Free Trial

Blue Star Foods (BSFC) Competitors

Blue Star Foods logo
$0.0009 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/7/2026

BSFC vs. STKH, TTCFQ, SNAX, RIBT, and COOTW

Should you buy Blue Star Foods stock or one of its competitors? Blue Star Foods's main competitors and comparable companies include Steakholder Foods (STKH), Tattooed Chef (TTCFQ), Stryve Foods (SNAX), RiceBran Technologies (RIBT), and Australian Oilseeds (COOTW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "packaged foods & meats" industry.

How does Blue Star Foods compare to Steakholder Foods?

Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) and Steakholder Foods (NASDAQ:STKH) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blue Star Foods
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Steakholder Foods
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steakholder Foods has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its stock price is 65% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Steakholder Foods had 1 more articles in the media than Blue Star Foods. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Steakholder Foods and 0 mentions for Blue Star Foods. Steakholder Foods' average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat Blue Star Foods' score of -2.00 indicating that Steakholder Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Foods Very Negative
Steakholder Foods Very Positive

Steakholder Foods has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Blue Star Foods' net margin of -82.34%. Steakholder Foods' return on equity of 0.00% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star Foods-82.34% -134.60% -66.98%
Steakholder Foods N/A N/A N/A

18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of Steakholder Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Blue Star Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Steakholder Foods.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.02-$4.47M-$0.03N/A
Steakholder FoodsN/AN/A-$11.25MN/AN/A

Summary

Steakholder Foods beats Blue Star Foods on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Foods compare to Tattooed Chef?

Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) and Tattooed Chef (NASDAQ:TTCFQ) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

In the previous week, Tattooed Chef's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Blue Star Foods' score of -2.00 indicating that Tattooed Chef is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Foods Very Negative
Tattooed Chef Neutral

Tattooed Chef has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Blue Star Foods' net margin of -82.34%. Tattooed Chef's return on equity of 0.00% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star Foods-82.34% -134.60% -66.98%
Tattooed Chef N/A N/A N/A

Blue Star Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tattooed Chef. Blue Star Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tattooed Chef, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.02-$4.47M-$0.03N/A
Tattooed Chef$230.93M0.00-$141.75M-$0.23N/A

Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Tattooed Chef has a beta of 19.67, indicating that its share price is 1,867% more volatile than the broader market.

18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Tattooed Chef shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tattooed Chef beats Blue Star Foods on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Foods compare to Stryve Foods?

Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) and Stryve Foods (NASDAQ:SNAX) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Blue Star Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stryve Foods. Blue Star Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stryve Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.02-$4.47M-$0.03N/A
Stryve Foods$19.36M0.00-$19.04M-$5.47N/A

In the previous week, Stryve Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Blue Star Foods' score of -2.00 indicating that Stryve Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Foods Very Negative
Stryve Foods Neutral

Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.83, suggesting that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stryve Foods has a beta of 10.91, suggesting that its share price is 991% more volatile than the broader market.

Stryve Foods has a net margin of -79.07% compared to Blue Star Foods' net margin of -82.34%. Blue Star Foods' return on equity of -134.60% beat Stryve Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star Foods-82.34% -134.60% -66.98%
Stryve Foods -79.07%-2,100.61%-47.85%

18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.3% of Stryve Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.6% of Stryve Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stryve Foods beats Blue Star Foods on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Foods compare to RiceBran Technologies?

Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) and RiceBran Technologies (NASDAQ:RIBT) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

RiceBran Technologies has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Blue Star Foods' net margin of -82.34%. RiceBran Technologies' return on equity of 0.00% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blue Star Foods-82.34% -134.60% -66.98%
RiceBran Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Blue Star Foods has higher earnings, but lower revenue than RiceBran Technologies. Blue Star Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RiceBran Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.02-$4.47M-$0.03N/A
RiceBran Technologies$41.16M0.00-$17.56M-$0.68N/A

Blue Star Foods has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RiceBran Technologies has a beta of -1.41, meaning that its stock price is 241% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, RiceBran Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Blue Star Foods' score of -2.00 indicating that RiceBran Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Blue Star Foods Very Negative
RiceBran Technologies Neutral

18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of RiceBran Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.0% of RiceBran Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

RiceBran Technologies beats Blue Star Foods on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Blue Star Foods compare to Australian Oilseeds?

Australian Oilseeds (NASDAQ:COOTW) and Blue Star Foods (NASDAQ:BSFC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

18.8% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 53.7% of Blue Star Foods shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Australian Oilseeds had 1 more articles in the media than Blue Star Foods. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Australian Oilseeds and 0 mentions for Blue Star Foods. Australian Oilseeds' average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Blue Star Foods' score of -2.00 indicating that Australian Oilseeds is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Australian Oilseeds Very Positive
Blue Star Foods Very Negative

Australian Oilseeds has higher revenue and earnings than Blue Star Foods.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Australian Oilseeds$43.82MN/AN/AN/AN/A
Blue Star Foods$5.93M0.02-$4.47M-$0.03N/A

Australian Oilseeds has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Blue Star Foods' net margin of -82.34%. Australian Oilseeds' return on equity of 0.00% beat Blue Star Foods' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Australian OilseedsN/A N/A N/A
Blue Star Foods -82.34%-134.60%-66.98%

Summary

Australian Oilseeds beats Blue Star Foods on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Blue Star Foods News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BSFC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BSFC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BSFC vs. The Competition

MetricBlue Star FoodsFood Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$147K$5.49B$16.44B$12.93B
Dividend YieldN/A3.25%3.28%19.61%
P/E Ratio-0.0312.7612.4720.29
Price / Sales0.0283.17265,659.5786.60
Price / CashN/A112.1557.3351.56
Price / Book0.003.664.416.01
Net Income-$4.47M$772.49M$844.17M$380.68M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.69%0.61%-3.15%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-4.17%-1.53%-5.18%
1 Year PerformanceN/A32.25%9.47%-4.07%

Blue Star Foods Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BSFC
Blue Star Foods
N/A$0.00
flat
N/A-100.0%$147K$5.93MN/A20
STKH
Steakholder Foods
0.641 of 5 stars
$0.60
-1.5%
N/A-95.0%$400K$10KN/A12
TTCFQ
Tattooed Chef
N/AN/AN/AN/A$8K$230.93MN/A600
SNAX
Stryve Foods
N/A$0.00
flat
N/AN/A$4K$19.36MN/A86
RIBT
RiceBran Technologies
N/AN/AN/AN/A$1K$41.16MN/A35

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BSFC) was last updated on 10/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners