Free Trial

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 134 +5.00 (+3.88%)
As of 12:53 PM Eastern

CMPI vs. SLS, TRG, RTW, BRSC, and BGFD

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Income include Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust (SLS), The European Smaller Companies Trust (TRG), RTW Biotech Opportunities (RTW), BlackRock Smaller Companies (BRSC), and The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (BGFD). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust?

Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust (LON:SLS) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.08 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Standard Life UK Smaller Companies TrustN/A N/A N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

In the previous week, Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust. Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust£222.48M0.00N/A£217.40N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.04£101.85M£17.157.81

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to The European Smaller Companies Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and The European Smaller Companies Trust (LON:TRG) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. The European Smaller Companies Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.03 per share. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The European Smaller Companies Trust pays out 0.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled The European Smaller Companies Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to The European Smaller Companies Trust's net margin of 0.00%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat The European Smaller Companies Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
The European Smaller Companies Trust N/A N/A N/A

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The European Smaller Companies Trust. The European Smaller Companies Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.04£101.85M£17.157.81
The European Smaller Companies Trust£340.08M0.00N/A£82.00N/A

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats The European Smaller Companies Trust on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to RTW Biotech Opportunities?

RTW Biotech Opportunities (LON:RTW) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

11.3% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of RTW Biotech Opportunities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to RTW Biotech Opportunities' net margin of 95.03%. RTW Biotech Opportunities' return on equity of 34.38% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RTW Biotech Opportunities95.03% 34.38% -0.47%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

RTW Biotech Opportunities has a beta of 1.1536776, indicating that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.76458204, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

RTW Biotech Opportunities has higher revenue and earnings than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. RTW Biotech Opportunities is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RTW Biotech Opportunities£250.89M0.03£14.09B£63.000.03
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.04£101.85M£17.157.81

In the previous week, RTW Biotech Opportunities' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
RTW Biotech Opportunities Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

Summary

RTW Biotech Opportunities beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to BlackRock Smaller Companies?

BlackRock Smaller Companies (LON:BRSC) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to BlackRock Smaller Companies' net margin of 89.65%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat BlackRock Smaller Companies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Smaller Companies89.65% 10.11% -2.39%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

BlackRock Smaller Companies has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. BlackRock Smaller Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Smaller Companies-£89.64M-7.52£120.17M-£189.42N/A
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.04£101.85M£17.157.81

BlackRock Smaller Companies pays an annual dividend of GBX 44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. BlackRock Smaller Companies pays out -23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, BlackRock Smaller Companies had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for BlackRock Smaller Companies and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. BlackRock Smaller Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock Smaller Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Smaller Companies Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

BlackRock Smaller Companies has a beta of 1.3535705, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.76458204, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

45.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of BlackRock Smaller Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income beats BlackRock Smaller Companies on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust?

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust (LON:BGFD) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership and valuation.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a net margin of 158.45% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's net margin of 104.12%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's return on equity of 19.34% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust158.45% 19.34% 0.31%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust has a beta of 0.9864226, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.76458204, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust pays out 5.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

8.8% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CT Global Managed Portfolio Income'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust Neutral
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust. The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust£154.29M4.38£65.49M£188.955.19
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M6.04£101.85M£17.157.81

Summary

The Baillie Gifford Japan Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£126.98M£2.40B£5.85B£2.82B
Dividend Yield5.89%5.94%5.22%6.08%
P/E Ratio7.8125.3215.88365.87
Price / Sales6.042,031.991,565.8688,165.72
Price / CashN/A60.1792.8127.89
Price / Book0.771.386.597.71
Net Income£101.85M£265.53M£1.14B£5.89B
7 Day Performance3.28%1.20%0.85%1.77%
1 Month Performance4.43%2.48%2.32%3.79%
1 Year Performance15.82%13.17%19.76%70.48%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 134
+3.9%
N/A+11.1%£126.98M£21.03M7.81N/A
SLS
Standard Life UK Smaller Companies Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£715.41M£222.48M3.3710
TRG
The European Smaller Companies Trust
N/AN/AN/AN/A£701.52M£340.08M2.13N/A
RTW
RTW Biotech Opportunities
N/AGBX 2.18
+0.9%
N/A+80.7%£698.86M£250.89M0.034,971
BRSC
BlackRock Smaller Companies
N/AGBX 1,320
+1.7%
N/A+3.9%£666.93M-£89.64MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 5/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners