LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volvere'saverage media sentiment score.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Volvere shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Jupiter Green'saverage media sentiment score.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foresight Technology VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 132.48% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -3.27% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.