Go Pro
→ The dollar reset no one told you about (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free LMS Stock Alerts

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 14.10 -1.45 (-9.32%)
As of 07/30/2026 10:00 AM Eastern
Compare

LMS vs. CBA, JGC, VLE, TENT, and FWT

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares LMS Capital with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with LMS Capital include Ceiba Investments (CBA), Jupiter Green (JGC), Volvere (VLE), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), and Foresight Technology VCT (FWT).

How does LMS Capital compare to Ceiba Investments?

Ceiba Investments (LON:CBA) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and media sentiment.

Ceiba Investments has a beta of 0.2, indicating that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Ceiba Investments has higher earnings, but lower revenue than LMS Capital. Ceiba Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ceiba Investments-£10.05M-4.77£8.64M-£10.00N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-2.89-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Ceiba Investments. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Ceiba Investments. Ceiba Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat LMS Capital's score of -1.29 indicating that Ceiba Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ceiba Investments Neutral
LMS Capital Negative

LMS Capital has a net margin of -148.07% compared to Ceiba Investments' net margin of -602.11%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -10.48% beat Ceiba Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ceiba Investments-602.11% -14.58% 2.31%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

1.4% of Ceiba Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 19.5% of Ceiba Investments shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

LMS Capital beats Ceiba Investments on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Jupiter Green?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Jupiter Green (LON:JGC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Jupiter Green has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Jupiter Green. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Jupiter Green. Jupiter Green's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat LMS Capital's score of -1.29 indicating that Jupiter Green is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Negative
Jupiter Green Neutral

Jupiter Green has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Jupiter Green, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-2.89-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Jupiter Green£7.93M0.00£6.55M£34.51N/A

Jupiter Green has a net margin of -26.72% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Jupiter Green's return on equity of -0.45% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Jupiter Green -26.72%-0.45%0.15%

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 37.4% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.6% of Jupiter Green shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Jupiter Green beats LMS Capital on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Volvere?

Volvere (LON:VLE) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Volvere7.90% 9.96% 6.16%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 35.2% of Volvere shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volvere has a beta of 0.618, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Volvere£52.70M0.85£2.94M£188.8910.87
LMS Capital-£3.94M-2.89-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Volvere. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Volvere. Volvere's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat LMS Capital's score of -1.29 indicating that Volvere is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Volvere Neutral
LMS Capital Negative

Summary

Volvere beats LMS Capital on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation and earnings.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -148.07%. Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity of -7.81% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
LMS Capital -148.07%-10.48%-7.08%

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
LMS Capital-£3.94M-2.89-£4.84M-£7.00N/A

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Triple Point Energy Transition. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Triple Point Energy Transition. Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat LMS Capital's score of -1.29 indicating that Triple Point Energy Transition is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
LMS Capital Negative

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, LMS Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Foresight Technology VCT. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for LMS Capital and 0 mentions for Foresight Technology VCT. Foresight Technology VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat LMS Capital's score of -1.29 indicating that Foresight Technology VCT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Negative
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, meaning that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has a net margin of -148.07% compared to Foresight Technology VCT's net margin of -150.21%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -0.83% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-148.07% -10.48% -7.08%
Foresight Technology VCT -150.21%-0.83%3.17%

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£3.94M-2.89-£4.84M-£7.00N/A
Foresight Technology VCT-£2.30M-19.29£23.15M-£7.45N/A

Summary

LMS Capital beats Foresight Technology VCT on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLMS CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£11.38M£5.47B£13.63B£2.78B
Dividend Yield5.20%7.51%5.96%6.15%
P/E Ratio-2.0136.7728.67368.29
Price / Sales-2.891,148.43469.7383,501.30
Price / Cash1.5684.8852.5827.89
Price / Book0.313.663.687.04
Net Income-£4.84M£417.17M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A7.99%4.00%6.43%
1 Month Performance-6.00%-1.07%-0.17%0.02%
1 Year Performance-17.06%5.61%12.94%63.72%

LMS Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 14.10
-9.3%		N/A-17.1%£11.38M-£3.94MN/A9
CBA
Ceiba Investments
N/AGBX 29
flat		N/AN/A£47.91M-£10.05MN/AN/A
JGC
Jupiter Green
N/AN/AN/AN/A£46.49M£7.93M7.10N/A
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,057
+0.3%		N/A-0.8%£45.05M£52.70M10.89226
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 8/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
One signature away. Expected within months.
On May 21, 2026, a federal bank board unanimously approved a nearly $3 billion loan to build a gold mine on Am...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your withdrawal order could cost you in taxes
If you have $2M or more saved, the 4% rule points to roughly $92,000 a year - but it's a single-variable answe...
SmartAsset | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
This AI fund posted a 34 percent annualized payout last month
One small fund tied to artificial intelligence stocks delivered $1,051 in a single month, not through selling ...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump’s $250 Bill – See Immediately
Former Goldman Sachs VP Dr. David Eifrig is warning that July 28 could trigger the biggest wealth reset in mod...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
The cat is out the bag
Almost 80,000 tech jobs vanished in the first three months of 2026. Meta cut 14,000 roles, Microsoft offered s...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m betting on Peter Thiel’s next winner. Here’s why.
SpaceX's $1.75 trillion IPO turned more than 4400 employees into millionaires, according to The New York Times...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel