Free Trial
→ Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE (From Base Camp Trading) (Ad)tc pixel Free LMS Stock Alerts

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 14.20 -0.05 (-0.35%)
As of 05:54 AM Eastern
Compare

LMS vs. KR1, TENT, ASLI, BRIG, and LGT

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? LMS Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include KR1 (KR1), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), abrdn European Logistics Income (ASLI), BlackRock Income and Growth (BRIG), and Lighthouse Group (LGT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does LMS Capital compare to KR1?

KR1 (LON:KR1) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, KR1 had 1 more articles in the media than LMS Capital. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for KR1 and 1 mentions for LMS Capital. KR1's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat LMS Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that KR1 is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
KR1
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
LMS Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

0.3% of KR1 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

KR1 has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than KR1, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KR1£4.87M9.66N/A-£20.23N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-18.67-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

KR1 has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. KR1's return on equity of 0.00% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
KR1N/A N/A N/A
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

Summary

KR1 beats LMS Capital on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-18.67-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -5.48% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to abrdn European Logistics Income?

abrdn European Logistics Income (LON:ASLI) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment and valuation.

LMS Capital has a net margin of -38.69% compared to abrdn European Logistics Income's net margin of -214.42%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -5.48% beat abrdn European Logistics Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
abrdn European Logistics Income-214.42% -19.46% 1.88%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

In the previous week, abrdn European Logistics Income had 2 more articles in the media than LMS Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for abrdn European Logistics Income and 1 mentions for LMS Capital. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat abrdn European Logistics Income's score of -0.53 indicating that LMS Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
abrdn European Logistics Income
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
LMS Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn European Logistics Income. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn European Logistics Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
abrdn European Logistics Income-£19.34M-2.27-£79.93M-£8.10N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-18.67-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

abrdn European Logistics Income has a beta of 0.854, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

7.2% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

LMS Capital beats abrdn European Logistics Income on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to BlackRock Income and Growth?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and BlackRock Income and Growth (LON:BRIG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock Income and Growth has a beta of 0.628, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Income and Growth has a net margin of 88.25% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. BlackRock Income and Growth's return on equity of 14.31% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
BlackRock Income and Growth 88.25%14.31%2.59%

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock Income and Growth. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for BlackRock Income and Growth. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BlackRock Income and Growth'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
BlackRock Income and Growth Neutral

BlackRock Income and Growth has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Income and Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-18.67-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
BlackRock Income and Growth£7.07M6.04£6.90M£34.866.61

Summary

BlackRock Income and Growth beats LMS Capital on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Lighthouse Group?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Lighthouse Group (LON:LGT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lighthouse Group has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lighthouse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-18.67-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
Lighthouse Group£53.42M0.00N/A£1.80N/A

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Lighthouse Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Lighthouse Group. LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Lighthouse Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Lighthouse Group Neutral

Lighthouse Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Lighthouse Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
Lighthouse Group N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Lighthouse Group beats LMS Capital on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLMS CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.46M£5.13B£13.31B£2.82B
Dividend Yield5.20%7.57%6.04%6.26%
P/E Ratio-7.4729.4224.39366.26
Price / Sales-18.611,259.19508.6789,110.96
Price / Cash1.5647.6729.4627.89
Price / Book0.313.482.706.93
Net Income-£4.84M£415.67M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-0.11%-0.46%-0.72%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-2.72%-3.22%-1.09%
1 Year Performance-12.35%9.03%10.49%22.87%

LMS Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 14.20
-0.4%		N/A-12.0%£11.46M-£616KN/A7
KR1
KR1
N/AGBX 25.50
-1.9%		N/AN/A£45.29M£4.87MN/AN/A
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
ASLI
abrdn European Logistics Income
N/AGBX 10.52
-4.4%		N/A-68.2%£43.36M-£19.34MN/AN/A
BRIG
BlackRock Income and Growth
N/AGBX 230.60
-1.0%		N/A+12.5%£42.70M£7.07M6.62N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's New Dollar
Porter Stansberry says President Trump has signed an executive order initiating what he calls a full U.S. doll...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel