Go Pro
→ DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning (From Priority Gold) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPI Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 130.04 -0.96 (-0.74%)
As of 10:49 AM Eastern
Compare

CMPI vs. UEM, NAIT, PAC, JPGI, and AAIF

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Income include Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), North American Income Trust (NAIT), Pacific Assets (PAC), Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (JPGI), and abrdn Asian Income Fund (AAIF). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust?

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (LON:UEM) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.7493717, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Utilico Emerging Markets Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.13 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust£121.37M4.13£20.98M£63.984.53
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.88£101.85M£17.157.58

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays out 14.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

23.2% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's net margin of 90.43%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's return on equity of 21.74% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust90.43% 21.74% 7.22%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

Summary

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to North American Income Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and North American Income Trust (LON:NAIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than North American Income Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North American Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.88£101.85M£17.157.58
North American Income Trust£37.87M12.87£49.67M£29.3414.49

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.9% of North American Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of North American Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. North American Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 12.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. North American Income Trust pays out 42.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to North American Income Trust's net margin of 90.75%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat North American Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
North American Income Trust 90.75%7.76%-0.86%

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled North American Income Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
North American Income Trust Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.7493717, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, North American Income Trust has a beta of 0.413, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

North American Income Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Pacific Assets?

Pacific Assets (LON:PAC) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

11.3% of Pacific Assets shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Pacific Assets shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pacific Assets' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Pacific Assets Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Pacific Assets has a beta of 0.349, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.7493717, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Pacific Assets' net margin of -29.27%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Pacific Assets' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pacific Assets-29.27% -0.93% 0.07%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

Pacific Assets pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Pacific Assets pays out -132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher revenue and earnings than Pacific Assets. Pacific Assets is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pacific Assets-£4.44M-106.70£42.65M-£3.70N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.88£101.85M£17.157.58

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Pacific Assets on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income?

Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income (LON:JPGI) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jpmorgan Global Growth & IncomeN/A N/A N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income£93.27M0.00N/A£67.80N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.88£101.85M£17.157.58

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.13 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to abrdn Asian Income Fund?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and abrdn Asian Income Fund (LON:AAIF) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.7493717, suggesting that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn Asian Income Fund has a beta of 0.699, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to abrdn Asian Income Fund's net margin of 89.27%. abrdn Asian Income Fund's return on equity of 19.40% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
abrdn Asian Income Fund 89.27%19.40%7.35%

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of abrdn Asian Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. abrdn Asian Income Fund pays out 36.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than abrdn Asian Income Fund. abrdn Asian Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.88£101.85M£17.157.58
abrdn Asian Income Fund£76.34M6.07£42.37M£50.956.38

In the previous week, abrdn Asian Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn Asian Income Fund and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled abrdn Asian Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
abrdn Asian Income Fund Neutral

Summary

abrdn Asian Income Fund beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£123.68M£2.50B£6.20B£2.79B
Dividend Yield6.56%6.00%5.23%6.12%
P/E Ratio7.5861.8729.75368.14
Price / Sales5.881,857.871,187.0684,536.19
Price / CashN/A60.3388.6427.87
Price / Book0.751.406.477.64
Net Income£101.85M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-2.07%0.09%0.13%-0.33%
1 Month Performance-0.97%0.39%0.55%-1.07%
1 Year Performance11.14%7.85%15.38%61.72%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 130.04
-0.7%		N/A+13.5%£123.68M£21.03M7.58N/A
UEM
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust
N/AGBX 286
+0.4%		N/A+18.1%£496.83M£121.37M10.58N/A
NAIT
North American Income Trust
N/AGBX 430
-0.5%		N/A+26.7%£493.26M£37.87M14.66N/A
PAC
Pacific Assets
N/AGBX 415
+0.2%		N/A+18.8%£474.19M-£4.44MN/A1,740
JPGI
Jpmorgan Global Growth & Income
N/AN/AN/AN/A£472.52M£93.27M5.01N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $5 company SpaceX can’t survive without
The investors who got rich on AI didn't all buy Nvidia. Some bought ASML, the company that makes the machines ...
Traders Agency | Sponsoredtc pixel
BNZI Lands a Zacks Upgrade!
Banzai International (NASDAQ: BNZI) just received a Zacks Rank 2 (Buy) upgrade, driven by improving earnings e...
Huge Alerts | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Set to Unleash 219-Year-Old “Super Weapon” on U.S. Soil
Four-time U.S. Presidential advisor Jim Rickards is warning of a political move he calls 'The Trump Supremacy'...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
60 years. Zero competitors.
One company has spent 60 years developing an energy source the International Energy Agency estimates at 140 ti...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
It’s one of Trump’s biggest holdings. Do you own it?
President Trump holds up to $5 million in shares of an AI company that just landed a nearly $10 billion Pentag...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Forget SpaceX, this is Elon’s Next Breakthrough
Jeff Brown and Marc Chaikin - two investors who called Nvidia a decade ago - say Elon Musk's newly filed AI pa...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel