Go Pro

Ascent Resources (AST) Competitors

Ascent Resources logo
GBX 0.0041 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/23/2026

AST vs. CZN, WDS, ITH, HBR, and SEPL

Should you buy Ascent Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Ascent Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Ascent Resources include Curzon Energy (CZN), Woodside Energy Group (WDS), Ithaca Energy (ITH), Harbour Energy (HBR), and Seplat Energy (SEPL). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas e&p" industry.

How does Ascent Resources compare to Curzon Energy?

Ascent Resources (LON:AST) and Curzon Energy (LON:CZN) are both small-cap energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, media sentiment, dividends and profitability.

Curzon Energy has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ascent Resources' net margin of -3,807.79%. Ascent Resources' return on equity of 644.44% beat Curzon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ascent Resources-3,807.79% 644.44% -114.93%
Curzon Energy N/A N/A -272.65%

Ascent Resources has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Curzon Energy has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Ascent Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Ascent Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Curzon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Curzon Energy has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Ascent Resources. Ascent Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Curzon Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ascent Resources£77K0.50-£2.87M-£98.49N/A
Curzon EnergyN/AN/AN/A-£0.01N/A

In the previous week, Ascent Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Curzon Energy'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ascent Resources Neutral
Curzon Energy Neutral

Summary

Ascent Resources beats Curzon Energy on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ascent Resources compare to Woodside Energy Group?

Woodside Energy Group (LON:WDS) and Ascent Resources (LON:AST) are both energy companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

42.1% of Woodside Energy Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ascent Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Woodside Energy Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Ascent Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Woodside Energy Group had 1 more articles in the media than Ascent Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Woodside Energy Group and 0 mentions for Ascent Resources. Woodside Energy Group's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Ascent Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Woodside Energy Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Woodside Energy Group Positive
Ascent Resources Neutral

Woodside Energy Group has higher revenue and earnings than Ascent Resources. Ascent Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Woodside Energy Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Woodside Energy Group£12.58B0.00£1.86B£0.74N/A
Ascent Resources£77K0.50-£2.87M-£98.49N/A

Woodside Energy Group has a net margin of 14.76% compared to Ascent Resources' net margin of -3,807.79%. Ascent Resources' return on equity of 644.44% beat Woodside Energy Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Woodside Energy Group14.76% 5.32% 2.90%
Ascent Resources -3,807.79%644.44%-114.93%

Woodside Energy Group has a beta of 0.74, suggesting that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ascent Resources has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Woodside Energy Group beats Ascent Resources on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ascent Resources compare to Ithaca Energy?

Ascent Resources (LON:AST) and Ithaca Energy (LON:ITH) are both energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Ithaca Energy has a net margin of 7.53% compared to Ascent Resources' net margin of -3,807.79%. Ascent Resources' return on equity of 644.44% beat Ithaca Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ascent Resources-3,807.79% 644.44% -114.93%
Ithaca Energy 7.53%9.33%0.18%

Ascent Resources has a beta of 0.01, meaning that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ithaca Energy has a beta of 0.313, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Ithaca Energy has a consensus target price of GBX 226.67, indicating a potential downside of 12.01%. Given Ithaca Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ithaca Energy is more favorable than Ascent Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ascent Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Ithaca Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, Ithaca Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ascent Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ithaca Energy and 0 mentions for Ascent Resources. Ithaca Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Ascent Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Ithaca Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ascent Resources Neutral
Ithaca Energy Positive

0.2% of Ascent Resources shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Ithaca Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 4.6% of Ascent Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ithaca Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ithaca Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ascent Resources. Ithaca Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ascent Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ascent Resources£77K0.50-£2.87M-£98.49N/A
Ithaca Energy£2.95B1.44£230.29M-£5.10N/A

Summary

Ithaca Energy beats Ascent Resources on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ascent Resources compare to Harbour Energy?

Harbour Energy (LON:HBR) and Ascent Resources (LON:AST) are both energy companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Harbour Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Ascent Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Harbour Energy and 0 mentions for Ascent Resources. Harbour Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat Ascent Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Harbour Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Harbour Energy Neutral
Ascent Resources Neutral

Harbour Energy has a net margin of -2.13% compared to Ascent Resources' net margin of -3,807.79%. Ascent Resources' return on equity of 644.44% beat Harbour Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Harbour Energy-2.13% -4.05% 3.96%
Ascent Resources -3,807.79%644.44%-114.93%

Harbour Energy presently has a consensus target price of GBX 312.67, indicating a potential upside of 21.03%. Given Harbour Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Harbour Energy is more favorable than Ascent Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Harbour Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Ascent Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

15.7% of Harbour Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ascent Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Harbour Energy shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Ascent Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Harbour Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ascent Resources. Harbour Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ascent Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Harbour Energy£10.09B0.40£71.42M-£16.00N/A
Ascent Resources£77K0.50-£2.87M-£98.49N/A

Harbour Energy has a beta of -0.23, indicating that its stock price is 123% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ascent Resources has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Harbour Energy beats Ascent Resources on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Ascent Resources compare to Seplat Energy?

Seplat Energy (LON:SEPL) and Ascent Resources (LON:AST) are both energy companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Seplat Energy had 2 more articles in the media than Ascent Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Seplat Energy and 0 mentions for Ascent Resources. Seplat Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Ascent Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Seplat Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Seplat Energy Positive
Ascent Resources Neutral

Seplat Energy has higher revenue and earnings than Ascent Resources. Ascent Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Seplat Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Seplat Energy£2.76B1.25£99.56M£30.0019.10
Ascent Resources£77K0.50-£2.87M-£98.49N/A

Seplat Energy presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,672.50, indicating a potential upside of 540.92%. Given Seplat Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Seplat Energy is more favorable than Ascent Resources.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Seplat Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ascent Resources
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

2.4% of Seplat Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Ascent Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of Seplat Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Ascent Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Seplat Energy has a net margin of 5.68% compared to Ascent Resources' net margin of -3,807.79%. Ascent Resources' return on equity of 644.44% beat Seplat Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Seplat Energy5.68% 9.72% 5.52%
Ascent Resources -3,807.79%644.44%-114.93%

Seplat Energy has a beta of 0.106, suggesting that its share price is 89% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ascent Resources has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Seplat Energy beats Ascent Resources on 15 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Ascent Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for AST and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding AST and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

AST vs. The Competition

MetricAscent ResourcesOil & Gas E&P IndustryEnergy SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£3.88M£2.06B£10.61B£2.75B
Dividend Yield3.97%7.58%11.39%6.15%
P/E Ratio0.0032.0319.79368.39
Price / Sales0.501,141.97372.3784,479.14
Price / Cash40.0085.5336.7827.89
Price / Book-0.022.334.147.41
Net Income-£2.87M£82.07M£4.25B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A2.93%1.41%0.39%
1 Month PerformanceN/A5.53%3.19%0.27%
1 Year PerformanceN/A37.65%29.37%68.12%

Ascent Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
AST
Ascent Resources
N/AGBX 0
flat
N/AN/A£3.88M£77KN/A7
CZN
Curzon Energy
N/AN/AN/AN/A£34KN/AN/A14,700
WDS
Woodside Energy Group
N/AN/AN/AN/A£23.94B£12.58B1,702.704,380
ITH
Ithaca Energy
1.4318 of 5 stars
GBX 230
-2.9%
GBX 226.67
-1.4%
+53.5%£3.80B£2.95BN/A220
HBR
Harbour Energy
3.8071 of 5 stars
GBX 223.80
-2.6%
GBX 312.67
+39.7%
+29.6%£3.51B£10.09BN/A1,716

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:AST) was last updated on 7/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners