Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 16.59 +0.14 (+0.87%)
As of 05/19/2026 12:22 PM Eastern
Compare

LMS vs. SWEF, OFG, JGC, TENT, and FWT

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares LMS Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with LMS Capital include Starwood European Real Estate Finance (SWEF), Octopus Future Generations VCT (OFG), Jupiter Green (JGC), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), and Foresight Technology VCT (FWT). These companies are all part of the "asset management" industry.

How does LMS Capital compare to Starwood European Real Estate Finance?

Starwood European Real Estate Finance (LON:SWEF) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap asset management industry companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends and media sentiment.

Starwood European Real Estate Finance has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Starwood European Real Estate Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Starwood European Real Estate Finance£15.24M3.26£18.07M-£0.64N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.40-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

43.9% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Starwood European Real Estate Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Starwood European Real Estate Finance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Starwood European Real Estate Finance. Starwood European Real Estate Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Starwood European Real Estate Finance Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Starwood European Real Estate Finance has a net margin of 38.35% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Starwood European Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 2.92% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Starwood European Real Estate Finance38.35% 2.92% N/A
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

Summary

Starwood European Real Estate Finance beats LMS Capital on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Octopus Future Generations VCT?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Octopus Future Generations VCT (LON:OFG) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Octopus Future Generations VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Octopus Future Generations VCT. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Octopus Future Generations VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Octopus Future Generations VCT Neutral

Octopus Future Generations VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Octopus Future Generations VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.40-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Octopus Future Generations VCT-£767K-63.38N/A-£2.30N/A

Octopus Future Generations VCT has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Octopus Future Generations VCT's return on equity of 0.00% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Octopus Future Generations VCT N/A N/A N/A

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Octopus Future Generations VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

LMS Capital and Octopus Future Generations VCT tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Jupiter Green?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.40-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Green. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Jupiter Green. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jupiter Green'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Jupiter Green Neutral

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Jupiter Green -26.72%-0.45%0.15%

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.4% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats LMS Capital on 10 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and valuation.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.40-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Triple Point Energy Transition 152.90%-7.81%-4.86%

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and media sentiment.

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 127.75% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -7.25% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Technology VCT127.75% -7.25% 3.17%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Technology VCT-£2.30M-18.73£23.15M-£7.45N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-3.40-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Foresight Technology VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Foresight Technology VCT. Foresight Technology VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Summary

LMS Capital beats Foresight Technology VCT on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLMS CapitalAsset Management IndustryFinancial SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£13.40M£2.31B£5.79B£2.90B
Dividend Yield5.20%5.97%5.25%6.17%
P/E Ratio-2.3725.1415.92365.16
Price / Sales-3.402,010.89989.7187,648.92
Price / Cash1.5660.1789.1827.89
Price / Book0.371.356.547.62
Net Income-£4.84M£265.53M£1.15B£5.89B
7 Day Performance6.37%-0.65%-0.23%-0.30%
1 Month Performance-4.09%0.60%0.36%0.42%
1 Year Performance-18.86%11.63%18.29%82.43%

LMS Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 16.59
+0.9%		N/A-20.2%£13.40M-£3.94MN/A9
SWEF
Starwood European Real Estate Finance
N/AGBX 91.50
flat		N/AN/A£49.61M£15.24MN/AN/A
OFG
Octopus Future Generations VCT
N/AGBX 77
flat		N/AN/A£48.62M-£767KN/A2,250
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
Hey, it's Jon Najarian. The SpaceX IPO is right around the corner. But I discovered Elon may have something BIGGER planned. Check this out before June 9th...
After being invited to the SpaceX launch headquarters in Cape Canaveral from one of Elon's top lobbyists… Hall...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Veteran trader Bill Poulos is giving away his 'Simple Options Trading For Beginners' book - normally $29.97 - ...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
The one number Musk can't hide in the S-1
When SpaceX files its S-1 in June, one number will stand out - power consumption. Running 1 million GPUs requi...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
He doesn't buy gold. He just profits from it.
Former hedge fund manager Larry Benedict generated $274 million in profits - and Barron's ranked his fund in t...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel