV or SLRC?

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 5 more articles in the media than Barings Participation Investors. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for SLR Investment and 2 mentions for Barings Participation Investors. Barings Participation Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat SLR Investment's score of -0.01 indicating that Barings Participation Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Barings Participation Investors 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SLR Investment 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Barings Participation Investors (MPV) Competitors

$15.42 -0.11 (-0.72%)

As of 02:08 PM Eastern

Compare

MPV vs. PAX, PFLT, FAC, NMFC, and SLRC

Should you buy Barings Participation Investors stock or one of its competitors? Barings Participation Investors's main competitors and comparable companies include Patria Investments (PAX), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), Factorial Energy (FAC), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), and SLR Investment (SLRC). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Patria Investments?

Patria Investments (NYSE:PAX) and Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and dividends.

Patria Investments presently has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 25.94%. Given Patria Investments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Patria Investments is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Patria Investments	3 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.60
Barings Participation Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Patria Investments has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Participation Investors has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

96.3% of Patria Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 58.1% of Patria Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Barings Participation Investors shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Patria Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Barings Participation Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Patria Investments pays out 147.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Patria Investments and Patria Investments both had 2 articles in the media. Barings Participation Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Patria Investments' score of -0.49 indicating that Barings Participation Investors is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Patria Investments	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Barings Participation Investors	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Patria Investments has a net margin of 19.91% compared to Barings Participation Investors' net margin of 0.00%. Patria Investments' return on equity of 38.68% beat Barings Participation Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Patria Investments	19.91%	38.68%	15.84%
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A

Patria Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Patria Investments	$399.23M	1.69	$73.40M	$0.44	23.01
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Patria Investments beats Barings Participation Investors on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends and media sentiment.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Participation Investors. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 2 mentions for Barings Participation Investors. Barings Participation Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.48 indicating that Barings Participation Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Barings Participation Investors	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Barings Participation Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Barings Participation Investors' net margin of 0.00%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Barings Participation Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Barings Participation Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$61.93M	11.11	$66.36M	$0.51	13.60

Barings Participation Investors has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 41.31%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Participation Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Barings Participation Investors on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Factorial Energy?

Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) and Factorial Energy (NASDAQ:FAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, Factorial Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Participation Investors. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Factorial Energy and 2 mentions for Barings Participation Investors. Factorial Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Barings Participation Investors' score of 0.58 indicating that Factorial Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Barings Participation Investors	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Factorial Energy	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Factorial Energy	N/A	N/A	$6.22M	-$0.66	N/A

Factorial Energy has a consensus price target of $13.00, indicating a potential upside of 103.92%. Given Factorial Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Factorial Energy is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Participation Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Factorial Energy	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Barings Participation Investors has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Factorial Energy has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Barings Participation Investors' return on equity of 0.00% beat Factorial Energy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A
Factorial Energy	N/A	-41.99%	-1.91%

Summary

Factorial Energy beats Barings Participation Investors on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to New Mountain Finance?

Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Barings Participation Investors and Barings Participation Investors both had 2 articles in the media. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Barings Participation Investors' score of 0.58 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Barings Participation Investors	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
New Mountain Finance	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Barings Participation Investors shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Mountain Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
New Mountain Finance	-$53.58M	-12.26	$16.49M	-$0.47	N/A

Barings Participation Investors has a net margin of 0.00% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat Barings Participation Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A
New Mountain Finance	-16.78%	10.94%	4.58%

Barings Participation Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Barings Participation Investors has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance has a consensus target price of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 18.62%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Participation Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
New Mountain Finance	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats Barings Participation Investors on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to SLR Investment?

Barings Participation Investors (NYSE:MPV) and SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, valuation and dividends.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to Barings Participation Investors' net margin of 0.00%. SLR Investment's return on equity of 7.96% beat Barings Participation Investors' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A
SLR Investment	35.20%	7.96%	3.09%

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Barings Participation Investors	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
SLR Investment	$218.54M	2.90	$92.54M	$1.35	8.60

Barings Participation Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 5 more articles in the media than Barings Participation Investors. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for SLR Investment and 2 mentions for Barings Participation Investors. Barings Participation Investors' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat SLR Investment's score of -0.01 indicating that Barings Participation Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Barings Participation Investors	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SLR Investment	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Barings Participation Investors has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SLR Investment has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Barings Participation Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment has a consensus target price of $14.10, suggesting a potential upside of 21.50%. Given SLR Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Barings Participation Investors.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Barings Participation Investors	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
SLR Investment	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

SLR Investment beats Barings Participation Investors on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Barings Participation Investors News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPV vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Barings Participation Investors	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$165.90M	$5.16B	$13.43B	$22.72B
Dividend Yield	9.60%	7.51%	5.99%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	N/A	29.06	24.31	27.62
Price / Sales	N/A	1,184.13	507.22	90.09
Price / Cash	N/A	47.83	50.23	41.75
Price / Book	N/A	3.50	2.69	4.61
Net Income	N/A	$417.69M	$1.32B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-6.68%	-0.88%	-0.99%	-1.67%
1 Month Performance	-6.50%	4.86%	0.85%	-5.92%
1 Year Performance	-23.20%	3.91%	8.24%	5.46%

Barings Participation Investors Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPV Barings Participation Investors	N/A	$15.42 -0.7%	N/A	-22.3%	$165.90M	N/A	N/A	900
PAX Patria Investments	4.431 of 5 stars	$10.24 -2.5%	$12.75 +24.5%	-31.9%	$698.49M	$399.23M	20.48	548
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	3.9048 of 5 stars	$7.04 -1.1%	$9.80 +39.3%	-21.8%	$698.01M	$261.43M	13.79	658
FAC Factorial Energy	3.6319 of 5 stars	$6.44 +4.7%	$13.00 +101.9%	N/A	$689.21M	N/A	N/A	2	Positive News High Trading Volume
NMFC New Mountain Finance	2.4657 of 5 stars	$7.06 -0.6%	$8.25 +16.9%	-27.4%	$666.82M	$327.08M	N/A	N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:MPV) was last updated on 9/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Barings Participation Investors (MPV) Competitors

MPV vs. PAX, PFLT, FAC, NMFC, and SLRC

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Patria Investments?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Factorial Energy?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to SLR Investment?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPV vs. The Competition

Barings Participation Investors Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Barings Participation Investors (MPV) Competitors

MPV vs. PAX, PFLT, FAC, NMFC, and SLRC

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Patria Investments?

Do analysts recommend PAX or MPV?

Which has more volatility & risk, PAX or MPV?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in PAX or MPV?

Is PAX or MPV a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to PAX or MPV?

Is PAX or MPV more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, PAX or MPV?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Does the media favor MPV or PFLT?

Is MPV or PFLT a better dividend stock?

Is MPV or PFLT more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MPV or PFLT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPV or PFLT?

Which has more volatility & risk, MPV or PFLT?

Do analysts rate MPV or PFLT?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to Factorial Energy?

Does the media refer more to MPV or FAC?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPV or FAC?

Do analysts rate MPV or FAC?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPV or FAC?

Is MPV or FAC more profitable?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to New Mountain Finance?

Does the media favor MPV or NMFC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPV or NMFC?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MPV or NMFC?

Is MPV or NMFC more profitable?

Is MPV or NMFC a better dividend stock?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPV or NMFC?

Do analysts rate MPV or NMFC?

Summary

How does Barings Participation Investors compare to SLR Investment?

Is MPV or SLRC more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MPV or SLRC?

Is MPV or SLRC a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer MPV or SLRC?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPV or SLRC?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in MPV or SLRC?

Do analysts prefer MPV or SLRC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPV vs. The Competition

Barings Participation Investors Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools