Go Pro
→ The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free LMS Stock Alerts

LMS Capital (LMS) Competitors

LMS Capital logo
GBX 15.60 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/20/2026
Compare

LMS vs. VLE, TENT, FWT, BRIG, and LGT

Should you buy LMS Capital stock or one of its competitors? LMS Capital's main competitors and comparable companies include Volvere (VLE), Triple Point Energy Transition (TENT), Foresight Technology VCT (FWT), BlackRock Income and Growth (BRIG), and Lighthouse Group (LGT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does LMS Capital compare to Volvere?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Volvere (LON:VLE) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Volvere has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Volvere, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-20.44-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
Volvere£52.70M0.85£2.94M£188.8910.82

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Volvere'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Volvere Neutral

Volvere has a net margin of 7.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Volvere's return on equity of 9.96% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
Volvere 7.90%9.96%6.16%

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Volvere has a beta of 0.612, meaning that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of Volvere shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.2% of Volvere shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Volvere beats LMS Capital on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Triple Point Energy Transition?

Triple Point Energy Transition (LON:TENT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

LMS Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Triple Point Energy Transition. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Triple Point Energy Transition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Triple Point Energy Transition-£9.97M0.00-£12.35M-£12.35N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-20.44-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

In the previous week, Triple Point Energy Transition's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Triple Point Energy Transition Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

62.8% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Triple Point Energy Transition shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Triple Point Energy Transition has a net margin of 152.90% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. LMS Capital's return on equity of -5.48% beat Triple Point Energy Transition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Triple Point Energy Transition152.90% -7.81% -4.86%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

Summary

LMS Capital beats Triple Point Energy Transition on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Foresight Technology VCT?

LMS Capital (LON:LMS) and Foresight Technology VCT (LON:FWT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

In the previous week, LMS Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Foresight Technology VCT'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
LMS Capital Neutral
Foresight Technology VCT Neutral

Foresight Technology VCT has a net margin of 255.13% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Foresight Technology VCT's return on equity of -4.85% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
LMS Capital-38.69% -5.48% -7.08%
Foresight Technology VCT 255.13%-4.85%3.17%

Foresight Technology VCT has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. Foresight Technology VCT is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than LMS Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
LMS Capital-£616K-20.44-£4.84M-£1.90N/A
Foresight Technology VCT£64K689.86£23.15M-£0.80N/A

LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Foresight Technology VCT has a beta of -0.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% less volatile than the broader market.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Foresight Technology VCT shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Foresight Technology VCT beats LMS Capital on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to BlackRock Income and Growth?

BlackRock Income and Growth (LON:BRIG) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

BlackRock Income and Growth has a beta of 0.62268645, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, LMS Capital has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

BlackRock Income and Growth has a net margin of 88.25% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. BlackRock Income and Growth's return on equity of 14.31% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock Income and Growth88.25% 14.31% 2.59%
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

0.7% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of LMS Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of BlackRock Income and Growth shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock Income and Growth has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BlackRock Income and Growth, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock Income and Growth£7.07M6.09£6.90M£34.866.66
LMS Capital-£616K-20.44-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

In the previous week, BlackRock Income and Growth's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock Income and Growth Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Summary

BlackRock Income and Growth beats LMS Capital on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does LMS Capital compare to Lighthouse Group?

Lighthouse Group (LON:LGT) and LMS Capital (LON:LMS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

3.0% of LMS Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.9% of LMS Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lighthouse Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled LMS Capital'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lighthouse Group Neutral
LMS Capital Neutral

Lighthouse Group has a net margin of 0.00% compared to LMS Capital's net margin of -38.69%. Lighthouse Group's return on equity of 0.00% beat LMS Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lighthouse GroupN/A N/A N/A
LMS Capital -38.69%-5.48%-7.08%

Lighthouse Group has higher revenue and earnings than LMS Capital. LMS Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lighthouse Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lighthouse Group£53.42M0.00N/A£1.80N/A
LMS Capital-£616K-20.44-£4.84M-£1.90N/A

Summary

Lighthouse Group beats LMS Capital on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get LMS Capital News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LMS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

LMS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricLMS CapitalCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£12.59M£5.58B£13.52B£2.55B
Dividend Yield5.20%7.39%5.89%6.15%
P/E Ratio-8.2139.1029.60367.57
Price / Sales-20.441,233.04514.4183,481.81
Price / Cash1.5648.2238.3127.89
Price / Book0.342.132.187.19
Net Income-£4.84M£416.48M£1.31B£5.89B
7 Day Performance11.43%-0.25%-0.34%0.30%
1 Month Performance4.00%1.41%1.75%2.84%
1 Year PerformanceN/A7.24%10.31%22.29%

LMS Capital Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
LMS
LMS Capital
N/AGBX 15.60
flat		N/A-22.2%£12.59M-£616KN/A9
VLE
Volvere
N/AGBX 2,050
-0.5%		N/A-3.9%£44.90M£52.70M10.85226
TENT
Triple Point Energy Transition
N/AN/AN/AN/A£44.51M-£9.97MN/AN/A
FWT
Foresight Technology VCT
N/AGBX 87.50
flat		N/AN/A£44.15M£64KN/A375
BRIG
BlackRock Income and Growth
N/AGBX 236
+0.9%		N/A+11.4%£43.74M£7.07M6.77N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:LMS) was last updated on 8/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Pass by August 7… or wait until 2027?
President Trump recently hosted crypto's biggest names at the White House… Coinbase, Ripple, Robinhood, Kraken...
Crypto 101 Media | Sponsoredtc pixel
The retirement stock I'd buy before Nvidia today
In 2014, Marc Chaikin pointed readers toward Nvidia. Now the 60-year Wall Street veteran and creator of the Ch...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Why major institutions are piling into this digital asset now
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, and Fidelity are reportedly accumulating a scarce blockchain asset - one t...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your Free Report (Inside)
A free copy of Options Trading Made Simple is available now but wont stay that way for long. Chris Rowe cal...
True Market Insiders | Sponsoredtc pixel
23,281 stocks. Only ONE survived.
One American energy producer just cleared a screen of 23281 stocks for elite operating profits, double-digit r...
Monument Traders Alliance | Sponsoredtc pixel
They didn't warn anyone in 1971. This time someone is warning you.
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Someone just dumped the biggest gold fund.
Investors pulled 2.9 billion dollars from the world's largest gold fund in a single day this March, pushing to...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel