Free Trial
→ Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised (From Stansberry Research) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPI Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 131.10 +0.60 (+0.46%)
As of 10/2/2026 11:53 AM Eastern
Compare

CMPI vs. NAIT, UEM, FSG, PCGH, and JPGI

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's main competitors and comparable companies include North American Income Trust (NAIT), Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), Foresight Group (FSG), Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (PCGH), and Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (JPGI). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to North American Income Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and North American Income Trust (LON:NAIT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of North American Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of North American Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to North American Income Trust's net margin of 94.06%. North American Income Trust's return on equity of 21.05% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
North American Income Trust 94.06%21.05%-0.86%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. North American Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Income Trust pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Income Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.35£101.85M£24.935.26
North American Income Trust£37.87M12.94£49.67M£29.3414.56

In the previous week, North American Income Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North American Income Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. North American Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that North American Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
North American Income Trust Positive

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Income Trust has a beta of 0.867, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Income Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust?

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (LON:UEM) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Utilico Emerging Markets Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

23.2% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust£121.37M4.03£20.98M£63.984.42
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.35£101.85M£24.935.26

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust has a beta of 0.388, suggesting that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's net margin of 90.43%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's return on equity of 21.74% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust90.43% 21.74% 7.22%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 97.09%20.29%N/A

Summary

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Foresight Group?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Foresight Group (LON:FSG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Group has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Foresight Group's net margin of 25.91%. Foresight Group's return on equity of 46.72% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
Foresight Group 25.91%46.72%15.09%

In the previous week, Foresight Group had 4 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Foresight Group and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Foresight Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Foresight Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Foresight Group Neutral

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.8% of Foresight Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 33.5% of Foresight Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Foresight Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 24.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Foresight Group pays out 65.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Foresight Group has a consensus price target of GBX 554, suggesting a potential upside of 21.49%. Given Foresight Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Foresight Group is more favorable than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Foresight Group
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Foresight Group. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Foresight Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.35£101.85M£24.935.26
Foresight Group£164.92M3.06£25.54M£37.8012.06

Summary

Foresight Group beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare?

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare (LON:PCGH) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's net margin of 87.94%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare87.94% 11.29% N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 97.09%20.29%N/A

5.8% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Polar Capital Glb Healthcare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Polar Capital Glb Healthcare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare has a beta of 0.605, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.732, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Polar Capital Glb Healthcare pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Polar Capital Glb Healthcare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare£48.41M9.50£77.59M£41.7610.21
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.35£101.85M£24.935.26

Summary

Polar Capital Glb Healthcare beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JPGI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 97.09% compared to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 20.29% beat Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income97.09% 20.29% N/A
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income N/A N/A N/A

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£37.29M3.35£101.85M£24.935.26
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income£93.27M0.00N/A£67.80N/A

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£190.50M£5.16B£13.12B£2.46B
Dividend Yield6.13%7.57%6.04%6.25%
P/E Ratio5.2629.4524.42366.74
Price / Sales3.351,200.87500.0889,426.67
Price / CashN/A47.6745.5127.89
Price / Book0.763.482.706.83
Net Income£101.85M£416.56M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day Performance1.63%-0.74%-1.04%-0.72%
1 Month Performance-0.29%-2.71%-3.20%-1.01%
1 Year Performance11.14%9.00%10.47%22.82%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 131.10
+0.5%		N/A+11.1%£190.50M£37.29M5.26N/A
NAIT
North American Income Trust
N/AGBX 428.17
+0.7%		N/A+20.5%£491.04M£37.87M14.59N/A
UEM
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust
N/AGBX 283
+0.7%		N/A+11.4%£488.96M£121.37M4.42N/A
FSG
Foresight Group
4.0984 of 5 stars		GBX 430.50
+1.1%		GBX 554
+28.7%		-7.1%£475.82M£164.92M11.39314
PCGH
Polar Capital Glb Healthcare
N/AGBX 438.50
-0.2%		N/A+14.3%£472.92M£48.41M10.50N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Elon Warns "America Will Go Bankrupt". Trump's Plan Inside.
National debt just crossed 40 trillion dollars, and Elon Musk says America is 1,000% going to go bankrupt with...
American Hartford Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
WATCH THIS BEFORE DECEMBER 8th!!
James Altucher says a quiet government filing could reveal Elon Musk's biggest move yet, and almost nobody has...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book is inside
The "Sucker's Bet" Most New Options Traders Fall For Most people who try options lose money the same way. ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
I'm giving you a space stock today. Free.
On December 8th, $600 billion in frozen SpaceX stock comes loose. Dylan Jovine says one simple purchase in any...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
How Elon’s Empire Ends (and how to profit)
Marc Chaikin, the 60 year Wall Street veteran whose Chaikin Money Flow indicator sits on every Bloomberg termi...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel