Go Pro

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 15.95 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 07/10/2026

LMS vs. CBA, VLE, JGC, TENT, and FWT

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares LMS Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with LMS Capital include Ceiba Investments (CBA), Volvere (VLE), Jupiter Green (JGC), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), and Foresight Technology VCT (FWT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does LMS Capital compare to Ceiba Investments?

Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 19.5% of Ceiba Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its stock price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has a net margin of -148.07% compared to Ceiba Investments' net margin of -602.11%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -10.48% beat Ceiba Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ceiba Investments-602.11% -14.58% 2.31%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

In the previous week, Ceiba Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ceiba Investments Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Ceiba Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LMS Capital. Ceiba Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ceiba Investments-£10.05M-4.77£8.64M-£10.00N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

Summary

LMS Capital beats Ceiba Investments on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Volvere?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Volvere (LON:VLE) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Volvere 7.90%9.96%6.16%

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.618, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Volvere£52.70M0.90£2.94M£188.8911.51

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Volvere shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volvere'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Volvere Neutral

Summary

Volvere beats LMS Capital on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Jupiter Green?

Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Jupiter Green Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Jupiter Green-26.72% -0.45% 0.15%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats LMS Capital on 10 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Triple Point Energy Transition 152.90%-7.81%-4.86%

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Technology VCT-£2.30M-19.29£23.15M-£7.45N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.27-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 132.48% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -3.27% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Technology VCT132.48% -3.27% 3.17%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

In the previous week, Foresight Technology VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

LMS Capital beats Foresight Technology VCT on 6 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

MetricLMS CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.88M£2.45B£6.20B£3.00B
Dividend Yield5.20%6.01%5.23%6.17%
P/E Ratio-2.2862.0129.84368.17
Price / Sales-3.271,851.931,182.6684,565.95
Price / Cash1.5660.3388.8327.87
Price / Book0.351.406.597.69
Net Income-£4.84M£265.27M£1.13B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.02%-0.05%-0.65%
1 Month Performance-5.62%1.14%1.02%-0.08%
1 Year Performance-27.50%8.00%15.68%61.70%

LMS Capital Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 15.95
flat
N/A-31.2%£12.88M-£3.94MN/A9
CBA
Ceiba Investments
N/AGBX 29
flat
N/AN/A£47.91M-£10.05MN/AN/A
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,183
-0.3%
N/A-7.7%£47.81M£52.70M11.56226
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 7/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners