Yunhong Green CTI (YHGJ) Competitors

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -12.84% compared to Northann's net margin of -26.58%. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -28.77% beat Northann's return on equity.

Yunhong Green CTI has higher revenue and earnings than Northann. Yunhong Green CTI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Northann, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Northann has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its stock price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

0.3% of Northann shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by institutional investors. 8.2% of Northann shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 44.8% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Northann and Northann both had 1 articles in the media. Northann's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Yunhong Green CTI'saverage media sentiment score.

In the previous week, Lightwave Logic had 11 more articles in the media than Yunhong Green CTI. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Lightwave Logic and 1 mentions for Yunhong Green CTI. Lightwave Logic's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Yunhong Green CTI's score of 0.00 indicating that Lightwave Logic is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -12.84% compared to Lightwave Logic's net margin of -8,571.31%. Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -28.77% beat Lightwave Logic's return on equity.

Yunhong Green CTI has higher revenue and earnings than Lightwave Logic. Lightwave Logic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yunhong Green CTI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lightwave Logic has a beta of 3.22, suggesting that its share price is 222% more volatile than the S&P 500.

2.1% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.0% of Lightwave Logic shares are held by institutional investors. 44.8% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Lightwave Logic shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Newell Brands had 18 more articles in the media than Yunhong Green CTI. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Newell Brands and 1 mentions for Yunhong Green CTI. Newell Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Yunhong Green CTI's score of 0.00 indicating that Newell Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Newell Brands has a net margin of -3.91% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of -12.84%. Newell Brands' return on equity of 8.89% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity.

Yunhong Green CTI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Newell Brands. Newell Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Yunhong Green CTI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Newell Brands presently has a consensus price target of $5.06, indicating a potential upside of 12.60%. Given Newell Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Newell Brands is more favorable than Yunhong Green CTI.

Newell Brands has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

92.5% of Newell Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Newell Brands shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.8% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Latham Group has a net margin of 2.04% compared to Yunhong Green CTI's net margin of -12.84%. Latham Group's return on equity of 2.79% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity.

Latham Group has higher revenue and earnings than Yunhong Green CTI. Yunhong Green CTI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Latham Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Latham Group had 9 more articles in the media than Yunhong Green CTI. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Latham Group and 1 mentions for Yunhong Green CTI. Latham Group's average media sentiment score of 0.44 beat Yunhong Green CTI's score of 0.00 indicating that Latham Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Latham Group has a beta of 1.72, suggesting that its share price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 0.42, suggesting that its share price is 58% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Latham Group presently has a consensus price target of $6.75, indicating a potential upside of 15.19%. Given Latham Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Latham Group is more favorable than Yunhong Green CTI.

83.9% of Latham Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.1% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Latham Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 44.8% of Yunhong Green CTI shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.