United Fire Group (UFCS) Competitors

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assured Guaranty has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Assured Guaranty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Assured Guaranty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Fire Group. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 45.31% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.88% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty had 3 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Assured Guaranty and 10 mentions for United Fire Group. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.25 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

United Fire Group currently has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $98.50, suggesting a potential upside of 19.47%. Given Assured Guaranty's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than United Fire Group.

Hilltop currently has a consensus price target of $37.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.92%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. Given United Fire Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe United Fire Group is more favorable than Hilltop.

57.1% of Hilltop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 29.9% of Hilltop shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hilltop has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Hilltop has higher revenue and earnings than United Fire Group. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hilltop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 2 more articles in the media than Hilltop. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for United Fire Group and 8 mentions for Hilltop. Hilltop's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.25 indicating that Hilltop is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hilltop pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Hilltop pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hilltop has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Hilltop is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Hilltop has a net margin of 10.13% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.88% beat Hilltop's return on equity.

Stewart Information Services currently has a consensus price target of $81.00, suggesting a potential upside of 15.96%. United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. Given Stewart Information Services' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Stewart Information Services is more favorable than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Stewart Information Services. United Fire Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stewart Information Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Stewart Information Services pays an annual dividend of $2.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Stewart Information Services pays out 46.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Stewart Information Services has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Stewart Information Services is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, United Fire Group had 8 more articles in the media than Stewart Information Services. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for United Fire Group and 2 mentions for Stewart Information Services. Stewart Information Services' average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.25 indicating that Stewart Information Services is being referred to more favorably in the media.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 9.16% compared to Stewart Information Services' net margin of 4.19%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 14.88% beat Stewart Information Services' return on equity.

Stewart Information Services has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500.

96.9% of Stewart Information Services shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Stewart Information Services shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

United Fire Group presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.97%. HCI Group has a consensus price target of $231.67, suggesting a potential upside of 51.68%. Given HCI Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HCI Group is more favorable than United Fire Group.

HCI Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than United Fire Group. HCI Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than United Fire Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

United Fire Group pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. HCI Group pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. United Fire Group pays out 16.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HCI Group pays out 7.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, HCI Group had 1 more articles in the media than United Fire Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for HCI Group and 10 mentions for United Fire Group. HCI Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat United Fire Group's score of 0.25 indicating that HCI Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

HCI Group has a net margin of 32.64% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 9.16%. HCI Group's return on equity of 33.04% beat United Fire Group's return on equity.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HCI Group has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.

62.7% of United Fire Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.0% of HCI Group shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of United Fire Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.9% of HCI Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.