Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPI Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 128.35 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/21/2026 06:50 AM Eastern
Compare

CMPI vs. PAC, UEM, JPGI, EOT, and JII

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Pacific Assets (PAC), Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (JPGI), European Opportunities Trust (EOT), and JPMorgan Indian (JII). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Pacific Assets?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
Pacific Assets -29.27%-0.93%0.07%

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Pacific Assets'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Pacific Assets Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.648, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.83£101.85M£17.157.48
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-109.18£42.65M-£3.70N/A

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Pacific Assets on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (LON:UEM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust has a beta of 0.388, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's net margin of 90.43%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's return on equity of 21.74% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust 90.43%21.74%7.22%

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Utilico Emerging Markets Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust Positive

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.83£101.85M£17.157.48
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust£121.37M3.93£20.98M£63.984.31

Summary

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JPGI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership and profitability.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.83£101.85M£17.157.48
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income£93.27M0.00N/A£67.80N/A

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to European Opportunities Trust?

European Opportunities Trust (LON:EOT) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than European Opportunities Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than European Opportunities Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
European Opportunities Trust£29.05M16.21£79.96M£39.0625.83
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.83£101.85M£17.157.48

European Opportunities Trust has a beta of 1.2273101, meaning that its share price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.737, meaning that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to European Opportunities Trust's net margin of 73.73%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat European Opportunities Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
European Opportunities Trust73.73% 5.01% 7.67%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

In the previous week, European Opportunities Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
European Opportunities Trust Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

European Opportunities Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. European Opportunities Trust pays out 5.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

14.0% of European Opportunities Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of European Opportunities Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

European Opportunities Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to JPMorgan Indian?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and JPMorgan Indian (LON:JII) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.737, indicating that its share price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Indian has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JPMorgan Indian'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
JPMorgan Indian Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to JPMorgan Indian's net margin of 101.13%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat JPMorgan Indian's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
JPMorgan Indian 101.13%-22.45%10.97%

JPMorgan Indian has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JPMorgan Indian, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.83£101.85M£17.157.48
JPMorgan Indian£29.88M15.46£121.67M£0.195,295.66

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of JPMorgan Indian shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of JPMorgan Indian shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

JPMorgan Indian beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£122.69M£5.66B£13.89B£2.90B
Dividend Yield6.59%7.38%5.89%6.17%
P/E Ratio7.4839.0929.61367.57
Price / Sales5.831,233.13516.7383,481.74
Price / CashN/A48.3130.7127.89
Price / Book0.743.752.847.19
Net Income£101.85M£417.46M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.40%0.04%0.05%0.42%
1 Month Performance-1.39%2.13%2.11%3.03%
1 Year Performance5.89%5.71%9.68%22.14%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 128.35
flat		N/A+5.9%£122.69M£21.03M7.48N/A
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 427
+0.2%		N/A+18.9%£487.90M-£4.44MN/A1,740
UEM
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust
N/AGBX 281
+0.4%		N/A+10.8%£485.78M£121.37M4.39N/A
JPGI
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AN/AN/AN/A£472.52M£93.27M5.01N/A
EOT
European Opportunities Trust
N/AGBX 1,008.81
flat		N/AN/A£470.70M£29.05M25.83N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 8/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
A Simple Guide to Options Trading While It's Still Free
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America grew this stake 139%
Bank of America raised its stake in a small gold company by 139%. Jane Street increased its position by 159%, ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
A $382 trillion migration and the position no one is talking about
Trump just signed a law requiring America's entire $382 trillion financial system to migrate to a new money ne...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
Free Stock Pick: The Company First in Line for America’s New Super Fuel
The U.S. Army and Department of Energy are launching Project Janus - a high-priority initiative ordered by Pre...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
I found Rolls-Royce at $2 - now I see the same setup again
In 2022, Karim Rahemtulla recommended Rolls-Royce under $2 - a misunderstood aerospace name the market had wri...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel