MLP vs. AFCG, AOMR, OPI, FPH, SRG, TRC, FRPH, INDT, HPP, and EFC
Should you be buying Maui Land & Pineapple stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Maui Land & Pineapple include AFC Gamma (AFCG), Angel Oak Mortgage REIT (AOMR), Office Properties Income Trust (OPI), Five Point (FPH), Seritage Growth Properties (SRG), Tejon Ranch (TRC), FRP (FRPH), INDUS Realty Trust (INDT), Hudson Pacific Properties (HPP), and Ellington Financial (EFC). These companies are all part of the "real estate" industry.
Maui Land & Pineapple vs.
Maui Land & Pineapple (NYSE:MLP) and AFC Gamma (NASDAQ:AFCG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their community ranking, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.
AFC Gamma has a consensus target price of $19.33, indicating a potential upside of 67.39%. Given AFC Gamma's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe AFC Gamma is more favorable than Maui Land & Pineapple.
In the previous week, AFC Gamma had 1 more articles in the media than Maui Land & Pineapple. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for AFC Gamma and 1 mentions for Maui Land & Pineapple. AFC Gamma's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Maui Land & Pineapple's score of 1.00 indicating that AFC Gamma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
Maui Land & Pineapple received 79 more outperform votes than AFC Gamma when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 55.03% of users gave Maui Land & Pineapple an outperform vote while only 51.85% of users gave AFC Gamma an outperform vote.
12.4% of Maui Land & Pineapple shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.9% of AFC Gamma shares are held by institutional investors. 65.0% of Maui Land & Pineapple shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.5% of AFC Gamma shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Maui Land & Pineapple has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, AFC Gamma has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.
AFC Gamma has a net margin of 43.99% compared to Maui Land & Pineapple's net margin of 4.95%. AFC Gamma's return on equity of 16.66% beat Maui Land & Pineapple's return on equity.
AFC Gamma has higher revenue and earnings than Maui Land & Pineapple. AFC Gamma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Maui Land & Pineapple, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Summary
AFC Gamma beats Maui Land & Pineapple on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
New MarketBeat Followers Over Time
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MLP and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip ChartMedia Sentiment Over Time
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart
Maui Land & Pineapple Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools