Go Pro
→ Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid (From Altimetry) (Ad)tc pixel Free LMS Stock Alerts

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 14.34 -1.26 (-8.08%)
As of 09/11/2026 11:42 AM Eastern
Compare

LMS vs. ASLI, TENT, CLC, FWT, and BRIG

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? LMS Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include abrdn European Logistics Income (ASLI), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), Calculus VCT (CLC), Foresight Technology VCT (FWT), and BlackRock Income and Growth (BRIG). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does LMS Capital compare to abrdn European Logistics Income?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and abrdn European Logistics Income (LON:ASLI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, abrdn European Logistics Income had 1 more articles in the media than LMS Capital. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for abrdn European Logistics Income and 0 mentions for LMS Capital. abrdn European Logistics Income's average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat LMS Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that abrdn European Logistics Income is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
abrdn European Logistics Income Positive

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.2% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of abrdn European Logistics Income shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, abrdn European Logistics Income has a beta of 0.854, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than abrdn European Logistics Income. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than abrdn European Logistics Income, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-18.79-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
abrdn European Logistics Income-£19.34M-2.34-£79.93M-£8.10N/A

LMS Capital has a net margin of -38.69% compared to abrdn European Logistics Income's net margin of -127.31%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -5.48% beat abrdn European Logistics Income's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
abrdn European Logistics Income -127.31%-13.29%1.88%

Summary

abrdn European Logistics Income beats LMS Capital on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and risk.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Triple Point Energy Transition'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-18.79-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -5.48% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
Triple Point Energy Transition 152.90%-7.81%-4.86%

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Calculus VCT?

Calculus VCT (LON:CLC) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Calculus VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Calculus VCT Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Calculus VCT has a beta of 0.39, indicating that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Calculus VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Calculus VCT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Calculus VCT£974K45.54-£599.38K£0.6767.16
LMS Capital-£616K-18.79-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Calculus VCT shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Calculus VCT has a net margin of 28.23% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Calculus VCT's return on equity of 1.14% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Calculus VCT28.23% 1.14% -0.14%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

Summary

Calculus VCT beats LMS Capital on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, indicating that its stock price is 125% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Foresight Technology VCT£64K681.56£23.15M-£0.80N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-18.79-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 255.13% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -4.85% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Foresight Technology VCT255.13% -4.85% 3.17%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

In the previous week, Foresight Technology VCT's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Summary

Foresight Technology VCT beats LMS Capital on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to BlackRock Income and Growth?

BlackRock Income and Growth (LON:BRIG) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

BlackRock Income and Growth has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Income and Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Income and Growth£7.07M6.08£6.90M£34.866.66
LMS Capital-£616K-18.79-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

0.7% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BlackRock Income and Growth had 3 more articles in the media than LMS Capital. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BlackRock Income and Growth and 0 mentions for LMS Capital. BlackRock Income and Growth's average media sentiment score of 1.26 beat LMS Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock Income and Growth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Income and Growth Positive
LMS Capital Neutral

BlackRock Income and Growth has a net margin of 88.25% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. BlackRock Income and Growth's return on equity of 14.31% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Income and Growth88.25% 14.31% 2.59%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

BlackRock Income and Growth has a beta of 0.628, indicating that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

BlackRock Income and Growth beats LMS Capital on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLMS CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.59M£5.52B£13.80B£2.51B
Dividend Yield5.20%7.48%5.94%6.25%
P/E Ratio-7.5530.5425.67366.83
Price / Sales-18.791,184.19502.1089,753.13
Price / Cash1.5647.9240.4527.89
Price / Book0.323.532.756.33
Net Income-£4.84M£418.04M£1.32B£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A-1.39%-1.17%-0.69%
1 Month Performance2.43%-1.78%-0.23%0.00%
1 Year Performance-18.43%2.79%8.39%19.96%

LMS Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 14.34
-8.1%		N/A-18.4%£12.59M-£616KN/A9
ASLI
abrdn European Logistics Income
N/AGBX 11
+2.2%		N/A-76.8%£45.34M-£19.34MN/AN/A
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
CLC
Calculus VCT
N/AGBX 45
-11.8%		N/AN/A£44.36M£974K67.16N/A
FWT
Foresight Technology VCT
N/AGBX 87.50
flat		N/AN/A£43.62M£64KN/A375

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 9/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
The $15 Gold Fund That Pays Up to $1,152/Month
Gold is hitting record highs, but most investors are leaving income on the table. A $15 fund is quietly paying...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel