Go Pro

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 132.67 +2.67 (+2.06%)
As of 09/11/2026 12:15 PM Eastern

CMPI vs. POLN, NAIT, UEM, PAC, and JPGI

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's main competitors and comparable companies include Pollen Street Group (POLN), North American Income Trust (NAIT), Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), Pacific Assets (PAC), and Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (JPGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Pollen Street Group?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Pollen Street Group (LON:POLN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, Pollen Street Group had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Pollen Street Group and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Pollen Street Group's average media sentiment score of 0.20 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Pollen Street Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Pollen Street Group Neutral

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.3% of Pollen Street Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.4% of Pollen Street Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pollen Street Group has a consensus price target of GBX 1,088.67, indicating a potential upside of 31.16%. Given Pollen Street Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pollen Street Group is more favorable than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Pollen Street Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Pollen Street Group. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pollen Street Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.39£101.85M£24.935.32
Pollen Street Group£118.52M4.14£44.86M£93.708.86

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Pollen Street Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 54.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pollen Street Group pays out 57.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pollen Street Group has a beta of 0.016, suggesting that its share price is 98% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Pollen Street Group's net margin of 53.91%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat Pollen Street Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
Pollen Street Group 53.91%9.58%5.32%

Summary

Pollen Street Group beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to North American Income Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and North American Income Trust (LON:NAIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, North American Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
North American Income Trust Positive

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. North American Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Income Trust pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Income Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.39£101.85M£24.935.32
North American Income Trust£37.87M13.08£49.67M£29.3414.72

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to North American Income Trust's net margin of 90.75%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat North American Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
North American Income Trust 90.75%7.76%-0.86%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Income Trust has a beta of 0.867, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of North American Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of North American Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

North American Income Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust?

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (LON:UEM) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends and earnings.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust£121.37M4.01£20.98M£63.984.41
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.39£101.85M£24.935.32

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust has a beta of 0.388, indicating that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's net margin of 90.43%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's return on equity of 21.74% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust90.43% 21.74% 7.22%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 97.09%20.29%N/A

23.2% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Pacific Assets?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 97.09%20.29%N/A

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-107.73£42.65M-£3.70N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.39£101.85M£24.935.32

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Pacific Assets on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JPGI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.39£101.85M£24.935.32
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income£93.27M0.00N/A£67.80N/A

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income N/A N/A N/A

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£190.76M£5.52B£13.80B£2.51B
Dividend Yield6.15%7.48%5.94%6.25%
P/E Ratio5.3230.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales3.391,182.27500.4189,753.13
Price / CashN/A47.9240.4527.89
Price / Book0.763.532.756.33
Net Income£101.85M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance0.91%-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance2.27%-1.78%-0.23%0.00%
1 Year Performance11.96%2.79%8.39%19.96%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 132.67
+2.1%
N/A+12.0%£190.76M£37.29M5.32N/A
POLN
Pollen Street Group
3.4982 of 5 stars
GBX 845
+1.7%
GBX 1,088.67
+28.8%
-7.0%£500.67M£118.52M9.0284
NAIT
North American Income Trust
N/AGBX 436
-0.9%
N/A+24.0%£500.02M£37.87M14.86N/A
UEM
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust
N/AGBX 280
+0.7%
N/A+13.3%£484.05M£121.37M4.38N/A
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 422.65
+0.2%
N/A+17.4%£482.94M-£4.44MN/A1,740

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners