OTCMKTS:SCHYY

Sands China Competitors

$47.59
+0.38 (+0.80 %)
(As of 04/20/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$47.53
Now: $47.59
$48.63
50-Day Range
$46.46
MA: $48.74
$51.51
52-Week Range
$34.79
Now: $47.59
$52.11
Volume110,101 shs
Average Volume49,808 shs
Market Capitalization$38.51 billion
P/E Ratio18.96
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.22

Competitors

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) Vs. ACGBY, BACHY, IDEXY, SBGSY, EADSY, and IBDRY

Should you be buying SCHYY stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "private households" are considered alternatives and competitors to Sands China, including Agricultural Bank of China (ACGBY), Bank of China (BACHY), Industria de Diseño Textil (IDEXY), Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSY), Airbus (EADSY), and Iberdrola (IBDRY).

Agricultural Bank of China (OTCMKTS:ACGBY) and Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends and valuation.

Volatility and Risk

Agricultural Bank of China has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sands China has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for Agricultural Bank of China and Sands China, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Agricultural Bank of China00203.00
Sands China01102.50

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Agricultural Bank of China and Sands China's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agricultural Bank of China$134.32 billion1.04$30.69 billionN/AN/A
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96

Agricultural Bank of China has higher revenue and earnings than Sands China.

Profitability

This table compares Agricultural Bank of China and Sands China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Agricultural Bank of China19.64%10.19%0.76%
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agricultural Bank of China beats Sands China on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Bank of China (OTCMKTS:BACHY) and Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Bank of China and Sands China's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bank of China$87.67 billion1.34$27.12 billionN/AN/A
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96

Bank of China has higher revenue and earnings than Sands China.

Risk & Volatility

Bank of China has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sands China has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Bank of China and Sands China, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Bank of China01002.00
Sands China01102.50

Profitability

This table compares Bank of China and Sands China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Bank of China20.45%8.40%0.72%
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Sands China beats Bank of China on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Industria de Diseño Textil (OTCMKTS:IDEXY) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Sands China and Industria de Diseño Textil's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96
Industria de Diseño Textil$31.68 billion3.32$4.07 billion$0.6525.95

Industria de Diseño Textil has higher revenue and earnings than Sands China. Sands China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Industria de Diseño Textil, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Industria de Diseño Textil has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Industria de Diseño Textil's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Industria de Diseño Textil7.18%12.74%6.67%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Industria de Diseño Textil shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Sands China and Industria de Diseño Textil, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Industria de Diseño Textil25402.18

Summary

Industria de Diseño Textil beats Sands China on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Schneider Electric S.E. (OTCMKTS:SBGSY) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Sands China and Schneider Electric S.E., as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Schneider Electric S.E.03702.70

Institutional and Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Schneider Electric S.E. shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sands China and Schneider Electric S.E.'s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96
Schneider Electric S.E.$30.07 billion3.09$2.70 billion$1.1827.79

Schneider Electric S.E. has higher revenue and earnings than Sands China. Sands China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schneider Electric S.E., indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Schneider Electric S.E. has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Schneider Electric S.E.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Schneider Electric S.E.N/AN/AN/A

Summary

Schneider Electric S.E. beats Sands China on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) and Airbus (OTCMKTS:EADSY) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Sands China and Airbus, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Sands China01102.50
Airbus26802.38

Volatility and Risk

Sands China has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Airbus has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.0% of Sands China shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.1% of Airbus shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Sands China and Airbus' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96
Airbus$78.94 billion1.17$-1,525,440,000.00$1.2823.09

Sands China has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Airbus. Sands China is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Airbus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Sands China and Airbus' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A
Airbus-11.39%-27.79%-0.78%

Summary

Sands China beats Airbus on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Iberdrola (OTCMKTS:IBDRY) and Sands China (OTCMKTS:SCHYY) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Iberdrola and Sands China's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Iberdrola10.44%7.63%2.88%
Sands ChinaN/AN/AN/A

Risk and Volatility

Iberdrola has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Sands China has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its share price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Iberdrola and Sands China's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Iberdrola$40.82 billion2.16$3.82 billionN/AN/A
Sands China$8.81 billion4.37$2.03 billion$2.5118.96

Iberdrola has higher revenue and earnings than Sands China.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

0.2% of Iberdrola shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Sands China shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Iberdrola and Sands China, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Iberdrola17602.36
Sands China01102.50

Summary

Iberdrola beats Sands China on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.


Sands China Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Agricultural Bank of China logo
ACGBY
Agricultural Bank of China
1.2$9.96+0.0%$139.43 billion$134.32 billion5.30Upcoming Earnings
Decrease in Short Interest
Bank of China logo
BACHY
Bank of China
1.2$10.00+0.4%$117.72 billion$87.67 billion5.10Increase in Short Interest
Industria de Diseño Textil logo
IDEXY
Industria de Diseño Textil
1.1$16.87+2.7%$105.12 billion$31.68 billion58.16Dividend Cut
Gap Up
Schneider Electric S.E. logo
SBGSY
Schneider Electric S.E.
1.2$32.79+0.8%$92.97 billion$30.07 billion27.79
Airbus logo
EADSY
Airbus
0.9$29.56+5.0%$92.71 billion$78.94 billion-13.26Gap Up
Iberdrola logo
IBDRY
Iberdrola
0.9$55.44+1.0%$88.01 billion$40.82 billion22.18Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
L'Air Liquide logo
AIQUY
L'Air Liquide
0.9$33.68+1.0%$79.67 billion$24.55 billion31.48Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Atlas Copco logo
ATLKY
Atlas Copco
1.2$63.55+2.3%$77.19 billion$10.98 billion48.88Upcoming Earnings
Recruit logo
RCRRF
Recruit
0.8$46.00+0.8%$76.84 billion$22.12 billion63.89Increase in Short Interest
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme logo
ESLOY
EssilorLuxottica Société anonyme
1.3$83.82+0.2%$73.60 billion$19.48 billion34.07
Shin-Etsu Chemical logo
SHECY
Shin-Etsu Chemical
1.1$43.57+1.7%$72.62 billion$14.20 billion27.06Upcoming Earnings
Deutsche Post logo
DPSGY
Deutsche Post
1.4$57.79+0.5%$71.61 billion$70.95 billion25.24
KDDI logo
KDDIY
KDDI
1.4$15.51+1.4%$71.48 billion$48.18 billion11.49
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft logo
BAMXF
Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
1.4$103.83+3.1%$62.50 billion$116.72 billion12.51Gap Up
Vinci logo
VCISY
Vinci
0.6$26.36+2.8%$62.37 billion$53.83 billion0.00Analyst Report
Daikin Industries,Ltd. logo
DKILY
Daikin Industries,Ltd.
1.3$20.10+4.7%$58.81 billion$23.46 billion37.22Gap Up
Pjsc Lukoil logo
LUKOY
Pjsc Lukoil
1.0$76.86+2.4%$53.25 billion$123.17 billion32.03Gap Up
DENSO logo
DNZOY
DENSO
1.0$32.24+2.4%$50.81 billion$47.41 billion-51.17
Oriental Land logo
OLCLY
Oriental Land
0.9$29.50+0.0%$48.51 billion$4.27 billion-491.58Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S logo
AMKBY
A.P. Møller - Mærsk A/S
1.0$12.07+2.4%$48.36 billion$38.89 billion31.76
Jardine Matheson logo
JMHLY
Jardine Matheson
0.3$64.51+0.4%$47.39 billion$40.92 billion0.00
ITOCHU logo
ITOCY
ITOCHU
1.0$62.42+2.1%$46.51 billion$101.26 billion10.76
HOYA logo
HOCPY
HOYA
1.1$123.24+2.7%$45.95 billion$5.31 billion45.48News Coverage
Sun Hung Kai Properties logo
SUHJY
Sun Hung Kai Properties
1.4$15.42+0.2%$44.68 billion$10.66 billion11.77
Bank of Communications logo
BCMXY
Bank of Communications
1.2$15.01+0.0%$44.59 billion$60.07 billion4.77Upcoming Earnings
The Swatch Group logo
SWGAY
The Swatch Group
0.5$15.21+1.1%$44.35 billion$8.30 billion0.00Decrease in Short Interest
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA logo
HENKY
Henkel AG & Co. KGaA
1.4$25.01+0.5%$43.81 billion$22.53 billion18.53Dividend Announcement
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in München logo
MURGY
Münchener Rückversicherungs-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft in München
0.6$30.54+1.4%$42.79 billion$61.62 billion31.48News Coverage
China Shenhua Energy logo
CSUAY
China Shenhua Energy
1.3$8.42+0.2%$41.87 billion$35.00 billion7.65Upcoming Earnings
SMC logo
SMCAY
SMC
1.3$29.91+0.7%$40.58 billion$4.84 billion42.13
Compass Group logo
CMPGY
Compass Group
0.8$21.90+1.6%$39.07 billion$25.75 billion91.25Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Vestas Wind Systems A/S logo
VWDRY
Vestas Wind Systems A/S
1.2$63.93+3.7%$38.74 billion$13.61 billion72.65Gap Up
Kuehne + Nagel International logo
KHNGY
Kuehne + Nagel International
0.9$61.98+0.2%$37.11 billion$21.23 billion45.91Upcoming Earnings
Seven & i logo
SVNDY
Seven & i
1.6$20.63+0.3%$36.50 billion$61.13 billion21.95
Flutter Entertainment logo
PDYPY
Flutter Entertainment
0.4$103.10+3.9%$36.12 billion$2.73 billion53.98Gap Up
Experian logo
EXPGY
Experian
1.1$37.59+0.6%$34.48 billion$5.18 billion36.85Analyst Upgrade
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ) logo
HNNMY
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB (publ)
0.7$4.72+3.2%$34.45 billion$24.63 billion157.25Upcoming Earnings
Sandvik AB (publ) logo
SDVKY
Sandvik AB (publ)
0.8$26.89+5.8%$33.73 billion$10.92 billion50.74Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Gap Up
Japan Tobacco logo
JAPAY
Japan Tobacco
1.2$9.49+1.4%$33.67 billion$19.96 billion12.49
Techtronic Industries logo
TTNDY
Techtronic Industries
0.2$89.57+0.5%$32.83 billion$7.67 billion0.00News Coverage
CK Hutchison logo
CKHUY
CK Hutchison
0.7$8.26+0.6%$31.85 billion$38.34 billion0.00Gap Down
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ) logo
ASAZY
ASSA ABLOY AB (publ)
1.2$14.76+1.7%$31.13 billion$9.95 billion35.99Decrease in Short Interest
Amadeus IT Group logo
AMADY
Amadeus IT Group
0.5$68.10+4.4%$30.68 billion$6.25 billion-234.82News Coverage
Gap Up
Swire Pacific logo
SWRAY
Swire Pacific
1.6$7.80+2.1%$30.32 billion$10.93 billion3.11News Coverage
Fujitsu logo
FJTSY
Fujitsu
0.9$29.75+2.1%$30.15 billion$35.49 billion22.54Gap Up
Ashtead Group logo
ASHTY
Ashtead Group
1.2$258.05+1.5%$28.99 billion$5.84 billion35.64Analyst Report
Zalando logo
ZLNDY
Zalando
0.4$55.07+1.1%$28.74 billion$7.26 billion250.33Analyst Report
News Coverage
Sunny Optical Technology (Group) logo
SNPTF
Sunny Optical Technology (Group)
0.5$25.20+0.0%$27.64 billion$5.48 billion0.00
Sampo Oyj logo
SAXPY
Sampo Oyj
0.8$24.05+1.5%$26.93 billion$12.62 billion18.79
China CITIC Bank logo
CHCJY
China CITIC Bank
0.9$10.79+0.0%$26.40 billion$47.62 billion0.00Upcoming Earnings
This page was last updated on 4/21/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.