Crocs (CROX) Competitors

Crocs has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, RCI Hospitality has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500.

RCI Hospitality has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crocs. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RCI Hospitality, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.8% of RCI Hospitality shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Crocs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.6% of RCI Hospitality shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crocs had 25 more articles in the media than RCI Hospitality. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Crocs and 1 mentions for RCI Hospitality. Crocs' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat RCI Hospitality's score of 0.00 indicating that Crocs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crocs presently has a consensus price target of $103.73, suggesting a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Crocs' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Crocs is more favorable than RCI Hospitality.

RCI Hospitality has a net margin of 3.87% compared to Crocs' net margin of -2.58%. Crocs' return on equity of 48.29% beat RCI Hospitality's return on equity.

Crocs has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Steven Madden has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its share price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Steven Madden has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crocs. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steven Madden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.9% of Steven Madden shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Crocs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Steven Madden shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Crocs had 13 more articles in the media than Steven Madden. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Crocs and 13 mentions for Steven Madden. Steven Madden's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Crocs' score of 0.63 indicating that Steven Madden is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Crocs presently has a consensus target price of $103.73, suggesting a potential upside of 0.76%. Steven Madden has a consensus target price of $43.88, suggesting a potential upside of 16.41%. Given Steven Madden's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Steven Madden is more favorable than Crocs.

Steven Madden has a net margin of 1.76% compared to Crocs' net margin of -2.58%. Crocs' return on equity of 48.29% beat Steven Madden's return on equity.

Six Flags Entertainment has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its stock price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crocs has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Crocs had 22 more articles in the media than Six Flags Entertainment. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Crocs and 4 mentions for Six Flags Entertainment. Six Flags Entertainment's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Crocs' score of 0.63 indicating that Six Flags Entertainment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

64.7% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Crocs shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Six Flags Entertainment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Crocs shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crocs has a net margin of -2.58% compared to Six Flags Entertainment's net margin of -51.58%. Crocs' return on equity of 48.29% beat Six Flags Entertainment's return on equity.

Six Flags Entertainment currently has a consensus target price of $23.69, suggesting a potential upside of 30.49%. Crocs has a consensus target price of $103.73, suggesting a potential upside of 0.76%. Given Six Flags Entertainment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Six Flags Entertainment is more favorable than Crocs.

Crocs has higher revenue and earnings than Six Flags Entertainment. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Six Flags Entertainment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crocs currently has a consensus target price of $103.73, suggesting a potential upside of 0.76%. Gildan Activewear has a consensus target price of $79.77, suggesting a potential upside of 33.48%. Given Gildan Activewear's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gildan Activewear is more favorable than Crocs.

93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Crocs shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Crocs has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Gildan Activewear had 1 more articles in the media than Crocs. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Gildan Activewear and 26 mentions for Crocs. Crocs' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Gildan Activewear's score of 0.50 indicating that Crocs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gildan Activewear has a net margin of 6.10% compared to Crocs' net margin of -2.58%. Crocs' return on equity of 48.29% beat Gildan Activewear's return on equity.

Gildan Activewear has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crocs. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gildan Activewear, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.