Free Trial
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free CMPI Stock Alerts

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (CMPI) Competitors

GBX 131.52 +1.02 (+0.78%)
As of 12:04 PM Eastern
Compare

CMPI vs. SEIT, NAS, UEM, JCH, and SSIT

Should you buy CT Global Managed Portfolio Income stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares CT Global Managed Portfolio Income with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with CT Global Managed Portfolio Income include SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust (SEIT), North Atlantic Smaller Cos (NAS), Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (UEM), JPMorgan Claverhouse (JCH), and Seraphim Space Investment Trust (SSIT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust?

SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust (LON:SEIT) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, earnings and dividends.

SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust has a beta of 0.8112407, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.74921805, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

28.6% of SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust's net margin of 51.91%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust51.91% 3.79% -6.21%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust£39.60M8.77-£56.77M£3.409.41
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.93£101.85M£17.157.67

In the previous week, SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.33 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.8%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust pays out 186.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to North Atlantic Smaller Cos?

North Atlantic Smaller Cos (LON:NAS) and CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

11.6% of North Atlantic Smaller Cos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. 34.0% of North Atlantic Smaller Cos shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

North Atlantic Smaller Cos has a beta of 0.9501607, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.74921805, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to North Atlantic Smaller Cos' net margin of 73.06%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat North Atlantic Smaller Cos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
North Atlantic Smaller Cos73.06% 3.99% 0.24%
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income 104.12%12.68%N/A

North Atlantic Smaller Cos pays an annual dividend of GBX 8.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. North Atlantic Smaller Cos pays out 39.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, North Atlantic Smaller Cos had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for North Atlantic Smaller Cos and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. North Atlantic Smaller Cos' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that North Atlantic Smaller Cos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
North Atlantic Smaller Cos Positive
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has lower revenue, but higher earnings than North Atlantic Smaller Cos. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than North Atlantic Smaller Cos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
North Atlantic Smaller Cos£31.67M16.05£87.97M£22.2817.86
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.93£101.85M£17.157.67

Summary

North Atlantic Smaller Cos beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (LON:UEM) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and analyst recommendations.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays an annual dividend of GBX 9.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Utilico Emerging Markets Trust pays out 34.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's net margin of 80.51%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity of 12.68% beat Utilico Emerging Markets Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust 80.51%9.96%7.22%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.74921805, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Utilico Emerging Markets Trust has a beta of 0.381, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Utilico Emerging Markets Trust'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Utilico Emerging Markets Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.93£101.85M£17.157.67
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust£54.70M9.18£20.98M£27.0210.70

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.2% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Utilico Emerging Markets Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Utilico Emerging Markets Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to JPMorgan Claverhouse?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and JPMorgan Claverhouse (LON:JCH) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a net margin of 104.12% compared to JPMorgan Claverhouse's net margin of 96.27%. JPMorgan Claverhouse's return on equity of 23.65% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
JPMorgan Claverhouse 96.27%23.65%8.21%

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.5% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of JPMorgan Claverhouse shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JPMorgan Claverhouse. JPMorgan Claverhouse is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.93£101.85M£17.157.67
JPMorgan Claverhouse£111.53M4.49£57.79M£200.584.59

In the previous week, JPMorgan Claverhouse had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for JPMorgan Claverhouse and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. JPMorgan Claverhouse's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that JPMorgan Claverhouse is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
JPMorgan Claverhouse Neutral

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.65 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. JPMorgan Claverhouse pays an annual dividend of GBX 35.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. CT Global Managed Portfolio Income pays out 44.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JPMorgan Claverhouse pays out 17.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.74921805, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JPMorgan Claverhouse has a beta of 1.0011687, indicating that its stock price is 0% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

JPMorgan Claverhouse beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does CT Global Managed Portfolio Income compare to Seraphim Space Investment Trust?

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income (LON:CMPI) and Seraphim Space Investment Trust (LON:SSIT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has a beta of 0.74921805, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a beta of 2.2807581, indicating that its stock price is 128% more volatile than the broader market.

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Seraphim Space Investment Trust. Seraphim Space Investment Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income£21.03M5.93£101.85M£17.157.67
Seraphim Space Investment Trust£99.56M4.85£6.88M£41.264.93

Seraphim Space Investment Trust has a net margin of 1,940.84% compared to CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's net margin of 104.12%. Seraphim Space Investment Trust's return on equity of 20.81% beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income104.12% 12.68% N/A
Seraphim Space Investment Trust 1,940.84%20.81%N/A

In the previous week, Seraphim Space Investment Trust had 1 more articles in the media than CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Seraphim Space Investment Trust and 0 mentions for CT Global Managed Portfolio Income. Seraphim Space Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat CT Global Managed Portfolio Income's score of 0.00 indicating that Seraphim Space Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Neutral
Seraphim Space Investment Trust Positive

0.4% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.7% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of CT Global Managed Portfolio Income shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Seraphim Space Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Seraphim Space Investment Trust beats CT Global Managed Portfolio Income on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get CT Global Managed Portfolio Income News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CMPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CMPI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CMPI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricCT Global Managed Portfolio IncomeAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£124.76M£2.48B£5.99B£2.82B
Dividend Yield6.59%6.03%5.28%6.16%
P/E Ratio7.6725.9015.77367.05
Price / Sales5.932,101.161,099.7186,357.73
Price / CashN/A60.1689.7427.85
Price / Book0.761.396.627.90
Net Income£101.85M£264.62M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day Performance-0.12%1.00%1.32%1.32%
1 Month Performance1.06%0.89%1.79%1.70%
1 Year Performance17.11%11.14%20.87%71.98%

CT Global Managed Portfolio Income Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CMPI
CT Global Managed Portfolio Income
N/AGBX 131.52
+0.8%		N/A+13.2%£124.76M£21.03M7.67N/A
SEIT
SDCL Energy Efficiency Income Trust
N/AGBX 45.80
+0.1%		N/A-32.0%£497.12M£39.60M13.47N/A
NAS
North Atlantic Smaller Cos
N/AGBX 389
-0.3%		N/A+2.3%£496.91M£31.67M17.46N/A
UEM
Utilico Emerging Markets Trust
N/AGBX 285
+1.4%		N/A+20.7%£495.09M£54.70M10.55N/A
JCH
JPMorgan Claverhouse
N/AGBX 890.82
-1.5%		N/A+16.3%£484.71M£111.53M4.44N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:CMPI) was last updated on 6/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Is SpaceX really worth 1.78 Trillion?
With SpaceX approaching a near-$2 trillion valuation, most investors are focused on the IPO itself - but analy...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX is chump change compared to Elon’s $20T ‘iPhone’
Early Apple investors saw peak gains as high as 7,537% after the iPhone launched. Now, multiple insider source...
StocksToTrade | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump just signed it
A recent policy development is drawing attention from income-focused investors. According to one analyst, c...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
This is the worst news for stocks in 50 years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are issuing a rare warning: what's ahead for U.S. stocks could be the worst e...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Porter flew 3,300 miles to investigate this system
Porter Stansberry flew the Porter and Co. team 3,300 miles to Dublin to investigate a 17-year investing experi...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel